Maternal Outcomes of Placental Position in Placental Previa Patients with Scar Uterine

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2014.01.020

Objective

To discuss the effects of placental position in placental previa patients with scar uterine on maternal outcomes.

Methods

The study was conducted on 13 patients underwent cesarean section at the Chengdu Women and Children's Center Hospital from September 2011 to August 2012. They were divided into two groups according to different the location of the main part of the placenta, observation group (n=9, placenta was located in the anterior portion of the uterus) and posterior group (n=4, placenta was located in the posterior portion of the uterus) . There had no significant differences of age and gestational weeks between two groups (P>0.05) . The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Investigation in Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital. Informed consent was obtained from all participates. The accurate diagnosis were made in all most cases from the ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) . The bleeding amount during operation, hysterectomy and pestoperative complications between two groups were analyzed.

Results

The bleeding amount during operation were 850-7 055 mL and 350-1 200 mL in observation group and control group, respectively, with significant difference (P<0.01) ．The rate of hysterectomy in observation group and control group were 55.56% (5/ 9) and 25.00%(1/ 4) , respectively.

Conclusions

Sonographic determination and MRI of the placental position in the anterior portion where its location beneath the uterine incision is very important to predict maternal outcomes in placenta previa patients with scar uterine, and such cases, close attention should be paid for massive hemorrhage.

Key words: Pernicious placenta previa, Scar uterus, Placental accrete, Massive hemorrhage

表1 两组患者一般情况比较[n（％）]

Table 1 Comparison of general information between two groups[n（% ）]

组别	n	平均年龄(岁)	距离前次剖宫产平均时间(年)	人工终止妊娠术史(次)		产前平均出血量(mL)
组别	n	平均年龄(岁)	距离前次剖宫产平均时间(年)	1	≥2	产前平均出血量(mL)
前壁组	9	28.17	6.30	3(33.33)	6 (66.66)	51.7
后壁组	4	37.25	9.25	0 (0.00)	4(100.00)	45.0
P		>0.05	>0.05	>0.05	>0.05	>0.05

表1 两组患者一般情况比较[n（％）]

Table 1 Comparison of general information between two groups[n（% ）]

组别	n	平均年龄(岁)	距离前次剖宫产平均时间(年)	人工终止妊娠术史(次)		产前平均出血量(mL)
组别	n	平均年龄(岁)	距离前次剖宫产平均时间(年)	1	≥2	产前平均出血量(mL)
前壁组	9	28.17	6.30	3(33.33)	6 (66.66)	51.7
后壁组	4	37.25	9.25	0 (0.00)	4(100.00)	45.0
P		>0.05	>0.05	>0.05	>0.05	>0.05

表2 术中出血量比较（mL）

Table 2 Comparison of blood loss during operation between two groups(mL）

前壁组(n=9)		后壁组(n = 4)
出血量	秩次	出血量	秩次
850	4.0	350	1.0
1 000	5.0	800	2.5
1 200	6.5	800	2.5
2 200	8.0	1 200	6.0
2 950	9.0
3 450	10.0
4 120	11.0
5 500	12.0
7 055	13.0
	T1 = 78.5		T2=12.0

表2 术中出血量比较（mL）

Table 2 Comparison of blood loss during operation between two groups(mL）

前壁组(n=9)		后壁组(n = 4)
出血量	秩次	出血量	秩次
850	4.0	350	1.0
1 000	5.0	800	2.5
1 200	6.5	800	2.5
2 200	8.0	1 200	6.0
2 950	9.0
3 450	10.0
4 120	11.0
5 500	12.0
7 055	13.0
	T1 = 78.5		T2=12.0

表3 两组患者术后切除子宫情况比较[n（％）]

Table 3 Comparison of hysterectomy between two groups [n（％）]

组别	n	子宫切除率	子宫未切除率
前壁组	9	5(55.56)	4(44.44)
后壁组	4	1(25.00)	3(75.00)
合计	13	6(46.15)	7(53.85)

表3 两组患者术后切除子宫情况比较[n（％）]

Table 3 Comparison of hysterectomy between two groups [n（％）]

组别	n	子宫切除率	子宫未切除率
前壁组	9	5(55.56)	4(44.44)
后壁组	4	1(25.00)	3(75.00)
合计	13	6(46.15)	7(53.85)

[1]	Chattopadhyay SK，Kharif H，Sherbeeni MM．Placenta praevia and accreta after previous caesarean section [J]．Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol，1993，52(3)，151-156．
[2]	Ogawa M，Sato A，Yasuda K，et al．Cesarean section by transfundal approach for placenta previa percreta attached to anterior uterine wall in a woman with a previous repeat cesarean section：case report[J]．Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand，2004，83(1):115-116．
[3]	郭英花，韩素慧，郑郑．瘢痕子宫再次剖宫产时前置胎盘风险的评估[J]．中国综合临床，2011，27(3):321-323．
[4]	Miller DA，Chollet JA，Goedwin TM．Clinical risk factors for placenta previa-plaeenta aecreta[J]．Am J Obstet Gynecol，1997，177(1):210-214．
[5]	Usta IM，Hobeika EM，Musa AA，et al．Placenta previa-accreta：risk factors and complications[J]．Am J Obstet Gynecol，2005，193(10):1045-1049．
[6]	Hasegawa J，Matsuoka R，Ichizuka K，et al．Predisposing factors for massive hemorrhage during cesarean section in patients with placenta previa[J]．Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol，2009，34(1):80-84．
[7]	Sumigama S，Itakura A，Ota T，et al．Placenta previa increta／percreta in Japan：a retrospective study of ultrasound findings，management and clinical course[J]．J Obstet Gynaecol Res，2007，33(5):606-611．
[8]	Hull AD，Resnik R．Placenta accreta and postpartum hemorrhage[J]．Clin Obstet Gynecol，2010，53(1):228-236．
[9]	Dwyer BK，Belogolovkin V，Tran L，et al．Prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta：sonography or magnetic resonance imaging？[J]． J Ultrasound Med，2008，27(9):1275-1281．
[10]	Welsh AW，Ellwood D，Carter J，et al．Opinion：integration of diagnostic and management perspectives for placenta accreta[J]．Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol，2009，49(6):578-587．
[11]	温华惠，周府，冯丽，等．都江堰地区地震后高龄产妇分娩相关并发症及应对措施[J]．成都医学院学报，2013，7(6):110-112．
[12]	石琪，李佳平．子宫下段局部全层压迫缝合术联合改良B-Lynch缝合术治疗凶险型前置胎盘4例[J/CD]．中华妇幼临床医学杂志：电子版，2012，8(4):532．
[13]	李新琳，漆洪波．宫腔阴道填塞联合子宫横行捆绑术治疗凶险型前置胎盘导致的剖宫产术后出血的临床疗效分析[J/CD]．中华妇幼临床医学杂志：电子版，2012，8(1):67-68．

[1]	Chunrong Lin, Meng Chen, Xinghui Liu. Clinical characteristics of complete uterine rupture[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2019, 15(06): 639-645.
[2]	Lei Xiang, Qi Yang, Hui Xie, Haitao Liu, Feng Xia, Weishun Lan, Wenzhong Yang. Application of non-compliant balloon occlusion of abdominal aorta during cesarean section of pernicious placenta previa with placental implantation[J]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2023, 11(02): 106-112.
[3]	Yulan Zhou, Jingjing Zhang, Li Liu. Perioperative nursing of internal iliac artery balloon occlusion in dangerous placenta previa cesarean section[J]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2022, 10(03): 339-342.
[4]	Tingan Yang, Qiuyang Li, Xuelian Liu, Qian Gao, xian Fu, Haipeng He. "One-stop" hybrid surgery treatment of medical care cooperation in patients with pernicious placenta previa by implantation[J]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2022, 10(03): 320-324.
[5]	Yanli Wang, Tian Jiang, Xuhua Duan, Yi Zhao, Miao Xu, Dechao Jiao, Xinwei Han, Zhimin Chen, Chuan Liu, Xianlan Zhao, Xiaojuan Wang, Qinjun Chu. Safety follow-up study of abdominal aortic balloon occlusion combined with cesarean section in the treatment of pernicious placenta previa[J]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2021, 09(01): 36-40.
[6]	Rongguang Luo, Yanxing Guan. Application of various interventional techniques in cesarean section of pernicious placenta previa[J]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2020, 08(03): 269-275.
[7]	Tian Jiang, Yanli Wang, Xinwei Han, Wenzhe Zhang, Xuhua Duan, Zhengyang Wu, Tengfei Li, Zongming Li. The clinical application of abdominal aortic balloon occlusion followed by uterine artery embolization in the treatment of pernicious placenta previa complicated with placenta accreta during cesarean section[J]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2017, 05(03): 149-152.
[8]	Fuzhong Liu, Jinxia Xu, Yu Liu, Fengqin Xia, Ying Hao, Shangya Gao. The application value of two temporary balloon occlusion techniques during caesarean section of patients with pernicious placenta previa[J]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2017, 05(03): 139-142.
[9]	Wenzhong Chen, Yueming Zhong, Meng Chen, Jun Li, Li Zhang, Guolin Luo, Jiyun Tian. The application of the preset internal iliac artery balloon catheter and postoperative embolization in treating patients with pernicious placenta previa undergoing caesarean section[J]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2017, 05(03): 135-138.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export