切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (02) : 148 -156. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2024.02.004

妊娠合并症专辑

产科快速反应团队成功救治心脏骤停孕产妇1例并文献复习
王晓亚1, 王燕芸1, 顾永忠1,()   
  1. 1. 山东第一医科大学附属省立医院·山东大学附属省立医院产科,济南 250021
  • 收稿日期:2023-04-04 修回日期:2023-11-06 出版日期:2024-04-01
  • 通信作者: 顾永忠

Successful resuscitation of a pregnant woman with cardiac arrest by an obstetric rapid response team: a case report and literature review

Xiaoya Wang1, Yanyun Wang1, Yongzhong Gu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University·Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan 250021, Shandong Province, China
  • Received:2023-04-04 Revised:2023-11-06 Published:2024-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Yongzhong Gu
  • Supported by:
    National Key Research and Development Program(2018YFC1004303); Clinical Medicine Science and Technology Innovation Plan of Jinan Science and Technology Bureau(202328072); Medical Technology Innovation Incentive Project of Shandong Provincial Hospital(CXJL: ZQN-202209)
引用本文:

王晓亚, 王燕芸, 顾永忠. 产科快速反应团队成功救治心脏骤停孕产妇1例并文献复习[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(02): 148-156.

Xiaoya Wang, Yanyun Wang, Yongzhong Gu. Successful resuscitation of a pregnant woman with cardiac arrest by an obstetric rapid response team: a case report and literature review[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2024, 20(02): 148-156.

目的

探讨对心脏骤停(CA)孕产妇采取本院产科快速反应团队(RRT)进行救治的效果。

方法

选择2020年7月24日山东第一医科大学附属省立医院收治的1例30孕周时发生阵发性下腹痛,入院后发生CA孕产妇(孕产妇1)为研究对象。采取回顾性分析方法对孕产妇1临床病史、入院相关检查结果、诊治经过等临床资料进行分析。分别以"孕产妇""心脏骤停""pregnant woman""pregnancy""heart arrest""cardiac arrest"为中英文关键词,在中国知网、维普、万方数据知识服务平台及PubMed数据库中,检索CA孕产妇救治相关研究文献。其文献检索时间设定为各数据库建库至2022年12月。总结孕产妇1及文献涉及CA孕产妇相关研究的CA发生时间、原因及孕产妇预后等。本研究遵循的程序符合山东第一医科大学附属省立医院伦理委员会制定的伦理学标准,并得到该伦理委员会批准(审批文号为CXJL:ZQN-202209)。

结果

①孕产妇1病史、入院相关检查结果、诊治经过:26岁,自然妊娠,本次入院检查结果提示,羊水偏多(羊水指数为27.4 cm)。2020年7月27日,对其实施超声引导下羊水减量术。7月29日14:45,发生胎膜早破,入产房待产;16:18,突发胸闷、憋气,紧急进行凝血功能、心肌酶学指标与N末端脑钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)水平检查结果显示,D-二聚体水平>5.93 mg/L,纤维蛋白原水平为8.46 g/L,超敏肌钙蛋白T(hs-TnT)水平为242.2 pg/mL,肌酸激酶同工酶(CKI)水平为16.83 ng/mL,肌红蛋白(Mb)水平为800.7 ng/mL,NT-proBNP水平为23 643 pg/mL,均较正常值异常增高;16:20,实施本院产科RRT救治方案;16:30,RRT初步诊断孕产妇1为急性心肌损伤、心功能衰竭、急性肺栓塞,羊水栓塞不能排除,建议做好全身麻醉下剖宫产术分娩准备;16:52,孕产妇1被转入手术室,突发CA,产科RRT立即启动猝死孕产妇急诊剖宫产术分娩预案,对其进行心肺复苏(CPR) 4 min后成功,立即于全身麻醉下进行紧急子宫下段剖宫产术分娩+双侧子宫动脉上行支结扎术,手术顺利,术后转入重症医学科。娩出1例女活婴的出生体重为1 900 g,生后1-5-10 min Apgar评分为1-3-4分,转入本院新生儿科治疗。7月31日,孕产妇1心脏超声结果提示,围产期心肌病(PPCM),左心室射血分数(LVEF)为46%(较正常值降低),左心室内径(LV)为52.3 mm(较正常值增高)。对其采取维持生命体征平稳及水、电解质平衡,控制静脉液体输入量及速率,密切监测心功能相关指标、体温及炎性指标变化,并注意脏器保护及营养支持等治疗方案。8月7日,孕产妇1顺利出院,其分娩新生儿于生后第14天(8月12日)自动出院后,失访。②文献复习结果:根据本研究设定的文献检索策略,检索到CA孕产妇救治相关研究的国内外相关文献共计52篇,纳入158例CA孕产妇,加上孕产妇1,共计159例CA孕产妇。这159例孕产妇中,CA发生于产前、产时、产后者分别为57例(35.8%)、42例(26.5%)与60例(37.7%);对其产科CA均进行初级CPR,120例(75.5%)成功,39例(24.5%)失败;孕产妇CA原因主要为失血性休克(34例)、羊水栓塞(25例)、心脏疾病(19例)、感染性休克(13例)、重度子痫前期/子痫(12例)、麻醉相关并发症(8例)及其他(26例);报道预后情况的124例孕产妇中,CA所致孕产妇死亡率为37.1%(46/124);报道新生儿预后情况的112例新生儿中,新生儿死亡率为49.1%(55/112)。

结论

本研究中,通过早期预警、一键呼叫及产科RRT快速反应,成功挽救了CA孕产妇生命。孕产妇CA的救治依赖于产科RRT成员准确判断、快速反应及协同合作。

Objective

To investigate the effect of obstetrics rapid response team (RRT) in treating pregnant women with cardiac arrest (CA).

Methods

A pregnant woman with paroxysmal lower abdominal pain (pregnant woman 1) at 30 gestational weeks admitted to the Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University on July 24, 2020 was selected as study subject. The clinical data of pregnant woman 1 such as clinical history, admission-related examination results, and diagnosis and treatment processes was retrospectively analyzed. Medical literature related to pregnant women with CA was reviewed with keywords " pregnant women", " pregnancy" " heart arrest" and " cardiac arrest" both in Chinese and English as keywords in CNKI, VIP, Wanfang Data service platform and PubMed database. The literature search time was set from the establishment of each database to December 2022. Pregnant woman 1 and the occurrence time, causes and prognosis of CA in pregnant women and related studies were summarized. The procedures followed in this study were in line with the ethical standards set by the Ethics Committee of Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University and were approved by the Ethics Committee (Approval No. CXJL: ZQN-202209).

Results

①Medical history, admission-related examination results, diagnosis and treatment of pregnant woman 1: 26 years old, spontaneous pregnancy, polyhydramnios (amniotic fluid index of 27.4 cm) at admission. On July 27, 2020, she was performed with amniotic fluid reduction under ultrasound guidance. At 14: 45 on July 29, she had premature rupture of membranes and was admitted to the delivery room for delivery. At 16: 18, chest tightness and suffocation suddenly appeared, urgent examination of coagulation function, myocardial enzyme index and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level showed: D-dimer level was > 5.93 mg/L, fibrinogen level was 8.46 g/L, hypersensitive troponin T (hs-TnT) level was 242.2 pg/mL, creatine kinase isoenzyme (CKI) level was 16.83 ng/mL, myoglobin level (Mb) was 800.7 ng/mL, NT-proBNP level was 23 643 pg/mL, all of which were significantly higher than normal value. At 16: 20, the RRT treatment plan of obstetrics department in our hospital was implemented. At 16: 30, preliminary diagnosis of RRT was that pregnant woman 1 was acute myocardial injury and heart failure, the possibility of acute pulmonary embolism and amniotic fluid embolism, RRT recommended preparation for cesarean section delivery under general anesthesia. At 16: 52, pregnant woman 1 was transferred to the operating room, CA occurred, obstetric RRT immediately initiated emergency cesarean section delivery plan for sudden death pregnant women, successful cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was achieved for 4 minutes, then emergency lower uterine cesarean delivery and bilateral ascending branch ligation of uterine artery were performed immediately under general anesthesia. The operation was successful, and pregnant woman 1 was transferred to intensive care department after operation. A female live neonate was delivered with a birth weight of 1 900 g and a 1-5-10 min Apgar score of 1-3-4. The neonate was transferred to the neonatology department of our hospital for treatment. On July 31, the results of cardiac ultrasound in pregnant women 1 suggest peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 46% (lower than normal value), and left ventricular diameter (LV) of 52.3 mm (higher than normal value). Pregnant woman 1 was treated by measures to maintain stable vital signs and balance electrolytes, control the volume and rate of intravenous fluid infusion, closely monitor cardiac function-related indicators, temperature, and inflammatory marker changes, and pay attention to organ protection and nutritional support. On August 7th, she was discharged and her newborn was automatically discharged 14 days after birth (August 12), with the loss to follow-up. ② Literature review results: according to the literature search strategy set in this study, 52 pieces of domestic and foreign literature related to CA pregnant women treatment were retrieved, involving 158 cases of CA pregnant women. Including pregnant woman 1, a total of 159 cases of CA pregnant women were reviewed. Among them, CA occurred in 57 cases (35.8%) before delivery, 42 cases (26.5%) during delivery, and 60 cases (37.7%) after delivery. Primary CPR was performed successfully in 120 cases (75.5%) and failed in 39 cases (24.5%). The main causes of CA in pregnant women were hemorrhagic shock (34 cases), amniotic fluid embolism (25 cases), heart disease (19 cases), septic shock (13 cases), severe preeclampsia/eclampsia (12 cases), anesthesia-related complications (8 cases) and others (26 cases). Among the 124 pregnant women with reported prognosis, the maternal mortality rate due to CA was 37.1% (46/124) and among 112 neonates with reported prognosis, the neonatal mortality rate was 49.1% (55/112).

Conclusions

In this study, the CA pregnant woman is successfully rescued through early warning, one-click call and rapid response of obstetric RRT. The treatment of maternal CA depends on accurate judgment, rapid response, and the cooperation of obstetrics RRT.

图1 产科RRT组织架构图注:RRT为快速反应团队
表1 MEWS(≥6分)作为产科RRT启动信号的MEWS评分细则
图1 对孕产妇1(孕龄为30孕周)启动产科RRT救治的流程图注:RRT为快速反应团队。MEWS为改良早期预警评分,PMCD为濒死期剖宫产,CPR为心肺复苏
表2 本研究159例CA孕产妇相关临床资料分析结果[例数(%)]
[4]
Kikuchi J, Deering S. Cardiac arrest in pregnancy[J]. Semin Perinatol, 2018, 42(1): 33-38. DOI: 10.1053/j.semperi.2017.11.007.
[5]
Lessan-Pezeshki M, Ghazizadeh S, Khatami MR, et al. Fertility and contraceptive issues after kidney transplantation in women[J]. Transplant Proc, 2004, 36(5): 1405-1406. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.04.090.
[6]
Olasveengen TM, Mancini ME, Perkins GD, et al. Adult basic life support: 2020 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations[J]. Circulation, 2020, 142(16_suppl_1): S41-S91. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000892.
[7]
Subbe CP, Kruger M, Rutherford P, et al. Validation of a modified early warning score in medical admissions[J]. QJM, 2001, 94(10): 521-526. DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/94.10.521.
[8]
Lipman S, Cohen S, Einav S, et al. The Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology consensus statement on the management of cardiac arrest in pregnancy[J]. Anesth Analg, 2014, 118(5): 1003-1016. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000171.
[9]
Garland J, Little D. Maternal death and its investigation[J]. Acad Forensic Pathol, 2018, 8(4): 894-911. DOI: 10.1177/1925362118821485.
[10]
Mazza GR, Youssefzadeh AC, Klar M, et al. Association of pregnancy characteristics and maternal mortality with amniotic fluid embolism[J]. JAMA Netw Open, 2022, 5(11): e2242842. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.42842.
[11]
中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组. 妊娠合并心脏病的诊治专家共识(2016)[J]. 中华妇产科杂志2016, 51(6): 401-409. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2016.06.001.
[12]
Lima FV, Yang J, Xu J, et al. National trends and in-hospital outcomes in pregnant women with heart disease in the United States[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2017, 119(10): 1694-700. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.02.003.
[13]
Sanusi M, Momin ES, Mannan V, et al. Using echocardiography and biomarkers to determine prognosis in peripartum cardiomyopathy: a systematic review[J]. Cureus, 2022, 14(6): e26130. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.26130.
[14]
Pearson GD, Veille JC, Rahimtoola S, et al. Peripartum cardiomyopathy: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and Office of Rare Diseases (National Institutes of Health) workshop recommendations and review[J]. JAMA, 2000, 283(9): 1183-1188. DOI: 10.1001/jama.283.9.1183.
[15]
Jeejeebhoy FM, Zelop CM, Lipman S, et al. Cardiac arrest in pregnancy: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association[J]. Circulation, 2015, 132(18): 1747-1773. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000300.
[16]
Thomas M, Hejjaji V, Tang Y, et al. Survival outcomes and resuscitation process measures in maternal in-hospital cardiac arrest[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2022, 226(3): 401.e1-401.e10. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.09.046.
[17]
李晓燕,都玉娜,陈民,等. 改良早期预警评分临床应用的SWOT分析[J]. 中华危重病急救医学2019, 31(4): 509-512. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2019.04.029.
[18]
O′Horo JC, Sevilla Berrios RA, Elmer JL, et al. The role of the primary care team in the rapid response system[J]. J Crit Care, 2015, 30(2): 353-357. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.10.022.
[19]
Miles I, Anderson M, Ren D, et al. Use of the modified early warning score by medical-surgical nurses to initiate the rapid response team: impact on patient outcomes[J]. J Nurs Care Qual, 2023, 38(2): 171-176. DOI: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000680.
[1]
Ford ND, DeSisto CL, Galang RR, et al. Cardiac arrest during delivery hospitalization: a cohort study[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2023, 176(4): 472-479. DOI: 10.7326/M22-2750.
[2]
Beckett VA, Knight M, Sharpe P. The CAPS Study: incidence, management and outcomes of cardiac arrest in pregnancy in the UK: a prospective, descriptive study[J]. BJOG, 2017, 124(9): 1374-1381. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14521.
[3]
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Pregnancy mortalitysurveillance system [EB/OL]. (2015-04-17) [2022-12-05].

URL    
[20]
Davis DP, Aguilar SA, Graham PG, et al. A novel configuration of a traditional rapid response team decreases non-intensive care unit arrests and overall hospital mortality[J]. J Hosp Med, 2015, 10(6): 352-357. DOI: 10.1002/jhm.2338.
[21]
陈甜甜,王晓东,余海燕. 双胎妊娠合并Gitelman综合征孕妇的妊娠结局及文献复习[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(5): 559-568. DOI:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2023.05.009.
[22]
Taras J, Raghavan G, Downey K, et al. Obstetric emergencies requiring rapid response team activation: a retrospective cohort study in a high-risk tertiary care centre[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2022, 44(2): 167.e5-174.e5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2021.09.016.
[23]
Ludikhuize J, Brunsveld-Reinders AH, Dijkgraaf MG, et al. Outcomes associated with the nationwide introduction of rapid response systems in the Netherlands[J]. Crit Care Med, 2015, 43(12): 2544-2551. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001272.
[24]
Lipman SS, Wong JY, Arafeh J, et al. Transport decreases the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during simulated maternal cardiac arrest[J]. Anesth Analg, 2013, 116(1): 162-167. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31826dd889.
[25]
Schimmelpfennig K, Stanfill TJ. Advanced cardiovascular life support for the obstetric population: bridging the gap[J]. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs, 2012, 26(2): 136-146. DOI: 10.1097/JPN.0b013e318252363e.
[26]
Katz V, Balderston K, Defreest M. Perimortem cesarean delivery: were our assumptions correct?[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2005, 192(6): 1916-1920. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.02.038.
[27]
Jung H, Ko RE, Ko MG, et al. Trends of in-hospital cardiac arrests in a single tertiary hospital with a mature rapid response system[J]. PLoS One, 2022, 17(1): e0262541. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262541.
[1] 危玲, 李会, 陈奕. 孕产妇产超广谱β-内酰胺酶的肠杆菌定植/感染与母婴传播研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 517-521.
[2] 吴晶晶, 胡倩, 李华凤. 围产期焦虑/抑郁与分娩疼痛相关性的研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(02): 156-161.
[3] 魏佳文, 徐爱群. 肥胖症对孕产妇分娩镇痛及麻醉的影响[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(03): 249-254.
[4] 周燕, 金靓, 王志群, 卢先艳, 戴毅敏. 对促宫颈成熟与引产孕产妇的全程分娩管理模式[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(03): 350-356.
[5] 吴晓兰, 刘辉. 妊娠期生殖道感染所致产科脓毒症合并羊水栓塞分析并文献复习[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(06): 685-691.
[6] 李冰, 徐婷婷, 朱丽丽, 李宁, 徐爱群, 张俊, 李淑红. 组织因子途径抑制物与妊娠相关疾病的研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(06): 650-656.
[7] 廖祥鹏, 安锐. 《2020新生儿复苏指南》和《新生儿复苏项目(8版)》的最新建议解读[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(05): 527-535.
[8] 鞠捷, 李济宇, 顾建娟, 刘立卓, 吕芳. 血清乳酸脱氢酶检测对子痫前期诊断价值的Meta分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(05): 612-620.
[9] 李振华, 解宝江, 易为, 李丽, 卫雅娴, 周明书, 伊诺. 82例孕产妇对新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情防控认知的心理干预及常态化疫情防控应对要点[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 173-179.
[10] 顾世杰, 马麟, 陈秋源, 崔瑞文, 赖柏聪, 石小红, 孟凡航, 易述红, 曹荣华. 徒手-机器联合复苏在脑死亡供者心脏骤停后器官维护中的作用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2022, 11(03): 283-287.
[11] 肖海燕, 段业英, 吴玥琳, 伍丽婵, 唐灏珂. 神经学音乐治疗心搏骤停后缺血缺氧性脑病产妇一例[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 217-224.
[12] 吴玥琳, 欧泳琳, 肖海燕, 段业英, 陆翠薇, 李德阳, 王懿春, 唐灏珂. 危重症孕产妇的心理状况及其影响因素的调查[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 198-204.
[13] 杨晓光, 王玉妹, 王晓岩, 高婉丽, 王岩, 何璇, 刘海洋, 周建新. 5G+物联网冬奥会医疗保障指挥调度平台在危重孕产妇抢救中的应用展望[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2022, 08(03): 253-256.
[14] 段红霞, 刘欣, 栗方芝, 张云起, 李瑞基, 庄金强. 羊水栓塞的诊断及治疗策略研究进展[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 133-135.
[15] 阿孜古丽·阿力木江, 买买提·依斯热依力, 王婧, 阿巴伯克力·乌斯曼, 陆萍, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 产后不同程度的抑郁症状与胃食管反流病的相关性[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2022, 09(02): 90-94.
阅读次数
全文


摘要