Chinese Medical E-ournals Database

Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition) ›› 2008, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (06): 571 -574. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2008.06.113

Original Article

The Exploration on the Practicability Value of Trans-Vaginal Hysterectomy

Jin-ying LIU   

  1. Tianhe Area Women's and Children's Clinic, Guangzhou 510630, China
  • Published:2008-12-01
Objective

To explore the clinic value of trans-vaginal hysterectomy.

Methods

From January 2004 to January 2007, 136 hospitalized patients with signs of hysterectomy were divided into trans-vaginal hysterectomy group(TVH group, n= 60)and trans-abdominal hysterectomy group(TAH group, n= 86)according to their choices. Informed consent were obtained from all patients. Sixty cases in the TVH group were all received trans-vaginal hysterectomy, including 43 cases with uterine volume lower than 10 gestational weeks, and 17 cases during 10~14 gestational weeks; and 15 case had operation history. Eighty-six cases in the TAH group were all received trans-abdominal hysterectomy, including 65 cases with uterine volume lower than 10 gestational weeks, and 21 case during 10~14 gestational weeks; and 20 cases had operation history. The following items were compared between two groups, operative duration, blood loss, intraoperative complication, post-surgery anal-exsufflation time, postoperative activity out of bed days, hospitalization time and rate of wound infection.

Results

In terms of the operative duration and intraoperative blood loss, the TVH group were significantly lower than those in the TAH group(t=-5. 11, P<0. 01 ; t=-0. 38, P<0. 05). Furthermore, compared with the items of post-surgery anal-exsufflation time, postoperative activity out of bed days, and wound infection rate, two groups had significant differences(t=-2. 34, P<0. 05; t=-2. 30, P<0. 05; χ2=-2. 30, P<0. 05). There had no significant difference of hospitalization expenses between two groups. All the operations were smoothly completed without any complication.

Conclusion

The trans-vaginal hysterectomy is an applicable minimal invasive operative method, which has better effects than trans-abdominal hysterectomy,

图1 两组患者手术持续时间比较
1 Agostini A, Bretelle F,Cravello L, et al. Vaginal hysterectomy in nulliparous women without prolapse. A prospective comparative study. BJOG, 2000, 110(5):515-518.
2 Ottosen C,Lingman G,Ottosen L. Three methods for hysterectomy:A randomised, prospective study of short term outcome. BJOG, 2000,107(11):1380-1385.
3 LI GY,Shang HL, Chen LS. Analysis of operative patterns of 2 272 laparoscopic hysterectomies. Chin J Obstet Gynecol,2005,40(3):168-170.[李光仪,尚慧玲,陈露诗.腹腔镜下不同子宫切除术2 272例分析.中华妇产科杂志,2005,40(3):168-170.]
4 Chen L, Liu XC,Xie QH. Clinical analysis of trans-vaginal hysterectomy for 644 large volume, non-prolapse uterus. J Pract Obstet Gynecol, 2004, 20(6):360-361.[陈龙,柳晓春,谢庆煌.644例非脱垂大子宫经阴道切除临床总结分析.实用妇产科杂志,2004,20(6):360-361.]
5 Liu P. A comparison of therapeutic effects between trans-vaginal hysterectomy and trans-abdominal hysterectomy for nonprolapsed uterus. Anhui Med Pharmaceut J, 2008,12(11):1058-1060.[刘萍.非脱垂子宫经阴道切除与经腹切除临床效果对比.安徽医学,2008,12(11):1058-1060.]
6 Ma QL, Zhu XJ,Zhang Y. Clinical evaluation of non-vaginal prolapse and uterine scar abdominal hysterectomy. Chin J Pract Gynecol Obstet, 2005,21(3):171-172.[马庆良,朱雪静,张羽.非脱垂瘢痕子宫阴式和腹式全切术临床评价.中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2005,21(3):171-172.]
7 Liang ZQ. To deal with in the laparoscopic gynecological cancer treatment and its indications and complications. Chin J Obs/Gyne&Pediatr(Electronic Version), 2006, 2(2):241-245.[梁志清.腹腔镜在妇科恶性肿瘤治疗中的适应证和并发症及其处理.中华妇幼临床医学杂志:电子版,2006,9(2):241-245.]
8 Arbel R,Lavy Y. Vaginal vault prolapse:Choice of operation. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2005,19(6):959-977.
9 Maher C,Baessler K,Glazener CM, et al. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2004,(4):CD004014.
10 Kovac SR. Clinical opinion:Guidelines for hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2004, 191(2): 635-640.
[1] Lian-min ZHANG, Xu ZHAO. Clinical Effects Analysis of Three Minimally Invasive Surgery Procedures for Hysterectomy With Large Uterus: Size More Than 12 Pregnant Weeks[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2011, 07(06): 552-554.
[2] Ru-xia SHI, Su-fen LIU, Ye-ling XIE. Comparative Analysis of Pelvic Floor Reconstruction and Trans-Vaginal Hysterectomy in the Treatment of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2011, 07(01): 34-38.
[3] Hai-bing LI, Zhi-qing LIU, Yao HE, Yan HUAN, Yao SUN, Peng HU. Application of Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia in Trans-Vaginal Hysterectomy[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2010, 06(01): 29-32.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract