切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (01) : 61 -66. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2025.01.008

妇儿影像学研究专辑

动脉自旋标记技术对儿童毛细胞型星形细胞瘤与血管母细胞瘤及髓母细胞瘤脑血流量检测的临床价值
牛田力1, 牛春艳1, 赵鹏飞2, 李世俊1,()   
  1. 1. 中国人民解放军总医院放射诊断科,北京 100853
    2. 山东省宁津县人民医院放射科,宁津 253400
  • 收稿日期:2024-09-19 修回日期:2025-01-12 出版日期:2025-02-01
  • 通信作者: 李世俊
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划“国家质量基础设施体系“重点专项”项目(2022YFC2409404)首都卫生发展科研专项项目(首发2024-2-5024)

Clinical value of arterial spin labeling in detecting cerebral blood flow in children with pilocytic astrocytoma,hemangioblastoma and medulloblastoma

Tianli Niu1, Chunyan Niu1, Pengfei Zhao2, Shijun Li1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Radiology,Chinese PLA General Hospital,Beijing 100853,China
    2. Department of Radiology,Ningjin People's Hospital,Ningjin 253400,Shandong Province,China
  • Received:2024-09-19 Revised:2025-01-12 Published:2025-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Shijun Li
引用本文:

牛田力, 牛春艳, 赵鹏飞, 李世俊. 动脉自旋标记技术对儿童毛细胞型星形细胞瘤与血管母细胞瘤及髓母细胞瘤脑血流量检测的临床价值[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 21(01): 61-66.

Tianli Niu, Chunyan Niu, Pengfei Zhao, Shijun Li. Clinical value of arterial spin labeling in detecting cerebral blood flow in children with pilocytic astrocytoma,hemangioblastoma and medulloblastoma[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2025, 21(01): 61-66.

目的

探讨动脉自旋标记(ASL)技术对毛细胞型星形细胞瘤(PA)、血管母细胞瘤(HB)、髓母细胞瘤(MB)3种常见颅脑肿瘤患儿脑血流量(CBF)检测的临床应用价值。

方法

选择2015年4月至2024年7月于中国人民解放军总医院手术治疗后切除组织病理学检查被确诊为PA、HB、MB的35 例患儿为研究对象。采用回顾性分析方法,将其分别纳入PA 组(n=10)、HB 组(n=12)、MB组(n=13)。手术治疗前,对3组患儿均进行MRI平扫、增强及3D ASL成像,测量3组患儿肿瘤实质、近侧瘤周区(距离肿瘤强化边缘≤1 cm)、远侧瘤周区(距离肿瘤强化边缘>1 cm)CBF值。采用单因素方差分析与Kruskal-Wallis H 秩和检验,对3 组患儿肿瘤实质、近侧与远侧瘤周区CBF值进行统计学比较。本研究遵循的程序符合2013 年修订的《世界医学协会赫尔辛基宣言》要求。

结果

PA 组、HB 组、MB 组患儿肿瘤实质CBF 值中位数分别为59.1、255.7、32.1 m L/(100 g·min),近侧瘤周区CBF 值分别为(62.3±30.0)、(196.3±113.6)、(39.6±17.5)m L/(100 g·min),远侧瘤周区CBF 值中位数分别为59.2、112.2、33.1 m L/(100 g·min),3组患儿肿瘤实质、近侧与远侧瘤周区CBF值分别总体比较,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=25.51、P<0.001,F=18.00、P<0.001,χ2=15.26、P<0.001)。对3组患儿的上述数据进一步两两比较的结果显示,HB组肿瘤实质、近侧瘤周区CBF值,均分别显著高于PA 组、MB组,并且差异均有统计学意义(肿瘤实质CBF值:Z=-3.56、-4.13,均为P<0.001;近侧瘤周区CBF值:均为P<0.001);而PA 组、HB组患儿远侧瘤周区CBF 值,则均分别显著高于MB 组,差异亦均有统计学意义(P=0.009、<0.001)。

结论

ASL是一种磁共振灌注成像技术,可定量评估PA、HB、MB等3种儿童常见颅脑肿瘤患儿的CBF值,为PA、HB、MB鉴别诊断提供辅助参考。

Objective

To explore the application value of arterial spin labeling(ASL)in detecting cerebral blood flow(CBF)in children with three common intracranial tumors,namely pilocytic astrocytoma(PA),hemangioblastoma(HB),and medulloblastoma(MB).

Methods

A total of 35 children who underwent surgical treatment in Chinese PLA General Hospital from April 2015 to July 2024 and were diagnosed with PA,HB,or MB by histopathological examination of the surgically resected tissues were selected as the research subjects.They were included into the PA group (n=10),HB group n=12),and MB group n=13)by retrospective analysis method.Before surgical treatment,all children in three groups underwent plain MRI scan,enhanced MRI scan,and 3D ASL imaging.The CBF values of the tumor parenchyma,proximal peritumoral area (within 1 cm from the enhanced edge of the tumor),and distal peritumoral area(more than 1 cm from the enhanced edge of the tumor)were measured in the three groups.One-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis H rank sum test were used to statistically compare the CBF values of the tumor parenchyma,proximal and distal peritumoral areas among the three groups.The study protocol complied with the WorldMedical AssociationDeclarationofHelsinki revised in 2013.

Results

In PA group,HB group,and MB group,the median CBF values of the tumor parenchyma were 59.1,255.7,and 32.1 mL/(100 g·min),respectively,and the CBF values of the proximal peritumoral area were(62.3±30.0),(196.3±113.6),and(39.6±17.5)m L/(100 g·min),respectively,and the median CBF values of the distal peritumoral area were 59.2,112.2,and 33.1 m L/(100 g· min),respectively.There were statistically significant differences in the overall comparison of the CBF values of the tumor parenchyma,proximal and distal peritumoral areas among three groups (χ2=25.51,P<0.001;F=18.00,P<0.001; χ2=15.26,P<0.001).The results of further pairwise comparison showed that the CBF values of the tumor parenchyma and proximal peritumoral area in the HB group were significantly higher than those in PA group and MB group,and the differences were statistically significant(CBF values of the tumor parenchyma:Z=-3.56,-4.13,both P <0.001;CBF values of the proximal peritumoral area:both P <0.001).The CBF values of the distal peritumoral area in PA group and HB group were significantly higher than those in MB group,and the differences were statistically s ignificant (P=0.009,<0.001).

Conclusions

ASL is a perfusion weight imaging technique,which can quantitatively evaluate the CBF values of three common intracranial tumors such as PA,HB,and MB,providing an auxiliary reference for the clinical differential diagnosis of PA,HB,and MB.

图1 本研究PA、HB、MB患儿颅脑MRI图像[图1A~1C分别为1例小脑蚓部MB患儿(男性,2岁)颅脑MRI T2WI平扫、T1WI增强扫描和ASL图像,ASL图像显示MB肿瘤病灶呈较低灌注,CBF值为49.2 m L/(100 g·min);图1D~1F分别为1例小脑半球PA 患儿(男性,15岁)颅脑MRI T2WI平扫、T1WI增强扫描和ASL 图像,ASL 图像显示PA 肿瘤病灶呈低灌注,CBF值为24.2 m L/(100 g·min);图1G~1I分别为1例右侧小脑半球HB患儿(女性,6岁)颅脑MRI T2WI平扫、T1WI增强扫描和ASL图像,ASL图像显示HB肿瘤病灶呈明显高灌注,CBF值为237.6 m L/(100 g·min)] 注:MB为髓母细胞瘤,PA 为毛细胞型星形细胞瘤,HB为血管母细胞瘤。ASL为动脉自旋标记,CBF为脑血流量
表1 本研究PA 组、HB 组、MB 组患儿肿瘤实质CBF 值比较[m L/(100 g·min),MQ1Q3)]
表2 本研究PA 组、HB组、MB组患儿近侧瘤周区CBF值比较[mL/(100 g·min),±s
表3 本研究PA 组、HB组、MB组患儿远侧瘤周区CBF值比较[mL/(100 g·min),MQ1Q3)]
[1]
Salles D,Laviola G,Malinverni ACM,et al.Pilocytic astrocytoma:a review of general,clinical,and molecular characteristics[J].J Child Neurol,2020,35(12):852-858.DOI:10.1177/0883073820937225.
[2]
Knight J,Karsonovich T,De Jesus O.Pilocytic astrocytoma[M].Treasure Island(FL):StatPearls Publishing,2025.
[3]
Gaha M,Bouzayen F,Limam Y,et al.Pilocytic astrocytoma mimicking cavernous angioma:imaging features and histological characteristics[J].Neurochirurgie,2017,63(4):330-333.DOI:10.1016/j.neuchi.2017.04.002.
[4]
罗旺启,蒋飚,孙琪,等.小脑血管母细胞瘤典型和不典型MRI特征[J].浙江医学,2022,44(6):652-656.DOI:10.12056/j.issn.1006-2785.2022.44.6.2021-3087.Luo WQ,Jiang B,Sun Q,et al.Typical and atypical MRI features of hemangioblastoma of the cerebellum[J].Zhejiang Med J,2022,44(6):652-656.DOI:10.12056/j.issn.1006-2785.2022.44.6.2021-3087.
[5]
Louis DN,Perry A,Wesseling P,et al.The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System:a summary[J].Neuro Oncol,2021,23(8):1231-1251.DOI:10.1093/neuonc/noab106.
[6]
Xiao HF,Chen ZY,Lou X,et al.Astrocytic tumour grading:a comparative study of three-dimensional pseudocontinuous arterial spin labelling,dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion-weighted imaging,and diffusion-weighted imaging[J].Eur Radiol,2015,25(12):3423-3430.DOI:10.1007/s00330-015-3768-2.
[7]
Gaudino S,Martucci M,Russo R,et al.MR imaging of brain pilocytic astrocytoma:beyond the stereotype of benign astrocytoma[J].Childs Nerv Syst,2017,33(1):35-54.DOI:10.1007/s00381-016-3262-4.
[8]
Lahkim M,Andour H,Laamrani FZ,et al.Cerebellar hemangioblastoma:case report with review of the literature[J].Radiol Case Rep,2021,16(10):3109-3112.DOI:10.1016/j.radcr.2021.07.027.
[9]
Macfarlane AI,Soares JH,Maharaj M.Diagnostic accuracy of MRI without gadolinium for follow-up of pilocytic astrocytoma in the paediatric population[J].J Clin Neurosci,2025,135:111173.DOI:10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111173.
[10]
Kikuchi K,Hiwatashi A,Togao O,et al.Correlation between arterial spin-labeling perfusion and histopathological vascular density of pediatric intracranial tumors[J].J Neurooncol,2017,135(3):561-569.DOI:10.1007/s11060-017-2604-8.
[11]
Bale TA,Rosenblum MK.The 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system:an update on pediatric low-grade gliomas and glioneuronal tumors[J].Brain Pathol,2022,32(4):e13060.DOI:10.1111/bpa.13060.
[12]
Gaha M,Bouzayen F,Limam Y,et al.Pilocytic astrocytoma mimicking cavernous angioma:imaging features and histological characteristics[J].Neurochirurgie,2017,63(4):330-333.DOI:10.1016/j.neuchi.2017.04.002.
[13]
van Bree NFHN,Wilhelm M.The tumor microenvironment of medulloblastoma:an intricate multicellular network with therapeutic potential[J].Cancers (Basel),2022,14(20):5009.DOI:10.3390/cancers14205009.
[1] 吴润池, 李娟娟. 乳腺颗粒细胞瘤1 例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 61-62.
[2] 高梅娟, 董素贞. 多模态影像学新技术在儿童腹部常见恶性肿瘤中的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 21(01): 15-20.
[3] 余成军, 张杰, 裴军, 孔繁森, 杨舒媛, 吴盛德, 刘星, 温晟, 华燚, 魏光辉. 终末期肾病儿童肾移植临床特征和疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-35.
[4] 孙瑜博, 陈瑞, 翟亦晖, 汤梁峰, 张致庆, 王春燕, 耿红全, 沈茜, 刘锋, 徐虹. 合并膀胱功能障碍儿童肾移植受者疗效评估[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 2-8.
[5] 姜梦婕, 黄淑娟, 裴瑜馨, 容丽萍, 许园园, 林知朗, 丘原全, 刘龙山, 蒋小云, 陈丽植. 儿童复发性移植肾肾病临床特点及诊治[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 16-21.
[6] 曾锦华, 韩新利, 徐虹, 翟亦晖, 刘锋, 陈瑞, 方晓燕, 张致庆, 王春燕, 陈径, 沈茜. 儿童肾移植受者移植后淋巴组织增生性疾病临床特点及诊治[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 22-25.
[7] 金小艳, 邓芳, 方韶晗, 丁亚婷. 儿童肾移植受者心脏结构及功能分析[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 26-30.
[8] 刘志新, 陈小林, 肖文军, 刘思琪. 日间手术在儿童鞘膜积液腹腔镜手术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 36-40.
[9] 孙淼, 吴盛德. 机器人辅助手术治疗小儿肾积水的范围综述[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 95-102.
[10] 范利杰, 韦雅丽. 右旋氯胺酮与舒芬太尼对腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术患儿血流动力学及自主恢复的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 214-218.
[11] 吕奎林, 陈虹. 465 例儿童肺炎支原体肺炎的流行病学及临床特征分析:一项单中心回顾性研究[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(01): 55-61.
[12] 鲍文海, 阮勤, 李菲菲. Th17/Treg 免疫失衡在儿童腹型过敏性紫癜诊断与病情评估中的应用[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(02): 162-167.
[13] 韩彩云, 马娇, 李燕. 血清PAF和sTM水平与小儿轮状病毒肠炎及脱水程度的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(01): 83-88.
[14] 王云, 刘磊, 徐敏, 怀德. 度普利尤单抗注射液加玉屏风颗粒治疗儿童中重度特应性皮炎的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-32.
[15] 吴荣昌, 房孝莲, 杨磊, 张诚玥, 赵军阳, 彭芸, 尤佳, 阴捷. 视网膜母细胞瘤动脉灌注化疗的并发症单中心研究分析[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2025, 13(01): 49-53.
阅读次数
全文


摘要