切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (05) : 410 -417. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2026.05.005

论著

0~2个月龄百日咳婴儿的临床特征及进展为重症百日咳的影响因素分析
朱欣欣1, 张懿1, 杨亚荣1, 袁娟1, 王增国2,†()   
  1. 1西安交通大学附属儿童医院,西安市儿童医院感染科,西安 710003
    2西安交通大学附属儿童医院,西安市儿童医院检验科,西安 710003
  • 收稿日期:2026-06-13 修回日期:2026-08-17 出版日期:2026-10-01
  • 通信作者: 王增国

Clinical characteristics and influencing factors of severe pertussis in infants between 0-2 months of age

Xinxin Zhu1, Yi Zhang1, Yarong Yang1, Juan Yuan1, Zengguo Wang2,†()   

  1. 1Department of Infection, Xi′an Children′s Hospital, Affiliated Children′s Hospital of Xi′an Jiaotong University, Xi′an 710003, Shaanxi Province, China
    2Department of Clinical Laboratory, Xi′an Children′s Hospital, Affiliated Children′s Hospital of Xi′an Jiaotong University, Xi′an 710003, Shaanxi Province, China
  • Received:2026-06-13 Revised:2026-08-17 Published:2026-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Zengguo Wang
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(82172312)
引用本文:

朱欣欣, 张懿, 杨亚荣, 袁娟, 王增国. 0~2个月龄百日咳婴儿的临床特征及进展为重症百日咳的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2026, 22(05): 410-417.

Xinxin Zhu, Yi Zhang, Yarong Yang, Juan Yuan, Zengguo Wang. Clinical characteristics and influencing factors of severe pertussis in infants between 0-2 months of age[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2026, 22(05): 410-417.

目的

探讨0~2个月龄百日咳婴儿的临床特征及进展为重症百日咳的影响因素。

方法

选择2024年1至12月西安市儿童医院收治的78例0~2个月龄百日咳婴儿的临床病例资料为研究对象。根据百日咳婴儿病情严重程度,将其分为研究组(n=18,重症百日咳婴儿)和对照组(n=60,轻症百日咳婴儿),采用回顾性分析法对2组婴儿的一般资料、临床表现及实验室检查结果进行统计学分析。采用多因素非条件logistic回归分析重症百日咳发生的独立影响因素,并基于影响因素构建预测模型。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估2组婴儿各项指标,并构建预测低龄百日咳婴儿进展为重症百日咳联合模型(以下简称为联合预测模型)对婴儿进展为重症百日咳的预测效能。本研究遵循的程序符合西安市儿童医院伦理委员会制定的相关标准,并获得该伦理委员会批准(批件号:2024-010-01)。

结果

①这78例婴儿均以阵发性痉挛性咳嗽为主要临床表现(100.0%),其次为咳嗽时面色潮红(43.6%,34/78)及发绀(39.7%,31/78),而吸气性鸡鸣样回声和咳后呕吐发生率仅为15.4%(12/78)和10.3%(8/78)。②研究组婴儿入院时体重低于对照组[4.0 kg(3.6,4.5 kg) vs 5.0 kg(4.5,5.5 kg)],咳嗽时发绀发生率高于对照组(66.7% vs 31.7%),并且差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组婴儿的住院时间长于对照组[11.0 d(8.0,16.5 d) vs 8.0 d(6.3,10.0 d)],差异亦有统计学意义(P=0.001)。③多因素非条件logistic回归分析结果显示,入院时体重(OR=0.169,95%CI:0.059~0.485,P=0.001),咳嗽时发绀(OR=3.719,95%CI:1.046~13.220,P=0.042)均是0~2个月百日咳婴儿进展为重症百日咳的影响因素。基于咳嗽时发绀和入院时体重建立联合预测模型,Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度检验显示该联合预测模型拟合良好(χ2=6.27,P=0.508)。④ROC曲线分析结果显示,入院时婴儿体重、咳嗽时发绀及联合预测模型预测重症百日咳的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.810(95%CI:0.697~0.924),0.675(95%CI:0.531~0.819)和0.841(95%CI:0.721~0.961)。

结论

本研究0~2个月龄百日咳婴儿最常见的临床表现为阵发性痉挛性咳嗽、咳嗽时面色潮红及发绀。入院时体重和咳嗽时发绀二者联合,对0~2个月龄百日咳婴儿进展为重症百日咳具有一定的早期预测价值。

Objective

To analyze clinical features of pertussis in infants of aged 0-2 months and to identify risk factors for progression to severe disease.

Methods

Clinical data of 78 infants with pertussis aged 0-2 months who were hospitalized in Xi′an Children′s Hospital from January to December 2024 were retrospectively analyzed.They were divided into study group (n=18, severe pertussis) and control group (n=60, mild pertussis) according to the diagnostic criteria for severe pertussis. General clinical data, clinical manifestations, and laboratory results were collected and compared between the two groups by statistical methods. Multivariate unconditional logistic regression was used to identify factors influencing the development of severe pertussis, and a predictive model was constructed based on these factors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the predictive performance of each individual factor and the combined model for severe pertussis. This study followed the standards set by the Ethics Committee of Xi′an Children′s Hospital and was approved by the committee (Approval No. 2024-010-01).

Results

① All 78 children presented with paroxysmal spasmodic cough (100.0%), followed by facial flushing during coughing (43.6%, 34/78) and cyanosis during coughing (39.7%, 31/78), while inspiratory whooping and post-tussive vomiting occurred in only 15.4% (12/78) and 10.3% (8/78), respectively. ② The study group had lower admission body weight than the control group [4.0 kg(3.6, 4.5 kg) vs 5.0 kg(4.5, 5.5 kg), P<0.001], and a higher incidence of cyanosis during coughing (66.7% vs 31.7%), with statistically significant differences between two groups (P<0.05). Additionally, study group had a longer hospital stay than control group [11.0 d (8.0, 16.5 d) vs 8.0 d(6.3, 10.0 d)], and the difference was also statistically significant (P=0.001).③ Multivariate unconditional logistic regression analysis showed that admission body weight (OR=0.169, 95%CI: 0.059-0.485, P=0.001) and cyanosis during coughing (OR=3.719, 95%CI: 1.046-13.220, P=0.042) were factors influencing the progression to severe pertussis. A combined predictive model was established based on cyanosis during coughing and admission body weight, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test indicated good model calibration (χ2=6.27, P=0.508). ④ ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of admission body weight, cyanosis during coughing, and the combined model for predicting severe pertussis were 0.810 (95%CI: 0.697-0.924), 0.675 (95%CI: 0.531-0.819), and 0.841 (95%CI: 0.721-0.961), respectively.

Conclusions

The most common clinical manifestations of infants with pertussis aged 0-2 months were paroxysmal spasmodic cough, facial flushing during coughing, and cyanosis during coughing. The combination of admission body weight and cyanosis during coughing showed good early predictive value for progressing to severe pertussis.

表1 本研究78例0~2个月龄百日咳婴儿一般资料及临床表现
表2 本研究78例0~2个月龄百日咳婴儿的实验室及影像学检查结果比较
表3 本研究0~2个月龄百日咳婴儿治疗及临床转归
表4 本研究2组百日咳婴儿的临床特征比较
表5 本研究0~2个月龄婴儿重症百日咳影响因素的多因素非条件logistic回归分析
[1]
中华预防医学会,中华预防医学会疫苗与免疫分会. 中国百日咳行动计划专家共识[J]. 中华流行病学杂志,2021,42(6): 955-965. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20210308-00186.
[2]
余珍燕,王启明,许超,等. 百日咳毒力基因变异与疫苗株抗原关联性研究进展[J/OL].中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版),2025,21(6):707-713. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2025.06.014.
[3]
Smout E, Mellon D, Rae M. Whooping cough rises sharply in UK and Europe [J]. BMJ, 2024, 385: q736. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.q736. PMID: 38565246.
[4]
Zhu X, Wang Z. Resurgence of pertussis in China: evaluating the efficacy of sulfa methoxazole-trime thoprim as an alternative treatment [J]. J Infect, 2025, 90(1): 106373. DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106373.
[5]
中华预防医学会百日咳防控工作委员会. 婴幼儿百日咳重症与死亡情况及相关研究进展[J].中华预防医学杂志,2026,60(6): 947-951. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20250701-00615.
[6]
中华医学会感染病学分会儿科感染学组,国家卫生健康委能力建设和继续教育儿科专委会感染组,中国临床实践指南联盟方法学专委会,等. 中国百日咳诊疗与预防指南(2024版)[J]. 中华医学杂志,2024, 104(15): 1258-1279. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20240124-00179.
[7]
姚开虎,李丽君. 重症百日咳的诊断及其死亡风险因素研究进展[J]. 中华实用儿科临床杂志,2019,34(22): 1681-1685. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-428X.2019.22.001.
[8]
王静娟,米荣,崔小岱,等. 婴幼儿重症百日咳研究进展[J]. 中华实用儿科临床杂志,2022,37(17):1351-1354. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn101070-20210122-00099.
[9]
张继燕,卓裕霏,陈艳萍,等. 儿童百日咳住院病例248例临床特征及重症百日咳相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华实用儿科临床杂志,2023,38(4):275-280. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn101070-20220820-00993.
[10]
Yuan J, Yang Y, Zhang Y, et al. Clinical efficacy of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole treatment for pediatric pertussis in macrolide-resistant endemic regions: a retrospective cohort study [J]. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2026, 47: 33-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.jgar.2026.01.011.
[11]
康利民,米荣,王亚娟,等. 新生儿百日咳61例临床特征分析[J]. 中华新生儿科杂志(中英文), 2025,40(1): 28-33. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn101451-20240717-00251.
[12]
周润泽,郭映兰,刘霞,等. 新生儿重症百日咳临床特征及危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 21(3): 329-336. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2025.03.011.
[13]
康利民,米荣,崔小岱,等. 3月龄以下百日咳住院患儿临床特征分析[J]. 中华医学杂志,2024, 104(16): 1422-1425. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20231107-01030.
[14]
Cherry JD. The prevention of severe pertussis and pertussis deaths in young infants [J]. Expert Rev Vaccines, 2019, 18(3): 205-208. DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2019.1581065.
[15]
Winter K, Zipprich J, Harriman K, et al. Risk factors associated with infant deaths from pertussis: a case-control study [J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2015, 61(7): 1099-1106. DOI: 10.1093/cid/civ472.
[16]
Murray EL, Nieves D, Bradley JS, et al. Characteristics of severe bordetella pertussis infection among infants ≤90 days of age admitted to pediatric intensive care units-Southern California, September 2009-June 2011[J]. J Pediatr Infect Dis Soc, 2013, 2(1): 1-6. DOI: 10.1093/jpids/pis105.
[17]
Cousin VL, Caula C, Vignot J, et al. Pertussis infection in critically ill infants: Meta-analysis and validation of a mortality score [J]. Critical Care, 2025, 29(1): 71. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-025-05300-2.
[1] 范霞林, 黄慈丹, 周俏苗, 曹霞. 海南省新生儿遗传代谢病筛查结果分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2026, 22(05): 398-409.
[2] 刘可文, 向鹏程, 周雯, 韩俊毅. 肠造口出口梗阻的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 319-324.
[3] 王吉伟, 许治坤, 谢志远, 龚龙波. 胃上部癌与胃下部癌淋巴结转移特征差异及预后相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 427-431.
[4] 王中尧, 李敬东. 肝细胞癌术后早期复发危险因素研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 495-500.
[5] 张彬, 王敏, 郑鹏, 冯犁, 李鑫, 赵高平. 早期胃癌淋巴结转移的危险因素及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 337-342.
[6] 鲁峰刚, 刘宇, 张毅, 王秦玉. 新辅助放化疗直肠癌根治术患者术后吻合口漏影响因素分析及风险预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 347-351.
[7] 杨敏, 杜峻峰, 辛林璞. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术后常见并发症防治与管理[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 352-355.
[8] 伍志辉, 彭隽晖, 潘润华, 严伟华. BRAFV600E、PAR和FPR联合检测对cN0期甲状腺乳头状癌中央组淋巴结转移的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 361-365.
[9] 袁强, 范慈勃, 韩丽丽, 陈光, 陈纲, 赵锁. 融合病理图像与报告的多模态模型用于乳腺癌预后预测[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 374-378.
[10] 凌思果, 杨军, 乔旭华. ThuLEP与TURP术后发生尿道狭窄的预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 534-541.
[11] 代鑫亮, 李威, 柳子瑜, 杨玙豪, 方灿, 庞俊, 江东根. 前列腺增生手术患者基础代谢指标与膀胱内前列腺突入程度的相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 549-555.
[12] 马煜博, 李起, 耿智敏. 胆道恶性肿瘤预后预测模型:现状、挑战与未来展望[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(05): 702-710.
[13] 王平, 郝天骄, 陈兴宇, 翟俊, 朱文伟, 陈季松. 急性坏疽性胆囊炎临床风险预测模型的建立与验证[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(05): 760-767.
[14] 郭洋洁, 杨培, 曾新桃, 史瑞籽, 唐易平. 肝内胆管结石肝切除术后胆漏的危险因素分析及预测模型建立与验证[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(05): 783-790.
[15] 刘娟, 姚金菊, 廖青, 邹琪婧, 雷建国, 钟婷婷. 亚临床甲状腺功能减退合并代谢相关脂肪性肝病患者发生显著肝纤维化的风险预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(05): 445-451.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI
小
编
AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?