Comparison Study on the Efficacy of Bronchiolitis Between Different Dosage of Nebulised Budesonide Suspension for Inhalation

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2013.01.013

Objective

To evaluate the clinical features of children with bronchiolitis, and compared their treatment response between different dosage of nebulised budesonide suspension for inhalation.

Methods

From January to December 2011, a total of 157 cases of children with bronchiolitis were recruited. Related clinical data of children diagnosed and administrated were collected and analyzed by soft ware SPSS 19.0. The patients were randomly divided into low dose group(n=78) and high dose group(n=79), they were nebulised budesonide suspension for inhalation 0.5 mg once and 1.0 mg once, respectively. Informed consent was obtained from the parents of each participating child. There had no significance difference between two groups among age, gender ratio and classified of bronchiolitis evaluated(P>0.05).

Results

At treatment 30 minutes, children with mild bronchiolitis, Beck score, respiratory frequency in high dose group were much lower than those in low dose group(P<0.001, P=0.01), pulse oxygen saturation in high dose group was statistically higher than that in low dose group(t=3.596, P<0.001). The same result could be seen in children with severe bronchiolitis. At treatment 60 minutes, children with mild bronchiolitis, Beck score, respiratory frequency in high dose group were much lower than those in low dose group(P=0.003, P=0.001), pulse oxygen saturation in high dose group was much higher than that in low dose group(t=4.593, P<0.001), The same result could be seen in children with severe bronchiolitis. There had no significance difference between high and low dose group in hospitalization time and expenses (P<0.05), and those in high dose group were much shorter and less cost.

Conclusions

Treatment by 1.0 mg budesonide suspension, response of children with bronchiolitis are much better than that of 0.5 mg group. Related clinical data include faster changing in Beck clinical score, respiratory frequency, pulse oxygen saturation; shorter hospitalization time and less cost of hospitalization expenses.

Key words: bronchiolitis, budesonide suspension, dosage, clinical effect, child

图1 小儿毛细支气管炎发病的好发季节比较

Figure 1 Comparison of seasonal occurrence rate of bronchiolitis

表1 两组患儿治疗前及接受0.5 mg与1.0 mg雾化吸入治疗30 min，60 min时的Beck评分比较(分，±s)

Table 1 Comparison of Beck score between two groups at admission, and treatment 30 min, 60 min (score，±s)

组别		n	治疗前	30 min时	60 min时
重度患儿		?	?	?	?
?	高剂量组	26	10.35±2.14	8.63±1.52^a	7.63±0.52^a
?	低剂量组	24	10.23±2.17	9.56±1.75^b	8.72±0.74^a
?	t	?	－0.198	2.040	7.042
?	P	?	0.844	0.047	<0.001
轻度患儿		?	?	?	?
?	高剂量组	53	5.65±1.28	5.02±0.21^a	4.81±0.41^a
?	低剂量组	54	5.72±1.21	5.18±0.36^a	5.02±0.53^a
?	t	?	0.861	4.293	3.069
?	P	?	0.391	<0.001	0.003

表1 两组患儿治疗前及接受0.5 mg与1.0 mg雾化吸入治疗30 min，60 min时的Beck评分比较(分，±s)

Table 1 Comparison of Beck score between two groups at admission, and treatment 30 min, 60 min (score，±s)

组别		n	治疗前	30 min时	60 min时
重度患儿		?	?	?	?
?	高剂量组	26	10.35±2.14	8.63±1.52^a	7.63±0.52^a
?	低剂量组	24	10.23±2.17	9.56±1.75^b	8.72±0.74^a
?	t	?	－0.198	2.040	7.042
?	P	?	0.844	0.047	<0.001
轻度患儿		?	?	?	?
?	高剂量组	53	5.65±1.28	5.02±0.21^a	4.81±0.41^a
?	低剂量组	54	5.72±1.21	5.18±0.36^a	5.02±0.53^a
?	t	?	0.861	4.293	3.069
?	P	?	0.391	<0.001	0.003

表2 两组患儿治疗前及接受雾化吸入治疗30 min，60 min时的呼吸频率比较(次/min，±s)

Table 2 Comparison of respiratory rate between two groups at admission, and treatment 30 min, 60 min (/min，±s)

组别		n	治疗前	30 min时	60 min时
重度患儿		?	?	?	?
?	高剂量组	26	56.42±4.97	49.43±3.95^a	45.32±6.87^a
?	低剂量组	24	55.71±5.23	52.15±4.32^a	49.50±7.12^a
?	t	?	－0.448	2.311	2.087
?	P	?	0.628	0.025	0.042
轻度患儿		?	?	?	?
?	高剂量组	53	48.31±4.95	41.92±6.83^a	40.21±5.07^a
?	低剂量组	54	47.12±5.09	44.27±7.12^a	43.17±4.59^a
?	t	?	－1.160	－2.628	3.322
?	P	?	0.249	0.010	0.001

表2 两组患儿治疗前及接受雾化吸入治疗30 min，60 min时的呼吸频率比较(次/min，±s)

Table 2 Comparison of respiratory rate between two groups at admission, and treatment 30 min, 60 min (/min，±s)

组别		n	治疗前	30 min时	60 min时
重度患儿		?	?	?	?
?	高剂量组	26	56.42±4.97	49.43±3.95^a	45.32±6.87^a
?	低剂量组	24	55.71±5.23	52.15±4.32^a	49.50±7.12^a
?	t	?	－0.448	2.311	2.087
?	P	?	0.628	0.025	0.042
轻度患儿		?	?	?	?
?	高剂量组	53	48.31±4.95	41.92±6.83^a	40.21±5.07^a
?	低剂量组	54	47.12±5.09	44.27±7.12^a	43.17±4.59^a
?	t	?	－1.160	－2.628	3.322
?	P	?	0.249	0.010	0.001

表3 两组患儿治疗前及接受雾化吸入治疗30 min，60 min时的血氧饱和度比较(%，±s)

Table 3 Comparison of pulse oxygen saturation between two groups at admission, and treatment 30 min, 60 min (%，±s)

组别		n	治疗前	30 min时	60 min时
重度患儿		?	?	?	?
?	高剂量组	26	90.87±2.95	95.79±2.41^a	97.63±2.28^a
?	低剂量组	24	91.26±3.12	93.36±2.73^a	95.52±3.46^a
?	t	?	0.454	－3.349	－2.562
?	P	?	0.652	0.002	0.014
轻度患儿		?	?	?	?
?	高剂量组	53	93.81±3.23	97.41±2.15^a	98.42±1.49^a
?	低剂量组	54	93.52±3.18	95.41±3.52^a	96.53±2.73^a
?	t	?	－0.390	－3.596	－4.593
?	P	?	0.698	<0.001	<0.001

表3 两组患儿治疗前及接受雾化吸入治疗30 min，60 min时的血氧饱和度比较(%，±s)

Table 3 Comparison of pulse oxygen saturation between two groups at admission, and treatment 30 min, 60 min (%，±s)

组别		n	治疗前	30 min时	60 min时
重度患儿		?	?	?	?
?	高剂量组	26	90.87±2.95	95.79±2.41^a	97.63±2.28^a
?	低剂量组	24	91.26±3.12	93.36±2.73^a	95.52±3.46^a
?	t	?	0.454	－3.349	－2.562
?	P	?	0.652	0.002	0.014
轻度患儿		?	?	?	?
?	高剂量组	53	93.81±3.23	97.41±2.15^a	98.42±1.49^a
?	低剂量组	54	93.52±3.18	95.41±3.52^a	96.53±2.73^a
?	t	?	－0.390	－3.596	－4.593
?	P	?	0.698	<0.001	<0.001

表4 两组患儿平均住院时间、住院费用比较 (±s)

Table 4 Comparison of hospitalization time and expenses between two groups(±s)

组别		n	住院时间(d)	住院费用(元)
重度患儿		?	?	?
?	高剂量组	26	8.62±2.67	2573±196
?	低剂量组	24	10.73±3.27	2816±184
?	t	?	2.504	4.556
?	P	?	0.016	<0.001
轻度患儿		?	?	?
?	高剂量组	53	6.17±1.64	2029±213
?	低剂量组	54	7.12±1.28	2215±162
?	t	?	3.721	5.504
?	P	?	<0.001	<0.001

表4 两组患儿平均住院时间、住院费用比较 (±s)

Table 4 Comparison of hospitalization time and expenses between two groups(±s)

组别		n	住院时间(d)	住院费用(元)
重度患儿		?	?	?
?	高剂量组	26	8.62±2.67	2573±196
?	低剂量组	24	10.73±3.27	2816±184
?	t	?	2.504	4.556
?	P	?	0.016	<0.001
轻度患儿		?	?	?
?	高剂量组	53	6.17±1.64	2029±213
?	低剂量组	54	7.12±1.28	2215±162
?	t	?	3.721	5.504
?	P	?	<0.001	<0.001

[1]	Leader S, Kohlhase K. Recent trends in severe respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)among US infants, 1997 to 2000[J]. J Pediatr, 2003，143:S127-S132.
[2]	Che d, Nicolau J, Bergonunioux J, et al.Bronchiolitis among infants under 1 year of age in France: Epidemiology and factors associated with mortality[J]. Arch Pediatr，2012，19(7):700-706.
[3]	Shay DK, Holman RC, Newman RD, et al. Bronchiolitis associated hospitalizations among US children, 1980-1996[J]. JAMA，1999，282:1440-1446.
[4]	Njoo H, Pelletier L, Spika J. Infectious disease//Canadian Institute for Health Information, Canadian Lung Association, Health Canada, Statistics Canada, eds. Respiratory disease in Canada. Ottawa: Canadian Institute for Health Information[R]，2001，81-86.
[5]	Stang P, Brandenburg N, Carter B. The economic burden of respiratory syncytial virus-associated bronchiolitis hospitalizations[J]. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, 2001，155:95-96.
[6]	Bentur L, Shoseyov D. Dexamethasone inhalations in RSV bronchiolitis: A doubleblind, placebo-controlled study[J]. Acta Paediatr，2005，94:866-871.
[7]	Shen KL, Li YZ, Li CR, et al. The experts'consensus about glucocorticoid anapnotherapy in children[J]．J Clin Pediatr，2011，29(1):86-91.
[8]	Hu YM, Jiang ZF. Zhu Fu-tang practical peadiatrics.7th ed[M]Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House，2002，1199-1201.
[9]	Beck R, Elias N. Computerized acoustic assessment of treatment efficiency of nebulized epinephrine and albuterol in RSV bronchiolitis[J]. J BMC Pediatr, 2007，7(1):22-27.
[10]	Xue XD, Li YB. Pediatrics[M]. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House，2005，219-221.
[11]	Martin MA.Respiratory syncytial virus infection and asthma[J]．A1lergol Immunopathol，2001，29(3):140.
[12]	Dimova-Yaneva D, Russell D, Main M, et al.Eosinophil activation and cysteinyl leukotriene production in infants with respiratory syncial virus bronchiolitis[J]．Clin Exp Allergy，2004，34(41:555.
[13]	Global Initiative for Asthma(GINA)．GINA workshop report，global strategy of asthma management and prevention[R/OL]．National Heart Lung and Blood Institute，World Health Organization[20062007-07-18]． URL
[14]	Chen YZ, Hua YH. The routine intervention of bronchial asthma in children[J] Chin J Pediatr，2004，42(2):104.
[15]	Song IH, Buttgereit F. Non-genomic glucocorticoid effects to probide the basis for new drug developments[J]．Mol Cell Endocrinol，2006，246(1-2):142-146.

[1]	Xuan Zhang, Yutong Ma, Yuqian Miao, Yun Zhang, Shiwen Wu, Xiaochu Dang, Yingying Chen, Zhaoming Zhong, Xuejuan Wang, Miao Hu, Yanfeng Sun, Xiuzhu Ma, Faqin Lyu, Haiyan Kou. Ultrasound assessment of diaphragm function in pediatric patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2023, 20(10): 1068-1073.
[2]	Baofu Zhang, Jin Yu, Jingjing Ye, Jiangen Yu, Xiaohui Ma, Xiwang Liu. Echocardioimagedata diagnosis of anomalous pulmonary venous connection caused by congenital malposition of the septum primum[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2023, 20(10): 1074-1080.
[3]	Dan Han, Ting Wang, Huan Xiao, Lirong Zhu, Jingyu Chen, Yi Tang. Diagnostic value of contrast enhanced ultrasound versus contrast enhanced computed tomography in benign and malignant liver lesions in children[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2023, 20(09): 939-944.
[4]	Tingting Liu, Yanbing Lin, Shan Wang, Murong Chen, Zijian Tang, Dongling Dai, Bei Xia. Evaluation of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease in children by ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2023, 20(08): 787-794.
[5]	Yuhan Zhou, Huan Xiao, Chunjiang Yang, Juan Zhou, Lirong Zhu, Juan Xu, Fangting Mou. Diagnostic value of ultrasound in children with temporary hip synovitis[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2023, 20(08): 795-800.
[6]	Jiu Wang, Jun Chen, Xia Zhu, Yangjin Mima, Sheng Zhao, Xinlin Chen, Jianhua Li, Shuang Wang. Effect of implementing fetal systemic ultrasound screening in Material and Child Health Hospital of Shannan[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2023, 20(07): 728-733.
[7]	Jie Mi, Chen Chen, Jialing Li, Haina Pei, Hengbo Zhang, Fei Li, Dongjie Li. Analysis of the characteristics of children's head and face trauma[J]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2023, 18(06): 511-515.
[8]	Tao Ma, Chunwei Ye, Tao Liu, Wenxi Peng, Zhipeng Li. Comparison of laparoscopic and open disconnected pyeloplasty in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children[J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 605-610.
[9]	Lei Wang, Shaohua Wang, Haizhen Niu, Tengfei Yin. Application of early warning intervention based on risk assessment in perioperative nursing of children with inguinal hernia[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 768-772.
[10]	Fang Li, Rui Xu, Yangyang Li, Xiuquan Shi. Application of the concept of evidence-based medicine in children with inguinal hernia[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 782-786.
[11]	Lei Lyu, Xiao Feng, Kaiming He, Kaining Zeng, Qing Yang, Haijin Lyu, Huimin Yi, Shuhong Yi, Yang Yang, Binsheng Fu. Value of revised King's score in evaluation of live transplantation timing for children with acute liver failure due to Wilson's disease and literature review[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(06): 661-668.
[12]	Xiangyu Zhu, Jianmei Wang, Hui Zhang, Hongying Ye. Correlation analysis between left ventricular function parameters and liver cirrhosis using non-invasive left ventricular pressure-strain cycle[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2023, 13(06): 494-498.
[13]	Shaohong Zhuo, Xiuling Lin, Cuimei Zhou, Weilian Xiong, Xingzao Ma. Application value of CD64 index combined with serum SAA/CRP and PCT in the diagnosis of children with infectious gastrointestinal diseases[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2023, 13(06): 505-509.
[14]	Zehui Huang, Jiexian Liang, Wei Zeng. Application of dexmedetomidine combined with esketamine in painless gastroscopy in children[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2023, 13(06): 510-513.
[15]	Jing Li, Lingling Zhang, Wei Xing. Value of concept of interest induction before anesthesia induction in pediatric surgery and its effect on family satisfaction[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(07): 812-817.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export