Chinese Medical E-ournals Database

Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition) ›› 2018, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (01): 25 -30. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2018.01.004

Special Issue:

Original Article

Evaluation on pelvic floor functions of primiparae in early postpartum period with different delivery modes by pelvic floor function of pelvic organ prolapse quantification

Jun Liu1, Yao Tang1, Juan Huang1, Xiaodong Wang2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Chengdu Women and Children′s Central Hospital, Chengdu 610000, Sichuan Province, China
    2. Department of Obstetrics, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2017-10-13 Revised:2017-12-29 Published:2018-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Xiaodong Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Xiaodong, Email:
Objective

To investigate affects on the pelvic floor functions of primiparae in early postpartum period with different delivery modes by pelvic floor function of pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) scoring system.

Methods

From January 1 to December 31, 2016, a total of 200 primiparae who were with single birth, full-term pregnancy and cephalic presentations in Chengdu Women and Children′s Central Hospital were chosen as study subjects by retrospective analysis method and random digits table method. According to different delivery modes, they were divided into observation group (n=100, with elective cesarean section delivery mode) and control group (n=100, with transvaginal delivery mode). All the primiparae received epidural anesthesia during labor and were managed in accordance with the Standard of New Production Process and Expert Consensus (2014). Primiparae with genital malformation, stress urinary incontinence (SUI), pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) before pregnancy, and with internal and external severe complications were excluded from this study. At about 42 d after delivery, the incidences of SUI, 9 indicators in POP-Q scoring system, grades of vaginae anterior prolapse, vaginae posterior prolapse and uterine prolapse, muscle strength classification in Ⅰ and Ⅱ types of pelvic floor muscle fiber in two groups were detected. Independent sample t test was used to compare the results of 9 indicatons in POP-Q scoring system of two groups. Chi-square test was used to compare the incidences of SUI in early postpartum period and grade Ⅰ-Ⅲ vaginae anterior prolapse, vaginae posterior prolapse and uterine prolapse of two groups. Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare constituent ratios of muscle strength classification in Ⅰ and Ⅱ types of pelvic floor muscle fibers in two groups. The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Investigation in Human Being of Chengdu Women and Children′s Central Hospital.

Results

①There were no significant differences between two groups among the incidences of obstetrical complications, such as premature rupture of membranes, gestational diabetes mellitus and subclinical hypothyroidism, as well as age, body mass index (BMI) before pregnancy, weight gain during pregnancy, and birth weight of newborns, respectively (P>0.05). ②The results of POP-Q scoring system of primiparae in two groups showed as follows. The lengths of gh (genital hiatus) in observation group and control group were (2.8±0.4) cm and (3.0±0.6) cm, respectively; lengths of pb (perineal body) were (3.6±0.3) cm and (3.5±0.3) cm, respectively; tvl (total vaginal length) were (8.4±0.6) cm and (7.4±3.9) cm, respectively; point Aa (point in the anterior vaginal wall, 3 cm from hymen) were located at (-2.0±0.8) cm and (-1.3±0.8) cm, respectively; point Ba (point in the anterior vaginal prolapse, farthest from hymen) were located at (-2.1±0.8) cm and (-1.4±0.7) cm, respectively; point Bp (point in the posterior vaginal prolapse, farthest from hymen) were located at (-2.9±0.4) cm and (-2.7±0.5) cm, respectively; and all the differences between two groups in the measurement results were statistically significant (t=-2.774, P=0.006; t=2.537, P=0.019; t=-2.534, P=0.012; t=-6.187, P<0.001; t=-6.585, P<0.001; t=-3.123, P=0.002). There were no significant differences between two groups in the measurement results of point Ap (point in the posterior vaginal wall, 3 cm from hymen), point C (point in the anterior fornix of vagina or vaginal stump), and point D (point in the vaginal posterior fornix) (P>0.05). ③The incidence of grade Ⅰ-Ⅲ vaginae anterior prolapse in observation group was 21.0% (21/100), which was significantly lower than that in control group 98.0% (98/100); and the incidence of grade Ⅰ-Ⅲ vaginae posterior prolapse was 13.0% (13/100), which was significantly lower than that in control group 26.0% (26/100), and both the differences were statistically significant (χ2=119.846, P<0.001; χ2=5.383, P=0.016). But there was no significant difference between two groups in the incidence of grade Ⅰ-Ⅲ uterus prolapse (P>0.05). ④ There were no significant differences between two groups in the incidence of SUI in early postpartum period and constituent ratio of muscle strength classification inⅠ and Ⅱ types of pelvic floor muscle fibers (P>0.05).

Conclusions

As to primiparae in early postpartum period with elective cesarean section and transvaginal delivery, there are no differences in the incidences of SUI, muscle strength classification in pelvic floor muscle fibers and uterus prolapse. But the evaluation results of POP-Q scoring system show that transvaginal delivery may be the high risk factor of PFD.

表1 2组初产妇一般临床资料比较
表2 2组初产妇POP-Q评分系统中的9项指标测定结果比较(cm,±s)
表3 2组初产妇阴道前壁与后壁脱垂及子宫脱垂分度结果比较[例数(%)]
表4 2组初产妇压力性尿失禁发生率及Ⅰ、Ⅱ类盆底肌纤维肌力分级构成比比较[例数(%)]
[1]
朱兰,郎景和,主编. 女性盆底学[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2014: 46-236.
[2]
罗新. 妊娠和选择性剖宫产对盆底结构功能的影响[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2008, 4(2):69-75.
[3]
Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic floor dysfunction[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1996, 175(1):10-17.
[4]
张珂,王澜静,焦玲洁,等. 产后盆底功能障碍性疾病与盆底肌收缩力及其相关因素分析[J]. 实用妇产科杂志,2014, 30(10):757-759.
[5]
祁志宇,党翠玲,赵耀红,等. 不同分娩因素对产后盆底肌力的近期影响[J]. 河北医药,2016, 38(13):2016-2019.
[6]
高原,罗小芳. 围生期压力性尿失禁相关因素临床分析[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2012, 8(3):329-331.
[7]
王淑静,邓晓岚,菅莹莹,等. 不同分娩方式对盆底功能的影响及电刺激治疗的疗效分析[J]. 中国计划生育和妇产科,2016, 8(1):58-64.
[8]
中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组. 新产程标准及处理的专家共识(2014)[J]. 中华妇产科杂志,2014, 49(7):486-488.
[9]
夏志,主编. 女性泌尿盆底疾病临床诊治[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2016: 56-377.
[10]
Handa VL, Blomquist, McDermott KC, et al. Pelvic floor disorders after childbirth: effect of episiotomy, perineal laceration, and operative birth[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2012, 19(2):233-239.
[11]
徐永萍. 不同分娩方式对产妇盆底支持组织功能所产生的近期影响[J]. 安徽医学,2012, 33(10):1314-1316.
[12]
龚琳,刘兴会,张力. 安全避免首次剖宫产[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2016, 12(2):221-227.
[13]
漆洪波,石琪. 重视难产的诊断与产程时限[J]. 中国实用妇科与产志,2016, 32(8):716-718.
[14]
漆洪波,杨慧霞,段涛. 关注和采纳正常产程和产程异常的新标准[J]. 中华妇产科杂志,2014, 49(7):487-489.
[15]
Spong CY, Berghella V, Wenstrom KD, et al. Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 121(3):686-687.
[16]
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College), Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Caughey AB, et al. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 210(3):179-193.
[17]
李俊英,贾秀荣,刘富霞. 不同分娩方式对产妇产后早期盆底功能所的影响[J]. 贵阳医学院学报,2015, 40(5):527-529.
[18]
肖霞,韦瑞敏,吕丽清,等. 3种不同分娩方式对初产妇盆底肌力影响的研究[J]. 中国妇幼保健,2015, 30(26):4458-4460.
[1] Yanduo Gao, Xia Zhu, Jianhua Fan, Xiuqin Ji, Sheng Zhao, Lei Xie. Three-dimensional ultrasonic evaluation of female pelvic floor function after forceps assisted delivery[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2022, 19(12): 1361-1365.
[2] Tingting Zhong, Li Wang, Zaihong Li, Dayan Yang, Dongni Luo, Yan Chen, Qing Lin, Yu Mi, Xiangxiang Jing. Diagnostic value of virtual touch tissue imaging quantification shear wave elastography combined with pelvic ultrasound in pelvic floor dysfunction after vaginal delivery[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2022, 19(03): 226-233.
[3] Chuntao Zhao, Fengxue Liang, Ruimin Yang, Yunxuan Chen, Xi Chen, Guiqing Jiao. Value of three-dimensional pelvic floor ultrasound in predicting the occurrence of pelvic organ prolapse in parturients and its influencing factors[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2022, 18(05): 606-614.
[4] Lili Zhu, Bing Li, Jing Xue, Hui Yu, Shuhong Li. Influence of intraspinal anesthesia and analgesia on early postpartum pelvic floor functions of primiparae with vaginal delivery[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2022, 18(04): 484-491.
[5] Xuan Zheng, Yun Zhao. Research status of pelvic floor dysfunction diseases during pregnancy and postpartum and its prevention and treatment[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2022, 18(03): 366-372.
[6] Dandan Xie, Zunke Gong, Lilin Fan, Caixia Zhang. Clinical effects of early postpartum static contraction training combined with neuromuscular electrical stimulation in the treatment of postpartum diastasis recti abdominis[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2022, 18(03): 357-365.
[7] Jiani Zhang, Chihui Mao, Qi Cao, Xiaodong Wang. Influencing factors of postpartum abnormal glucose metabolism outcomes among patients with gestational diabetes mellitus[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2022, 18(01): 53-60.
[8] Jing Xu, Aohua Zhang, Zeping Huang, Zhijuan Zheng, Manting Su, Xiangfu Zhou, Xinling Zhang. Study on the relationship between female urethral funneling and stress urinary incontinence[J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(06): 546-549.
[9] Zhentao Gao, Xiangfu Zhou, Xuelian Chen, Yanshan Ding, Jing Gao, Qiuping Ma, Danling Rao, Bolong Liu. Clinical efficacy analysis of fractional CO2 laser in the treatment of female with mild-to-moderate stress urinary incontinence[J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(01): 40-44.
[10] Xiaoli Wang, Shaohua Lin, Yingying Liu, Ying Fan. Difference in pelvic floor muscle strength among pregnant women and its effect on labour and postpartum stress urinary incontinence[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(03): 260-265.
[11] Ran Zhang, Ming Zhang, Fengping Liu. Efficacy of magnetoelectric pelvic floor rehabilitation therapy in patients with postpartum stress urinary incontinence[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(11): 1103-1108.
[12] Xiaorui Ye, Heiying Jin, Chunxia Zhang. Necessity and existing problems of multidisciplinary integration for diagnosis and treatment of pelvic floor dysfunction[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(07): 605-609.
[13] Yongtong Wang, Heiying Jin, Chunxia Zhang, Xiaorui Ye, Jun Wang, Yang Yang, Jianlei Liu, Xinyi Zhang. Efficacy of magnetic stimulation combined with biofeedback in treatment of pelvic floor dysfunction: a prospective nonrandomized controlled study[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(07): 621-625.
[14] Ping Ouyang, Lingqing Shen. Impact of free postures combined with unprotected perineum on self-efficacy and childbirth experience in primiparas[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(03): 231-235.
[15] Lianchao Jin, Bing Yang, Zhe Zhou, Dongliang Pan, Zunke Xie. Correlation of metabolic syndrome and stress urinary incontinence in women[J]. Chinese Journal of Obesity and Metabolic Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2023, 09(02): 109-113.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract