Chinese Medical E-ournals Database

Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition) ›› 2016, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (03): 305 -311. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2016.03.010

Special Issue:

Original Article

Research of glycemic variability of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus and its relationship with infant birth weight and adverse pregnancy outcomes

Fan Yu1, Haiming Liao2, Wenjing Yin1, Xiuhong Peng1, Zhimin Li1, Yi Wang1, Jianmin Niu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou 510010, Guangdong Province, China
    2. Department of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510630, Guangdong Province, China
  • Received:2016-01-04 Revised:2016-04-28 Published:2016-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Jianmin Niu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Niu Jianmin, Email:
Objective

To analyze the glycemic variability in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) by using continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) and to explore the relationship between GDM glycemic variability and infant birth weight and maternal and neonatal adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Methods

From April 2011 to August 2012, 189 cases of patients with GDM who were ready to regularly receive prenatal examination in the Department of Obstetrics of Guangdong Women and Children Hospital were enrolled in this study. All the GDM patients in this research met the GDM diagnostic criteria recommended by American Diabetes Association. They were instructed to wear the CGMS for 72 consecutive hours in the first week of this study. After four weeks of individual glucose control following strictly with doctors' advice, all the patients wear the CGMS for 72 consecutive hours for the second time in the fifth week of this study The parameters of glycemic variability which included mean blood glucose (MBG), the standard deviation of blood glucose (SDBG), mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE), and the mean of daily differences (MODD) were measured in the first and fifth weeks of this study. The maternal and neonatal adverse pregnancy outcomes and infant birth weight were collected. The relationship between infant birth weight and GDM patients' age, height, pregnancy history, body weight before pregnancy, fasting blood glucose level, oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) 1 h glucose (OGTT-GLU1h), OGTT 2 h glucose (OGTT-GLU2h) and level of glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) on OGTT day, and MBG, SDBG, MAGE, MODD in the first and fifth weeks of this study were analyzed by multiple linear regression analysis. The relationship between maternal and neonatal adverse pregnancy outcomes and those above indexes of GDM patients in the first and fifth weeks of this study were analyzed by multiple logistic regression analysis. The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Investigation in Human Being of Guangdong Women and Children Hospital.

Results

①The MBG, SDBG, MAGE, MODD, duration of hyperglycemia level (≥7.8 mmol/L) and duration of hypoglycemia level (≤3.3mmol/L) of GDM patients in the fifth week of this study were (5.7±0.7) mmol/L, (1.1±0.4) mmol/L, (2.4±0.9) mmol/L, (1.2±0.3) mmol/L, 60 min/d (0-380 min/d) and 0 min/d (0~270 min/d) respectively, which all were significantly lower than those (6.1±0.9) mmol/L, (1.3±0.4) mmol/L, (3.1±0.9) mmol/L, (1.5±0. 4) mmol/L, 100 min/d (0~760 min/d) and 0 min/d (0~470 min/d) in the first week of this study respectively, and all the differences were statistically significant (χ2=4.197, P<0.001; χ2=7.028, P<0.001; χ2=7.691, P<0.001; χ2=12.986, P<0.001; Z=-4.992, P<0.001; Z=-2.601, P=0.009). ②189 women with GDM delivered 186 living infants, as 1 woman miscarried and 2 women experienced intrauterine fetal death. The average birth weight of infants was (3 345±508) kg. The maternal adverse pregnancy outcomes included: 1(0.5%) miscarriage, 2 (1.1%) intrauterine fetal deaths, 19(10.1%) combined with preeclampsia, 88(46.6%) primary cesarean delivery, 36(19.0%) repeat cesarean delivery. The neonatal adverse pregnancy outcomes included: 1(0.5%) obstetric trauma, 20(10.8%) macrosomia, 48(25.8%) large for gestational age, 5(2.7%) small for gestational age, 26(14.0%) combined with hypoglycemia, 18(9.7%) combined with hyperbilirubinemia, 11(5.9%) combined with respiratory distress syndrome. In total, 92(49.5%) infants suffered adverse pregnancy outcomes. ③MBG in the first week and MAGE in the fifth week were strongly associated with infant birth weight (b=104.709, P=0.013; b=87.804, P=0.035). ④MBG in the first week of GDM patients and primipara were independent risk factors for primary cesarean delivery (OR=1.728, 95% CI: 1.160-2.573, P=0.007; OR=5.208, 95% CI: 2.677-10.133, P=0.000). MAGE and MBG in the first week of GDM patients were independent risk factors for large or small for gestational age (OR=1.632, 95% CI: 1.137-2.343, P=0.008; OR=1.992, 95% CI: 1.269-3.128, P=0.003). MAGE, MBG in the first week and MAGE in the fifth week of GDM patients were independent risk factors for macrosomia (OR=1.800, 95% CI: 1.107-2.925, P=0.018; OR=1.987, 95% CI: 1.038-3.803, P=0.038; OR=1.885, 95% CI: 1.063-3.341, P=0.030). MAGE in the first week of GDM patients was independent risk factor for neonatal adverse pregnancy outcome (OR=1.452, 95% CI: 1.050-2.008, P=0.024).

Conclusions

Abnormal glycemic variability in patients with GDM may lead to maternal and neonatal adverse pregnancy outcomes. Therefore, seven times of measurements for glucose levels per day may be not enough for GDM. Monitoring for glycemic variability is also recommended.

表1 GDM患者血糖波动情况
表2 入组第1、第5周时GDM患者血糖波动与新生儿出生体重的相关性分析
表3 入组第1、第5周时GDM患者血糖波动与母体及新生儿不良妊娠结局的非条件多因素logistic回归分析
1
HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group, Metzger BE, Lowe LP, et al. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes[J]. N Engl J Med, 2008, 358(19):1991-2002.
2
王蕴慧,吴惠华,刘玉昆,等.加强妊娠期糖尿病管理对妊娠期糖代谢异常患者的影响分析[J/CD].中华临床医师杂志:电子版,2011,5(4):1042-1046.
3
徐洁,杨菁.强化血糖控制对妊娠期糖尿病产妇以及新生儿健康的影响[J/CD].中华妇幼临床医学杂志:电子版,2015,11(2):229-231.
4
魏华莉,刘亚静.妊娠期糖尿病妊娠结局及对新生儿影响的临床分析[J/CD].中华临床医师杂志:电子版,2011,5(18):5479-5480.
5
郑迅风,董巨浪,杜继红,等.妊娠期糖尿病的干预治疗与妊娠结局的临床分析[J/CD].中华妇幼临床医学杂志:电子版,2012,8(4):447-409.
6
Klonoff DC. Continuous glucose monitoring: roadmap for 21st century diabetes therapy[J]. Diabetes Care, 2005, 28(5):1231-1239.
7
McLachlan K, Jenkins A, O'Neal D. The role of continuous glucose monitoring in clinical decision-making in diabetes in pregnancy[J]. Aust NZJ Obstet Gynaecol, 2007, 47(3):186-190.
8
Kestilä KK, Ekblad UU, Rönnemaa T. Continuous glucose monitoring versus self-monitoring of blood glucose in the treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus[J]. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2007, 77(2):174-179.
9
Su JB, Wang XQ, Chen JF, et al. Glycemic variability in gestational diabetes mellitus and its association with β cell function[J]. Endocrine, 2013, 43(2):370-375.
10
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes-2011[J]. Diabetes Care, 2011, 34(Suppl 1):S11-S61.
11
Service FJ, O'Brien PC, Rizza RA. Measurements of glucose control[J]. Diabetes Care 1987, 10(10):225-237.
12
Service FJ, Nelson RL. Characteristics of glycemic stability[J]. Diabetes Care, 1980, 3(1):58-62.
13
Dalfrà MG, Sartore G, Di Cianni G, et al. Glucose variability in diabetic pregnancy[J]. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2011, 13(8):853-859.
14
刘帅,沈洁,罗祥蓉,等.应用持续动态血糖监测系统分析妊娠期糖尿病血糖波动特征[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2009,25(11):853-855.
15
周健,贾伟平."首届动态血糖监测国际论坛"纪要[J].中华内分泌代谢杂志,2010,26(2):175-176.
16
Yu F, Lv L, liang Z, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring effects on maternal glycemic control and pregnancy outcomes in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study[J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2014, 99(12):4674-4682.
[1] Haoyuan Yang, Jie Gong, Qingwei Zou, Hang Ruan. Current research status on adverse pregnancy outcomes of maternal and infant in pregnant women with asthma[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 522-529.
[2] Tiantian Chen, Xiaodong Wang, Haiyan Yu. Pregnancy outcome of twin pregnancy with Gitelman syndrome: a case report and literature review[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 559-568.
[3] Xiaoqing Ju, Yunjie Jin, Xiaoyan Wang. Influencing factors of uterine rupture during vaginal delivery in patients with scarred uterus after cesarean section[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 575-581.
[4] Juan Gu, Qingqing Sun, Fangfang Hu, Yijuan Cao, Yujuan Qi. Clinical application of endometrial receptivity array to improve pregnancy outcomes in women with repeated embryo implantation failure[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 582-587.
[5] Mengling Zhou, Zhiwei Xue, Shu Zhou. Changes in size of uterine myoma during pregnancy and its association with adverse pregnancy outcomes[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 611-615.
[6] Li Chen, Xueqin Lei, Lian Duan, Yue Zeng, Guolin He. Analysis of influencing factors of success of trial of labor after twice cesarean sections and its pregnancy outcomes[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(03): 287-294.
[7] Ying Chen, Yanli Chen. Causes of heart rate variability and perinatal outcomes in elderly pregnant women[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(03): 295-301.
[8] Danyan Feng, Xiaohui Cao, Yuxia Shi. Effect of serum adiponectin and placental leucine aminopeptidase levels on pregnancy outcome in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(03): 302-308.
[9] Guohua Ren, Xiaoxiao Du, Shanling Hong, Shuai Shao. Change and significance of serum interleukin-22, hydrogen sulfide, and osteoprotegerin levels of patients with hypertensive acute kidney injury in pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Kidney Disease Investigation(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(03): 150-155.
[10] Yuyan Zhang, Bin Hu, Weihong Zhang, Mei Xu, Hui Zhu, Xinyue Yang, Hailing Liu. Relationship between echocardiography parameters and liver function during the second trimester of pregnancy and their predictive value for adverse pregnancy outcomes[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2023, 13(06): 499-504.
[11] Xin Wang, Lin Liu, Zhejia Wen, Chunling Liu, Hong Zhang, Fang Lyu. Effect of stress exposure before pregnancy on subsequent pregnancy outcomes in mice[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(04): 431-437.
[12] Xiaoxiang Wu, Bo Yang, Jingxuan Li, Fengling Zhang, Guihui Guo, Shaopei Zheng. Predictive value of umbilical artery ultrasonography parameters, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, and sFlt-1/PLGF ratio for adverse pregnancy outcomes in patients with pregnancy induced hypertension syndrome[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(03): 266-271.
[13] Lizi Zhang, Dunjin Chen. Adverse outcomes and long­term prognosis of placenta accreta spectrum disorders[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(03): 155-158.
[14] Qunying Li, Liting Zheng, Yan Yu. Clinical analysis of 10 cases with a history of gynecological operation of uterine rupture in pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(02): 98-102.
[15] Xiaofang Zheng, Songquan Wei, Zhenxuan Huang, Wenshi Wu, Guimin Li, Hongxia Zhang, Qingping Jiang, Dunjin Chen, Lin Yu. Pregnancy outcome and pathological changes of the placenta in preeclampsia with fetal growth restriction[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(02): 85-92.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract