切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (06) : 698 -703. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2018.06.012

所属专题: 文献

论著

基于肌内神经分布针刺联合常规康复训练治疗痉挛性脑性瘫痪尖足畸形
向俊璐1, 刘圆圆1, 魏巍1, 李岚1, 王东2, 周文智1,()   
  1. 1. 610000 成都市妇女儿童中心医院康复科
    2. 610081 成都大学附属医院康复医学科
  • 收稿日期:2018-04-25 修回日期:2018-11-12 出版日期:2018-12-01
  • 通信作者: 周文智

Acupuncture therapy based on intramuscular nerve distribution combined with routine rehabilitation exercise training for the treatment of spastic cerebral palsy with tip foot deformity

Junlu Xiang1, Yuanyuan Liu1, Wei Wei1, Lan Li1, Dong Wang2, Wenzhi Zhou1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Rehabilitation, Chengdu Women′s and Children′s Central Hospital, Chengdu 610000, Sichuan Province, China
    2. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, Chengdu 610081, Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2018-04-25 Revised:2018-11-12 Published:2018-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Wenzhi Zhou
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhou Wenzhi, Email:
  • Supported by:
    General Project of Sichuan Education Department(16ZB0432); Medical Research Project of Chengdu Health and Family Planning Commission(2015070)
引用本文:

向俊璐, 刘圆圆, 魏巍, 李岚, 王东, 周文智. 基于肌内神经分布针刺联合常规康复训练治疗痉挛性脑性瘫痪尖足畸形[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2018, 14(06): 698-703.

Junlu Xiang, Yuanyuan Liu, Wei Wei, Lan Li, Dong Wang, Wenzhi Zhou. Acupuncture therapy based on intramuscular nerve distribution combined with routine rehabilitation exercise training for the treatment of spastic cerebral palsy with tip foot deformity[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2018, 14(06): 698-703.

目的

探讨基于肌内神经分布的针刺疗法联合常规康复训练,对痉挛性脑性瘫痪(CP)尖足畸形患儿的痉挛程度及粗大运动功能的疗效。

方法

选择2013年7月至2016年11月,于成都市妇女儿童中心医院康复科进行治疗的47例痉挛性CP尖足畸形患儿为研究对象。采用随机数字表法,将其分为观察组(n=24)和对照组(n=23)。2组患儿均给予相同的常规粗大运动训练及中医推拿治疗,观察组患儿则在此基础上,另给予基于肌内神经分布的针刺治疗,所有患儿均共计治疗6个月。分别于治疗前及治疗1、3、6个月时,采用《综合痉挛量表(CSS)》及《粗大运动功能测试量表(GMFM)》,对2组患儿进行疗效评价。对2组患儿的一般临床资料,以及2组患儿治疗前、后不同时间点疗效评价结果组间及组内进行比较,采用t检验及χ2检验进行统计学分析。本研究遵循的程序符合成都市妇女儿童中心医院伦理委员会制定的伦理学标准,并获得该伦理委员会批准[审批文号:2015(11)号],所有患儿监护人均签署临床研究知情同意书。

结果

①2组患儿性别构成比,年龄及粗大运动功能分级系统(GMFCS)分级(Ⅱ级、Ⅲ级)构成比比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。②CSS及GMFM分值组间比较:治疗前,2组患儿CSS及GMFM分值比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗1、3、6个月时,观察组患儿CSS分值分别为(10.5±1.9)分、(7.6±1.7)分、(7.0±1.5)分,均低于对照组的(11.9±1.7)分、(8.6±1.6)分、(8.2±1.8)分;而GMFM分值分别为(66.7±9.5)分、(79.6±10.1)分、(90.2±10.9)分,均高于对照组的(49.1±8.8)分、(73.1±11.2)分、(81.5±12.6)分,并且上述差异均有统计学意义(CSS分值:t=-2.662, P=0.011; t=-2.022, P=0.049; t=-2.374, P=0.022;GMFM分值:t=6.588, P<0.001; t=2.086, P=0.043; t=2.532, P=0.015)。③CSS及GMFM分值组内比较:治疗1、3、6个月时,观察组患儿CSS分值均分别低于治疗前的(12.1±1.7)分,GMFM分值均分别高于治疗前的(49.5±7.9)分,并且差异均有统计学意义(CSS分值:t=-11.632、-26.432、-32.111,GMFM分值:t=9.091、14.159、17.352;均为P<0.001);治疗1个月时,对照组患儿CSS及GMFM分值与治疗前比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗3、6个月时,对照组患儿CSS分值分别低于治疗前的(12.0±1.6)分,GMFM分值分别高于治疗前的(48.5±8.5)分,并且差异均有统计学意义(CSS分值:t=-18.247、-17.109, GMFM分值:t=10.366、11.723;均为P<0.001)。

结论

在常规粗大运动功能训练及中医推拿治疗基础上,联合基于肌内神经分布的针刺疗法,治疗痉挛性CP尖足畸形患儿起效更早,能进一步缓解肢体痉挛、减轻下肢尖足异常程度、提高下肢运动能力。

Objective

To study the clinical efficacy of the degree of spasm and gross motor function of acupuncture therapy based on intramuscular nerve distribution combined with routine rehabilitation exercise training for treatment of tip foot deformity in children with spastic cerebral palsy (CP).

Methods

From July 2013 to November 2016, a total of 47 children with spastic CP tip foot deformity who were treated in the Department of Rehabilitation, Chengdu Women′s and Children′s Central Hospital, were selected as research subjects. Using random number table method, they were divided into observation group (n=24) and control group (n=23). Both groups were treated by the same routine rehabilitation exercise training and traditional Chinese medicine massage, meanwhile the observation group were taken additional acupuncture therapy based on intramuscular nerve distribution, and all the children were treated for 6 months. Before treatment, and after treatment of 1, 3, 6 months, curative effect of CP children were evaluate by the Gross Motor Function Measure Scale (GMFM) and Composite Spasticity Scale (CSS). The general clinical data between two groups of children, also the evaluation results of curative effect at different time points before and after treatment between two groups and intra group were compared by t test and chi-square test for statistical analysis. The procedure followed in this study were in lined with the ethical standards formulated by the Ethics Committee of Chengdu Women′s and Children′s Central Hospital, and has been approved by this committee [approval number: 2015 (11)]. All guardians of children signed the informed consents of clinical research.

Results

①There were no significant differences between two groups of children in gender constituent ratio of male and female, age, and grade constituent ratio of grade Ⅱ and Ⅲ of gross motor function grading system (GMFCS) (P>0.05). ②Comparison results of CSS and GMFM scores between two groups: there were no significant differences between two groups in CSS and GMFM scores before treatment (P>0.05). The CSS scores at 1, 3, 6 months after treatment in observation group were (10.5±1.9) sores, (7.6±1.7) sores and (7.0±1.5) sores, respectively, which were lower than those of (11.9±1.7) sores, (8.6±1.6) sores and (8.2±1.8) sores, respectively in control group; the GMFM scores at 1, 3, 6 months after treatment in observation group were (66.7±9.5) sores, (79.6±10.1) sores and (90.2±10.9) sores, respectively, which were higher than those of (49.1±8.8) sores, (73.1±11.2) sores and (81.5±12.6) sores, respectively in control group, and the differences were all statistically significant (CSS score: t=-2.662, P=0.011; t=-2.022, P=0.049; t=-2.374, P=0.022. GMFM score: t=6.588, P<0.001; t=2.086, P=0.043; t=2.532, P=0.015). ③Comparison results of CSS and GMFM scores of intra group: the CSS scores at 1, 3, 6 months after treatment were lower than that of before treatment′s (12.1±1.7) scores, respectively, the GMFM scores were higher than that of before treatment′s (49.5±7.9) scores, respectively in observation group, and the differences were statistically significant (t=-11.632, -26.432, -32.111; t=9.091, 14.159, 17.352; all P<0.001). There were no significant differences in CSS and GMFM scores between 1 months after treatment and before treatment in control group (P>0.05). The CSS scores at 3, 6 months after treatment were lower than that of before treatment′s (12.0±1.6) scores, respectively, while the GMFM scores were higher than that of before treatment′s (48.5±8.5) scores, respectively in control group, and the differences were statistically significant (t=-18.247, -17.109; t=10.366, 11.723; all P<0.001).

Conclusions

Through the basis of routine rehabilitation exercise training of gross motor function and massage therapy of traditional Chinese medicine, and combined with acupuncture therapy based on intramuscular nerve distribution, those treatment strategies for spastic CP tip foot deformity took effect earlier, which can further alleviate limbs spasm, alleviate abnormal posture of lower limb toes and improve motor function of lower limbs.

图2 胫神经刺激点位置示意图
表1 2组患儿一般临床资料比较
表2 2组患儿治疗前、后不同时间点疗效评价结果组间及组内比较(分,±s)
[1]
陈秀洁. 小儿脑性瘫痪的神经发育学治疗法[M]. 2版. 郑州:河南科学技术出版社,2012: 297-300 .
[2]
林庆,李松,刘建蒙,等. 我国六省(区)小儿脑性瘫痪患病率及临床类型的调查分析[J].中华儿科杂志,2001, 39(10): 613-615.
[3]
Rosenbaum P, Paneth N, Leviton A, et al. A report: the definition and classification of cerebral palsy April 2006[J]. Dev Med Child Neurol Suppl, 2007, 109: 8-14.
[4]
高晶,王丽娜,赵斌,等. 虚拟情景循环踏车训练对痉挛型脑瘫患儿下肢肌张力及运动功能的影响[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志,2015, 37(6): 432-435.
[5]
杜青,唐久来,魏国荣,等. 2016国际脑瘫及其它儿童残疾学术会议纪要[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志,2016, 38(8): 631-633.
[6]
陈秀洁,李树春. 小儿脑性瘫痪的定义、分型和诊断条件[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志,2007, 29(5): 309.
[7]
向俊璐,周文智,田萍,等. 针刺推拿对痉挛型脑性瘫痪尖足的影响[J]. 中国康复理论与实践,2015, 21(3): 334-337.
[8]
杨再春. 神经干刺激疗法[M]. 沈阳:辽宁人民出版社,1978: 4.
[9]
燕铁斌,许云影. 综合痉挛量表的信度研究[J]. 中国康复医学杂志,2002, 17(5): 263-265.
[10]
Alotaibi M, Long T, Kennedy E, et al. The efficacy of GMFM-88 and GMFM-66 to detect changes in gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy (CP): a literature review[J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2014, 36(8): 617-627.
[11]
Soleimani F, Vameghi R, Biglarian A. Antenatal and intrapartum risk factors for cerebral palsy in term and near-term newborns[J]. Arch Iran Med, 2013, 16(4): 213-216.
[12]
Wu YW, Kuzniewicz MW, Wickremasinghe AC, et al. Risk for cerebral palsy in infants with total serum bilirubin levels at or above the exchange transfusion threshold: a population-based study[J]. JAMA Pediatr, 2015, 169(3): 239-246.
[13]
Wu CS, Pedersen LH, Miller JE, et al. Risk of cerebral palsy and childhood epilepsy related to infections before or during pregnancy[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(2): e57552.
[14]
Wong C, Bartlett DJ, Chiarello LA, et al. Comparison of the prevalence and impact of health problems of pre-school children with and without cerebral palsy[J]. Child Care Health Dev, 2012, 38(1): 128-138.
[15]
Mann JR, McDermott S, Griffith MI, et al. Uncovering the complex relationship between pre-eclampsia, preterm birth and cerebral palsy[J]. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol, 2011, 25(2): 100-110.
[16]
徐淑玲,赵向,郭晓,等. 痉挛型脑性瘫痪尖足患儿临床治疗及其踝足矫形器的应用[J]. 中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2009, 13(34): 6781-6784.
[17]
汪军,崔晓. 针刺治疗痉挛研究进展[J]. 中国康复医学杂志,2012, 27(2): 191-193.
[18]
吴绪波,张海蒙,孙克兴. 互动式头针治疗痉挛型小儿脑瘫粗大运动功能疗效评价[J]. 上海针灸杂志,2011, 30(3): 177-179.
[19]
刘岚,刘累耕,吕鸣,等. 快速经络针刺合头针疗法治疗小儿脑性瘫痪[J]. 中国针灸,2010, 30(10): 826-829.
[20]
汪军,孙克兴,吴绪波. 头针治疗对脑瘫儿童粗大运动功能的影响[J]. 上海针灸杂志,2010, 29(7): 442-445.
[21]
任秀云. 头针结合康复运动疗法治疗痉挛性脑瘫[J]. 针灸临床杂志,2011, 27(1): 25-26.
[22]
佟帅,苏李,吕海波,等. 关键点针刺法配合康复治疗脑梗死后痉挛期偏瘫疗效观察[J]. 中国针灸,2013, 33(5): 399-402.
[23]
顾旭东,姚云海,顾敏,等. 电针结合运动疗法对脑卒中偏瘫患者躯干控制的影响[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2005, 27(9): 533.
[24]
马壮,谢宜南,王舒. 浅议现代医学对针刺选穴的指导意义[J]. 针灸临床杂志,2011, 27(4): 3-4.
[25]
程永. 脑的经脉联系与中风病痉挛性运动障碍针灸治疗思路探讨[J]. 中国中医急症,2012, 21(4): 592-594.
[1] 陶宏宇, 叶菁菁, 俞劲, 杨秀珍, 钱晶晶, 徐彬, 徐玮泽, 舒强. 右心声学造影在儿童右向左分流相关疾病中的评估价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 959-965.
[2] 刘琴, 刘瀚旻, 谢亮. 基质金属蛋白酶在儿童哮喘发生机制中作用的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 564-568.
[3] 向韵, 卢游, 杨凡. 全氟及多氟烷基化合物暴露与儿童肥胖症相关性研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 569-574.
[4] 王雅楠, 刘丹, 曹正浓, 贾慧敏. 儿童迟发性先天性膈疝患儿的临床诊治特点分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(04): 410-419.
[5] 刘静, 王燕妮, 王继萍. 儿童毛发移植应用前景及病例讨论[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(04): 368-368.
[6] 郑宝英, 黄小兰, 贾楠, 朱春梅. 儿童难治性肺炎支原体肺炎早期预警指标[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 215-221.
[7] 刘冉佳, 崔向丽, 周效竹, 曲伟, 朱志军. 儿童肝移植受者健康相关生存质量评价的荟萃分析[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 302-309.
[8] 丁荷蓓, 王珣, 陈为国. 七氟烷吸入麻醉与异丙酚静脉麻醉在儿童腹股沟斜疝手术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 570-574.
[9] 曾纪晓, 徐晓钢, 王欣星, 刘斐, 兰梦龙, 陶波圆, 梁子建, 叶志华, 罗媛圆. 达芬奇机器人辅助Swenson-like巨结肠根治术[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 239-243.
[10] 中华医学会器官移植学分会, 中华医学会外科学分会外科手术学学组, 中华医学会外科学分会移植学组, 华南劈离式肝移植联盟. 劈离式供肝儿童肝移植中国临床操作指南[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 593-601.
[11] 刘军, 丘文静, 孙方昊, 李松盈, 易述红, 傅斌生, 杨扬, 罗慧. 在体与离体劈离式肝移植在儿童肝移植中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 688-693.
[12] 张琛, 秦鸣, 董娟, 陈玉龙. 超声检查对儿童肠扭转缺血性改变的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 565-568.
[13] 王晓瑜, 郭群英, 牛雅萌, 赵成松. 公立儿童医院促进儿科就医均等化实践探析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 383-387.
[14] 陈晓胜, 何佳, 刘方, 吴蕊, 杨海涛, 樊晓寒. 直立倾斜试验诱发31 秒心脏停搏的植入心脏起搏器儿童一例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 488-494.
[15] 曹亚丽, 高雨萌, 张英谦, 李博, 杜军保, 金红芳. 儿童坐位不耐受的临床进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 510-515.
阅读次数
全文


摘要