切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (03) : 270 -276. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2018.03.004

所属专题: 文献

论著

聚合酶链反应-反向点杂交法检测遗传性耳聋相关基因的热点突变
张彦1,(), 刘晶晶2, 叶秋萍2, 李印淑2   
  1. 1. 511442 广州,广东省妇幼保健院医学遗传中心
    2. 518000 广东深圳,亚能生物技术(深圳)有限公司
  • 收稿日期:2017-10-09 修回日期:2018-05-12 出版日期:2018-06-01
  • 通信作者: 张彦

Detection of gene hot spots mutation in genetic deafness associated gene by polymerase chain reaction-reverse dot blot technique

Yan Zhang1,(), Jingjing Liu2, Qiuping Ye2, Yinshu Li2   

  1. 1. Center for Medical Genetics, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou 511442, Guangdong Province, China
    2. Yaneng Bioscience (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518000, Guangdong Province, China
  • Received:2017-10-09 Revised:2018-05-12 Published:2018-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Yan Zhang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhang Yan, Email:
引用本文:

张彦, 刘晶晶, 叶秋萍, 李印淑. 聚合酶链反应-反向点杂交法检测遗传性耳聋相关基因的热点突变[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2018, 14(03): 270-276.

Yan Zhang, Jingjing Liu, Qiuping Ye, Yinshu Li. Detection of gene hot spots mutation in genetic deafness associated gene by polymerase chain reaction-reverse dot blot technique[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2018, 14(03): 270-276.

目的

探讨聚合酶链反应-反向点杂交(PCR-RDB)法对遗传性耳聋相关基因突变检测的准确性和实用性。

方法

选择2014年1月至2016年10月,于广东省妇幼保健院临床诊断为非综合征型耳聋(NSHI)的250例患者为研究对象。采用PCR-RDB法检测其外周血遗传性耳聋相关基因突变。PCR-RDB法采用遗传性耳聋基因芯片检测试剂盒,可检测中国人群常见的4个耳聋相关基因的12个热点突变,即GJB2(35del G、176_191del 16、235del C、299_300del AT),GJB3(538C>T),SLC26A4(1174A>T、1226G>A、1229C>T、IVS7-2A>G、2168A>G)及线粒体MTRNR1(1494C>T、1555A>G)。同时,所有DNA样本均采用金标准Sanger测序法进行对比验证。本研究符合2013年修订的《世界医学协会赫尔辛基宣言》,并征得受试者知情同意。

结果

①本研究来自250例受试者的250例DNA样本中,耳聋相关基因突变检出率为51.6%(129/250),其中GJB2基因突变检出率为28.4%(71/250),SLC26A4基因突变为19.2%(48/250),线粒体MTRNR1基因突变为4.4%(11/250),GJB3基因突变为2.0%(5/250);129例检出的耳聋相关基因突变中,符合遗传病致病特征的耳聋相关基因突变的几率为86.8%(112/129)。②PCR-RDB法与Sanger测序法,对12个耳聋相关基因热点突变的检测结果均相同。③PCR-RDB法检测12个耳聋相关基因热点突变的灵敏度、特异度、总一致性、阳性预测值及阴性预测值均为100.0%。

结论

虽然PCR-RDB法检测耳聋相关基因突变的结果与金标准Sanger测序法一致,但是本研究样本量尚小,因此是否可满足临床对遗传性耳聋基因检测的需求,则需多中心、大样本随机对照试验进一步研究、证实。

Objective

To verify the accuracy and effect of polymerase chain reaction-reverse dot blotting (PCR-RDB) technique in genetic deafness associated gene test.

Methods

A total of 250 patients with nonsyndromic hearing impairment(NSHI) who were diagnosed in Guangdong Women and Children Hospital from January 2014 to October 2016, were chosen as research objects. With PCR-RDB technique, we detected several genes associated with NSHI in genome DNA from peripheral blood cells of all the patients. To carry out PCR-RDB, the gene chip kit for hereditary hearing loss was used, which can detect 12 hot spots mutation of four genes in Chinese, including GJB2 (35del G, 176_191del 16, 235del C, 299_300del AT), GJB3 (538C>T), SLC26A4 (1174A>T, 1226G>A, 1229C>T, IVS7-2A>G, 2168A>G) and mitochondrion MTRNR1 (1494C>T, 1555A>G). Meanwhile, all the samples were also tested by Sanger sequencing, in order to compare and validate the results to that of PCR-RDB technique. This study was in line with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki revised in 2013 and informed contents were obtained from all patients.

Results

①There was 51.6%(129/250) genetic deafness associated gene mutations in DNA sample of 250 patients of NSHI, and some of which were 28.4%(71/250) from GJB2 gene, 19.2%(48/250) from SLC26A4 gene, 4.4%(11/250) from mitochondrion MTRNR1 gene and 2.0%(5/250) from GJB3 gene, respectively. Among 129 cases of deafness associated gene mutations, 86.8%(112/129) was met with pathogenicity characteristics of hereditary disease. ② All detection results of 12 hot spots mutations of deafness associated gene by PCR-RDB were consistent with those of by Sanger sequencing method. ③The sensitivity, specificity, total consistency, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of detection results of 12 hot spots mutations of deafness associated gene by PCR-RDB technique were all 100.0%.

Conclusions

Although detection results of gene hot spots mutation in genetic deafness associated gene by PCR-RDB technique were consistent with those of by Sanger sequencing method, whether it is worthy of clinical application, multicenter and large sample randomized controlled trial should be conducted as sample size of this study is still small.

表1 本组129例耳聋相关基因突变类型及其分布
图2 GJB2基因235 del C杂合突变(图2A:PCR-RDB法检测结果图,突变位点见红色方框处;图2B:Sanger测序法检测结果图,突变位点见红色方框处)
图3 GJB2基因235 del C杂合突变复合SLC26A4基因IVS7-2A>G杂合突变(图3A:PCR-RDB法检测结果图,突变位点见红色方框处;图3B:GJB2基因235 del C杂合突变的Sanger测序法检测结果图,突变位点见红色方框处;图3C:SLC26A4基因IVS7-2A>G杂合突变的Sanger测序法检测结果图,突变位点见红色方框处)
图5 GJB3基因538 C>T杂合突变(图5A:PCR-RDB法检测结果图,突变位点见红色方框处;图5B:Sanger测序法检测结果图,突变位点见红色方框处)
图7 SLC26A4基因IVS7-2A>G纯合突变(图7A:PCR-RDB法检测结果图,突变位点见红色方框处;图7B:Sanger测序法检测结果图,突变位点见红色方框处)
图8 SLC26A4基因IVS7-2A>G杂合突变复合1229 C>T杂合突变(图8A:PCR-RDB法检测结果图,突变位点见红色方框处;图8B:SLC26A4基因IVS7-2A>G杂合突变的Sanger测序法检测结果图,突变位点见红色方框处;图8C:SLC26A4基因1229 C>T杂合突变的Sanger测序法检测结果图,突变位点见红色方框处)
图9 SLC26A4基因IVS7-2A>G杂合突变复合2168 A>G杂合突变(图9A:PCR-RDB法检测结果图,突变位点见红色方框处;图9B:SLC26A4基因IVS7-2A>G杂合突变的Sanger测序法检测结果图,突变位点见红色方框处;图9C:SLC26A4基因2168 A>G杂合突变Sanger测序法检测结果图,突变位点见红色方框处)
表2 2种方法检测耳聋相关基因突变的结果比较(例数)
[1]
郑晓瑛,张蕾,陈功,等. 中国人口六类残疾流行现状[J]. 中华流行病学杂志,2008, 29(7): 634-638.
[2]
戴朴. 遗传性耳聋的预防和阻断[J]. 中华医学杂志,2007, 87(40): 2811-2813.
[3]
White KR. Early hearing detection and intervention programs: opportunities for genetic services[J]. AM J Med Genet A, 2004, 130A(1): 29-36.
[4]
Egilmez OK, Kalcioglu MT. Genetics of nonsyndromic congenital hearing loss[J]. Scientifica (Cairo), 2016, 2016: 7576064.
[5]
刘学忠,欧阳小梅,Denise, 等. 中国人群遗传性耳聋研究进展[J]. 中华耳科学杂志,2006, 4(2): 81-89.
[6]
Zhu J, Cao Q, Zhang N, et al. A study of deafness-related genetic mutations as a basis for strategies to prevent hereditary hearing loss in Hebei, China[J]. Intractable Rare Dis Res, 2015, 4(3): 131-138.
[7]
Yuan Y, Guo W, Tang J, et al. Molecular epidemiology and functional assessment of novel allelic variants of slc26a4 in non-syndromic hearing loss patients with enlarged vestibular aqueduct in China[J]. PLoS One, 2012, 7(11): e49984.
[8]
袁永一. 中国人重度—极重度耳聋分子流行病学及致病机制研究[D]. 北京:中国人民解放军军医进修学院,2007.
[9]
Dai P, Yu F, Han B, et al. GJB2 mutation spectrum in 2 063 Chinese patients with nonsyndromic hearing impairment[J]. J Transl Med, 2009, 7: 26.
[10]
Zheng J, Ying Z, Cai Z, et al. GJB2 mutation spectrum and genotype-phenotype correlation in 1 067 Han Chinese subjects with non-syndromic hearing loss[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(6): e0128691.
[11]
Dai P, Yuan Y, Huang D, et al. Molecular etiology of hearing impairment in Inner Mongolia: mutations in SLC26A4 gene and relevant phenotype analysis[J]. J Transl Med, 2008, 6: 74.
[12]
Wang QJ, Zhao YL, Rao SQ, et al. A distinct spectrum of SLC26A4 mutations in patients with enlarged vestibular aqueduct in China[J]. Clin Genet, 2007, 72(3): 245-254.
[13]
Xia JH, Liu CY, Tang BS, et al. Mutations in the gene encoding gap junction protein beta-3 associated with autosomal dominant hearing impairment[J]. Nat Genet, 1998, 20(4): 370-373.
[14]
管敏鑫,赵立东. 与氨基糖甙类抗生素耳毒性相关的线粒体12SrRNA突变的流行病学特征[J]. 中华耳科学杂志,2006, 4(2): 98-105.
[1] 庞嘉越成, 巨淑慧, 马冀青, 李恒宇, 盛湲. 乳腺癌易感基因突变人群接受降低乳腺癌风险手术的研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 179-183.
[2] 巨淑慧, 庞嘉越成, 皮浩, 蒋英杰, 李恒宇, 盛湲. ESR1基因突变在雌激素受体阳性转移性乳腺癌中的研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 40-43.
[3] 葛飞霞, 蒋银, 杨丹. 酶联免疫吸附测定法与PCR仪检测在乙型肝炎诊断中的临床应用[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 310-315.
[4] 陈甜甜, 王晓东, 余海燕. 双胎妊娠合并Gitelman综合征孕妇的妊娠结局及文献复习[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 559-568.
[5] 阚路兰, 田茂强, 唐一蜜. 以腹痛为首发症状的轻型Gitelman综合征患儿1例及文献复习[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 473-479.
[6] 李维, 莫俊俏. 儿童呼吸道耐药流感嗜血杆菌基因型鉴定及耐药分析对抗菌药物治疗选择的意义[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 315-323.
[7] 张小曼, 马筱秋, 许正锯, 张纯瑜, 何彩婷. 乙型肝炎病毒逆转录酶区耐药突变对血清乙型肝炎病毒表面抗原水平的影响[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 324-332.
[8] 袁育韬, 邢金琳, 谢克飞, 殷凯. CT征象及BRAFV600E基因突变与甲状腺乳头状癌中央区淋巴结转移的相关性[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 611-614.
[9] 杨晓健, 张炎, 冯嘉荣, 刘卓杰, 张浩. 先天性输精管缺如合并肾脏畸形三例CFTR基因突变检测并文献复习[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 110-113.
[10] 汪涛, 朱浩雨, 卜青松, 胡磊, 王文娟, 方阮, 刘啸峰. 非小细胞肺癌EGFR突变状态与CT特征的相关性[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(01): 51-54.
[11] 陈俞坊, 王康, 吴文昊, 张厚丽, 周向东. EGFR敏感突变ⅠA期浸润性肺腺癌术后辅助靶向治疗预后分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(06): 776-781.
[12] 陈润芝, 杨东梅, 徐慧婷. 信迪利单抗联合索凡替尼后线治疗MSS型BRAF突变的转移性结肠癌:个案报道并文献复习[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 431-435.
[13] 孙维英, 蔡晓辉, 陈梅玉, 贾祝霞, 晁红颖, 华海应, 刘洁, 吴品, 卢绪章, 秦伟. 伴DNMT3A突变老年急性髓细胞白血病的分子学特点[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(12): 1234-1242.
[14] 王倩, 王永萍, 李新培, 杨成艳, 许慧, 孙凤娟, 刘亚平. 伴基因突变的低钾血症诊断学特征分析[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 115-119.
[15] 滕振, 闫波. 转录因子HAND1基因多态性在心血管疾病中的研究进展[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 5-11.
阅读次数
全文


摘要