切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (03) : 270 -276. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2018.03.004

所属专题: 文献

论著

聚合酶链反应-反向点杂交法检测遗传性耳聋相关基因的热点突变
张彦1,(), 刘晶晶2, 叶秋萍2, 李印淑2   
  1. 1. 511442 广州,广东省妇幼保健院医学遗传中心
    2. 518000 广东深圳,亚能生物技术(深圳)有限公司
  • 收稿日期:2017-10-09 修回日期:2018-05-12 出版日期:2018-06-01
  • 通信作者: 张彦

Detection of gene hot spots mutation in genetic deafness associated gene by polymerase chain reaction-reverse dot blot technique

Yan Zhang1,(), Jingjing Liu2, Qiuping Ye2, Yinshu Li2   

  1. 1. Center for Medical Genetics, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou 511442, Guangdong Province, China
    2. Yaneng Bioscience (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518000, Guangdong Province, China
  • Received:2017-10-09 Revised:2018-05-12 Published:2018-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Yan Zhang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhang Yan, Email:
引用本文:

张彦, 刘晶晶, 叶秋萍, 李印淑. 聚合酶链反应-反向点杂交法检测遗传性耳聋相关基因的热点突变[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2018, 14(03): 270-276.

Yan Zhang, Jingjing Liu, Qiuping Ye, Yinshu Li. Detection of gene hot spots mutation in genetic deafness associated gene by polymerase chain reaction-reverse dot blot technique[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2018, 14(03): 270-276.

目的

探讨聚合酶链反应-反向点杂交(PCR-RDB)法对遗传性耳聋相关基因突变检测的准确性和实用性。

方法

选择2014年1月至2016年10月,于广东省妇幼保健院临床诊断为非综合征型耳聋(NSHI)的250例患者为研究对象。采用PCR-RDB法检测其外周血遗传性耳聋相关基因突变。PCR-RDB法采用遗传性耳聋基因芯片检测试剂盒,可检测中国人群常见的4个耳聋相关基因的12个热点突变,即GJB2(35del G、176_191del 16、235del C、299_300del AT),GJB3(538C>T),SLC26A4(1174A>T、1226G>A、1229C>T、IVS7-2A>G、2168A>G)及线粒体MTRNR1(1494C>T、1555A>G)。同时,所有DNA样本均采用金标准Sanger测序法进行对比验证。本研究符合2013年修订的《世界医学协会赫尔辛基宣言》,并征得受试者知情同意。

结果

①本研究来自250例受试者的250例DNA样本中,耳聋相关基因突变检出率为51.6%(129/250),其中GJB2基因突变检出率为28.4%(71/250),SLC26A4基因突变为19.2%(48/250),线粒体MTRNR1基因突变为4.4%(11/250),GJB3基因突变为2.0%(5/250);129例检出的耳聋相关基因突变中,符合遗传病致病特征的耳聋相关基因突变的几率为86.8%(112/129)。②PCR-RDB法与Sanger测序法,对12个耳聋相关基因热点突变的检测结果均相同。③PCR-RDB法检测12个耳聋相关基因热点突变的灵敏度、特异度、总一致性、阳性预测值及阴性预测值均为100.0%。

结论

虽然PCR-RDB法检测耳聋相关基因突变的结果与金标准Sanger测序法一致,但是本研究样本量尚小,因此是否可满足临床对遗传性耳聋基因检测的需求,则需多中心、大样本随机对照试验进一步研究、证实。

Objective

To verify the accuracy and effect of polymerase chain reaction-reverse dot blotting (PCR-RDB) technique in genetic deafness associated gene test.

Methods

A total of 250 patients with nonsyndromic hearing impairment(NSHI) who were diagnosed in Guangdong Women and Children Hospital from January 2014 to October 2016, were chosen as research objects. With PCR-RDB technique, we detected several genes associated with NSHI in genome DNA from peripheral blood cells of all the patients. To carry out PCR-RDB, the gene chip kit for hereditary hearing loss was used, which can detect 12 hot spots mutation of four genes in Chinese, including GJB2 (35del G, 176_191del 16, 235del C, 299_300del AT), GJB3 (538C>T), SLC26A4 (1174A>T, 1226G>A, 1229C>T, IVS7-2A>G, 2168A>G) and mitochondrion MTRNR1 (1494C>T, 1555A>G). Meanwhile, all the samples were also tested by Sanger sequencing, in order to compare and validate the results to that of PCR-RDB technique. This study was in line with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki revised in 2013 and informed contents were obtained from all patients.

Results

①There was 51.6%(129/250) genetic deafness associated gene mutations in DNA sample of 250 patients of NSHI, and some of which were 28.4%(71/250) from GJB2 gene, 19.2%(48/250) from SLC26A4 gene, 4.4%(11/250) from mitochondrion MTRNR1 gene and 2.0%(5/250) from GJB3 gene, respectively. Among 129 cases of deafness associated gene mutations, 86.8%(112/129) was met with pathogenicity characteristics of hereditary disease. ② All detection results of 12 hot spots mutations of deafness associated gene by PCR-RDB were consistent with those of by Sanger sequencing method. ③The sensitivity, specificity, total consistency, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of detection results of 12 hot spots mutations of deafness associated gene by PCR-RDB technique were all 100.0%.

Conclusions

Although detection results of gene hot spots mutation in genetic deafness associated gene by PCR-RDB technique were consistent with those of by Sanger sequencing method, whether it is worthy of clinical application, multicenter and large sample randomized controlled trial should be conducted as sample size of this study is still small.

表1 本组129例耳聋相关基因突变类型及其分布
图2 GJB2基因235 del C杂合突变(图2A:PCR-RDB法检测结果图,突变位点见红色方框处;图2B:Sanger测序法检测结果图,突变位点见红色方框处)
图3 GJB2基因235 del C杂合突变复合SLC26A4基因IVS7-2A>G杂合突变(图3A:PCR-RDB法检测结果图,突变位点见红色方框处;图3B:GJB2基因235 del C杂合突变的Sanger测序法检测结果图,突变位点见红色方框处;图3C:SLC26A4基因IVS7-2A>G杂合突变的Sanger测序法检测结果图,突变位点见红色方框处)
图5 GJB3基因538 C>T杂合突变(图5A:PCR-RDB法检测结果图,突变位点见红色方框处;图5B:Sanger测序法检测结果图,突变位点见红色方框处)
图7 SLC26A4基因IVS7-2A>G纯合突变(图7A:PCR-RDB法检测结果图,突变位点见红色方框处;图7B:Sanger测序法检测结果图,突变位点见红色方框处)
图8 SLC26A4基因IVS7-2A>G杂合突变复合1229 C>T杂合突变(图8A:PCR-RDB法检测结果图,突变位点见红色方框处;图8B:SLC26A4基因IVS7-2A>G杂合突变的Sanger测序法检测结果图,突变位点见红色方框处;图8C:SLC26A4基因1229 C>T杂合突变的Sanger测序法检测结果图,突变位点见红色方框处)
图9 SLC26A4基因IVS7-2A>G杂合突变复合2168 A>G杂合突变(图9A:PCR-RDB法检测结果图,突变位点见红色方框处;图9B:SLC26A4基因IVS7-2A>G杂合突变的Sanger测序法检测结果图,突变位点见红色方框处;图9C:SLC26A4基因2168 A>G杂合突变Sanger测序法检测结果图,突变位点见红色方框处)
表2 2种方法检测耳聋相关基因突变的结果比较(例数)
[1]
郑晓瑛,张蕾,陈功,等. 中国人口六类残疾流行现状[J]. 中华流行病学杂志,2008, 29(7): 634-638.
[2]
戴朴. 遗传性耳聋的预防和阻断[J]. 中华医学杂志,2007, 87(40): 2811-2813.
[3]
White KR. Early hearing detection and intervention programs: opportunities for genetic services[J]. AM J Med Genet A, 2004, 130A(1): 29-36.
[4]
Egilmez OK, Kalcioglu MT. Genetics of nonsyndromic congenital hearing loss[J]. Scientifica (Cairo), 2016, 2016: 7576064.
[5]
刘学忠,欧阳小梅,Denise, 等. 中国人群遗传性耳聋研究进展[J]. 中华耳科学杂志,2006, 4(2): 81-89.
[6]
Zhu J, Cao Q, Zhang N, et al. A study of deafness-related genetic mutations as a basis for strategies to prevent hereditary hearing loss in Hebei, China[J]. Intractable Rare Dis Res, 2015, 4(3): 131-138.
[7]
Yuan Y, Guo W, Tang J, et al. Molecular epidemiology and functional assessment of novel allelic variants of slc26a4 in non-syndromic hearing loss patients with enlarged vestibular aqueduct in China[J]. PLoS One, 2012, 7(11): e49984.
[8]
袁永一. 中国人重度—极重度耳聋分子流行病学及致病机制研究[D]. 北京:中国人民解放军军医进修学院,2007.
[9]
Dai P, Yu F, Han B, et al. GJB2 mutation spectrum in 2 063 Chinese patients with nonsyndromic hearing impairment[J]. J Transl Med, 2009, 7: 26.
[10]
Zheng J, Ying Z, Cai Z, et al. GJB2 mutation spectrum and genotype-phenotype correlation in 1 067 Han Chinese subjects with non-syndromic hearing loss[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(6): e0128691.
[11]
Dai P, Yuan Y, Huang D, et al. Molecular etiology of hearing impairment in Inner Mongolia: mutations in SLC26A4 gene and relevant phenotype analysis[J]. J Transl Med, 2008, 6: 74.
[12]
Wang QJ, Zhao YL, Rao SQ, et al. A distinct spectrum of SLC26A4 mutations in patients with enlarged vestibular aqueduct in China[J]. Clin Genet, 2007, 72(3): 245-254.
[13]
Xia JH, Liu CY, Tang BS, et al. Mutations in the gene encoding gap junction protein beta-3 associated with autosomal dominant hearing impairment[J]. Nat Genet, 1998, 20(4): 370-373.
[14]
管敏鑫,赵立东. 与氨基糖甙类抗生素耳毒性相关的线粒体12SrRNA突变的流行病学特征[J]. 中华耳科学杂志,2006, 4(2): 98-105.
[1] 铁晓玲, 刘毅, 杨颖, 车凤玉. Rubinstein-Taybi综合征先证者3例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(04): 452-459.
[2] 王莉, 曹蕾, 王亚丹, 张伟. Krabbe病1例临床分析并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 339-345.
[3] 张学. 说基因话疾病[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 366-.
[4] 黄莹, 李璇, 刘梦杨, 彭桂林, 徐鑫, 韦兵, 杨超. 靶向联合治疗双肺移植术后KRAS和BRAF基因双突变晚期肺腺癌一例[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 298-301.
[5] 刘云, 时月, 郭冬梅, 邱志远, 王丽娟, 冉学红, 李乾鹏. 造血干细胞移植治疗伴有胚系突变的髓系肿瘤患者三例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 230-234.
[6] 赖淼, 景鑫, 李桂珍, 李怡. 非小细胞肺癌EGFR 突变亚型的临床病理和预后意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 731-737.
[7] 郑琪, 马婕群, 张彦兵, 廖子君, 张锐. EPHA5突变预测肺腺癌免疫检查点抑制剂治疗预后的临床意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 548-552.
[8] 李静静, 许金花, 吴国峰, 任亚俊, 张骞云. 伏美替尼一线治疗EGFR突变晚期NSCLC脑转移的临床分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 426-429.
[9] 刘文竹, 唐窈, 刘付臣. 诱导多潜能干细胞在神经肌肉疾病研究中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 367-373.
[10] 刘洋, 吴涛, 刘恒, 刘文慧, 田红娟, 周芮, 高铭敏, 王向丽, 张睿. 异基因造血干细胞移植治疗CSF3R基因突变急性髓系白血病M2型1例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 90-92.
[11] 惠泉, 孙方昱, 赵欣, 许青, 李奕, 陈建雄, 吴立, 郑伟燕. 急性间歇性卟啉病HMBS基因新发缺失突变一例[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 507-511.
[12] 李玺, 蔡芸莹, 张永红, 苏恒. 假性软骨发育不全合并1型糖尿病一例[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 518-520.
[13] 张冬雷, 刘晓燕, 吴三云, 周怡, 张岘. 一例遗传性凝血因子Ⅻ缺乏症家系报道及中国人群凝血因子Ⅻ缺乏症分析[J/OL]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 162-169.
[14] 张滕, 陶艳玲. Shwachman-Diamond综合征继发骨髓增生异常综合征一例及文献复习[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 178-182.
[15] 李佳佳, 李凌华, 吕诗韵, 冯凯, 刘琳珊, 钟海丹, 颜婵, 刘聪. 广州市病毒学抑制失败HIV/AIDS患者的耐药特征及影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 207-212.
阅读次数
全文


摘要