切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (01) : 21 -28. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2025.01.003

妇儿影像学研究专辑

胎儿生发基质-脑室内出血的影像学研究
贺雪佳1, 刘静1, 张毓瑾1, 贾凤林1, 马鑫茂1, 张慧1, 宁刚1, 曲海波1, 廖怡1,2,()   
  1. 1. 四川大学华西第二医院放射科、出生缺陷与相关妇儿疾病教育部重点实验室,成都 610041
    2. 四川省儿童医院(四川省儿童医学中心)放射科,眉山 620010
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-13 修回日期:2025-01-03 出版日期:2025-02-01
  • 通信作者: 廖怡
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFC1002202-2)

Imaging study of fetal germinal matrix hemorrhage-intraventricular hemorrhage

Xuejia He1,2, Jing Liu1, Yujin Zhang1, Fenglin Jia1, Xinmao Ma1, Hui Zhang1, Gang Ning1, Haibo Qu1, Yi Liao1,3,()   

  1. 1. Department of Radiology,Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children(Sichuan University),Ministry of Education,West China Second University Hospital,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610041,Sichuan Province,China
    2. Department of Radiology,WCSUH-Tianfu·Sichuan Provincial Children's Hospital,Meishan 620010,Sichuan Province,China
    3. Department of Radiology,WCSUH-Tianfu · Sichuan Provincial Children's Hospital,Meishan 620010,Sichuan Province,China
  • Received:2024-10-13 Revised:2025-01-03 Published:2025-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Yi Liao
引用本文:

贺雪佳, 刘静, 张毓瑾, 贾凤林, 马鑫茂, 张慧, 宁刚, 曲海波, 廖怡. 胎儿生发基质-脑室内出血的影像学研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 21(01): 21-28.

Xuejia He, Jing Liu, Yujin Zhang, Fenglin Jia, Xinmao Ma, Hui Zhang, Gang Ning, Haibo Qu, Yi Liao. Imaging study of fetal germinal matrix hemorrhage-intraventricular hemorrhage[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2025, 21(01): 21-28.

目的

探讨胎儿生发基质-脑室内出血(GMH-IVH)的影像学特点,并评价胎儿颅脑MRI的3个序列,包括T1 容积内插梯度回波序列(THRIVE)、超快速平衡稳态自由进动序列(BTFE)、弥散加权成像(DWI),以及胎儿颅脑超声检查,对胎儿GMH-IVH 的诊断准确度。

方法

选择2014年9月至2022年4月于四川大学华西第二医院因产前超声检查提示胎儿颅内异常,并进行胎儿颅脑MRI检查,最终确诊为GMH-IVH 的40例胎儿为研究对象。采用回顾性分析方法,对胎儿颅脑MRI的3个序列THRIVE、BTFE、DWI,与胎儿颅脑超声检查的影像学特点,以及部分受试儿的影像学转归及出生后的临床功能转归进行总结分析;同时采用χ2 检验,对胎儿颅脑MRI的3个序列,分别与超声检测结果诊断GMH-IVH 的准确度进行统计学比较。本研究遵循的程序符合2013年修订的《世界医学协会赫尔辛基宣言》。

结果

①本研究40 例GMH-IVH 胎儿中,Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ级GMH-IVH 胎儿数分别为21 例(52.5%)、4 例(10.0%)、9 例(22.5%)、5 例(12.5%)。这4个级别的GMH-IVH 胎儿中,均为超声诊断的胎儿数最少,THRIVE 序列诊断的胎儿数最多。②THRIVE、BTFE、DWI序列与超声,诊断胎儿GMH-IVH 的准确度分别为97.5%(39/40)、87.5%(35/40)、65.0%(26/40)、32.5%(13/40),THRIVE、BTFE、DWI诊断胎儿GMH-IVH 的准确度均分别优于超声,并且差异均有统计学意义(χ2=37.14、P<0.001,χ2=25.21、P<0.001,χ2=8.46、P=0.004)。③40例GMH-IVH 胎儿结局:选择引产为22例、出生为15例、死胎为1例、失访为2例;5例于晚孕期复查颅脑MRI显示其出血均不同程度减轻。选择继续妊娠后出生的15例儿童中,5例进行颅脑MRI检查(仅3例完成检查)并完成《格里菲斯评估量表中文版(GDS-C)》测试,3例儿童的生发基质区域均无明显异常信号,但其中2 例仍有不同程度脑室扩张;2 例儿童GDS-C测试结果正常,其余3例出现不同方面临床功能落后,如运动发育迟缓等。

结论

颅脑MRI的THRIVE、BTFE、DWI序列扫描,对胎儿GMH-IVH 具有重要诊断价值。胎儿GMH-IVH 晚孕期可能被吸收,但是出生后可能有不同程度脑损伤后遗症表现。

Objective

To investigate the imaging characteristics of fetal germinal matrix hemorrhage-intraventricular hemorrhages (GMH-IVH)and evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of three sequences of fetal brain MRI,including T1 high resolution isotropic volume examination(THRIVE),balanced turbo field echo(BTFE),and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI),and fetal brain ultrasonography for fetal GMH-IVH detection.

Methods

This study enrolled 40 fetuses ultimately diagnosed with GMH-IVH in West China Second University Hospital,Sichuan University from September 2014 to April 2022.Their prenatal ultrasonography showed fetal intracranial abnormalities and followed by fetal brain MRI for final diagnosis.A retrospective analysis was conducted to summarize and analyze the imaging characteristics of three fetal brain MRI sequences,including THRIVE,BTFE and DWI,and fetal brain ultrasonography,as well as imaging outcomes and postnatal clinical functional outcomes of some subjects.The chi-square test was employed to compare the diagnostic accuracy for fetal GMH-IVH of 3 fetal brain MRI sequences versus ultrasonography results,respectively.The study protocol complied with the WorldMedicalAssociationDeclaration ofHelsinki revised in 2013.

Results

①Among 40 GMH-IVH fetuses,21 cases (52.5%),4 cases(10.0%),9 cases (22.5%),and 5 cases (12.5%)were classified as gradesⅠ-ⅣGMH-IVH respectively.Ultrasonography detected the fewest cases across all grades,while THRIVE identified the most.②The diagnostic accuracy for fetal GMH-IVH of THRIVE,BTFE,DWI sequence and ultrasonography were 97.5%(39/40),87.5%(35/40),65.0%(26/40)and 32.5%(13/40),respectively.The diagnostic accuracy of THRIVE,BTFE and DWI was higher than that of ultrasonography,respectively,and the differences were statistically significant (χ2=37.14,P <0.001; χ2=25.21,P<0.001; χ2=8.46,P=0.004).③Fetal outcomes of 40 cases of GMH-IVH showed that 22 cases were induced abortion,15 cases were born,1 case was stillbirth and 2 cases were lost to follow-up.Five cases were reexamined by brain MRI in third trimester,which showed the hemorrhage was relieved to varying degrees.Among 15 live births,5 underwent brain MRI (only 3 completed)and the GriffithsMentalDevelopmentScales-Chinese(GDS-C)assessment:there was no obvious abnormal signal in the germinal matrix area of 3 children,but 2 of them still had different degrees of ventriculomegaly;two children had normal GDS-C test results,and the other three had different aspects of clinical dysfunction,such as motor retardation,etc..

Conclusions

THRIVE,BTFE,and DWI sequence of brain MRI providing critical diagnostic value of fetal GMH-IVH.Fetal GMH-IVH may be absorbed in the third trimester of pregnancy,but postnatal neurological sequelae may persist.

图1 3个颅脑MRI序列与超声诊断的GMH-IVH 不同级别胎儿数分布柱状图 注:GMH-IVH 为生发基质-脑室内出血,THRIVE 为T1 容积内插梯度回波序列,DWI为弥散加权成像,BTFE 为超快速平衡稳态自由进动序列
表1 5例GMH-IVH 胎儿出生后GDS-C测试结果
图2 本研究胎儿1(胎龄为25+2 周)与胎儿2(胎龄为29+6 周)GMH-IVH 的影像学图像[胎儿1、2 影像学图像分别为图2A~2F与图2G~2H;图2A、2G 为T2-TSE序列均呈现稍高信号并环状低信号(箭头所示);图2B、2H 为THRIVE 序列呈现高信号(箭头所示);图2C、2I为BTFE序列稍高信号并环状低信号(箭头所示);图2D、2J为DWI序列b 值为800图像(箭头所示);图2E、2K 为ADC图像,DWI图像显示弥散受限,ADC值降低(箭头所示);图2F、2L 为超声图像,血块呈稍强回声团(箭头所示)] 注:GMH-IVH 为生发基质-脑室内出血。T2-TSE为T2快速自旋回波序列,THRIVE 为T1容积内插梯度回波序列,BTFE 为超快速平衡稳态自由进动序列,DWI为弥散加权成像,ADC为表观弥散系数
[1]
Leijser LM,de Vries LS.Preterm brain injury:germinal matrix-intraventricular hemorrhage and post-hemorrhagic ventricular dilatation[J].Handb Clin Neurol,2019,162:173-199.DOI:10.1016/B978-0-444-64029-1.00008-4.
[2]
Bradley WG Jr.MR appearance of hemorrhage in the brain[J].Radiology,1993,189(1):15-26.DOI:10.1148/radiology.189.1.8372185.
[3]
Saad AF,Chaudhari R,Fischbein NJ,et al.Intracranial hemorrhage imaging[J].Semin Ultrasound CT MRI,2018,39(5):441-456.DOI:10.1053/j.sult.2018.01.003.
[4]
Gedik Özköse Z,Oˇglak SC,Bestel A,et al.Fetal intracranial hemorrhage:prenatal sonographic diagnosis criteria and postnatal outcomes[J].J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc,2022,23(4):268-274.DOI:10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2021.2021-0042.
[5]
Putbrese B,Kennedy A.Findings and differential diagnosis of fetal intracranial haemorrhage and fetal ischaemic brain injury:what is the role of fetal MRI? [J].Br J Radiol,2017,90(1070):20160253.DOI:10.1259/bjr.20160253.
[6]
Papile LA,Burstein J,Burstein R,et al.Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage:a study of infants with birth weights less than 1 500 gm[J].J Pediatr,1978,92(4):529-534.DOI:10.1016/s0022-3476(78)80282-0.
[7]
Tso WY,Wong VN,Xia X,et al.The Griffiths DevelopmentScales-Chinese (GDS-C):a cross-cultural comparison of developmental trajectories between Chinese and British children[J].Child Care Health Dev,2018,44(3):378-383.DOI:10.1111/cch.12548.
[8]
Parodi A,Govaert P,Horsch S,et al.Cranial ultrasound findings in preterm germinal matrix haemorrhage,sequelae and outcome[J].Pediatr Res,2020,87(Suppl 1):13-24.DOI:10.1038/s41390-020-0780-2.
[9]
Rodriguez-Perez LM,Ojeda-Pérez B,López-de-San-Sebastián J,et al.Design of a stem cell-based therapy for ependymal repair in hydrocephalus associated with germinal matrix hemorrhages[J].Stroke,2024,55(4):1062-1074.DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.044677.
[10]
Gomori JM,Grossman RI.Mechanisms responsible for the MR appearance and evolution of intracranial hemorrhage[J].RadioGraphics,1988,8(3):427-440.DOI:10.1148/radiographics.8.3.3380989.
[11]
张名扬,宋磊.早产儿脑损伤发病机制的进展[J].南通大学学报(医学版),2021,41(4):349-352.DOI:10.16424/j.cnki.cn32-1807/r.2021.04.013.Zhang MY,Song L.Progress in pathogenesis of brain injury in premature infants[J].J Nantong Univ(Med Sci),2021,41(4):349-352.DOI:10.16424/j.cnki.cn32-1807/r.2021.04.013.
[12]
荆彦平,张俊,高峥嵘,等.不同期别脑出血MRI诊断及信号变化特点[J].脑与神经疾病杂志,2016,24(6):376-381.Jing YP,Zhang J,Gao ZR,et al.MRI diagnosis for all phase cerebral hemorrhage and analysis characteristics of signal evolution[J].J Brain Nerv Dis,2016,24(6):376-381.
[13]
王凯旋,李旭,尹传高,等.磁共振成像在胎儿颅内出血中的应用[J].中国临床医学影像杂志,2023,34(6):423-427.DOI:10.12117/jccmi.2023.06.009.Wang KX,Li X,Yin CG,et al.The application value of MRI in fetus intracranial hemorrhage[J].J China Clin Med Imaging,2023,34(6):423-427.DOI:10.12117/jccmi.2023.06.009.
[14]
秀梅,陈俊雅.胎儿颅内出血的产前诊断及预后研究进展[J].现代妇产科进展,2021,30(1):77-80.DOI:10.13283/j.cnki.xdfckjz.2021.01.015.Li XM,Chen JY.Progress in prenatal diagnosis and prognosis of fetal intracranial hemorrhage[J].Prog Obstet Gynecol,2021,30(1):77-80.DOI:10.13283/j.cnki.xdfckjz.2021.01.015.
[15]
Suzuki T,Akamatsu Y,Oshida S,et al.A case of cisternal pilocytic astrocytoma diagnosed with the balanced steadystate free precession sequence for magnetic resonance imaging:a rare cause of subarachnoid hemorrhage[J].World Neurosurg X,2018,1:100003.DOI:10.1016/j.wnsx.2018.100003.
[16]
刘海东,许相丰.扩散加权成像在胎儿脑发育中的应用进展[J].国际医学放射学杂志,2016,39(4):378-381.DOI:10.19300/j.2016.z3725.Liu HD,Xu XF.Research progresses of diffusion weighted imaging in fetal brain development[J].Int J Med Radiol,2016,39(4):378-381.DOI:10.19300/j.2016.z3725.
[17]
Cartry C,Viallon V,Hornoy P,et al.Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the normal fetal brain:marker of fetal brain maturation[J].J Radiol,2010,91(5 Pt 1):561-566.DOI:10.1016/s0221-0363(10)70088-3.
[18]
Ghi T,Simonazzi G,Perolo A,et al.Outcome of antenatally diagnosed intracranial hemorrhage:case series and review of the literature[J].Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2003,22(2):121-130.DOI:10.1002/uog.191.
[19]
Masselli G,Vaccaro Notte MR,Zacharzewska-Gondek A,et al.Fetal MRI of CNS abnormalities[J].Clin Radiol,2020,75(8):640.e1-640.e11.DOI:10.1016/j.crad.2020.03.035.
[20]
周立霞,寇晨光,卜静英,等.胎儿颅内出血的MRI诊断[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2018,26(4):252-257.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-5185.2018.04.003.Zhou LX,Kou CG,Bu JY,et al.MRI diagnosis of fetal intracranial hemorrhage[J].Chin J Med Imaging,2018,26(4):252-257.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-5185.2018.04.003.
[21]
郭燕.新生儿生发基质-脑室内出血的超声评估及其危险因素分析[D].贵阳:贵州医科大学,2021.DOI:10.27045/d.cnki.ggyyc.2021.000148.Guo Y.Ultrasonic evaluation and risk factors analysis of neonatal germinal matrix-intraventricular hemorrhage[D].Guiyang:Guizhou Medical University,2021.DOI:10.27045/d.cnki.ggyyc.2021.000148.
[22]
Brady D,Schlatterer SD,Whitehead MT.Fetal brain MRI:neurometrics,typical diagnoses,and resolving common dilemmas[J].Br J Radiol,2023,96(1147):20211019.DOI:10.1259/bjr.20211019.
[1] 孙舒涵, 陈雅静, 宗晴晴, 栗翠英, 缪殊妹, 杨斌, 俞飞虹. 基于超声的深度学习列线图预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗后腋窝淋巴结状态的研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2025, 22(02): 97-105.
[2] 王丹, 黄慧, 谢磊, 孙盼盼, 赵蕾, 陈佩文, 陈欣林. 基于中国胎儿超声筛查大数据的4345 例胎儿室间隔缺损分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2025, 22(02): 114-119.
[3] 沈婷婷, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 田园诗, 张铭旋. 胎儿心脏定量分析技术评估单纯性完全型大动脉转位胎儿心脏形态及功能的初步研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2025, 22(02): 120-130.
[4] 王昕玥, 袁亚, 束华, 曹琨芃, 叶新华, 李璐. 基于LightGBM 算法构建超声引导下凝血酶治疗假性动脉瘤剂量预测模型[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2025, 22(02): 153-161.
[5] 石珍, 杨小红, 赵胜, 伍玉晗, 王玉波, 陈诺. 先天性囊性神经母细胞瘤的产前及产后超声表现[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2025, 22(01): 25-30.
[6] 赵捷, 朱丽静, 郝磊, 陈泽政, 王博娟, 徐景竹, 张凯, 土继政, 王兴华. 双模态超声影像组学列线图鉴别周围型肺局灶性病变良恶性的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2025, 22(01): 62-69.
[7] 邸立君, 刘洋, 孙媛, 李晖. 脑源性无细胞DNA 对肺癌并发脑转移放射性脑损伤的预测意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(01): 80-85.
[8] 李彦腾, 张剑宁. 轻型颅脑战创伤的诊治[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2025, 11(01): 1-4.
[9] 张瑜廉, 党韩寒, 张传鹏, 何昆, 陈鹏宇, 张昀昇, 王在, 张黎, 于炎冰. 创伤性脑损伤急性期细胞焦亡关键分子的竞争性内源性RNA调控网络构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2025, 11(01): 5-16.
[10] 吕一帆, 张斌, 茆翔, 刘佰运, 高国一, 牛非. 定量蛋白质组学分析皮质酮对急性创伤性脑损伤的神经保护作用[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2025, 11(01): 17-25.
[11] 吴东阳, 赵玉龙, 文安国, 李俊之, 纪鑫, 赵明光. 重型颅脑损伤患者术后血钠水平变化规律对继发性脑积水的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2025, 11(01): 32-39.
[12] 赵文兵, 朱细燕, 许民辉, 徐伦山, 赵辉. 高原环境下创伤性脑损伤院前救治的策略与实践[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2025, 11(01): 57-61.
[13] 薛伟, 祝华, 贾涛. 经腹超声黏膜下层指数结合hs-CRP、IL-6、IL-8对溃疡性结肠炎患者早期治疗效果的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(01): 55-59.
[14] 汪小琳, 廖娟, 冯声蓉, 王毅, 金碧, 黄银平. 经腹超声黏膜下层指数结合血液炎症检查对中重度溃疡性结肠炎患者治疗效果的评价[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(01): 60-64.
[15] 刘兴庆, 孟祥洋, 李森, 王海燕, 谢友红, 杨策. 胆碱能α7 烟碱型乙酰胆碱受体通路对高原冲击性脑损伤后肺脏功能的影响研究进展[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2025, 13(01): 65-70.
阅读次数
全文


摘要