切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (01) : 25 -31. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2024.01.004

先天性膈疝专辑

不同术式治疗婴儿食管裂孔疝的疗效分析
马永钰1, 杨仕武1, 王舒钰1, 陈君如1, 曹辛1, 洪伟1, 罗忠明1, 温瑷菡2, 高云鹏1, 陈健1, 吴骏1,()   
  1. 1. 昆明市儿童医院心胸外科,昆明 650103
    2. 昆明医科大学公共卫生学院,昆明 650500
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-11 修回日期:2024-01-10 出版日期:2024-02-01
  • 通信作者: 吴骏

Efficacy analysis of two surgical methods for treating infantile esophageal hiatal hernia

Yongyu Ma1, Shiwu Yang1, Shuyu Wang1, Junru Chen1, Xin Cao1, Wei Hong1, Zhongming Luo1, Aihan Wen2, Yunpeng Gao1, Jian Chen1, Jun Wu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Kunming Children′s Hospital, Kunming 650103, Yunnan Province, China
    2. College of Public Health, Kunming Medical University, Kunming 650500, Yunnan Province, China
  • Received:2023-10-11 Revised:2024-01-10 Published:2024-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Jun Wu
  • Supported by:
    Project of Science and Technology by Science and Technology Bureau of Kunming, Yunnan Province(YSZJGZZ-2022037)
引用本文:

马永钰, 杨仕武, 王舒钰, 陈君如, 曹辛, 洪伟, 罗忠明, 温瑷菡, 高云鹏, 陈健, 吴骏. 不同术式治疗婴儿食管裂孔疝的疗效分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(01): 25-31.

Yongyu Ma, Shiwu Yang, Shuyu Wang, Junru Chen, Xin Cao, Wei Hong, Zhongming Luo, Aihan Wen, Yunpeng Gao, Jian Chen, Jun Wu. Efficacy analysis of two surgical methods for treating infantile esophageal hiatal hernia[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2024, 20(01): 25-31.

目的

探讨腹腔镜下手术与开腹手术治疗婴儿食管裂孔疝(EHH)患儿的临床疗效。

方法

选择2017年1月至2023年9月于昆明市儿童医院采取手术治疗的46例EHH婴儿为研究对象。按照手术方法,将其分为开腹组(n=22,采取开腹EHH修补术+Nissen胃底折叠术)与腔镜组(n=24,采取腹腔镜下EHH修补术+Nissen胃底折叠术)。采用回顾性分析方法,收集2组患儿手术治疗情况及术后并发症发生率、EHH复发率等,并采用Mann-Whitney U检验与连续性校正χ2检验,或Fisher确切概率法进行统计学分析。本研究遵循的程序符合2013年修订的《世界医学协会赫尔辛基宣言》相关要求。患儿监护人对诊疗均知情同意,并签署临床研究知情同意书。

结果

对46例患儿均成功完成手术,无一例患儿死亡。腔镜组患儿手术中位时间为192.0 min(112.5 min,243.8 min),显著长于开腹组的97.5 min(81.0 min,120.0 min),术后开始经口进食中位时间为2.0 d(2.0 d,4.0 d),较开腹组的4.0 d(3.0 d,4.0 d)短,并且差异均有统计学意义(Z=-3.59,P<0.001;Z=-2.39,P=0.017)。2组患儿术中出血量及术后住院时间比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。腔镜组术后,5例(20.8%)患儿发生EHH复发,术后并发症包括腹胀为1例(4.2%),呕吐为4例(16.7%),胃食管反流(GER)为3例(12.5%),消化道出血为2例(8.3%);再次手术修复EHH为1例(4.2%)。开腹组患儿术后腹胀、GER发生率均为4.5%(1/22)。2组患儿术后复发率与腹胀、呕吐、GER、消化道出血等并发症发生率和再手术率分别比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。对42例患儿随访的平均时间为27.6个月(1~83个月)。随访过程中,开腹组1例患儿长期存在反酸、胸痛等GER症状;腔镜组术后5例EHH复发,其中4例通过保守治疗好转,1例因保守治疗效果不佳,经再次腹腔镜下EHH修补术后治愈。

结论

腹腔镜下EHH修补术+Nissen胃底折叠术,以及开腹EHH修补术+Nissen胃底折叠术,均可有效治疗婴儿EHH。与开腹EHH修补术+Nissen胃底折叠术相比,腹腔镜下EHH修补术+Nissen胃底折叠术对患儿具有术后开始经口进食时间早、切口小、美观等优点。

Objective

To analyze the clinical efficacy between laparoscopic surgery and open surgery for treating infantrle esophageal hiatal hernia (EHH).

Methods

A total of 46 infants with EHH who underwent surgical treatment at Kunming Children′s Hospital from January 2017 to September 2023 were selected as research subjects. Patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical method: the open surgery group (n=22, received open surgery for EHH repair and Nissen fundoplication) and the laparoscopic group (n=24, received laparoscopic surgery for EHH repair and Nissen fundoplication). The surgical treatment, incidence of postoperative complications and EHH recurrence of two groups were collected by retrospective analysis method, and were compared Mann-Whitney U test, continuity-corrected chi-square test, or Fisher′s exact test. This study was in line with World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki revised in 2013. Guardians of the patients were informed and consented to the diagnosis and treatment, and they signed informed consent forms for clinical research.

Results

All 46 cases underwent successful surgery without any fatalities. The laparoscopic group had a longer surgical duration compared to the open surgery group [192.0 min (112.5 min, 243.8 min) vs 97.5 min (81.0 min, 120.0 min), Z=-3.59, P<0.001]. Time to oral intake post-operation was shorter in the laparoscopic group compared to the open surgery group [2.0 d (2.0 d, 4.0 d) vs 4.0 d (3.0 d, 4.0 d), Z=-2.39, P=0.017]. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of intraoperative blood loss or length of hospital stay (P>0.05). Postoperative complications in the laparoscopic group included recurrence in 5 cases (20.8%), abdominal distension in 1 case (4.2%), vomiting in 4 cases (16.7%), gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in 3 cases (12.5%), gastrointestinal bleeding in 2 cases (8.3%), and 1 case (4.2%) requiring reoperation. In the open surgery group, postoperative complications included abdominal distension in 1 case (4.5%) and GER in 1 case (4.5%). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding recurrence, incidences of abdominal distension, vomiting, GER, gastrointestinal bleeding, or rate of need for reoperation (P>0.05). Out of 42 followed-up cases with an average follow-up duration of 27.6 months post-operation (ranging from 1 to 83 months), vomiting symptoms disappeared, and normal growth and development were observed. One case in the open surgery group experienced long-term symptoms of GER such as acid regurgitation and chest pain. In the laparoscopic group, 5 cases experienced recurrence post-operation, with 4 cases showing improvement through conservative treatment and 1 case achieving cure after laparoscopic re-repair due to ineffective conservative treatment.

Conclusions

Both laparoscopic surgery for EHH repair and Nissen fundoplication, and open surgery for EHH repair and Nissen fundoplication can effectively treat infantile EHH. Compared to open surgery, laparoscopic repair of EHH and Nissen fundoplication demonstrates advantages such as an earlier start of oral intake post-operation, smaller incisions, and improved aesthetic outcomes.

图1 1例EHH患儿(男性,生后6个月+10 d龄)上消化道X射线摄片(箭头所示为右侧膈肌处可见透亮影)  图2 1例EHH惠儿(女性,生后3个月+15 d龄)上消化道X射线摄片(箭头所示为右侧膈肌处可见片状混杂密度影,内侧可见透亮气体密度灶)注:EHH为食管裂孔疝
表1 2组EHH患儿一般临床资料比较
表2 2组EHH患儿围手术期观察指标比较[M(Q1Q3)]
表3 2组EHH患儿术后复发率、并发症发生率及再手术率比较[例数(%)]
[1]
Chen S, Zhou TC, Ma N. Pathophysiology of hiatal hernia[J]. Chin J Gastroesophageal Reflux Dis, 2019, 6(2): 49-54. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8765.2019.02.001.
[2]
Baiu I, Lau J. What is a paraesophageal hernia?[J]. JAMA, 2019, 322(21): 2146. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.17395.
[3]
Zhang HJ, Hu HQ. Progress of dianosis and teatment of hiatal hernia of esophagus [J/OL]. Chin J Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (Electronic Edition), 2020, 7(1): 33-38. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-7157.2020.01.009.
[4]
Qi HJ, Yu S, Wang L. The observation of medium and long term effect of single center laparoscopic treatment of children hiatal hernia [J]. J Clin Surg, 2021, 29(7): 676-678. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2021.07.024.
[5]
中华医学会小儿外科学分会微创外科学组,中华医学会小儿外科学分会胸心外科学组. 儿童腹腔镜食管裂孔疝手术操作专家共识[J]. 中华小儿外科杂志2021, 42(1): 1-6. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn421158-20200601-00386.
[6]
Sfara A, Dumitrascu DL. The management of hiatal hernia: an update on diagnosis and treatment[J]. Med Pharm Rep, 2019, 92(4): 321-325. DOI: 10.15386/mpr-1323.
[7]
Dallemagne B, Weerts JM, Jehaes C, et al. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: preliminary report[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc, 1991, 1(3): 138-143.
[8]
Lobe TE, Schropp KP, Lunsford K. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication in childhood[J]. J Pediatr Surg, 1993, 28(3): 358-360, discussion 360-361. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3468(93)90231-9.
[9]
Cheng C, Wu Y, Pan W, et al. Follow-up report of laparoscopic fundoplication in different types of esophageal hiatal hernia in children[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2019, 29(10): 1320-1324. DOI: 10.1089/lap.2019.0071.
[10]
Xu G, Zhou CG, Wang HY, et al. A comparative study of laparoscopy versus open surgery for congenital hiatal hernia in infants aged under 3 months[J]. J Clin Pediatr Surg, 2019, 18(1): 39-44. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6353.2019.01.009.
[11]
Chinese Surgical Society, Chinese Society of Anesthesiology. Chinical practice guidelines for enhanced recovery after surgery in China (2021)[J]. Chin J Pract Surg, 2021, 41(9): 961-992. DOI: 10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2021.09.01.
[12]
Chen H, Xia JF, Mao JL, et al. Analysis of causes and countermeasures for postoperative recurrence of hiatal hernia[J]. Chin J Gen Surg, 2022, 37(2): 139-141. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn113855-20210929-00577.
[13]
Kohn GP, Price RR, DeMeester SR, et al. Guidelines for the management of hiatal hernia[J]. Surg Endosc, 2013, 27(12): 4409-4428. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-3173-3.
[14]
Lima DL, de Figueiredo SMP, Pereira X, et al. Hiatal hernia repair with biosynthetic mesh reinforcement: a qualitative systematic review[J]. Surg Endosc, 2023, 37(10): 7425-7436. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10379-1.
[15]
Gao Y, Tan Z, Yu JG, et al. Clinical analysis of da Vinci robotic surgical system repair of paraesophageal hiatus hernia in children[J]. J Clin Pediatr Surg, 2023, 22(7): 666-670. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn101785-202106074-012.
[1] 赵淑樱, 张聃. 腹腔镜胃癌外科治疗进展与发展趋势[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 459-462.
[2] 施烨鑫, 马翔, 鲁明, 夏青城, 王鹏超, 宋青雨, 赵庆洪. 腹腔镜下结直肠肿瘤定位研究进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 463-466.
[3] 刘连新, 孟凡征. 不断提高腹腔镜解剖性肝切除的规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 355-358.
[4] 戴朝六, 赵阳. 腹腔镜解剖性肝切除应该重视的几个问题[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 359-362.
[5] 陆朝阳, 金也, 孙备. 腹腔镜解剖性肝切除的发展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 363-366.
[6] 刘炯, 彭乐, 马伟, 江斌. 鞘外解剖肝蒂技术治疗肝内胆管细胞癌的疗效评估[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 373-376.
[7] 李晓鸥, 杨鹤鸣, 王国栋, 林海冠, 杨建武. 不同入路腹腔镜左半结肠癌根治术治疗效果对比[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 377-380.
[8] 张翼翔, 马明, 田金龙, 杨珊珊, 尚程程, 张景欣. 腹腔镜肝叶切除联合胆道镜取石治疗肝内胆管结石的临床观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 381-384.
[9] 陈燕. LCBDE和ERCP+EST治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的疗效观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 385-388.
[10] 陈文进, 张月君, 王传泰. 腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术后肠梗阻发生的影响因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 389-392.
[11] 吉顺富, 汤晓燕, 徐进. 腹腔镜近端胃癌根治术中拓展胃后间隙在肥胖患者中的应用研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 393-396.
[12] 嵇晋, 吴胜文, 姜明瑞, 汪刘华, 王伟, 任俊, 王道荣, 马从超. 三种方式关闭盆底联合改良造口在直肠癌腹会阴联合切除术的对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 406-410.
[13] 郭倩, 张晓峰, 张鹏, 苏文博. “四步法”清扫No.253淋巴结在保留LCA的直肠癌根治术中的研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 411-414.
[14] 史成宇, 季晓琳, 田莉莹, 张来香. 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术中第14c/d组淋巴结清扫在胰头癌中的临床效果研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 430-433.
[15] 孙龙凤, 侯高峰, 王幼黎, 刘磊. 腹腔镜下右半结肠癌D3根治术中SMA或SMV入路的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 438-441.
阅读次数
全文


摘要