切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (06) : 644 -648. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2018.06.004

所属专题: 文献

论著

儿童室性早搏的心率变异性分析
魏丽1, 周婧雅2, 乔莉娜1, 叶强华1,()   
  1. 1. 610041 成都,四川大学华西第二医院儿科、出生缺陷与相关妇儿疾病教育部重点实验室
    2. 610041 成都,四川大学生命科学学院
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-09 修回日期:2018-08-31 出版日期:2018-12-01
  • 通信作者: 叶强华

Analysis of heart rate variability in children with ventricular premature beat

Li Wei1, Jingya Zhou2, Lina Qiao1, Qianghua Ye1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
    2. College of Life Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2018-03-09 Revised:2018-08-31 Published:2018-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Qianghua Ye
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Ye Qianghua, Email:
  • Supported by:
    Plan Project of Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province(14ZC1845-9)
引用本文:

魏丽, 周婧雅, 乔莉娜, 叶强华. 儿童室性早搏的心率变异性分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2018, 14(06): 644-648.

Li Wei, Jingya Zhou, Lina Qiao, Qianghua Ye. Analysis of heart rate variability in children with ventricular premature beat[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2018, 14(06): 644-648.

目的

探讨良性和恶性室性早搏(VPB)儿童及健康儿童动态心电图的心率变异性(HRV),分析各时域指标和频域指标值变化。

方法

选择2012年1月至2017年12月,于四川大学华西第二医院接受动态心电图检查,根据临床辅助检查和随访结果明确病因的6~14岁VPB儿童100例为研究对象。按照VPB的良、恶性,将其分为恶性VPB组(n=50)及良性VPB组(n=50)。恶性VPB组患儿均为合并器质性心脏病的VPB患儿,其中合并先天性心脏病患儿为4例、扩张型心肌病(DCM)为9例、心肌酶学检查结果异常而被诊断为病毒性心肌炎患儿为37例。选取同期于同一家医院接受动态心电图检查未见异常,并且一般临床资料均显示正常的儿童50例,纳入对照组。对于呈正态分布与方差齐性计量资料,如总体标准差(SDNN)、均值标准差(SDANN)、差值均方根(rMSSD)、差值>50 ms的百分比(PNN50)、R-R间期变异系数(CV),超低频功率(ULF)、极低频功率(VLF)、低频功率(LF)及高频功率(HF),采用±s表示,3组比较,采用单因素方差分析;进一步组间两两比较,采用最小显著差异法(LSD)法。受试儿性别构成比等计数资料采取率(%)表示,3组间比较,采用χ2检验。3组受试儿的性别构成比及年龄比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。本研究符合2013年修订的《世界医学协会赫尔辛基宣言》要求,分组征得受试儿监护人的知情同意,并与之签署临床研究知情同意书。

结果

3组受试儿的HRV时域指标SDNN、SDANN、rMSSD、PNN50、CV,频域指标ULF、VLF、LF、HF分别整体比较,差异均有统计学意义(F=42.304、14.144、26.344、15.362、8.115,18.031、10.611、20.928、13.719, P<0.05)。进一步进行3组间两两比较的结果显示,恶性VPB组与良性VPB组CV、VLF、LF比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);良性VPB组与对照组PNN50、HF比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);其余HRV时域、频域指标3组间两两比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

儿童VPB的动态心电图HRV分析,对临床判断良、恶性VPB具有一定价值,但是否可作为判断儿童VPB严重程度及其预后的指标,则有待多中心、大样本、前瞻性随机对照试验进一步研究、证实。

Objective

To explore the heart rate variability (HRV) of dynamic electrocardiogram in children with benign or malignant ventricular premature beat (VPB) and healthy children, and analyze the changes of time and frequency domain indexes of HRV.

Methods

From January 2012 to December 2017, a total of 100 children with VPB diagnosed by auxiliary examinations and follow-up visits results, who were 6-14 years old and accepted dynamic electrocardiogram test in West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University were recruited in this study. According to benign or malignant VPB, they were divided into benign VPB group (n=50) and malignant VPB group (n=50). Children in malignant VPB group were all combined with organic heart diseases, such as congenital heart defects (4 cases), dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) (9 cases ), and viral myocarditis (37 cases) diagnosed by abnormal myocardial enzyme levels. Meanwhile, 50 cases of healthy children with the same age range who received dynamic electrocardiogram in the same hospital during the same period and the results were normal were included into control group. Measurement data with normal distribution and homogeneity such as standard deviation of all normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN), standard deviation of average normal-to-normal intervals (SDANN), root mean square of the successive difference (rMSSD), percentage normal-to-normal interval deviation greater than 50 ms (PNN50), coefficient of variance (CV), coefficient of variance (ULF), very-low frequencies (VLF), low frequencies (LF), and high frequencies (HF) were expressed by ±s. And those data among 3 groups were compared by one-way ANOVA, further comparisons between each two groups were conducted by least singnificant difference (LSD) test. Numeration data such as constituent ratio of genders were expressed by rate (%), and were compared by chi-square test among 3 groups. There were no significant differences among 3 groups in the constituent ratio of gender and age (P>0.05). This study met the requirements of the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki revised in 2013. Clinical informed consent was obtained from each child′s guardians.

Results

There were significant differences among 3 groups in HRV analysis results of time domain indicators such as SDNN, SDANN, rMSSD, PNN50, CV, and frequency domain indicators such as ULF, VLF, LF and HF (F=42.304, 14.144, 26.344, 15.362, 8.115, 18.031, 10.611, 20.928, 13.719; P<0.05). There were no significant differences among CV, VLF and LF between malignant VPB group and benign VPB group (P>0.05), and PNN50 and HF between benign VPB group and control group (P>0.05), but there were significant differences in the others time domain indicators and frequency domain indicators of HRV between each two groups (P<0.05).

Conclusions

The HRV analysis of dynamic electrocardiogram is helpful in determining benign and malignant VPB in children. However, prospective randomized controlled trials with multicenter and large-sample size are needed to evaluate whether the HRV analysis can be used to determine the severity of VPB and as a prognosis marker in children with VPB.

表1 3组受试儿一般临床资料比较
表2 3组受试儿心率变异性时域指标比较(±s)
表3 3组受试儿心率变异性频域指标比较(±s)
[1]
王霞,余更生. 儿童室性早搏的治疗与预后[J]. 现代医药卫生,2015, 31(14): 2138-2141.
[2]
Zhong L, Lee YH, Huang XM, et al. Relative efficacy of catheter ablation vs antiarrhythmic drugs in treating premature ventricular contractions: a single-center retrospective study[J]. Heart Rhythm, 2014, 11(2): 187-193.
[3]
Eugenio PL. Frequent premature ventricular contractions: an electrical link to cardiomyopathy[J]. Cardiol Rev, 2015, 23(4): 168-172.
[4]
Panizo JG, Barra S, Mellor G, et al. Premature ventricular complex-induced cardiomyopathy[J]. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev, 2018, 7(2): 128-134.
[5]
Wang Y, Eltit JM, Kaszala K, et al. Cellular mechanism of premature ventricular contraction-induced cardiomyopathy[J]. Heart Rhythm, 2014, 11(11): 2064-2072.
[6]
王影,都鹏飞. 儿童室性早搏的治疗[J]. 中华全科医学,2016, 14(5): 700-701.
[7]
李丽,庞保东,李树华,等. 儿童室性早搏心率变异性特点[J]. 临床儿科杂志,2013, 31(6): 598.
[8]
黄宛. 临床心电图学[M]. 5版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2005: 279.
[9]
魏丽,卢永义,乔莉娜,等. Tp-Te间期对于儿童室性早搏的意义[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志,2013, 15(11): 1014-1017.
[10]
Peltola MA. Role of editing of R-R intervals in the analysis of heart rate variability[J]. Front Physiol, 2012, 3: 148.
[11]
Sacha J. Heart rate contribution to the clinical value of heart rate variability[J]. Kardiol Pol, 2014, 72(10): 919-924.
[12]
Billman GE, Huikuri HV, Sacha J, et al. An introduction to heart rate variability: methodological considerations and clinical applications[J]. Front Physiol, 2015, 6: 55.
[13]
Billman GE. Heart rate variability- a historical perspective[J]. Front Physiol, 2011, 2: 86
[14]
王文娟,文红霞,曹晓晓,等. 特发性室性期前收缩患儿心率变异性和心率减速力的研究[J]. 临床儿科杂志,2016, 34(7): 481-485.
[15]
文川,王成,郑慧芬,等. 小儿扩张型心肌病心率变异性分析[J]. 临床儿科杂志,2007, 25(10): 832-834.
[16]
Morozova MP, Lukoshkova EV, Gavrilova SA. Some aspects of heart rate variability estimation in rats[J]. Ross Fiziol Zh Im I M Sechenova, 2015, 101(3): 291-307.
[17]
Shaffer F, McCraty R, Zerr CL. A healthy heart is not a metronome: an integrative review of the heart′s anatomy and heart rate variability[J]. Front Psychol, 2014, 5: 1040.
[1] 张璇, 马宇童, 苗玉倩, 张云, 吴士文, 党晓楚, 陈颖颖, 钟兆明, 王雪娟, 胡淼, 孙岩峰, 马秀珠, 吕发勤, 寇海燕. 超声对Duchenne肌营养不良儿童膈肌功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1068-1073.
[2] 张宝富, 俞劲, 叶菁菁, 俞建根, 马晓辉, 刘喜旺. 先天性原发隔异位型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图诊断[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1074-1080.
[3] 韩丹, 王婷, 肖欢, 朱丽容, 陈镜宇, 唐毅. 超声造影与增强CT对儿童肝脏良恶性病变诊断价值的对比分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 939-944.
[4] 刘婷婷, 林妍冰, 汪珊, 陈幕荣, 唐子鉴, 代东伶, 夏焙. 超声衰减参数成像评价儿童代谢相关脂肪性肝病的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 787-794.
[5] 周钰菡, 肖欢, 唐毅, 杨春江, 周娟, 朱丽容, 徐娟, 牟芳婷. 超声对儿童髋关节暂时性滑膜炎的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 795-800.
[6] 米洁, 陈晨, 李佳玲, 裴海娜, 张恒博, 李飞, 李东杰. 儿童头面部外伤特点分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 511-515.
[7] 中华医学会烧伤外科学分会小儿烧伤学组. 儿童烧伤早期休克液体复苏专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(05): 371-376.
[8] 王蕾, 王少华, 牛海珍, 尹腾飞. 儿童腹股沟疝围手术期风险预警干预[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 768-772.
[9] 李芳, 许瑞, 李洋洋, 石秀全. 循证医学理念在儿童腹股沟疝患者中的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 782-786.
[10] 彭永辉, 张文杰, 李炳根, 聂向阳, 吴凯, 杨六成. 单孔双针疝囊高位结扎术在儿童巨大腹股沟疝的临床应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 566-569.
[11] 周顺, 赵素侠, 时静静, 吴双双, 吴圆圆, 李金山. 丙泊酚-舒芬太尼复合七氟烷吸入对小儿腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术的麻醉效果及安全性[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 603-607.
[12] 吕垒, 冯啸, 何凯明, 曾凯宁, 杨卿, 吕海金, 易慧敏, 易述红, 杨扬, 傅斌生. 改良金氏评分在儿童肝豆状核变性急性肝衰竭肝移植手术时机评估中价值并文献复习[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 661-668.
[13] 卓少宏, 林秀玲, 周翠梅, 熊卫莲, 马兴灶. CD64指数、SAA/CRP、PCT联合检测在小儿消化道感染性疾病鉴别诊断中的应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 505-509.
[14] 刘笑笑, 张小杉, 刘群, 马岚, 段莎莎, 施依璐, 张敏洁, 王雅晳. 中国学龄前儿童先天性心脏病流行病学研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1021-1024.
[15] 李静, 张玲玲, 邢伟. 兴趣诱导理念用于小儿手术麻醉诱导前的价值及其对家属满意度的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 812-817.
阅读次数
全文


摘要