切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (03) : 239 -244. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2019.03.002

所属专题: 文献

述评

渗透性治疗在儿童颅内高压综合征中的应用与研究
赵金桂1, 罗蓉1,()   
  1. 1. 四川大学华西第二医院儿童神经科、出生缺陷与相关妇儿疾病教育部重点实验室,成都 610041
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-15 修回日期:2019-04-29 出版日期:2019-06-01
  • 通信作者: 罗蓉

Application and research of osmotic therapy in children with intracranial hypertension syndrome

Jingui Zhao1, Rong Luo1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Pediatric Neurology, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2019-01-15 Revised:2019-04-29 Published:2019-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Rong Luo
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Luo Rong, Email:
  • Supported by:
    National Key Research and Development Program(2016YFC1306205); Project of Popularization and Application by Health and Family Planning Commission in Sichuan Province(17PJ257)
引用本文:

赵金桂, 罗蓉. 渗透性治疗在儿童颅内高压综合征中的应用与研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 15(03): 239-244.

Jingui Zhao, Rong Luo. Application and research of osmotic therapy in children with intracranial hypertension syndrome[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2019, 15(03): 239-244.

儿童颅内高压(ICH)综合征是临床危急重症,对其正确而有效地治疗,可以降低患儿死亡率、脑损伤和神经后遗症发生率。儿童ICH综合征急性期进行降低颅内压处理,是达到有效治疗该病患儿的关键措施,其中渗透性治疗是临床最常见的降低颅内压措施。目前临床用于儿童ICH综合征急性期降低颅内压的渗透性治疗药物包括:经典渗透性药物甘露醇,其降低颅内压效果确切,临床使用广泛;高渗盐水作为另一种渗透性药物,其降低颅内压效果与甘露醇相当,甚至有研究结果表明,其降低颅内压效果较甘露醇更为显著。此外,高渗盐水在维持ICH综合征患儿脑组织灌注压(CPP)方面,较甘露醇更有效,可通过多种机制发挥脑功能保护作用。从脑功能保护角度,新的研究和指南愈来愈推崇和重视高渗盐水在ICH综合征患儿中的应用,尤其在创伤性脑损伤(TBI)所致ICH综合征患儿中,高渗盐水应作为首先推荐的降低颅内压治疗药物。儿童ICH综合征急性期降低颅内压治疗中,高渗盐水能否取代甘露醇成为首选渗透性药物,或哪些情况下首选高渗盐水,笔者拟就渗透性治疗药物在儿童ICH综合征急性期降低颅内压治疗的历史及其研究现状,甘露醇及高渗盐水降低颅内压的作用机制,甘露醇及高渗盐水在儿童ICH综合征降低颅内压的临床研究最新进展进行阐述,重点比较与分析甘露醇及高渗盐水的治疗作用。

Pediatric intracranial hypertension (ICH) syndrome is a critical and severe pathogenic disorder. An appropriate and effective treatment can reduce its mortality, and decrease incidences of secondary brain injuries and neurologic complications. Timely treatment of intracranial pressure is the key measure in the acute stage of pediatric ICH syndrome, and osmotic therapy is considered as the most common measure to reduce intracranial pressure. Osmotic drugs used in the acute stage of pediatric ICH syndrome include urea, glycerin, sorbitol, mannitol, and hypertonic saline, etc.. Since urea, glycerin and sorbitol are associated with numerous side effects, they are no longer used clinically. Mannitol as the traditionally used osmotic medication has a definitive effect on reducing intracranial pressure, thus it is still widely administrated in clinical practices. Despite that hypertonic saline has a similar effect on reduction of intracranial pressure as mannitol, continuous studies have shown that administration of hypertonic saline yields even better outcomes for reducing intracranial pressure and better maintenance of cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) compared with the use of mannitol. Moreover, the administration of hypertonic saline may provide protection for brain functions through various mechanisms. From the perspective of protection for brain functions, new studies and guidelines increasingly suggest and pay attention to the application of hypertonic saline in reduction of intracranial pressure, especially, recommend it as the first-line osmotic medcine for traumatic brain injury (TBI)-induced pediatric ICH syndrome. As of today, questions are still remained: could hypertonic saline replace mannitol as the first-line osmotic medcine in reducing intracranial pressure or in which cases should hypertonic saline be preferably selected? This article focuses on the historical and current research progresses of osmotic therapy in reduction of intracranial pressure in the acute stage for children with ICH syndrome, and explores the mechanisms of reduction of intracranial pressure for mannitol and hypertonic saline, and discovers recent clinical status of using mannitol and hypertonic saline as well as comparison between these two medications in treatment of children with ICH syndrome.

[1]
江载芳,申昆玲,沈颖. 诸福棠实用儿科学(下册)[M]. 8版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2015: 2725.
[2]
Sacco TL, Delibert SA. Management of intracranial pressure: part Ⅰ: pharmacologic interventions[J]. Dimens Crit Care Nurs, 2018, 37(3): 120-129.
[3]
岳少杰. 新生儿脑水肿与颅内高压的治疗[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2015, 11(1): 4-8.
[4]
Czosnyka M, Pickard JD, Steiner LA. Principles of intracranial pressure monitoring and treatment[J]. Handb Clin Neurol, 2017, 140: 67-89.
[5]
Freeman WD. Management ofintracranial pressure[J]. Continuum, 2015, 21(1): 1299-12323.
[6]
Mangat HS, Härtl R. Hypertonic saline for the management of raised intracranial pressure after severe traumatic brain injury[J]. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2015, 1345(1): 83-88.
[7]
Stevens RD, Huff JS, Duckworth J, et al. Emergency neurological life support: intracranial hypertension and herniation[J]. Neurocrit Care, 2012, 17(Suppl 1): S60-S65.
[8]
Shein SL, Ferguson NM, Kochanek PM, et al. Effectiveness of pharmacological therapies forintracranial hypertension in children with severe traumatic brain injury: results from an automated data collection system time-synched to drug administration[J]. Pediatr Crit Care Med, 2016, 17(3): 236-245.
[9]
Alnemari AM, Krafcik BM, Mansour TR, et al. A comparison of pharmacologic therapeutic agents used for the reduction of intracranial pressure following traumatic brain injury[J]. World Neurosurg, 2017, 106: 509-528.
[10]
Roumeliotis N, Dong C, Pettersen G, et al. Hyperosmolar therapy in pediatric traumatic brain injury: a retrospective study[J]. Childs Nerv Syst, 2016, 32(12): 2363-2368.
[11]
White H, Cook D, Venkatesh B. Theuse of hypertonic saline for treating intracranial hypertension after traumatic brain injury[J]. Anesth Analg, 2006, 102(6): 1836-1846.
[12]
The Brain Trauma Foundation. The American Association of Neurological Surgeons. The Joint Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care. Role of antiseizure prophylaxis following head injury[J]. J Neurotrauma, 2000, 17(6-7): 549-553.
[13]
Maas AIR, Dearden M, Teasdale GM, et al. EBIC-guidelines for management of severe head injury in adults. European Brain Injury Consortium[J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 1997, 139(4): 286-294.
[14]
Weed LH, McKibben PS. Experimental alteration of brain bulk[J]. Am J Physiol, 1919, 48(4): 531-558.
[15]
Worthley LI, Cooper DJ, Jones N. Treatment of resistant intracranial hypertension with hypertonic saline[J]. J Neurosurg, 1988, 68(3): 478-481.
[16]
Surani S, Lockwood G, Macias MY, et al. Hypertonic saline in elevated intracranial pressure: past, present, and future[J]. J Intensive Care Med, 2015, 30(1): 8-12.
[17]
Berger Pelletier E, Émond M, Lauzier F, et al. Hyperosmolar therapy in severe traumatic brain injury: a survey of emergency physicians from a large canadian province[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(4): e95778.
[18]
Hays AN, Lazaridis C, Neyens R, et al. Osmotherapy: use among neurointensivists[J]. Neurocrit Care, 2011, 14(2): 222-228.
[19]
Thongrong C, Kong N, Govindarajan B, et al. Current purpose and practice of hypertonic saline in neurosurgery: a review of the literature[J]. World Neurosurg, 2014, 82(6): 1307-1318.
[20]
Jagannatha AT, Sriganesh K, Devi BI, et al. An equiosmolar study on early intracranial physiology and long term outcome in severe traumatic brain injury comparing mannitol and hypertonic saline[J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2016, 27: 68-73.
[21]
Ropper AH. Management of raised intracranial pressure and hyperosmolar therapy[J]. Pract Neurol, 2014, 14(3): 152-158.
[22]
Tang SC, Lin RJ, Shieh JS, et al. Effect of mannitol on cerebrovascular pressure reactivity in patients with intracranial hypertension[J]. J Formos Med Assoc, 2015, 114(9): 842-848..
[23]
Yozova ID, Howard J, Henke D, et al. Comparison of the effects of 7.2% hypertonic saline and 20% mannitol on whole blood coagulation and platelet function in dogs with suspected intracranial hypertension - a pilot study[J]. BMC Vet Res, 2017, 13(1): 185.
[24]
Rallis D, Poulos P, Kazantzi M, et al. Effectiveness of 7.5% hypertonic saline in children with severe traumatic brain injury[J]. J Crit Care, 2017, 38(1): 52-56.
[25]
Leah M, Hellen G, Samson G, et al. The role for osmotic agents in children with acute encephalopathies: a systematic review[J]. BMC Pediatr, 2010, 10(1): 23.
[26]
Gu J, Huang H, Huang Y, et al. Hypertonic saline or mannitol for treating elevated intracranialpressure in traumatic brain injury: a Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J/OL]. Neurosurg Rev, 2018 (2018-06-15) [2019-01-04].

URL    
[27]
Kheirbek T, Pascual JL. Hypertonic saline for the treatment of intracranial hypertension[J]. Curr Neurol Neurosci Reports, 2014, 14(9): 1-6.
[28]
Perez CA, Figueroa SA. Complication rates of 3% hypertonic saline infusion through peripheral intravenous access[J]. J Neurosci Nurs, 2017, 49(3): 191-195.
[1] 陶宏宇, 叶菁菁, 俞劲, 杨秀珍, 钱晶晶, 徐彬, 徐玮泽, 舒强. 右心声学造影在儿童右向左分流相关疾病中的评估价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 959-965.
[2] 宋勇, 李东炫, 王翔, 李锐. 基于数据挖掘法分析3 种超声造影剂不良反应信号[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 890-898.
[3] 刘琴, 刘瀚旻, 谢亮. 基质金属蛋白酶在儿童哮喘发生机制中作用的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 564-568.
[4] 向韵, 卢游, 杨凡. 全氟及多氟烷基化合物暴露与儿童肥胖症相关性研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 569-574.
[5] 许月芳, 刘旺, 曾妙甜, 郭宇姝. 多粘菌素B和多粘菌素E治疗外科多重耐药菌感染临床疗效及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 700-703.
[6] 何岩, 向文采. 七氟醚与异丙酚联合氯胺酮麻醉在疝修补术中的镇静镇痛效果及安全性[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 566-569.
[7] 中华医学会器官移植学分会, 中华医学会外科学分会外科手术学学组, 中华医学会外科学分会移植学组, 华南劈离式肝移植联盟. 劈离式供肝儿童肝移植中国临床操作指南[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 593-601.
[8] 刘军, 丘文静, 孙方昊, 李松盈, 易述红, 傅斌生, 杨扬, 罗慧. 在体与离体劈离式肝移植在儿童肝移植中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 688-693.
[9] 赵磊, 刘文志, 林峰, 于剑, 孙铭骏, 崔佑刚, 张旭, 衣宇鹏, 于宝胜, 冯宁. 深部热疗在改善结直肠癌术后辅助化疗副反应及生活质量中的作用研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 488-493.
[10] 王守森, 傅世龙, 鲜亮, 林珑. 深入理解控制性减压技术对创伤性颅脑损伤术中脑膨出的预防机制与效果[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 257-262.
[11] 吴东阳, 林向丹, 石佐林, 赵玉龙, 王振, 文安国, 纪鑫, 李俊之, 赵明光. NF-L、NLRP3、S100B 蛋白在颅脑损伤严重程度及预后评估中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 279-285.
[12] 罗磊, 熊建平, 郑宏伟, 王嗣嵩, 柴祥, 吴青, 潘海鹏. 静脉留置针穿刺引流治疗颅骨修补术后硬膜外积液一例报道[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 315-317.
[13] 王如海, 王绅, 张敏, 李春, 韩超, 于强, 胡海成, 李习珍. 重型创伤性脑损伤患者去骨瓣减压术后短期死亡风险的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 285-291.
[14] 司楠, 孙洪涛. 创伤性脑损伤后肾功能障碍危险因素的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 300-305.
[15] 张琛, 秦鸣, 董娟, 陈玉龙. 超声检查对儿童肠扭转缺血性改变的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 565-568.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?