切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (01) : 25 -30. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2018.01.004

所属专题: 专题评论 文献

论著

盆腔脏器脱垂定量分度法对不同方式分娩初产妇产后近期盆底功能的评价
刘俊1, 唐瑶1, 黄娟1, 王晓东2,()   
  1. 1. 610000 成都市妇女儿童中心医院妇产科
    2. 610041 成都,四川大学华西第二医院产科、出生缺陷与相关妇儿疾病教育部重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2017-10-13 修回日期:2017-12-29 出版日期:2018-02-01
  • 通信作者: 王晓东

Evaluation on pelvic floor functions of primiparae in early postpartum period with different delivery modes by pelvic floor function of pelvic organ prolapse quantification

Jun Liu1, Yao Tang1, Juan Huang1, Xiaodong Wang2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Chengdu Women and Children′s Central Hospital, Chengdu 610000, Sichuan Province, China
    2. Department of Obstetrics, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2017-10-13 Revised:2017-12-29 Published:2018-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Xiaodong Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Xiaodong, Email:
引用本文:

刘俊, 唐瑶, 黄娟, 王晓东. 盆腔脏器脱垂定量分度法对不同方式分娩初产妇产后近期盆底功能的评价[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2018, 14(01): 25-30.

Jun Liu, Yao Tang, Juan Huang, Xiaodong Wang. Evaluation on pelvic floor functions of primiparae in early postpartum period with different delivery modes by pelvic floor function of pelvic organ prolapse quantification[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2018, 14(01): 25-30.

目的

探讨采用盆腔脏器脱垂定量分度法(POP-Q)评分系统,对不同方式分娩初产妇产后近期盆底功能评价的差异。

方法

采用回顾性分析法,按照随机数字表法选择2016年1月1日至12月31日,于成都市妇女儿童中心医院分娩单胎、足月、头先露活产儿的200例初产妇为研究对象。按照分娩方式,将采取择期剖宫产分娩的100例初产妇,纳入观察组;而采取阴道分娩的100例初产妇,纳入对照组。对2组初产妇均按照《新产程标准及处理的专家共识(2014)》标准进行管理,并采取硬膜外麻醉分娩镇痛。2组初产妇均在孕前排除生殖道畸形、压力性尿失禁(SUI)和盆底功能障碍(PFD),孕期无严重内、外科并发症。于产后42 d左右,对2组初产妇SUI发生率,POP-Q评分系统中的9项指标:阴道前壁脱垂、阴道后壁脱垂、子宫脱垂分度,以及Ⅰ、Ⅱ类盆底肌纤维肌力分级等进行检测。采用成组t检验,对2组初产妇POP-Q评分系统中的9项指标测定结果进行比较。采用χ2检验,对2组初产妇产后近期SUI发生率及Ⅰ~Ⅲ度阴道前壁脱垂、阴道后壁脱垂、子宫脱垂发生率进行比较。采用Wilcoxon秩和检验,对2组初产妇Ⅰ、Ⅱ类盆底肌纤维肌力分级构成比进行比较。本研究遵循的程序符合成都市妇女儿童中心医院人体试验委员会所制定的伦理学标准,得到该委员会批准。

结果

①2组初产妇胎膜早破、妊娠期糖尿病和亚临床甲状腺功能减退等主要产科并发症发生率,以及年龄、孕前人体质量指数(BMI)、孕期体重增加值、新生儿出生体重等一般临床资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。②观察组与对照组初产妇的POP-Q评分系统测定结果显示:gh(生殖道裂隙),长度分别为(2.8±0.4)cm与(3.0±0.6)cm,pb(会阴体)长度分别为(3.6±0.3)cm与(3.5±0.3)cm,tvl(阴道总长度)分别为(8.4±0.6)cm与(7.4±3.9)cm,Aa点(阴道前壁中线距离处女膜3 cm处)分别位于(-2.0±0.8)cm与(-1.3±0.8)cm处,Ba点(阴道前壁脱出距离处女膜最远处)分别位于(-2.1±0.8)cm与(-1.4±0.7)cm处,Bp点(阴道后壁脱出距离处女膜最远处)分别位于(-2.9±0.4)cm与(-2.7±0.5)cm处,上述测定结果分别比较,差异均有统计学意义(t=-2.774,P=0.006;t=2.537,P=0.019;t=-2.534,P=0.012;t=-6.187,P<0.001;t=-6.585,P<0.001;t=-3.123,P=0.002);而Ap点(阴道后壁中线距离处女膜3 cm处)、C点(阴道前穹窿或阴道残端距离处女膜处)、D点(阴道后穹窿距离处女膜处)的测定结果分别比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。③观察组初产妇Ⅰ~Ⅲ度阴道前壁脱垂发生率为21.0%(21/100),显著低于对照组的98.0%(98/100);Ⅰ~Ⅲ度阴道后壁脱垂发生率为13.0%(13/100),显著低于对照组的26.0%(26/100);2组Ⅰ~Ⅲ度阴道前壁、阴道后壁脱垂发生率分别比较,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=119.846,P<0.001;χ2=5.383,P=0.016)。2组Ⅰ~Ⅲ度子宫脱垂发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。④2组初产妇产后近期SUI发生率及Ⅰ、Ⅱ类盆底肌纤维肌力分级构成比比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

采取择期剖宫产分娩和阴道分娩的初产妇,产后近期SUI发生率、盆底肌纤维肌力分级和子宫脱垂分度比较无差异。但是,POP-Q评分系统评价结果显示,阴道分娩可能成为产后PFD的高危因素。

Objective

To investigate affects on the pelvic floor functions of primiparae in early postpartum period with different delivery modes by pelvic floor function of pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) scoring system.

Methods

From January 1 to December 31, 2016, a total of 200 primiparae who were with single birth, full-term pregnancy and cephalic presentations in Chengdu Women and Children′s Central Hospital were chosen as study subjects by retrospective analysis method and random digits table method. According to different delivery modes, they were divided into observation group (n=100, with elective cesarean section delivery mode) and control group (n=100, with transvaginal delivery mode). All the primiparae received epidural anesthesia during labor and were managed in accordance with the Standard of New Production Process and Expert Consensus (2014). Primiparae with genital malformation, stress urinary incontinence (SUI), pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) before pregnancy, and with internal and external severe complications were excluded from this study. At about 42 d after delivery, the incidences of SUI, 9 indicators in POP-Q scoring system, grades of vaginae anterior prolapse, vaginae posterior prolapse and uterine prolapse, muscle strength classification in Ⅰ and Ⅱ types of pelvic floor muscle fiber in two groups were detected. Independent sample t test was used to compare the results of 9 indicatons in POP-Q scoring system of two groups. Chi-square test was used to compare the incidences of SUI in early postpartum period and grade Ⅰ-Ⅲ vaginae anterior prolapse, vaginae posterior prolapse and uterine prolapse of two groups. Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare constituent ratios of muscle strength classification in Ⅰ and Ⅱ types of pelvic floor muscle fibers in two groups. The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Investigation in Human Being of Chengdu Women and Children′s Central Hospital.

Results

①There were no significant differences between two groups among the incidences of obstetrical complications, such as premature rupture of membranes, gestational diabetes mellitus and subclinical hypothyroidism, as well as age, body mass index (BMI) before pregnancy, weight gain during pregnancy, and birth weight of newborns, respectively (P>0.05). ②The results of POP-Q scoring system of primiparae in two groups showed as follows. The lengths of gh (genital hiatus) in observation group and control group were (2.8±0.4) cm and (3.0±0.6) cm, respectively; lengths of pb (perineal body) were (3.6±0.3) cm and (3.5±0.3) cm, respectively; tvl (total vaginal length) were (8.4±0.6) cm and (7.4±3.9) cm, respectively; point Aa (point in the anterior vaginal wall, 3 cm from hymen) were located at (-2.0±0.8) cm and (-1.3±0.8) cm, respectively; point Ba (point in the anterior vaginal prolapse, farthest from hymen) were located at (-2.1±0.8) cm and (-1.4±0.7) cm, respectively; point Bp (point in the posterior vaginal prolapse, farthest from hymen) were located at (-2.9±0.4) cm and (-2.7±0.5) cm, respectively; and all the differences between two groups in the measurement results were statistically significant (t=-2.774, P=0.006; t=2.537, P=0.019; t=-2.534, P=0.012; t=-6.187, P<0.001; t=-6.585, P<0.001; t=-3.123, P=0.002). There were no significant differences between two groups in the measurement results of point Ap (point in the posterior vaginal wall, 3 cm from hymen), point C (point in the anterior fornix of vagina or vaginal stump), and point D (point in the vaginal posterior fornix) (P>0.05). ③The incidence of grade Ⅰ-Ⅲ vaginae anterior prolapse in observation group was 21.0% (21/100), which was significantly lower than that in control group 98.0% (98/100); and the incidence of grade Ⅰ-Ⅲ vaginae posterior prolapse was 13.0% (13/100), which was significantly lower than that in control group 26.0% (26/100), and both the differences were statistically significant (χ2=119.846, P<0.001; χ2=5.383, P=0.016). But there was no significant difference between two groups in the incidence of grade Ⅰ-Ⅲ uterus prolapse (P>0.05). ④ There were no significant differences between two groups in the incidence of SUI in early postpartum period and constituent ratio of muscle strength classification inⅠ and Ⅱ types of pelvic floor muscle fibers (P>0.05).

Conclusions

As to primiparae in early postpartum period with elective cesarean section and transvaginal delivery, there are no differences in the incidences of SUI, muscle strength classification in pelvic floor muscle fibers and uterus prolapse. But the evaluation results of POP-Q scoring system show that transvaginal delivery may be the high risk factor of PFD.

表1 2组初产妇一般临床资料比较
表2 2组初产妇POP-Q评分系统中的9项指标测定结果比较(cm,±s)
表3 2组初产妇阴道前壁与后壁脱垂及子宫脱垂分度结果比较[例数(%)]
表4 2组初产妇压力性尿失禁发生率及Ⅰ、Ⅱ类盆底肌纤维肌力分级构成比比较[例数(%)]
[1]
朱兰,郎景和,主编. 女性盆底学[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2014: 46-236.
[2]
罗新. 妊娠和选择性剖宫产对盆底结构功能的影响[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2008, 4(2):69-75.
[3]
Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic floor dysfunction[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1996, 175(1):10-17.
[4]
张珂,王澜静,焦玲洁,等. 产后盆底功能障碍性疾病与盆底肌收缩力及其相关因素分析[J]. 实用妇产科杂志,2014, 30(10):757-759.
[5]
祁志宇,党翠玲,赵耀红,等. 不同分娩因素对产后盆底肌力的近期影响[J]. 河北医药,2016, 38(13):2016-2019.
[6]
高原,罗小芳. 围生期压力性尿失禁相关因素临床分析[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2012, 8(3):329-331.
[7]
王淑静,邓晓岚,菅莹莹,等. 不同分娩方式对盆底功能的影响及电刺激治疗的疗效分析[J]. 中国计划生育和妇产科,2016, 8(1):58-64.
[8]
中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组. 新产程标准及处理的专家共识(2014)[J]. 中华妇产科杂志,2014, 49(7):486-488.
[9]
夏志,主编. 女性泌尿盆底疾病临床诊治[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2016: 56-377.
[10]
Handa VL, Blomquist, McDermott KC, et al. Pelvic floor disorders after childbirth: effect of episiotomy, perineal laceration, and operative birth[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2012, 19(2):233-239.
[11]
徐永萍. 不同分娩方式对产妇盆底支持组织功能所产生的近期影响[J]. 安徽医学,2012, 33(10):1314-1316.
[12]
龚琳,刘兴会,张力. 安全避免首次剖宫产[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2016, 12(2):221-227.
[13]
漆洪波,石琪. 重视难产的诊断与产程时限[J]. 中国实用妇科与产志,2016, 32(8):716-718.
[14]
漆洪波,杨慧霞,段涛. 关注和采纳正常产程和产程异常的新标准[J]. 中华妇产科杂志,2014, 49(7):487-489.
[15]
Spong CY, Berghella V, Wenstrom KD, et al. Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 121(3):686-687.
[16]
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College), Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Caughey AB, et al. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 210(3):179-193.
[17]
李俊英,贾秀荣,刘富霞. 不同分娩方式对产妇产后早期盆底功能所的影响[J]. 贵阳医学院学报,2015, 40(5):527-529.
[18]
肖霞,韦瑞敏,吕丽清,等. 3种不同分娩方式对初产妇盆底肌力影响的研究[J]. 中国妇幼保健,2015, 30(26):4458-4460.
[1] 高艳多, 朱霞, 范建华, 戢秀勤, 赵胜, 谢磊. 产钳助产术后女性盆底机能的三维超声评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(12): 1361-1365.
[2] 钟婷婷, 王丽, 李载红, 杨大艳, 骆东妮, 陈艳, 林青, 米宇, 景香香. 声触诊组织定量剪切波弹性成像联合盆底超声对阴道分娩者产后盆底功能障碍的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(03): 226-233.
[3] 居晓庆, 金蕴洁, 王晓燕. 剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫患者再次妊娠阴道分娩发生子宫破裂的影响因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 575-581.
[4] 陈莉, 雷雪芹, 段炼, 曾悦, 何国琳. 影响2次剖宫产术后阴道试产产妇试产成功因素及妊娠结局分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 287-294.
[5] 赵春桃, 梁峰雪, 杨瑞敏, 陈云璇, 陈曦, 焦桂清. 三维盆底超声预测产妇发生盆腔脏器脱垂的价值及影响因素[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(05): 606-614.
[6] 朱丽丽, 李冰, 薛静, 于慧, 李淑红. 椎管内分娩镇痛对经阴道分娩初产妇产后早期盆底功能的影响[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(04): 484-491.
[7] 郑璇, 赵云. 孕期与产后盆底功能障碍性疾病及防治研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(03): 366-372.
[8] 李晓阳, 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 大数据及人工智能对女性盆底功能障碍性疾病的诊断及风险预测[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 549-552.
[9] 徐净, 张奥华, 黄泽萍, 郑志娟, 苏漫婷, 周祥福, 张新玲. 女性尿道内口开放与压力性尿失禁的相关性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 546-549.
[10] 王晓丽, 林少华, 刘莹莹, 范颖. 妊娠期女性盆底肌自主收缩的力量差异及对分娩、产后压力性尿失禁的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 260-265.
[11] 张冉, 张明, 刘风平. 磁电联合盆底康复治疗对产后压力性尿失禁患者的疗效分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(11): 1103-1108.
[12] 叶晓瑞, 金黑鹰, 张春霞. 盆底功能障碍性疾病多学科整合的必要性及其存在的问题[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(07): 605-609.
[13] 王永通, 金黑鹰, 张春霞, 叶晓瑞, 王俊, 杨阳, 刘建磊, 张心怡. 磁刺激联合生物反馈治疗盆底功能障碍性疾病的前瞻性非随机对照研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(07): 621-625.
[14] 欧阳平, 沈凌庆. 自由体位联合无会阴保护技术对初产妇自我效能感及分娩体验的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 231-235.
[15] 晋连超, 杨冰, 周哲, 潘东亮, 谢遵珂. 代谢综合征与女性压力性尿失禁相关性研究[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 109-113.
阅读次数
全文


摘要