切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (03) : 239 -244. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2019.03.002

所属专题: 文献

述评

渗透性治疗在儿童颅内高压综合征中的应用与研究
赵金桂1, 罗蓉1,()   
  1. 1. 四川大学华西第二医院儿童神经科、出生缺陷与相关妇儿疾病教育部重点实验室,成都 610041
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-15 修回日期:2019-04-29 出版日期:2019-06-01
  • 通信作者: 罗蓉

Application and research of osmotic therapy in children with intracranial hypertension syndrome

Jingui Zhao1, Rong Luo1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Pediatric Neurology, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2019-01-15 Revised:2019-04-29 Published:2019-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Rong Luo
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Luo Rong, Email:
  • Supported by:
    National Key Research and Development Program(2016YFC1306205); Project of Popularization and Application by Health and Family Planning Commission in Sichuan Province(17PJ257)
引用本文:

赵金桂, 罗蓉. 渗透性治疗在儿童颅内高压综合征中的应用与研究[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 15(03): 239-244.

Jingui Zhao, Rong Luo. Application and research of osmotic therapy in children with intracranial hypertension syndrome[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2019, 15(03): 239-244.

儿童颅内高压(ICH)综合征是临床危急重症,对其正确而有效地治疗,可以降低患儿死亡率、脑损伤和神经后遗症发生率。儿童ICH综合征急性期进行降低颅内压处理,是达到有效治疗该病患儿的关键措施,其中渗透性治疗是临床最常见的降低颅内压措施。目前临床用于儿童ICH综合征急性期降低颅内压的渗透性治疗药物包括:经典渗透性药物甘露醇,其降低颅内压效果确切,临床使用广泛;高渗盐水作为另一种渗透性药物,其降低颅内压效果与甘露醇相当,甚至有研究结果表明,其降低颅内压效果较甘露醇更为显著。此外,高渗盐水在维持ICH综合征患儿脑组织灌注压(CPP)方面,较甘露醇更有效,可通过多种机制发挥脑功能保护作用。从脑功能保护角度,新的研究和指南愈来愈推崇和重视高渗盐水在ICH综合征患儿中的应用,尤其在创伤性脑损伤(TBI)所致ICH综合征患儿中,高渗盐水应作为首先推荐的降低颅内压治疗药物。儿童ICH综合征急性期降低颅内压治疗中,高渗盐水能否取代甘露醇成为首选渗透性药物,或哪些情况下首选高渗盐水,笔者拟就渗透性治疗药物在儿童ICH综合征急性期降低颅内压治疗的历史及其研究现状,甘露醇及高渗盐水降低颅内压的作用机制,甘露醇及高渗盐水在儿童ICH综合征降低颅内压的临床研究最新进展进行阐述,重点比较与分析甘露醇及高渗盐水的治疗作用。

Pediatric intracranial hypertension (ICH) syndrome is a critical and severe pathogenic disorder. An appropriate and effective treatment can reduce its mortality, and decrease incidences of secondary brain injuries and neurologic complications. Timely treatment of intracranial pressure is the key measure in the acute stage of pediatric ICH syndrome, and osmotic therapy is considered as the most common measure to reduce intracranial pressure. Osmotic drugs used in the acute stage of pediatric ICH syndrome include urea, glycerin, sorbitol, mannitol, and hypertonic saline, etc.. Since urea, glycerin and sorbitol are associated with numerous side effects, they are no longer used clinically. Mannitol as the traditionally used osmotic medication has a definitive effect on reducing intracranial pressure, thus it is still widely administrated in clinical practices. Despite that hypertonic saline has a similar effect on reduction of intracranial pressure as mannitol, continuous studies have shown that administration of hypertonic saline yields even better outcomes for reducing intracranial pressure and better maintenance of cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) compared with the use of mannitol. Moreover, the administration of hypertonic saline may provide protection for brain functions through various mechanisms. From the perspective of protection for brain functions, new studies and guidelines increasingly suggest and pay attention to the application of hypertonic saline in reduction of intracranial pressure, especially, recommend it as the first-line osmotic medcine for traumatic brain injury (TBI)-induced pediatric ICH syndrome. As of today, questions are still remained: could hypertonic saline replace mannitol as the first-line osmotic medcine in reducing intracranial pressure or in which cases should hypertonic saline be preferably selected? This article focuses on the historical and current research progresses of osmotic therapy in reduction of intracranial pressure in the acute stage for children with ICH syndrome, and explores the mechanisms of reduction of intracranial pressure for mannitol and hypertonic saline, and discovers recent clinical status of using mannitol and hypertonic saline as well as comparison between these two medications in treatment of children with ICH syndrome.

[1]
江载芳,申昆玲,沈颖. 诸福棠实用儿科学(下册)[M]. 8版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2015: 2725.
[2]
Sacco TL, Delibert SA. Management of intracranial pressure: part Ⅰ: pharmacologic interventions[J]. Dimens Crit Care Nurs, 2018, 37(3): 120-129.
[3]
岳少杰. 新生儿脑水肿与颅内高压的治疗[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2015, 11(1): 4-8.
[4]
Czosnyka M, Pickard JD, Steiner LA. Principles of intracranial pressure monitoring and treatment[J]. Handb Clin Neurol, 2017, 140: 67-89.
[5]
Freeman WD. Management ofintracranial pressure[J]. Continuum, 2015, 21(1): 1299-12323.
[6]
Mangat HS, Härtl R. Hypertonic saline for the management of raised intracranial pressure after severe traumatic brain injury[J]. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2015, 1345(1): 83-88.
[7]
Stevens RD, Huff JS, Duckworth J, et al. Emergency neurological life support: intracranial hypertension and herniation[J]. Neurocrit Care, 2012, 17(Suppl 1): S60-S65.
[8]
Shein SL, Ferguson NM, Kochanek PM, et al. Effectiveness of pharmacological therapies forintracranial hypertension in children with severe traumatic brain injury: results from an automated data collection system time-synched to drug administration[J]. Pediatr Crit Care Med, 2016, 17(3): 236-245.
[9]
Alnemari AM, Krafcik BM, Mansour TR, et al. A comparison of pharmacologic therapeutic agents used for the reduction of intracranial pressure following traumatic brain injury[J]. World Neurosurg, 2017, 106: 509-528.
[10]
Roumeliotis N, Dong C, Pettersen G, et al. Hyperosmolar therapy in pediatric traumatic brain injury: a retrospective study[J]. Childs Nerv Syst, 2016, 32(12): 2363-2368.
[11]
White H, Cook D, Venkatesh B. Theuse of hypertonic saline for treating intracranial hypertension after traumatic brain injury[J]. Anesth Analg, 2006, 102(6): 1836-1846.
[12]
The Brain Trauma Foundation. The American Association of Neurological Surgeons. The Joint Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care. Role of antiseizure prophylaxis following head injury[J]. J Neurotrauma, 2000, 17(6-7): 549-553.
[13]
Maas AIR, Dearden M, Teasdale GM, et al. EBIC-guidelines for management of severe head injury in adults. European Brain Injury Consortium[J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 1997, 139(4): 286-294.
[14]
Weed LH, McKibben PS. Experimental alteration of brain bulk[J]. Am J Physiol, 1919, 48(4): 531-558.
[15]
Worthley LI, Cooper DJ, Jones N. Treatment of resistant intracranial hypertension with hypertonic saline[J]. J Neurosurg, 1988, 68(3): 478-481.
[16]
Surani S, Lockwood G, Macias MY, et al. Hypertonic saline in elevated intracranial pressure: past, present, and future[J]. J Intensive Care Med, 2015, 30(1): 8-12.
[17]
Berger Pelletier E, Émond M, Lauzier F, et al. Hyperosmolar therapy in severe traumatic brain injury: a survey of emergency physicians from a large canadian province[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(4): e95778.
[18]
Hays AN, Lazaridis C, Neyens R, et al. Osmotherapy: use among neurointensivists[J]. Neurocrit Care, 2011, 14(2): 222-228.
[19]
Thongrong C, Kong N, Govindarajan B, et al. Current purpose and practice of hypertonic saline in neurosurgery: a review of the literature[J]. World Neurosurg, 2014, 82(6): 1307-1318.
[20]
Jagannatha AT, Sriganesh K, Devi BI, et al. An equiosmolar study on early intracranial physiology and long term outcome in severe traumatic brain injury comparing mannitol and hypertonic saline[J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2016, 27: 68-73.
[21]
Ropper AH. Management of raised intracranial pressure and hyperosmolar therapy[J]. Pract Neurol, 2014, 14(3): 152-158.
[22]
Tang SC, Lin RJ, Shieh JS, et al. Effect of mannitol on cerebrovascular pressure reactivity in patients with intracranial hypertension[J]. J Formos Med Assoc, 2015, 114(9): 842-848..
[23]
Yozova ID, Howard J, Henke D, et al. Comparison of the effects of 7.2% hypertonic saline and 20% mannitol on whole blood coagulation and platelet function in dogs with suspected intracranial hypertension - a pilot study[J]. BMC Vet Res, 2017, 13(1): 185.
[24]
Rallis D, Poulos P, Kazantzi M, et al. Effectiveness of 7.5% hypertonic saline in children with severe traumatic brain injury[J]. J Crit Care, 2017, 38(1): 52-56.
[25]
Leah M, Hellen G, Samson G, et al. The role for osmotic agents in children with acute encephalopathies: a systematic review[J]. BMC Pediatr, 2010, 10(1): 23.
[26]
Gu J, Huang H, Huang Y, et al. Hypertonic saline or mannitol for treating elevated intracranialpressure in traumatic brain injury: a Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J/OL]. Neurosurg Rev, 2018 (2018-06-15) [2019-01-04].

URL    
[27]
Kheirbek T, Pascual JL. Hypertonic saline for the treatment of intracranial hypertension[J]. Curr Neurol Neurosci Reports, 2014, 14(9): 1-6.
[28]
Perez CA, Figueroa SA. Complication rates of 3% hypertonic saline infusion through peripheral intravenous access[J]. J Neurosci Nurs, 2017, 49(3): 191-195.
[1] 张璇, 马宇童, 苗玉倩, 张云, 吴士文, 党晓楚, 陈颖颖, 钟兆明, 王雪娟, 胡淼, 孙岩峰, 马秀珠, 吕发勤, 寇海燕. 超声对Duchenne肌营养不良儿童膈肌功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1068-1073.
[2] 张宝富, 俞劲, 叶菁菁, 俞建根, 马晓辉, 刘喜旺. 先天性原发隔异位型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图诊断[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1074-1080.
[3] 韩丹, 王婷, 肖欢, 朱丽容, 陈镜宇, 唐毅. 超声造影与增强CT对儿童肝脏良恶性病变诊断价值的对比分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 939-944.
[4] 刘婷婷, 林妍冰, 汪珊, 陈幕荣, 唐子鉴, 代东伶, 夏焙. 超声衰减参数成像评价儿童代谢相关脂肪性肝病的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 787-794.
[5] 周钰菡, 肖欢, 唐毅, 杨春江, 周娟, 朱丽容, 徐娟, 牟芳婷. 超声对儿童髋关节暂时性滑膜炎的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 795-800.
[6] 米洁, 陈晨, 李佳玲, 裴海娜, 张恒博, 李飞, 李东杰. 儿童头面部外伤特点分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 511-515.
[7] 邬文莉, 万约翰, 高梓君, 黎凡. 外科手术联合口服西罗莫司治疗儿童口腔颌面部淋巴管畸形[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 345-352.
[8] 王蕾, 王少华, 牛海珍, 尹腾飞. 儿童腹股沟疝围手术期风险预警干预[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 768-772.
[9] 李芳, 许瑞, 李洋洋, 石秀全. 循证医学理念在儿童腹股沟疝患者中的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 782-786.
[10] 吕垒, 冯啸, 何凯明, 曾凯宁, 杨卿, 吕海金, 易慧敏, 易述红, 杨扬, 傅斌生. 改良金氏评分在儿童肝豆状核变性急性肝衰竭肝移植手术时机评估中价值并文献复习[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 661-668.
[11] 张政赢, 鞠阳, 刘晓宁. 二甲双胍对2型糖尿病患者大肠腺瘤术后复发的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 485-488.
[12] 卓少宏, 林秀玲, 周翠梅, 熊卫莲, 马兴灶. CD64指数、SAA/CRP、PCT联合检测在小儿消化道感染性疾病鉴别诊断中的应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 505-509.
[13] 姜里蛟, 张峰, 周玉萍. 多学科诊疗模式救治老年急性非静脉曲张性上消化道大出血患者的临床观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 520-524.
[14] 刘笑笑, 张小杉, 刘群, 马岚, 段莎莎, 施依璐, 张敏洁, 王雅晳. 中国学龄前儿童先天性心脏病流行病学研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1021-1024.
[15] 李静, 张玲玲, 邢伟. 兴趣诱导理念用于小儿手术麻醉诱导前的价值及其对家属满意度的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 812-817.
阅读次数
全文


摘要