Chinese Medical E-ournals Database

Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition) ›› 2017, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (02): 149 -155. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2017.02.006

Special Issue:

Original Article

Clinical analysis of 1 146 cases of very/extremely low birth weight infants

Yong Hu1, Jun Tang1,(), Bin Xia1, Dezhi Mu1   

  1. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, West China Second University Hospital, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2017-01-11 Revised:2017-03-07 Published:2017-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Jun Tang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Tang Jun, Email:
Objective

To study the clinical characteristics, treatment strategies and outcomes of very low birth weight infants (VLBWI) and extremely low birth weight infants (ELBWI), and to provide references for the treatment of them.

Methods

From of 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2015, a total of 1 146 cases of VLBWI/ELBWI who were hospitalized in Department of Neonatology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University were recruited as research subjects. According to the gestational ages, the VLBWI/ELBWI were divided into 4 groups: <28 weeks group (n=84), and ≥28-32 weeks group (n=679), ≥32-37 weeks group (n=378), ≥37 weeks group (n=5). The clinical characteristics of each group were analyzed, and hospitalization time, survival rate, rate of using ventilator, rate of the main complications, and the situation of giving up treatment were statistically compared among groups.

Results

Among 1 146 cases of VLBWI/ELBWI, there were 1 141 premature infants and 5 full-term infants. Because the number of full-term infants was too small, they were not analyzed by statistical methods, <28 weeks, ≥28-32 weeks, ≥32-37 weeks group were compared by related statistical methods. The results showed as follows. ①There were significant differences among 3 groups in hospitalization time and survival rate (Z=34.667, P<0.001; χ2=71.012, P<0.001). And the smaller of gestational age, the longer of hospitalization time, the lower of survival rate among those 3 groups. ②Rates of using invasive ventilation in <28 weeks group were higher than those in ≥28-32 weeks group and ≥32-37 weeks group, and both the differences were statistically significant (χ2=53.001, 162.157; P<0.001). Rate of using noninvasive assisted ventilation in <28 weeks group and ≥28-32 weeks group were higher than those in ≥32-37 weeks group, and both the differences were statistically significant (χ2=21.872, 74.418; P<0.001), but there was no significant difference between <28 weeks group and ≥28-32 weeks group in the rates of using noninvasive assisted ventilation (P>0.05). There were significant differences in durations of noninvasive assisted ventilation treatment among 3 groups by pairwise comparison (Z=-4.077, P<0.001; Z=-4.655, P<0.001; Z=-2.879, P=0.002), and the smaller of gestational age, the longer duration of noninvasive assisted ventilation treatment. ③There were significant differences among common complications, such as neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS), severe intracranial hemorrhage (Ⅲ-Ⅳ), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in 3 groups (χ2=111.662, 74.639, 58.076, 70.049; P<0.001), and the smaller gestational age, the higher incidences of aboved complications among 3 groups. There were significant differences in the incidences of apnea and intrauterine infection in 3 groups (χ2=59.683, P<0.001; χ2=25.937, P<0.001), and the incidences of apnea and intrauterine infection in <28 weeks group and ≥28-32 weeks group were higher than those in ≥32-37 weeks group, and all the differences were statistically significant (χ2=19.586, 57.893, P<0.001; χ2=10.146, 25.019, P<0.001), but there were no significant differences between <28 weeks group and ≥28-32 weeks group in the incidences of apnea or intrauterine infection (P>0.05). ④There were significant difference in 3 groups of rates of abandoned treatment (χ2=18.636, P<0.01). The smaller gestational age, the higher rate of abandoned treatment among 3 groups. Among the dead of VLBWI/ELBWI, the percentage of death after abandoned treatment was 73.8% (141/191).

Conclusions

In the VLBWI/ELBWI, the smaller gestational age, the higher rate of complications, higher use rates and longer use time of ventilations, and the lower survival rate. Reducing the proportion of abandoned treatment can improve the survival rate of VLBWI/ELBWI.

表1 2009-2015年,1 146例VLBWI/ELBWI在病例收集医院接受相关治疗后的存活率比较[%(n/n′)]
表2 <28周组、≥28~32周组及≥32~37周组VLBWI/ELBWI基本临床资料比较
表3 <28周组、≥28~32周组及≥32~37周组VLBWI/ELBWI呼吸机治疗情况比较
表4 <28周组、≥28~32周组及≥32~37周组VLBWI/ELBWI主要并发症发生率比较[例数(%)]
表5 2009-2015年,<28周组、≥28~32周组及≥32~37周组VLBWI/ELBWI存活率比较 [%(n/n′)]
表6 <28周组、≥28~32周组及≥32~37周组VLBWI/ELBWI放弃治疗基本情况比较 [%(n/n′)]
表7 <28周组、≥28~32周组及≥32~37周组放弃治疗与未放弃治疗VLBWI/ELBWI前5位疾病患病率比较[例数(%)]
[1]
Owens JD, Soltau T, Mccaughn D, et al. Multi-hospital community NICU quality improvement improves survival of ELBW infants[J]. J Miss State Med Assoc, 2015, 56(8): 237-242.
[2]
Su BH, Hsieh WS, Hsu CH, et al. Neonatal outcomes of extremely preterm infants from Taiwan: comparison with Canada, Japan, and the USA[J]. Pediatr Neonatol, 2015, 56(1): 46-52.
[3]
陈春, 张谦慎. 超低出生体重儿救治的国内外近况[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2013, 15(8): 703-707.
[4]
Lin HJ, Du LZ, Ma XL, et al. Mortality and morbidity of extremely low birth weight infants in the mainland of China: a multi-center study[J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2015, 128(20): 2743-2750.
[5]
Shim JW, Jin HS, Bae CW. Changes in survival rate for very-low-birth-weight infants in Korea: comparison with other countries[J]. J Korean Med Sci, 2015, 30(Suppl 1): S25-S34.
[6]
李爱月, 杨宇萍. 极低和超低出生体重儿临床分析[J/CD]. 中国新生儿科杂志, 2016, 31(1): 24-27.
[7]
阚清, 杨洋, 邱洁, 等. 超低/极低出生体质量儿223例临床回顾分析[J]. 东南大学学报(医学版), 2016, 35(5): 713-718.
[8]
Zhang R, Zhang K, Yuan L, et al. Clinical analysis of 105 extremely low birth weight infants[J]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi, 2014, 94(6): 446-448.
[9]
李明玉, 唐军, 伍金林, 等. 极低与超低出生体质量儿的临床分析[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2014, 10(3): 44-49.
[10]
Njom Nlend AE, Zeudja C, Ndiang S, et al. Trends in neonatal mortality of very-low-birth-weight infants between 1998 and 2013 in Essos Hospital, Yaoundé, Cameroon[J]. Arch Pediatr, 2016, 23(9): 895-898.
[11]
王恋, 李娟, 毛健, 等. 极低及超低出生体重儿的预后因素分析[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2014, 16(6): 601-605.
[12]
Demauro SB, Millar D, Kirpalani H. Noninvasive respiratory support for neonates[J]. Curr Opin Pediatr, 2014, 26(2): 157-162.
[13]
Isayama T, Lee SK, Mori R, et al. Comparison of mortality and morbidity of very low birth weight infants between Canada and Japan[J]. Pediatrics, 2012, 130(4): e957-e965.
[14]
Morris M, Cleary JP, Soliman A. Small Baby unit improves quality and outcomes in extremely low birth weight infants[J]. Pediatrics, 2015, 136(4): 1007-1015.
[15]
夏斌, 胡勇, 李晋辉, 等. 足月儿和晚期早产儿出生早期呼吸困难的不同抗菌药物使用策略研究[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2014, 10(6): 737-741.
[16]
Horbar JD, Carpenter JH, Badger GJ, et al. Mortality and neonatal morbidity among infants 501 to 1 500 grams from 2000 to 2009[J]. Pediatrics, 2012, 129(6): 1019-1026.
[17]
Ballot DE, Davies VA, Cooper PA, et al. Retrospective cross-sectional review of survival rates in critically ill children admitted to a combined pediatric/neonatal intensive care unit in Johannesburg, South Africa, 2013-2015[J]. BMJ Open, 2016, 6(6): e010850.
[1] Liuqing Li, Xiaoxiang Chen, Chengyu Lv. Comparison of total laparoscopic and laparoscopic assisted radical gastrectomy in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer in the near and medium term[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[2] Shijun Liu, Jie Ma, Lujing Shi. Near-and medium-term follow-up study of complete mesangectomy plus standard D2 radical resection for advanced gastric cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[3] Lixia Zhao, Chunxia Wang, Yifeng Chen, Dongping Hu, Weisheng Zhang, Tao Wang, Honglai Zhang. Effects of visceral obesity on early complications after laparoscopic radical resection for rectal cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[4] Huazhi Li, Guang Cao, Diangang Liu, Yajing Zhang. Clinical comparison of descending hepatectomy with different approaches for primary hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[5] Xiaowei Chang, Yu Cai, Zhiyong Zhao, Wei Zhang. Efficacy and safety analysis of high intensity focused ultrasound ablation combined with hepatic arterial chemoembolization in the treatment of primary hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[6] Yinan Xu. Curative effect of different operation methods in the treatment of obstructive left colorectal cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[7] Lu Wang, Lijun Zhou. Effects of different anastomotic methods in total laparoscopic distal subtotal gastrectomy on gastric function recovery and complication rate in patients with gastric cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[8] Jie Xu, Yajun Li, Yiwen Feng. Comparison of recent follow-up between laparoscopic D2 radical surgery and conventional radical surgery for advanced gastric cancer after SOX neoadjuvant chemotherapy[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(06): 647-650.
[9] Chanjuan Kang, Haitao Zhang, Jingjie Zhai. Effect of pancreatic duct stent implantation in the treatment of acute biliary pancreatitis and its influence on liver function and levels of inflammatory factors[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(06): 667-670.
[10] Chengwang Fu, Dagang Yang, Rong Wang, Futang Li. Research progress of nutritional and inflammatory markers in resectable pancreatic cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[11] Zhenling Ji, Jie Chen, Jianxiong Tang. Attention should be paid to the prevention and management of complications of complex abdominal hernia surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(06): 601-606.
[12] Xuehu Wang, Yu Zhao. The prevention and treatment of vascular injury complications in complicated abdominal wall hernia surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(06): 616-619.
[13] Dongyang Ma, Bin Li, Anqing Lu, Guanghua Wang, Wenzhang Lei, Yinghan Song. Randomized controlled trial on the curative effect of the Gilbert procedure and single mesh preperitoneal hernia repair[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[14] Haoyuan Wang, Haiyang Wang, Jianming Sun, Yikuan Chen, Xiaotong Qi, Bo Tang. Comparison of laparoscopic and open surgery on early postoperative liver function and coagulation function in patients with abdominal external hernia and cirrhosis[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(06): 654-659.
[15] Yang Shi, Jianfeng Yu, Ke Cao, Zhiwei Zhai, Chunxiang Ye, Zhenjun Wang, Jiagang Han. Perioperative complication analysis of self-expanding metallic stents (sems) combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of complete obstructive left-sided colon cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2024, 13(06): 464-471.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract