切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (02) : 159 -165. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2021.02.006

所属专题: 文献

论著

人体感觉阻滞平面上升速率对剖宫产术腰硬联合麻醉后低血压的预测价值分析
田颖1,1, 张科2,2, 李羽1,,1()   
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-27 修回日期:2021-01-12 出版日期:2021-04-01
  • 通信作者: 李羽

Prediction value analysis of rising rate of sensory level on combined spinal-epidural anesthesia induced hypotension during cesarean section

Ying Tian1,1, Ke Zhang2,2, Yu Li1,1,()   

  • Received:2020-03-27 Revised:2021-01-12 Published:2021-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Yu Li
  • Supported by:
    Key Research and Development Project of Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province(2018SZ0217)
引用本文:

田颖, 张科, 李羽. 人体感觉阻滞平面上升速率对剖宫产术腰硬联合麻醉后低血压的预测价值分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(02): 159-165.

Ying Tian, Ke Zhang, Yu Li. Prediction value analysis of rising rate of sensory level on combined spinal-epidural anesthesia induced hypotension during cesarean section[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2021, 17(02): 159-165.

目的

探讨人体感觉阻滞平面上升速率,对剖宫产术腰硬联合麻醉(CSEA)后低血压的预测价值。

方法

选择2019年1月至12月,于成都医学院第二附属医院·核工业四一六医院进行择期剖宫产术分娩,美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级为Ⅰ~Ⅱ级的单胎妊娠产妇80例为研究对象。根据产妇是否发生CSEA后低血压,将其分为低血压组(n=36)与对照组(n=44)。对2组产妇采取L3~4腰椎间隙CSEA,于蛛网膜下腔15 s内推注0.5%重比重布比卡因2.4 mL。2组产妇CSEA注射药物后15 min内,每1 min监测1次生命体征、感觉阻滞平面及其时间,并采用成组t检验或Wilcoxon秩和检验对其进行统计学比较。绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,分析人体感觉阻滞平面上升速率(人体感觉阻滞平面达T8、T6的时间),对于预测剖宫产术分娩产妇发生CSEA后低血压的价值,并确定其最佳临界值。本研究方案经病例收集医院伦理委员会批准[审批文号:2018年审(030)号],并与受试者签署临床研究知情同意书。2组产妇年龄、身高、孕龄、人体质量指数(BMI)、脑脊液流出时间、CSEA注射药物后至恢复仰卧位时间、CSEA注射药物前输液量,术中输液量、失血量及尿量等一般临床资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结果

①低血压组产妇发生CSEA后低血压时,人体感觉阻滞平面为T5(T6~T4),发生CSEA后低血压的时间为CSEA注射药物后8 min(7~8 min),均显著低于组内人体感觉最高阻滞平面T4(T4~T3)和短于组内人体感觉达最高阻滞平面的时间CSEA注射药物后10 min(9~11 min),并且差异均有统计学意义(Z=-5.030、P<0.001, Z=-6.732、P<0.001)。低血压组产妇人体感觉阻滞平面达T8、T6与最高阻滞平面的时间分别为CSEA注射药物后3 min(3~4 min)、6 min(5~7 min)与10 min(9~11 min),均显著短于对照组的CSEA注射药物后5 min(5~6 min)、8 min(7~9 min)与11 min(10~12 min),而低血压组人体感觉最高阻滞平面T4(T4~T3)显著高于对照组的T5(T5~T4),2组比较,差异均有统计学意义(Z=-5.832、-4.202、-3.369、-3.399,均为P<0.001)。②对人体感觉阻滞平面达T8、T6的时间预测剖宫产术分娩产妇发生CSEA后低血压的ROC曲线分析结果显示,其曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.871(95%CI:0.787~0.955,P<0.001)与0.769(95%CI:0.661~0.856,P<0.001)。根据约登指数最大原则,人体感觉阻滞平面达T8、T6的时间预测剖宫产术分娩产妇发生CSEA后低血压的最佳临界值分别为CSEA注射药物后4 min与7 min,此时其约登指数分别为0.664、0.407,敏感度分别为77.8%与54.6%,特异度分别为88.6%与86.1%,前者预测剖宫产术分娩产妇发生CSEA后低血压的价值更高。

结论

人体感觉阻滞平面上升速率可预测剖宫产术分娩产妇CSEA后低血压的发生,可为剖宫产术CSEA后低血压的预警与及时干预提供参考。

Objective

To explore prediction value of rising rate of sensory level on combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) induced hypotension during cesarean section.

Methods

A total of 80 singleton pregnant women with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade Ⅰ-Ⅱ who underwent elective cesarean section in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, China National Nuclear Corporation 416 Hospital from January to December 2019, were selected as research subjects. All pregnant women were divided into hypotension group (n=36) and control group (n=44), according to whether development of CSEA induced hypotension or not. All of them underwent CSEA in L3-4 intervertebral space and were injected with 2.4 mL of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine into subarachnoid space (injection time was 15 s). The vital signs, sensory level and time of pregnant women in two groups were detected once per minute within 15 minutes after CSEA, and above indicators were statistically compared by independent-samples t test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn to analyze predictive value of rising rate of sensory level (at the time of sensory level reaching T8 and T6) on CSEA induced hypotension in pregnant women with elective cesarean section, and to determine the optimal cut-off value. This research was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College & Nuclear Industry 416 Hospital [Approval No. 2018(030)], and informed consent forms for clinical research was signed with each research subject. There were no significant differences in age, height, gestational age, body mass index (BMI), cerebrospinal fluid outflow time, the time from CSEA to supine position, infusion volume before CSEA, intraoperative infusion volume, blood loss volume and urine volume between two groups (P>0.05).

Results

①When CSEA induced hypotension occurred in hypotension group, sensory level was T5 (T6-T4), and the time of occurrence of CSEA induced hypotension was 8 min (7-8 min) after CSEA injection, which were significantly lower than upper sensory level as T4 (T4-T3) and shorter than the time of reaching upper sensory level at 10 min (9-11 min) after CSEA injection, and both differences were statistically significant (Z=-5.030, P<0.001; Z=-6.732, P<0.001). The time of sensory level reaching T8, T6 and upper sensory level in hypotension group was 3 min (3-4 min), 6 min (5-7 min) and 10 min (9-11 min) after CSEA injection, respectively, which was significantly shorter than those in control group at 5 min (5-6 min), 8 min (7-9 min) and 11 min (10-12 min) after CSEA injection, while upper sensory level T4 (T4-T3) was significantly higher than that in control group T5 (T5-T4), and all differences between two groups were statistically significant (Z=-5.832, -4.202, -3.369, -3.399; P all<0.001). ②ROC curve analysis results of the time of sensory level reaching T8, T6 for predicting CSEA induced hypotension of pregnant women with elective cesarean section showed that area under curve (AUC) of them were 0.871 (95%CI: 0.787-0.955, P<0.001) and 0.769 (95%CI: 0.661-0.856, P<0.001), respectively. According to the principle of maximum Youden index, the optimal cut-off values of time of sensory level reaching T8, T6 for predicting CSEA induced hypotension of pregnant women with elective cesarean section were 4 min and 7 min after CSEA injection, respectively. And Youden indexes were 0.664 and 0.407, sensitivities were 77.8% and 54.6%, and specificities were 88.6% and 86.1%, respectively. The former was more valuable in predicting occurrence of CSEA induced hypotension in pregnant woman with elective cesarean section.

Conclusions

Rising rate of sensory level can be used to predict the occurrence of CSEA induced hypotension in pregnant women during cesarean section, and provide a reference for early warning and timely intervention of CSEA induced hypotension in perioperative period of cesarean section.

表1 2组产妇相关临床资料比较
表2 2组产妇人体感觉阻滞平面及时间比较[M(P25P75)]
图1 人体感觉阻滞平面达T8、T6的时间预测剖宫产术分娩产妇发生CSEA后低血压的ROC曲线分析
[1]
杜唯佳,徐振东,刘志强. 剖宫产腰麻后低血压预测方法的研究进展[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志,2019, 35(2): 192-194. DOI: 10.12089/jca.2019.02.022.
[2]
Fakherpour A, Ghaem H, Fattahi Z, et al. Maternal and anaesthesia-related risk factors and incidence of spinal anaesthesia-induced hypotension in elective caesarean section: a multinomial logistic regression[J]. Indian J Anaesth, 2018, 62(1): 36-46. DOI: 10.4103/ija.IJA_416_17.
[3]
Kinsella SM, Carvalho B, Dyer RA, et al. International consensus statement on the management of hypotension with vasopressors during caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia[J]. Anaesthesia, 2018, 73(1): 71-92. DOI: 10.1111/anae.14080.
[4]
NganKee WD, Lee SW, Ng FF, et al. Randomized double-blinded comparison of norepinephrine and phenylephrine for maintenance of blood pressure during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery[J]. Anesthesiology, 2015, 122(4): 736-745. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000601.
[5]
Coppejans HC, Hendrickx E, Goossens J, et al. The sitting versus right lateral position during combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery: block characteristics and severity of hypotension[J]. Anesth Analg, 2006, 102(1): 243-247. DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000189049.11005.26.
[6]
Zhang N, He L, Ni JX. Level of sensory block after spinal anesthesia as a predictor of hypotension in parturient[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2017, 96(25): e7184. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007184.
[7]
Yang S, Berdine G. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve[J]. Southwest Respir Crit Care Chron, 2017, 5(19): 34-36. DOI: 10.12746/swrccc.v5i19.391.
[8]
段娜,孙志龙,李婵,等. 不同体位对剖宫产术中MAP的影响和仰卧综合征的预防[J]. 西南国防医药,2018, 28(7): 668-670. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-0188.2018.07.026.
[9]
李仲廉,邓乃封.妇产科麻醉学[M].天津:天津科学技术出版社,2001: 277.
[10]
朱毓玲,刘萍,张富荣,等. 不同推注时间在布比卡因腰硬联合剖宫产麻醉的临床观察[J]. 昆明医科大学学报,2019, 40(5): 63-67. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-4706.2019.05.012.
[11]
曹秀玲,徐铭军. 昂丹司琼对腰硬联合麻醉剖宫产术中产妇及胎儿影响[J]. 临床军医杂志,2018, 46(6): 705-706. DOI: 10.16680/j.1671-3826.2018.06.36.
[12]
Updated by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Committee on Standards and Practice Parameters. Practice guidelines for obstetric anesthesia: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia and the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology[J]. Anesthesiology, 2016, 124(2): 270-300. DOI: 10.1097/01.aoa.0000504699.59827.56.
[13]
李梦倩,孙凯,吴树彪,等. 腰硬联合麻醉下剖宫产术中甲氧明的用药时机[J]. 郑州大学学报(医学版), 2016, 51(1): 119-122. DOI: 10.13705/j.issn.1671-6825.2016.01.031.
[14]
史景发,汪胜友. 剖宫产产妇腰麻后低血压危险因素前瞻性多元逐步Logistic回归分析[J]. 中国计划生育和妇产科,2018, 10(12): 41-45. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4020.2018.12.11.
[15]
Seltenrich M, Kamani A, Gunka V, et al. Effect of rate of injection on hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section[J]. Anesthesiology, 2001, 94(suppl 1): A1042. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200104001-00005.
[16]
Higuchi H, Adachi Y, Kazama T. The influence of lumbosacral cerebrospinal fluid volume on extent and duration of hyperbaric bupivacaine spinal anesthesia: a comparison between seated and lateral decubitus injection positions[J]. Anesth Analg, 2005, 101(2): 555-560. DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000158465.17547.F1.
[17]
Onuki E, Higuchi H, Takagi S, et al. Gestation-related reduction in lumbar cerebrospinal fluid volume and dural sac surface area[J]. Anesth Analg, 2010, 110(1): 148-153. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181c04faf.
[18]
蔡昀夏,曾葵,倪娟,等. 不同体位对剖宫产腰硬联合麻醉等比重布比卡因阻滞平面的影响[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2016, 47(2): 283-286. DOI: 10.13464/j.scuxbyxb.2016.02.031.
[1] 危玲, 李会, 陈奕. 孕产妇产超广谱β-内酰胺酶的肠杆菌定植/感染与母婴传播研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 517-521.
[2] 杨皓媛, 龚杰, 邹青伟, 阮航. 哮喘孕妇的母婴不良妊娠结局研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 522-529.
[3] 居晓庆, 金蕴洁, 王晓燕. 剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫患者再次妊娠阴道分娩发生子宫破裂的影响因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 575-581.
[4] 周梦玲, 薛志伟, 周淑. 妊娠合并子宫肌瘤的孕期变化及其与不良妊娠结局的关系[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 611-615.
[5] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[6] 朱明, 童国煜, 赵海腾, 钟量, 邹翔宇, 吴少峰, 张轶男. 腹腔镜在减少儿童隐匿性腹股沟斜疝与鞘膜积液二次手术的意义[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 457-460.
[7] 田静, 方秀春. 超声引导下横筋膜平面阻滞在儿童腹股沟疝手术的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 740-744.
[8] 刘骏, 朱霁, 殷骏. 右美托咪定对腹股沟疝手术麻醉效果及安全性的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 570-573.
[9] 孙伟, 林丽, 师高洋. 超声引导下连续髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞在老年腹股沟疝手术中应用效果比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 593-597.
[10] 党情超, 魏星, 詹必伟, 何振. 超声引导下髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞联合局部麻醉在老年腹股沟疝修补术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 598-602.
[11] 段文忠, 白延霞, 徐文亭, 祁虹霞, 吕志坚. 七氟烷和丙泊酚在肝切除术中麻醉效果比较Meta分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 640-645.
[12] 王军, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 索利斌, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 腹膜后肿瘤切除术中大量输血患者的麻醉管理特点与分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 844-849.
[13] 索利斌, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 王军, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 原发性腹膜后副神经节瘤切除术麻醉管理的特点和分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 771-776.
[14] 李静, 张玲玲, 邢伟. 兴趣诱导理念用于小儿手术麻醉诱导前的价值及其对家属满意度的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 812-817.
[15] 边震, 宋绍永, 杨国旺, 范凤尾, 黄庆红, 李健, 金鑫. 江苏省基层医院围麻醉期危机状况的调查分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 499-506.
阅读次数
全文


摘要