Chinese Medical E-ournals Database

Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition) ›› 2018, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (02): 241 -248. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2018.02.019

Special Issue:

Original Article

Clinical efficacy of laparoscopic uterine suspension and fixation to anterior sheath of rectus abdominis in treatment of pelvic organ prolapse

Lanjie Huang1, Wei Chen2, Yaokui Zhu2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gynecology, Heping County People′s Hospital, Heyuan 517200, Guangdong Province, China; Department of Gynecology, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, Guangdong Province, China
    2. Department of Gynecology, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, Guangdong Province, China
  • Received:2017-11-19 Revised:2018-02-09 Published:2018-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Yaokui Zhu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhu Yaokui, Email:
Objective

To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of laparoscopic uterine suspension and fixation to anterior sheath of rectus abdominis in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

Methods

From October 1, 2014 to January 31, 2017, a total of 21 POP patients who received laparoscopic uterine suspension and fixation to anterior sheath of rectus abdominis were included into study group. Meanwhile, another 21 POP patients who received vaginal hysterectomy and vaginal wall repair surgery were included into control group. Patients of both two groups were admitted to Heping County People′s Hospital and First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University. The degree of POP was assessed by the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q), and 5 indicators of Aa, Ba, Ap, Bp and C points of the POP-Q scoring system were measured before the operation of two groups and at the 4th day after operation of study group. The operation duration, intraoperative blood loss and hospital stay between two groups were compared by independent-samples t test. Five indicators of Aa, Ba, Ap, Bp and C points of the POP-Q scoring system were measured by paired-samples t test. The constituent ratio of POP-Q degrees of uterine prolapse, anterior vaginal wall prolapse and posterior vaginal wall prolapse were compared by Wilcoxon rank sum test. The objective recurrence rates between two groups were detected by Fisher exact test. The study protocol was approved by the Ethnical Review Board of Investigation in Human Beings of Heping County People′s Hospital and First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University. Informed consent was obtained from each participant.

Results

① There were no significant differences between two groups in general clinical characteristics such as age, parity, menopause duration and body mass index (BMI) (P>0.05). ② There were no significant differences between two groups in constituent ratio of POP-Q degrees of uterine prolapse, anterior vaginal wall prolapse and posterior vaginal wall prolapse (P>0.05). ③ The operation duration in study group was (76.7±15.6)min, which was significant shorter than (123.8±17.9) min in control group, intraoperative blood loss in study group was (37.9±6.4) mL, which was significant less than (138.8±28.9) mL in control group, hospital stay in study group was (6.3±2.8) d, which was significant shorter than (9.4±3.8) d, and all the above differences were statistically significant (t=-8.654, P<0.001; t=-14.150, P<0.001; t=-2.452, P=0.023). ④ The results of POP-Q scoring system in study group before the operation and at the 4th day after the operation were as follows. Point Aa (point in the anterior vaginal wall, 3 cm from hymen) were located at (-0.5±1.3) cm and (-2.3±0.5) cm, point Ba (point in the anterior vaginal prolapse) were located at (2.1±1.6) cm and (1.9±0.4)cm, point Ap (point in the posterior vaginal wall, 3 cm from hymen) were located at (-1.1±1.3) cm and (-2.8±0.3) cm, point Bp (point in the posterior vaginal prolapse, farthest from hymen) were located at (0.3±1.8) cm and (-2.6±0.4) cm, point C (point in the anterior fornix of vagina or vaginal stump) were located at (3.6±1.7) cm and (-7.7±0.6) cm, respectively; and all the differences between two groups were statistically significant (t=12.408, 14.791, 6.355, 8.820, 28.302; P<0.001). ⑤ The objective recurrence rates of two groups were 33.3% (7/21) and 23.5% (4/17), and the difference between them was not statistically significant (P=0.167).

Conclusions

The surgery of laparoscopic uterine suspension and fixation to anterior sheath of rectus abdominis is a safe and effective approach for the treatment of POP. Compared with traditional operation, it has obvious advantages in the aspects of operation duration, intraoperative blood loss and postoperative hospital stay, but the long-term complications remain to be followed up.

图1 腹腔镜下子宫腹直肌前鞘悬吊固定术的主要手术步骤(图1A:进针穿过右侧子宫壁;图1B:在子宫前壁制造创面;图1C:收紧缝线悬吊子宫;图1D:子宫紧贴悬吊于腹前壁)
表1 2组盆腔脏器脱垂患者一般临床资料比较(±s)
表2 2组盆腔脏器脱垂患者子宫脱垂和阴道前、后壁脱垂POP-Q分度构成比比较[例数(%)]
表3 2组盆腔脏器脱垂患者手术情况比较(±s)
图2 盆腔脏器脱垂患者治疗前、后对照(图2A:治疗前全子宫及阴道前、后壁重度脱垂;图2B:治疗后全子宫及阴道前、后壁均恢复正常位置)
表4 研究组盆腔脏器脱垂患者术前与术后第4天POP-Q评分系统各指示点比较(cm,±s)
[1]
ACOG technical bulletin. Pelvic organ prolapse. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists [J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 1996, 52(2): 197-205.
[2]
DoaeeM,Moradi-LakehM,NourmohammadiA, et al. Management of pelvic organ prolapse and quality of life: a systematic review and Meta-analysis [J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2014, 25(2): 153-163.
[3]
KhanZA,ThomasL,EmerySJ. Outcomes and complications of trans-vaginal mesh repair using the Prolift™ kit for pelvic organ prolapse at 4 years median follow-up in a tertiary referral centre [J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2014, 290(6): 1151-1157.
[4]
HinoulP,OmbeletWU,BurgerMP, et al. A prospective study to evaluate the anatomic and functional outcome of a transobturator mesh kit (prolift anterior) for symptomatic cystocele repair [J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2008, 15(5): 615-620.
[5]
AbedH,RahnDD,LowensteinL, et al. Incidence and management of graft erosion, wound granulation, and dyspareunia following vaginal prolapse repair with graft materials: a systematic review [J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2011, 22(7): 789-798.
[6]
谢幸, 苟文丽. 妇产科学[M]. 8版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2013: 278-279.
[7]
段华, 林仲秋. 妇科手术彩色图解[M]. 南京: 江苏科学技术出版社, 2013: 12.
[8]
曹泽毅. 中华妇产科学(中册)[M]. 3版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2014.
[9]
DominicL,BenjaminE. D, Karen B. et al. Total hysterectomy and anterior vaginal wall suspension for concurrent uterine and bladder prolapses: long-term anatomical results of additional vault and/or posterior compartment prolapse repair [J]. Urol Sci, 2015, 26(1): 51-56.
[10]
JelovsekJE,MaherC,BarberMD. Pelvic organ prolapse [J]. Lancet, 2007, 369(9566): 1027-1038.
[11]
HelenJ,JacksonSR,PriceN. Management of uterine prolapse: is hysterectomy necessary? [J]. Obstet Gynaecol, 2016, 18(1): 17-23.
[12]
IbrahimKI,MowafaaM,EngyM, et al. Efficacy of biofeedback assisted pelvic floor muscle training in females with pelvic floor dysfunction[J]. Alexandria J Med, 2015, 51(2): 137-142.
[13]
MarchionniM,BraccoGL,CheccucciV, et al. True incidence of vaginal vault prolapse. Thirteen years of experience [J]. J Reprod Med, 1999, 44(8): 679-684.
[14]
刘树伟, 李瑞锡. 局部解剖学[M].8版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2013: 102-104.
[15]
孙秀云,邵继宏,孙连华, 等. 腹腔镜腹直肌悬吊术治疗子宫脱垂50例分析[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2015, 31(11): 1038-1039.
[16]
李文亮,魏向群,张磊. 腹腔镜下腹直肌前鞘子宫固定术治疗子宫脱垂的临床分析[J]. 昆明医科大学学报, 2015, 36(3): 72-74.
[17]
ForsgrenC,LundholmC,JohanssonAL, et al. Vaginal hysterectomy and risk of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence surgery [J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2012, 23(1): 43-48.
[18]
WilkinsMF,JenniferMW. Epidemiology of pelvic organ prolapse [J]. Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep, 2016, 5(2): 119-123.
[19]
刘俊,唐瑶,黄娟, 等. 盆腔脏器脱垂定量分度法对不同方式分娩初产妇产后近期盆底功能的评价[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2018, 14(1): 25-30.
[20]
ChenG,WuD,ZhaoW, et al. Modified laparoscopic extraperitoneal uterine suspension to anterior abdominal wall: the easier way to treat uterine prolapse [J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2012, 23(7): 887-891.
[21]
中华医学会妇产科学分会妇科盆底学组. 腹腔镜子宫或阴道骶骨固定术专家共识[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2014, 49(8): 573-575.
[22]
刘丽萍,刘丽丽,刘丽燕, 等. 经阴道髂尾肌筋膜固定术联合传统术式治疗盆腔脏器脱垂的疗效分析 [J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2016, 12(6): 705-709.
[1] Ziyu Li, Xinxing Lu, Shuangxi Li, Fei Shan. The selection of reconstruction methods in laparoscopic surgery for adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[2] Leping Li, Ronghua Zhang, Liang Shang. Laparoscopic lymph node dissection for adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[3] Fangpeng Chen, Dawei Yang, Congwen Jin. Effect of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy combined with modified esophagogastrostomy to reconstruct His Angle in patients with postoperative reflux esophagitis[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[4] Jie Xu, Yajun Li, Junwei Han. Comparison of the efficacy of radical laparoscopic total gastrectomy in the treatment of overweight gastric cancer with two approaches[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[5] Liuqing Li, Xiaoxiang Chen, Chengyu Lv. Comparison of total laparoscopic and laparoscopic assisted radical gastrectomy in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer in the near and medium term[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[6] Shijun Liu, Jie Ma, Lujing Shi. Near-and medium-term follow-up study of complete mesangectomy plus standard D2 radical resection for advanced gastric cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[7] Jia Ren, Shenghui Ma, Xin Wang, Xiuxia Shi, Shuyun Cai. Clinical observation of laparoscopic total gastrectomy and interposition jejunal gastrectomy[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] Lixia Zhao, Chunxia Wang, Yifeng Chen, Dongping Hu, Weisheng Zhang, Tao Wang, Honglai Zhang. Effects of visceral obesity on early complications after laparoscopic radical resection for rectal cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] Tianwei Xie, Yufan Pang, Li Wu. Effect of different ultrasound-guided ablation on the volume reduction rate and recurrence rate of benign thyroid nodules[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 80-83.
[10] Ji Han, Li Yang, Yu Chen. Study on the relationship between abdominal morphological CT parameters and blood loss during total laparoscopic gastrectomy[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[11] Lu Wang, Lijun Zhou. Effects of different anastomotic methods in total laparoscopic distal subtotal gastrectomy on gastric function recovery and complication rate in patients with gastric cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[12] Wang Feng, Zhenzhong Ma, Linhua Tang. Clinical study of CT scanning 3D reconstruction in laparoscopic hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 104-107.
[13] Su Yan, Bowen Huo. Laparoscopic radical dissection for adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[14] Quanyou Lai, Yuan Gao, Jianlin Wang, Shibin Qu, Dan Wei, Wei Peng. Effects of 3D reconstruction technology combined with laparoscopic precision hepatectomy on the levels of CD4+, CD8+ and immunoglobulin in patients with liver cancer after surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(06): 651-654.
[15] Lang Bai, Xueyu Zhang, Tiecheng Bai, Aijun He. Effect of conical overlapping anastomoplasty during laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy on gastroesophageal reflux and nutritional status in Siewert type II AEG patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(06): 679-682.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract