切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (02) : 168 -177. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2023.02.008

论著

预测肝门区囊肿患儿发生囊肿型胆道闭锁风险的列线图开发与验证
朱莉玲1, 于红奎1, 贺雪华1, 张遇乐1, 王娜1, 林泽锋2,()   
  1. 1广州市妇女儿童医疗中心超声科,广州 510120
    2广州市妇女儿童医疗中心外科,广州 510120
  • 收稿日期:2022-09-05 修回日期:2023-01-12 出版日期:2023-04-01
  • 通信作者: 林泽锋

Development and validation of a nomogram to predict risk of cystic biliary atresia in children with hepatic hilar cysts

Liling Zhu1, Hongkui Yu1, Xuehua He1, Yule Zhang1, Na Wang1, Zefeng Lin2,()   

  1. 1Department of Ultrasound, Guangzhou Women and Children′s Medical Center, Guangzhou 510120, Guangdong Province, China
    2Department of Pediatric Surgery, Guangzhou Women and Children′s Medical Center, Guangzhou 510120, Guangdong Province, China
  • Received:2022-09-05 Revised:2023-01-12 Published:2023-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Zefeng Lin
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China for Youth(82101808); Guangzhou Science of Technology Plan Project(202102020196)
引用本文:

朱莉玲, 于红奎, 贺雪华, 张遇乐, 王娜, 林泽锋. 预测肝门区囊肿患儿发生囊肿型胆道闭锁风险的列线图开发与验证[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(02): 168-177.

Liling Zhu, Hongkui Yu, Xuehua He, Yule Zhang, Na Wang, Zefeng Lin. Development and validation of a nomogram to predict risk of cystic biliary atresia in children with hepatic hilar cysts[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(02): 168-177.

目的

探讨超声联合血液生化指标,构建肝门区囊肿(HHC)患儿发生囊肿型胆道闭锁(CBA)风险列线图预测模型。

方法

选择2016年1月至2022年3月于广州市妇女儿童医疗中心,进行肝门-空肠吻合术(Kasai手术)治疗的134例HHC患儿(日龄<120 d)为研究对象。采取回顾性分析法,按照患儿腹腔镜下胆道造影术或Kasai手术中切除组织的组织病理学检查结果,将其分别纳入CBA组(n=54)与胆总管囊肿(CC)组(n=80)。收集2组患儿的年龄、性别、术前超声征象及血液生化指标。采用logistic回归分析方法筛选预测HHC患儿发生CBA的独立预测因子,并使用R软件rms程序包绘制HHC患儿发生CBA风险的列线图。采用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)及曲线下面积(AUC)、校准曲线、Hosmer-Lemeshow检验及决策曲线分析(DCA)评价该列线图模型预测效能。采用bootstrap方法对该列线图模型进行内部验证。2组患儿进行HHC超声检查时日龄、性别构成比等一般临床资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。本研究遵循的程序符合2013年修订的《世界医学协会赫尔辛基宣言》要求。

结果

①2组患儿HHC最大长径、最大横径,空腹胆囊形态异常、肝门区纤维斑块、肝门淋巴结肿大、肝内胆管扩张、HHC内胆泥沉积发生率,以及血清总胆红素(TBIL)、直接胆红素(DBIL)、γ-谷氨酰氨基转移酶(GGT)浓度分别比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。②多因素非条件logistic回归分析结果显示,HHC最大长径、空腹胆囊形态异常、肝内胆管扩张、血清DBIL浓度均为HHC患儿发生CBA的独立影响因素(OR=0.871、70.251、0.007、1.089,95%CI:0.780~0.972、2.445~2 018.581、0~0.530、1.026~1.156,P=0.014、0.013、0.025、0.005),并根据这4项因素建立预测HHC患儿发生CBA风险的列线图模型。③该列线图模型预测HHC患儿发生CBA风险的AUC为0.996(95%CI:0.991~1.000,P<0.001),说明该模型对HHC患儿发生CBA和CC区分度好,其预测HHC患儿发生CBA的最佳临界值为0.512,敏感度为97.5%,特异度为96.3%。④该模型的Hosmer-Lemeshow检验的P值为0.992;绘制该模型的校准曲线图分析结果显示,其校准曲线与理想曲线非常接近,该模型预测的HHC患儿CBA发生率与实际发生率一致性高,校准度好。⑤DCA曲线显示,该模型曲线显著高于所有HHC患儿均发生CBA与均未发生CBA这2条极端曲线,表明该模型预测HHC患儿发生CBA的临床净收益大。⑥采用bootstrap方法对该模型进行内部验证结果显示,其预测HHC患儿发生CBA的AUC为0.983(95%CI:0.976~1.000,P<0.001)。

结论

本研究基于HHC最大长径、空腹胆囊形态异常、肝内胆管扩张及血清DBIL浓度4项指标,构建了预测HHC患儿发生CBA风险的列线图预测模型。该模型区分度、校准度好,具有临床适应性。由于本研究仅为单中心研究,未对该模型进行外部验证,该模型对HHC患儿发生CBA的预测效能仍然有待大样本、多中心研究进行验证。

Objective

To establish a prediction model based on ultrasonic features combined with biochemical parameters to predict the risk for cystic biliary atresia (CBA) in neonates and infants with hepatic hilar cysts (HHC).

Methods

A total of 134 children aged under 120 days with HHC who received Kasai operation in Guangzhou Women and Children′s Medical Center from January 2016 to March 2022 were selected as research subjects. According to results of intraoperative laparoscopic cholangiography and histopathological examination of Kasai operation, they were divided into the CBA group (n=54) and choledochal cyst (CC) group (n=80) by retrospective method. The age, gender, preoperative ultrasonographic features and biochemical indicators of two groups were retrospectively collected. Logistic regression analysis method was used to identify the independent predictors of CBA in children with HHC and a nomogram was developed by using R software with package " rms". The performance of the nomogram was assessed by receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) and area under curve (AUC), calibration curve, Hosmer-Lemeshow test and decision curve analysis (DCA). Bootstrap was performed for internal model validation of the nomogram. There were no statistical differences in age of ultrasonography for HHC and gender constituent ratio between two groups (P>0.05). The procedures followed in this study were in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of the World Medical Association revised in 2013.

Results

①There were significant differences in the maximum length diameter of HHC, the maximum width diameter of HHC, incidence of abnormal gallbladder morphology, portal fibrous plaque, enlargement of portal lymph node, intrahepatic bile duct dilatation, and biliary sludge in HHC, as well as serum total bilirubin (TBIL), direct bilirubin (DBIL), γ-glutamyltransferase (GGT) levels between two groups (P<0.05). ②Multivariate logistic analysis indicated that the maximum length diameter of HHC, abnormal gallbladder morphology, intrahepatic bile duct dilatation and serum DBIL level all were independent influencing factors of CBA in children with HHC (OR=0.871, 70.251, 0.007, 1.089; 95%CI: 0.780-0.972, 2.445-2 018.581, 0-0.530, 1.026-1.156; P=0.014, 0.013, 0.025, 0.005), and a nomogram was developed based on these four prognostic factors. ③The AUC of this nomogram was 0.996 (95%CI: 0.991-1.000, P<0.001) for predicting the risk of CBA in children with HHC, indicating that the prediction model had a good discrimination between CBA and CC, and the optimal cut-off value of this model for predicting the risk of CBA in children with HHC was 0.512, with a sensitivity of 97.5% and a specificity of 96.3%. ④The P-value of the Hosmer-Lemeshow test for this model was 0.992. The calibration curve of this model showed that the calibration curve was very close to the ideal curve, the predicted incidence of CBA in HHC children by this model was consistent with the actual incidence and this model had a good calibration. ⑤DCA curve showed that the model was significantly higher than the two extreme curves of CBA in all HHC children and neighter CBA in HHC children, indicating that the clinical net benefit of predicting CBA in HHC children by this model was significant. ⑥Internal validation of the model using bootstrap method showed that the AUC of predicting CBA in children with HHC was 0.983 (95%CI: 0.976-1.000, P<0.001).

Conclusions

In this study, we constructed a nomogram model to predict the risk of CBA in children with HHC based on four indexes: the maximum length diameter of HHC, abnormal gallbladder morphology, intrahepatic bile duct dilatation and serum DBIL level. The model has good discrimination and calibration, and clinical adaptability. Because this study is only a single-center study, and the model has not been validated externally, it still needs large-sample, multi-center studies to validate the predict efficiency of this model for predicting CBA in children with HHC.

图4 1例皮肤、巩膜黄染3+个月和大便白陶土样CBA患儿(女性,118 d龄)肝、胆超声胆囊纵切面图像,提示胆囊形态僵硬、充盈好、囊壁凹凸不平呈波浪样(白色箭头所示),胆总管区一无回声囊腔(蓝色箭头所示),肝实质呈肝硬化改变
表1 2组HHC患儿临床资料比较
图5 预测HHC患儿发生CBA风险的列线图模型注:HHC为肝门区囊肿,CBA为囊肿型胆道闭锁,DBIL为直接胆红素
表2 影响HHC患儿发生CBA的单因素logistic回归分析结果
表3 影响HHC患儿发生CBA相关因素的多因素非条件logistic回归分析结果
图6 预测HHC患儿发生CBA风险的列线图模型预测HHC患儿发生CBA的ROC曲线注:HHC为肝门区囊肿,CBA为囊肿型胆道闭锁,ROC曲线为受试者工作特征曲线,AUC为曲线下面积
图7 预测HHC患儿发生CBA风险的列线图模型的校准曲线图注:HHC为肝门区囊肿,CBA为囊肿型胆道闭锁
图8 预测HHC患儿发生CBA风险的列线图模型的DCA曲线注:HHC为肝门区囊肿,CBA为囊肿型胆道闭锁,DCA决策曲线分析曲线
[1]
Girard M, Panasyuk G. Genetics in biliary atresia[J]. Curr Opin Gastroenterol, 2019, 35(2): 73-81. DOI: 10:1097/MOG.0000000000000509.
[2]
Wong C, Chung P, Tam P, et al. Long-term results and quality of life assessment in biliary atresia patients: a 35-year experience in a tertiary hospital[J]. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, 2018, 66(4): 570-574. DOI: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001854.
[3]
刘更新,詹江华. 胆道闭锁诊断方法价值分析[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志2021, 27(3): 232-235. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn113884-20200416-00203.
[4]
中华医学会小儿外科学分会肝胆外科组,中国医师协会器官移植医师会分会儿童器官移植学组. 胆道闭锁诊断及治疗指南(2018版)[J]. 中华小儿外科杂志2019, 40(5): 392-398. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3006.2019.05.003.
[5]
Tang J, Zhang D, Liu W, et al. Differentiation between cystic biliary atresia and choledochal cyst: a retrospective analysis[J]. J Paediatr Child Health, 2018, 54(4): 383-389. DOI: 10.1111/jpc.13779.
[6]
黄丽,唐清,单庆文,等. 谷氨酰转肽酶小于300 U/L临床疑诊为胆道闭锁的临床分析[J]. 中华小儿外科杂志2020, 41(4): 314-318. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.421158-20190123-00055.
[7]
于蒲,潘永康,李龙,等. 囊肿型胆道闭锁与胆总管囊肿的临床对比研究[J]. 中华小儿外科杂志2018, 39(6): 440-444. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.jssn.0253-3006.2018.06.008.
[8]
Yu P, Dong N, Pan YK, et al. Ultrasonography is useful in differentiating between cystic biliary atresia and choledochalcyst[J]. Pediatr Surg Int, 2021, 37(6): 731-736. DOI: 10.1007/s00383-021-04886-2.
[9]
Shin HJ, Yoon H, Han SJ, et al. Key imaging features for differentiating cystic biliary atresia from choledochal cyst: prenatal ultrasonography andMRI[J]. Ultrasonography, 2021, 40(2): 301-311. DOI: 10.14366/usg.20061.
[10]
张雪华,陈文娟,杨芳,等. 超声在先天性囊肿型胆道闭锁及胆总管囊肿的鉴别诊断探讨[J]. 中国超声医学杂志2016, 32(7): 619-621. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0101.2016.07.013.
[11]
王晓曼,贾立群. 胆道闭锁的超声诊断[J]. 放射性实践2011, 26(2): 220-222. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0313.2011.02.027.
[12]
Weng ZJ, Zhou LY, Wu QM, et al. Enlarged hepatic hilar lymph node: an additional ultrasonographic feature that may be helpful in the diagnosis of biliary atresia[J]. Eur Radiol, 2019, 29(12): 6699-6707. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06339-w.
[13]
Hopkin PC, Yazigi N, Nylund CM. Incidence of biliary atresia and timing of hepatoportoenterostomy in the United States[J]. J Pediatr, 2017, 187: 253-257. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.05.006.
[14]
Dong R, Jiang JY, Zhang SH, et al. Development and validation of novel diagnostic models for biliary atresia in a large cohort of Chinese patients[J]. EBioMedicine, 2018, 34: 223-230. DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.07.025.
[15]
李明明,潘永康,卢朝祥. 预测胆汁淤积患儿胆道闭锁风险的列线图[J]. 中华小儿外科杂志2020, 41(7): 640-645. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn421158-20200113-00024.
[16]
Koukoura O, Kelesidou V, Delianidou M, et al. Prenatal sonographic diagnosis of biliary tract malformations[J]. J Clin Ultrasound, 2019, 47(5): 292-297. DOI: 10.1002/jcu.22705.
[17]
Kim YH, Kim MJ, Shin HJ, et al. MRI-based decision tree model for diagnosis of biliary atresia[J]. Eur Radiol, 2018, 28(8): 3422-3431. DOI: 10.1007/S00330-018-5327-0.
[18]
姜璟㼆,董瑞,张志波,等. 胆道闭锁Nomogram诊断模型多中心验证及优化[J]. 中华小儿外科杂志2020, 41(7): 628-632. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn421158-20190412-00298.
[19]
崔晏春,王晓曼,贾立群. 新生儿及小婴儿肝门区囊肿性病变的超声鉴别诊断[J]. 中国小儿急救医学2019, 26(8): 600-603. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.jssn.1673-4912.2019.08.010.
[20]
张遇乐,王娜,关步云,等. 婴儿先天性肝门部囊性占位的超声鉴别[J]. 分子影像学杂志2018, 41(2): 147-151. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4500.2018.02.03.
[21]
Chen LZ, He FJ, Zeng KH, et al. Differentiation of cystic biliary atresia and choledochal cysts using prenatal ultrasonography[J]. Ultrasonography, 2022, 41(1): 140-149. DOI: 10.14366/usg.21028.
[22]
赵阳,王建华,米荣,等. 3个月龄内胆汁淤积症与胆道闭锁患儿胆道造影术的指征分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 15(2): 205-210. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2019.02.013.
[23]
Choochuen P, Kritsaneepaiboon S, Charoonratana V, et al. Is " gallbladder length-to-width ratio" useful indiagnosing biliary atresia?[J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2019, 54(9): 1946-1952. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.01.008.
[1] 陶宏宇, 叶菁菁, 俞劲, 杨秀珍, 钱晶晶, 徐彬, 徐玮泽, 舒强. 右心声学造影在儿童右向左分流相关疾病中的评估价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 959-965.
[2] 洪玮, 叶细容, 刘枝红, 杨银凤, 吕志红. 超声影像组学联合临床病理特征预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗完全病理缓解的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 571-579.
[3] 奚玲, 仝瀚文, 缪骥, 毛永欢, 沈晓菲, 杜峻峰, 刘晔. 基于肌少症构建的造口旁疝危险因素预测模型[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 48-51.
[4] 屈勤芳, 束方莲. 盆腔器官脱垂患者盆底重建手术后压力性尿失禁发生的影响因素及列线图预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 606-612.
[5] 公宇, 廖媛, 尚梅. 肝细胞癌TACE术后复发影响因素及预测模型建立[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 818-824.
[6] 中华医学会器官移植学分会, 中华医学会外科学分会外科手术学学组, 中华医学会外科学分会移植学组, 华南劈离式肝移植联盟. 劈离式供肝儿童肝移植中国临床操作指南[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 593-601.
[7] 张瑜, 姜梦妮. 基于DWI信号值构建局部进展期胰腺癌放化疗生存获益预测模型[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 657-664.
[8] 刘军, 丘文静, 孙方昊, 李松盈, 易述红, 傅斌生, 杨扬, 罗慧. 在体与离体劈离式肝移植在儿童肝移植中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 688-693.
[9] 王贝贝, 崔振义, 王静, 王晗妍, 吕红芝, 李秀婷. 老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者术后贫血预测模型的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 355-362.
[10] 孙晗, 于冰, 武侠, 周熙朗. 基于循环肿瘤DNA 甲基化的结直肠癌筛查预测模型的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 500-506.
[11] 张琛, 秦鸣, 董娟, 陈玉龙. 超声检查对儿童肠扭转缺血性改变的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 565-568.
[12] 韦巧玲, 黄妍, 赵昌, 宋庆峰, 陈祖毅, 黄莹, 蒙嫦, 黄靖. 肝癌微波消融术后中重度疼痛风险预测列线图模型构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 715-721.
[13] 蔡晓雯, 李慧景, 丘婕, 杨翼帆, 吴素贤, 林玉彤, 何秋娜. 肝癌患者肝动脉化疗栓塞术后疼痛风险预测模型的构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 722-728.
[14] 颜世锐, 熊辉. 感染性心内膜炎合并急性肾损伤患者的危险因素探索及死亡风险预测[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 618-624.
[15] 董晟, 郎胜坤, 葛新, 孙少君, 薛明宇. 反向休克指数乘以格拉斯哥昏迷评分对老年严重创伤患者发生急性创伤性凝血功能障碍的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 541-547.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?