切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (06) : 669 -676. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2022.06.008

论著

影响Omicron变异株感染轻型和普通型COVID-19患儿核酸转阴时间缩短因素分析
秦凤1, 丁博1, 陈轶维2, 周建国3, 张婷4, 俞蕙5, 王立波6, 周文浩3, 卢燕鸣1,()   
  1. 1上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院儿科,上海 201124
    2国家儿童医学中心/上海交通大学医学院附属上海儿童医学中心心内科,上海 200127
    3国家儿童医学中心/复旦大学附属儿科医院新生儿科,上海 201102
    4上海市儿童医院/上海交通大学医学院附属儿童医院消化科,上海 200062
    5国家儿童医学中心/复旦大学附属儿科医院感染传染科,上海 201102
    6国家儿童医学中心/复旦大学附属儿科医院呼吸科,上海 201102
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-17 修回日期:2022-10-23 出版日期:2022-12-01
  • 通信作者: 卢燕鸣

Analysis of influencing factors of shortened time of viral nucleic acid negative conversion in mild and common COVID-19 children infected with Omicron variant strain

Feng Qin1, Bo Ding1, Yiwei Chen2, Jianguo Zhou3, Ting Zhang4, Hui Yu5, Libo Wang6, Wenhao Zhou3, Yanming Lu1,()   

  1. 1Department of Pediatrics, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 201124, China
    2Department of Cardiology, National Children′s Medical Center/Shanghai Children′s Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200127, China
    3Department of Neonatology, National Children′s Medical Center/Children′s Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 201102, China
    4Department of Gastroenterology, Children′s Hospital of Shanghai, Children′s Hospital Affiliated to School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200062, China
    5Department of Infectious Diseases, National Children′s Medical Center/Children′s Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 201102, China
    6Department of Respiratory, National Children′s Medical Center/Children′s Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 201102, China
  • Received:2022-08-17 Revised:2022-10-23 Published:2022-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Yanming Lu
引用本文:

秦凤, 丁博, 陈轶维, 周建国, 张婷, 俞蕙, 王立波, 周文浩, 卢燕鸣. 影响Omicron变异株感染轻型和普通型COVID-19患儿核酸转阴时间缩短因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(06): 669-676.

Feng Qin, Bo Ding, Yiwei Chen, Jianguo Zhou, Ting Zhang, Hui Yu, Libo Wang, Wenhao Zhou, Yanming Lu. Analysis of influencing factors of shortened time of viral nucleic acid negative conversion in mild and common COVID-19 children infected with Omicron variant strain[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2022, 18(06): 669-676.

目的

探讨Omicron变异株感染轻型与普通型新型冠状病毒疾病(COVID-19)患儿的临床特征及影响其核酸检测结果转为阴性(以下简称为"核酸转阴")时间缩短因素。

方法

选取2022年4月7日至5月20日上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院南院区"亲子病房"集中收治的150例Omicron变异株感染轻型和普通型COVID-19患儿为研究对象。采用回顾性分析方法,根据这150例患儿的核酸转阴中位时间为13 d,将其分别纳入快转阴组(n=84,核酸转阴时间<13 d)和慢转阴组(n=66,核酸转阴时间≥13 d)。对2组患儿年龄、性别、轻型与普通型COVID-19患儿构成比、疫苗接种率、COVID-19相关临床表现及COVID-19发病48 h内系统炎症指数(SII)、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、淋巴细胞与单核细胞比值(LMR)、血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)等,进行成组t检验、Mann-Whitney U检验或χ2检验。采用多因素非条件logistic回归分析方法,分析影响Omicron变异株感染轻型与普通型COVID-19患儿核酸转阴时间缩短的因素。2组患儿合并基础疾病占比、采取对症治疗率等一般临床资料分别比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。本研究遵循的程序符合2013修订的《世界医学协会赫尔辛基宣言》要求。

结果

①快转阴组患儿年龄、女性患儿比例、普通型COVID-19患儿比例、疫苗接种率,发热、咽痛、胃肠道症状发生率,均显著高于慢转阴组,而热峰、肌肉酸痛发生率,则均显著低于慢转阴组,2组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。②多因素非条件logistic回归分析结果显示,伴有咽痛、接种疫苗是轻型与普通型COVID-19患儿核酸转阴时间缩短的独立保护因素(OR=14.609、7.866,95%CI:1.108~192.697、1.313~47.121,P=0.042、0.024),而伴有肌肉酸痛、男性患儿则是其独立危险因素(OR=0.275、0.206,95%CI:0.087~0.874、0.083~0.511,P=0.029、0.001)。③快转阴组患儿SII为250.9×109/L(111.1×109/L,466.9×109/L),NLR为1.0(0.6,2.2),均分别显著高于慢转阴组的109.8×109/L(47.2×109/L,266.7×109/L)与0.5(0.2,1.2),并且差异均有统计学意义(Z=6.48、5.34,P=0.011、0.021)。快转阴组患儿LMR为4.1(2.5,9.4),显著低于慢转阴组的8.2(3.4,11.1),并且差异有统计学意义(Z=4.50,P=0.034)。

结论

轻型与普通型COVID-19患儿临床表现不典型,以发热、咳嗽为主,高SII、NLR及低LMR患儿核酸转阴时间较短,接种疫苗、伴有咽痛是促进核酸转阴时间缩短的保护性因素,伴有肌肉酸痛及男性是影响核酸转阴时间缩短的危险因素。

Objective

To investigate the clinical features of mild and common corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) children infected with Omicron variant, and influencing factor of shortened time of nucleic acid negative conversion.

Methods

A total of 150 mild and common COVID-19 children infected with Omicron variant in the " parent-child ward" of the southern area of Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University from April 7 to May 20, 2022 were selected as research subjects. According to the median time of nucleic acid negative conversion (13 d), these 150 children were included in fast turning negative group (n=84, time of nucleic acid negative conversion <13 d) and slow turning negative group (n=66, time of nucleic acid negative conversion ≥13 d). Independent-samples t test, Mann-Whitney U test or chi-square test were performed for comparison between two groups, such as age, gender, composition ratio of mild and common COVID-19, vaccination rate, clinical manifestations related to COVID-19, and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) within 48 h of COVID-19 onset. Analysis of influencing factors of shortened time of nucleic acid negative conversion in mild and common COVID-19 children infected with Omicron variant was conducted by multivariate unconditional logistic regression analysis. There was no statistically significant difference between two groups in the proportion of children with basic diseases and the rate of symptomatic treatment (P>0.05). The procedures followed in this study were in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of the World Medical Association revised in 2013.

Results

①The age, proportion of female children, proportion of children with common type of COVID-19, vaccination rate, incidence of fever, sore throat and gastrointestinal symptoms in fast turning negative group were significantly higher than those in slow turning negative group, while the heat peak and incidence of muscle soreness were significantly lower than those in slow turning negative group, and all the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). ②Multivariate unconditional logistic regression analysis showed that sore throat and vaccination were independent protective factors for shortened time of nucleic acid negative conversion of mild and common COVID-19 children (OR=14.609, 7.866; 95%CI: 1.108-192.697, 1.313-47.121; P=0.042, 0.024), while with muscle pain and male children were its independent risk factors (OR=0.275, 0.206; 95%CI: 0.087-0.874, 0.083-0.511; P=0.029, 0.001). ③The SII of children in fast turning negative group was 250.9×109/L (111.1×109/L, 466.9×109/L), NLR was 1.0 (0.6, 2.2), which both were significantly higher than 109.8×109/L (47.2×109/L, 266.7×109/L) and 0.5 (0.2, 1.2) respectively in slowly turning negative group, and the differences were statistically significant (Z=6.48, 5.34; P=0.011, 0.021). The LMR in fast negative group was 4.1 (2.5, 9.4), which was significantly lower than that 8.2 (3.4, 11.1) of slow negative group, and the difference was statistically significant (Z=4.50, P=0.034).

Conclusions

The symptoms of children with mild and common COVID-19 are not typical, mainly with fever and cough. Children with high SII, NLR, and low LMR have a shorter time of nucleic acid negative conversion of Omicron variant. Vaccination with vaccine, and accompanied by sore throat are protective factors to promote the nucleic acid negative conversion of Omicron variant. While muscle soreness and boys are relative risk factors affecting the time of nucleic acid negative conversion of Omicron variant.

表1 2组轻型与普通型COVID-19患儿临床表现及接种疫苗情况比较
表2 影响轻型与普通型COVID-19患儿核酸转阴时间缩短因素的多因素非条件logistic回归分析结果
表3 2组轻型与普通型COVID-19患儿SII、NLR、LMR、PLR比较[M(Q1Q3)]
[1]
World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) weekly epidemiological update and weekly operational update[EB/OL]. (2022-04-20)[2022-04-21].

URL    
[2]
World Health Organization. Classification of Omicron (B.1.1.529): SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern[EB/OL]. (2021-11-26)[2022-04-22].

URL    
[3]
Seyit M, Avci E, Nar R, et al. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte to monocyte ratio and platelet to lymphocyte ratio to predict the severity of COVID-19[J]. Am J Emerg Med, 2021, 40: 110-114. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.11.058.
[4]
殷荣,陆权,焦佳丽. 等. 儿童新型冠状病毒Omicron变异株感染病毒核酸转阴特点及其影响因素[J]. 中华儿科杂志2022, 60(12): 1307-1311. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112140-20220623-00582.
[5]
Islamoglu MS, Borku-Uysal B, Yavuzer S, et al. The diagnostic and predictive roles of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio for severity of disease in COVID-19 patients[J]. Clin Lab, 2021, 67(12). DOI: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2021.210449.
[6]
Zhu R, Chen C, Wang Q, et al. Routine blood parameters are helpful for early identification of influenza infection in children[J]. BMC Infect Dis, 2020, 20(1): 864. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-020-05584-5.
[7]
Kalabin A, Mani VRK, Valdivieso SC, et al. Role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte, lymphocyte-to-monocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios as predictors of disease severity in COVID-19 patients[J]. Infez Med, 2021, 29(1): 46-53.
[8]
国家卫生健康委员会办公厅,国家中医药管理局办公室. 新型冠状病毒肺炎诊疗方案(试行第九版)[EB/OL]. (2022-03-15)[2022-04-20].

URL    
[9]
国家卫生健康委员会办公厅. 新型冠状病毒肺炎防控方案(第五版).新型冠状病毒肺炎实验室检测技术指南[EB/OL]. (2020-02-21)[2022-04-20].

URL    
[10]
Lu X, Zhang L, Du H, et al. SARSCoV2 infection in children[J]. N Engl J Med, 2020, 382(17): 16631665. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc2005073.
[11]
吕媛,舒桂华,侯玮玮,等. 扬州地区新型冠状病毒delta变异株感染54例儿童临床特点分析[J]. 临床儿科杂志2022, 40(4): 252-257. DOI: 10.12372/jcp.2022.21e1264.
[12]
Liguoro I, Pilotto C, Bonanni M, et al. SARS-COV-2 infection in children and newborns: a systematic review[J]. Eur J Pediatr, 2020, 179(7): 1029-1046. DOI: 10.1007/s00431-020-03684-7.
[13]
Ciccullo A, Borghetti A, Zileri Dal Verme L, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and clinical outcome in COVID-19: a report from the Italian front line[J]. Int J Antimicrob Agents, 2020, 56(2): 106017. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106017.
[14]
Erdogan T. Role of systemic immune-inflammation index in asthma and NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease[J]. Clin Respir J, 2021, 15(4): 400-405. DOI: 10.1111/crj.13314.
[15]
Andrews N, Stowe J, Kirsebom F, et al. Effectiveness of COVID-19 booster vaccines against COVID-19-related symptoms, hospitalization and death in England[J]. Nat Med, 2022, 28(4): 831-837. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-022-01699-1.
[16]
Liu L, Zheng Y, Cai L, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, a critical predictor for assessment of disease severity in patients with COVID-19[J]. Int J Lab Hematol, 2021, 43(2): 329-335. DOI: 10.1111/ijlh.13374..
[17]
Shahid MF, Malik A, Siddiqi FA, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and absolute lymphocyte count as early diagnostic tools for corona virus disease 2019[J]. Cureus, 2022, 14(3): e22863. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.22863.
[18]
Bg S, Gosavi S, Ananda Rao A, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte, lymphocyte-to-monocyte, and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios: prognostic significance in COVID-19[J]. Cureus, 2021, 13(1): e12622. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.12622.
[19]
Yildiz E, Cigri E, Dincer Z, et al. High neutrophil/lymphocyte ratios in symptomatic pediatric COVID-19 patients[J]. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak, 2021, 31(7): S93-S98. DOI: 10.29271/jcpsp.2021.
[20]
Anderson R, Feldman C. Review manuscript: mechanisms of platelet activation by the pneumococcus and the role of platelets in community-acquired pneumonia[J]. J Infect, 2017, 75(6): 473-485. DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2017.09.013.
[21]
Hirahara T, Arigami T, Yanagita S, et al. Combined neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio predicts chemotherapy response and prognosis in patients with advanced gastric cancer[J]. BMC Cancer, 2019, 19(1): 672. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5903-y.
[22]
Eissa M, Shaarawy S, Abdellateif MS, et al. The role of different inflammatory indices in the diagnosis of COVID-19[J]. Int J Gen Med, 2021, 14: 7843-7853. DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S337488.
[23]
Fleming-Dutra KE, Britton A, Shang N, et al. Association of prior BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccination with symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection in children and adolescents during omicron predominance[J]. JAMA, 2022, 327(22): 2210-2219. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2022.7493.
[24]
Bar-ON YM, Goldberg Y, Mandel M, et al. Protection of BNT162b2 vaccine booster against COVID-19 in Israel[J]. N Engl J Med, 2021, 385(15): 1393-1400. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2114255.
[25]
简丽娟,姚向阳,伍定辉. 新冠肺炎患者核酸转阴时间延长的影响因素分析[J]. 海峡预防医学杂志2022, 28(3): 14-17.
[26]
龚惠莉,黄汉平,周霞,等. 新型冠状病毒核酸转阴时间相关因素及其对预后的影响[J].医药导报2020, 39(6): 811-814. DOI: 10.3870/j.issn.1004-0781.2020.06.015.
[27]
刘波,单南冰,雷习群,等. 新型冠状病毒肺炎患者核酸转阴时间的影响因素及与淋巴细胞亚群的关系[J]. 临床检验杂志2021, 39(5): 333-336. DOI: 10.13602/j.cnki.jcls.2021.05.03.
[1] 张璇, 马宇童, 苗玉倩, 张云, 吴士文, 党晓楚, 陈颖颖, 钟兆明, 王雪娟, 胡淼, 孙岩峰, 马秀珠, 吕发勤, 寇海燕. 超声对Duchenne肌营养不良儿童膈肌功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1068-1073.
[2] 张宝富, 俞劲, 叶菁菁, 俞建根, 马晓辉, 刘喜旺. 先天性原发隔异位型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图诊断[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1074-1080.
[3] 韩丹, 王婷, 肖欢, 朱丽容, 陈镜宇, 唐毅. 超声造影与增强CT对儿童肝脏良恶性病变诊断价值的对比分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 939-944.
[4] 刘婷婷, 林妍冰, 汪珊, 陈幕荣, 唐子鉴, 代东伶, 夏焙. 超声衰减参数成像评价儿童代谢相关脂肪性肝病的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 787-794.
[5] 周钰菡, 肖欢, 唐毅, 杨春江, 周娟, 朱丽容, 徐娟, 牟芳婷. 超声对儿童髋关节暂时性滑膜炎的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 795-800.
[6] 米洁, 陈晨, 李佳玲, 裴海娜, 张恒博, 李飞, 李东杰. 儿童头面部外伤特点分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 511-515.
[7] 吴少峰, 张轶男, 孙杰. 机器人辅助手术在儿童微创泌尿手术中的应用和展望[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 440-444.
[8] 朱良振, 于永刚, 陈杲, 廖松柏. 儿童高级别闭合性肾损伤肾动脉栓塞与手术探查的疗效比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 461-465,475.
[9] 王蕾, 王少华, 牛海珍, 尹腾飞. 儿童腹股沟疝围手术期风险预警干预[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 768-772.
[10] 李芳, 许瑞, 李洋洋, 石秀全. 循证医学理念在儿童腹股沟疝患者中的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 782-786.
[11] 闵筱兰, 周洁超, 陈振添. 健康管理联合心理干预用于腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术患儿术后效果观察[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 657-661.
[12] 吕垒, 冯啸, 何凯明, 曾凯宁, 杨卿, 吕海金, 易慧敏, 易述红, 杨扬, 傅斌生. 改良金氏评分在儿童肝豆状核变性急性肝衰竭肝移植手术时机评估中价值并文献复习[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 661-668.
[13] 卓少宏, 林秀玲, 周翠梅, 熊卫莲, 马兴灶. CD64指数、SAA/CRP、PCT联合检测在小儿消化道感染性疾病鉴别诊断中的应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 505-509.
[14] 刘笑笑, 张小杉, 刘群, 马岚, 段莎莎, 施依璐, 张敏洁, 王雅晳. 中国学龄前儿童先天性心脏病流行病学研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1021-1024.
[15] 李静, 张玲玲, 邢伟. 兴趣诱导理念用于小儿手术麻醉诱导前的价值及其对家属满意度的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 812-817.
阅读次数
全文


摘要