切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (04) : 472 -477. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2020.04.015

所属专题: 文献

论著

新生儿无乳链球菌医院感染的临床分子流行病学特点及药物敏感性分析
陆月合1, 王立芳2,()   
  1. 1. 广西壮族自治区妇幼保健院新生儿科,南宁 530002
    2. 广西壮族自治区妇幼保健院医务部,南宁 530002
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-17 修回日期:2020-04-24 出版日期:2020-08-01
  • 通信作者: 王立芳

Clinical molecular epidemiological characteristics and drug sensitivity analysis of nosocomial infection of Streptococcus agalactiae in neonates

Yuehe Lu1, Lifang Wang2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Neonatology, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning 530002, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China
    2. Department of Medical, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning 530002, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China
  • Received:2020-01-17 Revised:2020-04-24 Published:2020-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Lifang Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Lifang, Email:
  • Supported by:
    Project of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Health and Family Planning Commission(Z2016091)
引用本文:

陆月合, 王立芳. 新生儿无乳链球菌医院感染的临床分子流行病学特点及药物敏感性分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 16(04): 472-477.

Yuehe Lu, Lifang Wang. Clinical molecular epidemiological characteristics and drug sensitivity analysis of nosocomial infection of Streptococcus agalactiae in neonates[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2020, 16(04): 472-477.

目的

探讨新生儿无乳链球菌医院感染的临床分子流行病学特点及其药物敏感性。

方法

选择2015年1月至2018年12月,于广西壮族自治区妇幼保健院接受治疗时,发生无乳链球菌医院感染的92例新生儿为研究对象,回顾性分析其临床病例资料。采用χ2检验,对病例收集医院的4个新生儿病区中,新生儿无乳链球菌医院感染率进行统计学比较。对分离培养的无乳链球菌,进行标本来源、血清型分型特点及上述2者占比分析。采用纸片扩散法进行无乳链球菌的药物敏感性试验,并分析其耐药性及药物敏感性。本研究符合2013年修订的《世界医学协会赫尔辛基宣言》要求。所有患儿监护人知情同意。

结果

①4个新生儿病区医院感染率:这4个病区包括极早早产儿重症监护病房(ICU)、早产儿ICU、足月儿ICU及新生儿普通病房,其新生儿无乳链球菌医院感染率分别为0.329%(5/1 521)、0.508%(18/3 545)、1.261%(48/3 807))及0.095%(21/22 160)。足月儿ICU的新生儿无乳链球菌医院感染率,分别较其他3个病区高,并且差异均有统计学意义(均为P<0.006)。②标本来源:92份检出无乳链球菌的标本中,占比位列前3位的标本,分别来源于呼吸道分泌物、静脉血及尿液,其占比分别为48.9%(45/92)、22.8%(21/92)及16.3%(15/92)。③早发败血症(EOS)发生率:本组血培养结果无乳链球菌呈阳性的21例患儿中,71.5%(15/21)为EOS。④血清型分型:本组92株无乳链球菌的血清型分型按照其占比高低,位列前3位的血清型依次为Ⅲ、Ⅰb及Ⅴ型,其分别占30.4%(28/92)、27.2%(25/92)及21.7%(20/92)。⑤药物敏感性试验结果:92株无乳链球菌对四环素、克林霉素及红霉素的耐药性均较高,耐药率分别为69.6%(64/92))、57.6%(53/92)、55.4%(51/92),而对万古霉素、青霉素、利奈唑胺、达福普汀及氨苄西林的敏感性均较高,敏感率均≥87.0%。

结论

尤其对足月儿ICU中住院治疗的新生儿,应警惕无乳链球菌医院感染,以减少该菌所致的EOS等严重感染发生率。本组新生儿病区检出无乳链球菌的血清型以Ⅲ、Ⅰb、Ⅴ型为主,可采用万古霉素、青霉素、利奈唑胺等抗菌药物进行治疗。

Objective

To explore clinical molecular epidemiological characteristics and drug sensitivity of nosocomial infection of Streptococcus agalactiae in neonates.

Methods

A total of 92 neonates who had nosocomial infection of Streptococcus agalactiae when treated in Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region from January 2015 to December 2018, were selected as research subjects. Clinical data of them were retrospectively analyzed. Chi-square test was used to compare the nosocomial infection rate of Streptococcus agalactiae among 4 wards of newborns in case collected hospital. For separated and cultured Streptococcus agalactiae, the sample source and serotyping, also their distribution characteristics were analyzed. The drug sensitivity and resistance of Streptococcus agalactiae were analyzed by paper diffusion method. This study was in line with World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki revised in 2013. Informed consents were acquired from all guardians.

Results

① Nosocomial infection rates in 4 neonatal wards: the rates of nosocomial infection of Streptococcus agalactiae in intensive care unit (ICU) of extremely premature infants, ICU of preterm infants, ICU of full term infants and neonatal general ward were 0.329% (5/1 521), 0.508% (18/3 545), 1.261% (48/3 807)) and 0.095% (21/22 160), respectively. Among them, the rate of neonatal nosocomial infection of Streptococcus agalactiae in ICU of full term infants were higher than those of other three wards, respectively, and the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.006). ② Specimens source: among 92 specimens which Streptococcus agalactiae were detected, the top 3 ratios of source of specimens from high to low were from respiratory secretion, venous blood and urine, their ratios were 48.9% (45/92), 22.8% (21/92) and 16.3% (15/92), respectively. ③Incidence rate of early onset sepsis (EOS): among 21 neonates whose results of blood culture with Streptococcus agalactiae positive, 71.5% (15/21) were diagnosed as EOS. ④ Serotype: among those strains of Streptococcus agalactiae from 92 specimens, the top 3 distributions of serotype typing from high to low were type Ⅲ, Ⅰb and Ⅴ, their ratios were 30.4% (28/92), 27.2% (25/92) and 21.7% (20/92), respectively. ⑤ Drug sensitivity test results: those 92 strains of Streptococcus agalactiae from 92 specimens were highly resistant to tetracycline, clindamycin and erythromycin, and drug resistance rates were 69.6% (64/92), 57.6% (53/92) and 55.4% (51/92), respectively, but they were highly sensitivity to vancomycin, penicillin, linezolid, dalfopristin and ampicillin, and drug sensitivity rates were all ≥87.0%.

Conclusions

Full term infants in ICU should be particularly vigilant against nosocomial infections of Streptococcus agalactiae to reduce incidence of serious infection complications such as EOS etc.. The serotypes of Streptococcus agalactiae detected in neonatal wards in our hospital were mainly type Ⅲ, Ⅰb, and Ⅴ. Antibacterials such as vancomycin, penicillin, linezolid could be used for treatment of Streptococcus agalactiae infection disease.

表1 4个新生儿病区中,新生儿的无乳链球菌医院感染率比较[%(n/n′)]
表2 本组检出的92株无乳链球菌的药物敏感性试验结果[株数(%)]
[1]
陈洁,李芹. 无乳链球菌感染致新生儿化脓性脑膜炎并硬膜下积液1例报告[J]. 临床儿科杂志,2014, 32(7): 658-659. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3606.2014.07.015.
[2]
王莹超,陆文香,周莉靖. 新生儿无乳链球菌感染的危险因素及药敏分析[J]. 国际检验医学杂志,2015, 36(8): 1065-1067. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4130.2015.08.023.
[3]
孙晴,张正银. 泌尿生殖系统无乳链球菌感染的临床病区分布及耐药性分析[J]. 生殖医学杂志,2014, 23(11): 876-879. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3845.2014.11.004.
[4]
翟青枝,高原,付晓琳,等. 妊娠晚期无症状无乳链球菌感染的高危因素及对母婴的影响[J]. 中国医药,2018, 13(9): 1398-1402. DOI: 10.3760/j.issn.1673-4777.2018.09.029.
[5]
林亚芬,张梅红,李春燕,等. 新生儿无乳链球菌败血症临床分析[J]. 中华传染病杂志,2015, 33(5): 297-298. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6680.2015.05.011.
[6]
崔海燕,谢春燕,李朝辉,等. 无乳链球菌引起临床感染的类型及耐药性分析[J]. 中国实验诊断学,2013, 17(11): 2029-2031.
[7]
章晟,庄璐,李秋平,等. 新生儿监护病房无乳链球菌临床分布及耐药性分析[J]. 中国感染控制杂志,2017, 16(9): 804-806. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9638.2017.09.003.
[8]
耿海峰,杨斌,朱雪萍. 新生儿化脓性脑膜炎53例临床分析及其无乳性链球菌脑膜炎特点[J/CD]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(5): 751-754. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2016.05.032.
[9]
林新祝,吴健宁,张雪芹,等. 晚孕期阴道B族链球菌定植与新生儿感染的关系[J]. 中华围产医学杂志,2016, 19(7): 491-496. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-9408.2016.07.003.
[10]
李丽,吴伟元,吴本清,等. 新生儿B族溶血链球菌感染血清型与临床表现相关性及药敏分析[J]. 中国新生儿科杂志,2015, 30(5): 339-342. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6710.2015.05.005.
[11]
谷献芳,马友凤,李志博. 新生儿无乳链球菌败血症15例临床分析[J]. 山西职工医学院学报,2018, 28(1): 53-55.
[12]
Porter MC, Henderson BA, Healy PE, et al. Can interchangeability of lincosamides be assumed in clinical practice comparative MICs of clindamycin and lincomycin for Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus agalactiae and Staphylococcus aureus[J]. J Antimicrob Chemother, 2014, 69(3): 856-857. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkt436.
[13]
Cockerill FR. Clinical and laboratory standards institute performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: twenty-second informational supplement[S]. PA:CLSI, 2012: M100-S22.
[14]
Piccinelli G, Fernandes P, Bonfanti C, et al. In vitro activity of solithromycin against erythromycin-resistant Streptococcus agalactiae[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2014, 58(3): 1693-1698. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02210-13.
[15]
Verhoeven PO, Noyel P, Bonneau J, et al. Evaluation of the new brilliance GBS chromogenic medium for screening of Streptococcus agalactiae vaginal colonization in pregnant women[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2014, 52(3): 991-993. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02926-13.
[16]
Savini V, Franco A, Gherardi G, et al. Beta-hemolytic, multi-lancefield antigen-agglutinating Enterococcus durans from a pregnant woman, mimicking Streptococcus agalactiae[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2014, 52(6): 2181-2182. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00296-14.
[17]
Buchan BW, Olson WJ, Mackey TL, et al. Clinical evaluation of the walk-away specimen processor and ESwab for recovery of Streptococcus agalactiae isolates in prenatal screening specimens[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2014, 52(6): 2166-2168. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00374-14.
[18]
Kim BJ, Hancock BM, Del Cid N, et al. Streptococcus agalactiae infection in zebrafish larvae[J]. Microb Pathog, 2015, 79: 57-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2015.01.007.
[19]
Louthrenoo W, Kasitanon N, Wangkaew S, et al. Streptococcus agalactiae: an emerging cause of septic arthritis[J]. J Clin Rheumatol, 2014, 20(2): 74-78. DOI: 10.1097/RHU.0000000000000071.
[20]
Patterson H, Saralahti A, Parikka M, et al. Adult zebrafish model of bacterial meningitis in Streptococcus agalactiae infection[J]. Dev Comp Immunol, 2012, 38(3): 447-455. DOI: 10.1016/j.dci.2012.07.007.
[21]
Barichello T, Lemos JC, Generoso JS, et al. Evaluation of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor, nerve growth factor and memory in adult rats survivors of the neonatal meningitis by Streptococcus agalactiae[J]. Brain Res Bull, 2013, 92: 56-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2012.05.014.
[22]
Cheng HL, Lin WC, Shih PY, et al. Streptococcus agalactiae infective endocarditis with large vegetation in a patient with underlying protein S deficiency[J]. Infection, 2013, 41(1): 247-250. DOI: 10.1007/s15010-012-0334-6.
[23]
Page-Ramsey SM, Johnstone SK, Kim D, et al. Prevalence of group B Streptococcus colonization in subsequent pregnancies of group B Streptococcus-colonized versus noncolonized women[J]. Am J Perinatol, 2013, 30(5): 383-388. DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1326981.
[24]
Bai Q, Zhang W, Yang Y, et al. Characterization and genome sequencing of a novel bacteriophage infecting Streptococcus agalactiae with high similarity to a phage from Streptococcus pyogenes[J]. Arch Virol, 2013, 158(8): 1733-1741. DOI: 10.1007/s00705-013-1667-x.
[25]
Oechslin F, Daraspe J, Giddey M, et al. In vitro characterization of PlySK1249, a novel phage lysin, and assessment of its antibacterial activity in a mouse model of Streptococcus agalactiae bacteremia[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2013, 57(12): 6276-6283. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01701-13.
[26]
Pimentel JD, Szymanski LJ, Samuel LP, et al. Discordant Streptococcus agalactiae (group B Streptococcus) gestational infection in monochorionic/diamniotic and dichorionic/diamniotic twins[J]. Fetal Pediatr Pathol, 2012, 31(3): 176-183. DOI: 10.3109/15513815.2012.659394.
[1] 农云洁, 黄小桂, 黄裕兰, 农恒荣. 超声在多重肺部感染诊断中的临床应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 872-876.
[2] 杨瑾, 刘雪克, 张媛媛, 金钧, 韦瑶. 肠道微生物来源石胆酸对脓毒症相关肝损伤的保护作用[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 265-274.
[3] 张霞, 张瑞, 郑志波, 张勤. 紫草素调控乳酸化修饰和线粒体功能改善脓毒症心肌病小鼠的预后[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 275-284.
[4] 张婧琦, 江洋, 孙佳璐, 唐兴喆, 赵宇飞, 崔颖, 李信响, 戴景月, 傅琳, 彭新桂. 基于肾周CT特征结合血清肌酐水平探讨脓毒症伴急性肾损伤的早期识别[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 285-292.
[5] 李振翮, 魏长青, 甄国栋, 李振富. 脓毒症并发急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者血清S1P、Wnt5a变化及其临床意义[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 293-300.
[6] 姜珊, 李湘燕, 田硕涵, 温冰, 何睿, 齐心. 采用优化抗感染治疗模式改善糖尿病足感染预后的临床观察[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 398-403.
[7] 许月芳, 刘旺, 曾妙甜, 郭宇姝. 多粘菌素B和多粘菌素E治疗外科多重耐药菌感染临床疗效及安全性分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 700-703.
[8] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[9] 陈冬丽, 邓迎丽, 毕婧. α-干扰素治疗急性呼吸道病毒感染对Th1/Th2平衡及肺功能的影响[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 590-594.
[10] 刘静, 徐爽, 缪亚军. 肺腺癌miR-3653表达与高危型人乳头瘤病毒感染及预后的关系[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 600-604.
[11] 郑玉, 许振浪, 陈青青. 类鼻疽致肺部感染患者的治疗及药学监护分析一例[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 670-672.
[12] 于泽, 隋宇航, 孙备. 坏死性胰腺炎相关并发症外科干预策略[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 450-455.
[13] 周祥, 张庆庆, 张雪琴, 王晓宇, 姜鸿. Meta分析庆大霉素封管液预防血透患者中心静脉导管相关感染[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 201-206.
[14] 丛黎, 马林, 陈旭, 李文文, 张亮亮, 周华亭. 改良CT严重指数联合炎症指标在重症急性胰腺炎患者胰腺感染预测及预后评估中的研究[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 432-436.
[15] 陈惠英, 邱敏珊, 邵汉权. 脓毒症诱发肠黏膜屏障功能损伤的风险因素模型构建与应用效果[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 448-452.
阅读次数
全文


摘要