Effects of Clinical Pharmacist Intervention on the Use of Antibacterials During Perioperative Period of Cesarean Section

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2014.04.014

Objective

To evaluate the effects of clinical pharmacist intervention on the use of antibacterials during perioperative period of cesarean section.

Methods

The patients with cesarean section who were not receive clinical pharmacist intervention on the use of antibacterials during perioperative period from July to September 2012 in Shaanxi Martenal and Child Hospital were chosen into non-intervention group(n= 136). The patients with cesarean section who received clinical pharmacist intervention on the use of antibacterials during perioperative period from July to September 2013 in the same hospital were chosen into intervention group(n= 145). The rationality of prophylactic use of antibacterials during perioperative period and effects of hospitalization were compared, retrospectively. The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Investigation in Human Beings of Shaanxi Marternal and Child Hospital. Informed consent was obtained from each participating patient. The average age, operation duration and the amount of bleeding had no significant differences between two groups (P> 0.05).

Results

After the intervention of clinical pharmacist, the rationality of choice of medicine and medication time of the preventive application of antibacterials during perioperative period were statistically improved compared with those of non-intervention(χ² = 6.30,221.38; P = 0.01,0.00). While the time points of prophylaxis use of antibacterials and mean hospital days had no significant differences between two groups(χ²/t= 1.36, 1.60; P=0.24,0.11). The per capita antibacterial expense, per capita total medicine expense and per capita total hospitalization expense were statistically lower after intervention (t = 28.99,5.10, 4.23; P = 0.00, 0.00, 0.00).

Conclusions

The rationality of use of antibacterials during perioperative period of cesarean section were significantly improved after clinical pharmacist intervention, which could reduce hospitalization expense. The clinical pharmacist intervention on the preventative application of antibacterials is feasible and effective.

Key words: Perioperative period, Anti-bacterial agents, Pharmacists

表1 围手术期预防应用抗菌药物合理性评价标准

Table 1 The reasonable criterion of prophylactic use of antibacterials during perioperative period

给药方案	合理	不合理
有预防用药指征	使用抗菌药物	未使用抗菌药物
抗菌药物种类	第一代或第二代头孢菌素，可加用甲硝唑	使用除第一代或第二代头孢菌素以外的抗菌药物（第一代或第二代头孢菌素过敏者除外）
初次给药时机	钳夹脐带后使用	术前或术后
术中追加抗菌药物	手术时间≥3 h或术中出血量>1 500 mL即追加	手术时间≥3 h或术中出血量>1 500 mL未追加
术后用药时间	≤48 h	>48 h
联合用药	未联合或有联合用药指征时使用	无联合用药指征仍使用

表1 围手术期预防应用抗菌药物合理性评价标准

Table 1 The reasonable criterion of prophylactic use of antibacterials during perioperative period

给药方案	合理	不合理
有预防用药指征	使用抗菌药物	未使用抗菌药物
抗菌药物种类	第一代或第二代头孢菌素，可加用甲硝唑	使用除第一代或第二代头孢菌素以外的抗菌药物（第一代或第二代头孢菌素过敏者除外）
初次给药时机	钳夹脐带后使用	术前或术后
术中追加抗菌药物	手术时间≥3 h或术中出血量>1 500 mL即追加	手术时间≥3 h或术中出血量>1 500 mL未追加
术后用药时间	≤48 h	>48 h
联合用药	未联合或有联合用药指征时使用	无联合用药指征仍使用

表2 两组抗菌药物使用种类及构成比[n(%)]

Table 2 The types of antibacterials and their constituent ratio of two groups[n(%)]

组别	n	青霉素类	第一代头孢菌素		第二代头孢菌素		第三代头孢菌素
组别	n	磺苄西林	头孢唑林	头孢西酮	头孢孟多	头孢呋辛	头孢曲松
未干预组	136	62(45.6)	1 (0.7)	0(0.0)	68(50.0)	4(3.0)	1(0.7)
干预组	145	0 (0.0)	131(90.3)	10(6.9)	0 (0.0)	4(2.8)	0(0.0)

表2 两组抗菌药物使用种类及构成比[n(%)]

Table 2 The types of antibacterials and their constituent ratio of two groups[n(%)]

组别	n	青霉素类	第一代头孢菌素		第二代头孢菌素		第三代头孢菌素
组别	n	磺苄西林	头孢唑林	头孢西酮	头孢孟多	头孢呋辛	头孢曲松
未干预组	136	62(45.6)	1 (0.7)	0(0.0)	68(50.0)	4(3.0)	1(0.7)
干预组	145	0 (0.0)	131(90.3)	10(6.9)	0 (0.0)	4(2.8)	0(0.0)

表3 两组抗菌药物用药时机、术后用药时间及其构成比[n(%)]

Table 3 The antibacterials use time and postoperative medication time and their constituent ratio of two groups[n(%)]

组别	n	用药时机				术后用药时间(h)
组别	n	大于术前2 h	术前0.5～2 h	钳夹脐带后用药	术后用药	≤24	>24～48	>48～72	>72
未干预组	136	1(0.7)	3(2.2)	130(95.6)	2(1.5)	7 (5.2)	5 (3.7)	19(14.0)	105(77.2)
干预组	145	0(0.0)	0(0.0)	143(98.6)	2(1.4)	65(44.8)	77(53.1)	3 (2.1)	0 (0.0)

表3 两组抗菌药物用药时机、术后用药时间及其构成比[n(%)]

Table 3 The antibacterials use time and postoperative medication time and their constituent ratio of two groups[n(%)]

组别	n	用药时机				术后用药时间(h)
组别	n	大于术前2 h	术前0.5～2 h	钳夹脐带后用药	术后用药	≤24	>24～48	>48～72	>72
未干预组	136	1(0.7)	3(2.2)	130(95.6)	2(1.5)	7 (5.2)	5 (3.7)	19(14.0)	105(77.2)
干预组	145	0(0.0)	0(0.0)	143(98.6)	2(1.4)	65(44.8)	77(53.1)	3 (2.1)	0 (0.0)

表4 两组抗菌药物合理使用率比较[n(%)]

Table 4 Comparison of reasonable use rate of antibacterials of two groups[n(%)]

组别	n	抗菌药物选择合理率	术后使用时间合理率	用药时机合理率
未干预组	136	73 (53.7)	12 (8.8)	130(95.6)
干预组	145	145(100.0)	142(97.9)	143(98.6)
χ²		6.30	221.38	1.36
P		0.01	0.00	0.24

表4 两组抗菌药物合理使用率比较[n(%)]

Table 4 Comparison of reasonable use rate of antibacterials of two groups[n(%)]

组别	n	抗菌药物选择合理率	术后使用时间合理率	用药时机合理率
未干预组	136	73 (53.7)	12 (8.8)	130(95.6)
干预组	145	145(100.0)	142(97.9)	143(98.6)
χ²		6.30	221.38	1.36
P		0.01	0.00	0.24

表5 两组患者平均住院时间及各项费用比较(±s)

Table 5 Comparison of mean hospital days and all the expenses of patients of two groups (±s)

组别	n	住院时间(d)	抗菌药物费用（元）	药品总费用（元）	住院总费用（元）
未干预组	136	4.88±1.02	2 478.81±23.26	4 961.17±29.35	10 574.59±78.32
干预组	145	5.08±1.01	135.71±5.39	2 955.22±20.06	8 627.09±48.85
t		1.60	28.99	5.10	4.23
P		0.11	0.00	0.00	0.00

表5 两组患者平均住院时间及各项费用比较(±s)

Table 5 Comparison of mean hospital days and all the expenses of patients of two groups (±s)

组别	n	住院时间(d)	抗菌药物费用（元）	药品总费用（元）	住院总费用（元）
未干预组	136	4.88±1.02	2 478.81±23.26	4 961.17±29.35	10 574.59±78.32
干预组	145	5.08±1.01	135.71±5.39	2 955.22±20.06	8 627.09±48.85
t		1.60	28.99	5.10	4.23
P		0.11	0.00	0.00	0.00

1	中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会．卫生部医管司关于征求《普通外科I类(清洁)切口手术围手术期预防用抗菌药物管理实施细则(征求意见稿)》和《剖宫产手术围手术期预防用抗菌药物管理实施细则(征求意见稿)》意见的通知[EB/OL].2009-11-25.[2013-03-12]. URL
2	中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会．卫办医政发[2004]285号抗菌药物临床应用指导原则[S].2004-08-19.
3	中华医学会妇产科学分会感染性疾病协作组．妇产科抗生素使用指南[J]．中华妇产科杂志，2011，46(3)：230-233.
4	张玲瑶．剖宫产患者围手术期预防性应用抗菌药物分析[J]．医学理论与实践，2013，26(7)：863-865.
5	王晓玲，刘晶，李岚．骨科I类切口手术预防性使用抗菌药物调查与分析[J]．中国医院用药评价与分析，2010，10(3)：207.
6	Khan AKA, Mirshad PV, Rashed MR, et al. A study on the usage pattern of antimicrobial agents for the prevention of surgical site infections (SSIs) in a tertiary care teaching hospital[J]. J Clin Diagn Res, 2013, 7(4):671-674.
7	史天陆，杜德才，孙言才．围手术期预防使用抗菌药物合理性探讨[J]．中华医院感染学杂志，2009，19(12)：1552-1553.
8	弟红兵．围手术期抗菌药物应用合理性的调查分析[J]．中国现代医药杂志，2007，9(1)：71.

[1]	Honghua Dong, Genchun Guo, Lei Jiang, Xuefei Wu, Feixiang Ma, Haifeng Li. Application of integrated orthopedic rehabilitation pathway in rapid rehabilitation of ankle fracture[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 802-807.
[2]	Shuxian Wang, Lianghao Zhang, Lijun Wang, Hui Zhang, Yuan Guo, Chuanshen Xu, Zhiqiang Li, Jinzhen Cai, Man Xie, We Rao. The establishment of predictive model and influencing factors of major adverse cardiovascular events during perioperative period of adult liver transplantation[J]. Chinese Journal of Transplantation(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(04): 222-229.
[3]	Ting Lu, Qiaoling Jiang, Li Sun, Xuejing Wang. Research progress in application of enhanced recovery after surgery concept in perioperative period of kidney transplantation[J]. Chinese Journal of Transplantation(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(01): 55-59.
[4]	Xiaoshan Wu, Guiling Ren, Jiedong Zhu, Tianlu Shi, Kuifen Ma. Analysis of the exposure and adverse reactions of mycophenolic acid in patients during the perioperative period after renal transplantation[J]. Chinese Journal of Transplantation(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(01): 17-21.
[5]	Bin Zhang, Daiyu Sun, Xin Hu, Fei Han, Jiuming Li, Gongyu Li, Weili Wu, Baofu Feng, Guohui Peng. Evaluation and comparison of the accuracy of the stone scoring systems in the prediction of stone-free rate after retrograde intrarenal surgery in different surgical experiences[J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(04): 353-360.
[6]	Hui Xia, Hui Liao, Yanping Dai, Junping Wu, Cheng Yang, Jianxiong Li, Cundong Liu. Research on the application of the medical nursing cooperation of enhanced recovery model in the perioperative period of single-hole laparoscopic urinary tract reconstruction[J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(03): 266-270.
[7]	Zilin Cheng, Ming Dai, Jianhua Li, Liang Ma. Application of enhanced recovery after surgery concept in perioperative period of inguinal hernia[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(03): 331-335.
[8]	Qingqing Zhu, Zhenqi Wei. Application value of self-efficacy management during perioperative period in patients with inguinal hernia[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 773-777.
[9]	Lei Wang, Shaohua Wang, Haizhen Niu, Tengfei Yin. Application of early warning intervention based on risk assessment in perioperative nursing of children with inguinal hernia[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 768-772.
[10]	Gege Dai, Li Yang, Yuanyuan Hu, Wenting Zhou. Application effect of comprehensive intervention in operating room in elderly patients with inguinal hernia[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[11]	Jinlin Xu, Zheng Chen. The impact of clinical monitoring of antimicrobial drugs on prophylactic medication and infection in inguinal hernia repair surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 720-723.
[12]	Lei Zhu, Bin Wang, Aimin Zhang, Xiaoyan Chen, Yanbing Zhang, Haolong Qi. Application of low-dose dexamethasone during perioperative period of laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 13(03): 339-343.
[13]	Hao Zhao, Feng Shang, Weitao Cheng, Yueqiao Xu, Meng Qi, Lidan Jiang, Wenjin Chen, Ning Wang, Xin Qu. Analysis of related factors of perioperative pupil change in neurosurgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Neurotraumatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 10(03): 147-150.
[14]	Sha Ruan, Yingying Wang, Jian Du, Xiaojue Qiu. Experience of individualized nursing care during perioperative period of endoscopic day operation for cardiac constriction[J]. Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy(Electronic Edition), 2024, 11(01): 65-66.
[15]	Kehan Wang, Tao Xu, Quanhong Zhou. Research progress on perioperative delirium and stress[J]. Chinese Journal of Geriatrics Research(Electronic Edition), 2024, 11(03): 45-49.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export