切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (06) : 708 -714. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2017.06.016

所属专题: 文献

论著

成年人无创性心功能血流图正常参考值在儿童运用的临床价值探讨
杨敏1,(), 乔莉娜1, 刘忠强1, 李德渊1, 罗黎力1, 卢国艳1, 王杨1, 卿璐1, 张海洋1, 徐敏1, 田大燕1   
  1. 1. 610041 成都,四川大学华西第二医院儿科、出生缺陷与相关妇儿疾病教育部重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2017-06-22 修回日期:2017-11-05 出版日期:2017-12-01
  • 通信作者: 杨敏

Normal reference values of adults noninvasive cardiac function test by impedance rheocardiogram apply to children: clinical values

Min Yang1,(), Lina Qiao1, Zhongqiang Liu1, Deyuan Li1, Lili Luo1, Guoyan Lu1, Yang Wang1, Lu Qing1, Haiyang Zhang1, Min Xu1, Dayan Tian1   

  1. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Disease of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2017-06-22 Revised:2017-11-05 Published:2017-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Min Yang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yang Min, Email:
引用本文:

杨敏, 乔莉娜, 刘忠强, 李德渊, 罗黎力, 卢国艳, 王杨, 卿璐, 张海洋, 徐敏, 田大燕. 成年人无创性心功能血流图正常参考值在儿童运用的临床价值探讨[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2017, 13(06): 708-714.

Min Yang, Lina Qiao, Zhongqiang Liu, Deyuan Li, Lili Luo, Guoyan Lu, Yang Wang, Lu Qing, Haiyang Zhang, Min Xu, Dayan Tian. Normal reference values of adults noninvasive cardiac function test by impedance rheocardiogram apply to children: clinical values[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2017, 13(06): 708-714.

目的

探讨不同年龄段儿童无创性心功能检查的正常参考值特点,以及成年人数字心阻抗血流图仪(D-ICG)检查的正常参考值,在儿童的临床应用价值。

方法

选择2015年10月至2016年3月,于四川大学华西第二医院PICU住院治疗后,病情平稳、心功能正常的53例儿童为研究对象。根据53例受试者年龄,将其分为3组,分别为婴儿期组(n=23,年龄≤1岁),幼儿及学龄前期组(n=15,年龄>1~6岁),学龄期组(n=15,年龄>6~15岁)。在受试者睡眠或安静配合状态下,应用D-ICG检测其心脏功能,获得30余项参数,统计学比较3组受试者各项参数的差异,并与成年人正常参考值进行比较。总结不同年龄阶段儿童D-ICG检查各参数特点,以及成年人D-ICG正常参考值在儿童的临床应用价值。

结果

①3组受试者心功能指标:每搏作功(SW)、每搏作功指数(SWI)、每分作功(CW)、心脏作功指数(CWI)、每搏量(SV)、心搏指数(SI)、心排血量(CO)及心排血指数(CI)比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001),且上述指标均随年龄增加而增加。3组受试者基础阻抗(Z0)和射血分数(EF)比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。②3组受试者4项心功能指标前、后负荷参数:心舒张末期容积(EDV)、主动脉顺应性(AC)、总外周阻力(TPR)及总外周阻力指数(TPRI)比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001),并且EDV及AC均随年龄增加而增加,TPR及TPRI则减少。③收缩功能参数射血前期(PEP)、射血前期指数(PEPI)、心室射血时间(VET)、心室射血时间指数(VETI)、收缩功能指数(PEP/VET)、总电机械收缩期(TEMS)、Q-C间期(Q-C)、心室快速射血指数(C/B-C)、心肌收缩力指数(HI)、室缩波波幅(Cdz/dtmax),以及舒张功能参数室舒波波幅(Odz/dtmax)、房缩波波幅(WAdz/dtmax)、左室顺应性指标(WA/C)、舒张功能指数(O/C)、等容舒张期(A2-O)共计15项指标中,PEP、VET、PEP/VET、TEMS、Q-C、Cdz/dtmax及A2-O 7项心功能指标3组受试者比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);其余8项收缩及舒张功能参数3组受试者比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。④前述提及的29项心功能指标中,SW、SWI、CW、CWI、SV、SI、CO、CI、EDV、AC、TPR、TPRI、PEP、VET及A2-O共计15项,仅学龄期组受试者的检测结果在成年人正常参考值范围内;其余14项指标,3组受试者的检测结果均基本在成年人正常参考值范围内。⑤相关性分析结果显示:体表面积(BSA)分别与心功能指标EDV(r=0.773,P<0.05),SV(r=0.843,P<0.05)及CO(r=0.839,P<0.05)呈高度正相关关系;Cdz/dtmax分别与HI(r=0.861,P<0.05)及SI(r=0.536,P<0.05)呈正相关关系;心率分别与PEP(r=-0.522,P<0.05),VET(r=-0.536,P<0.05),TEMS(r=-0.815,P<0.05),Q-C(r=-0.594,P<0.05)及A2-O(r=-0.451,P<0.05)呈负相关关系,心率与PEP/VET(r=-0.189,P>0.05)无相关关系。

结论

各年龄阶段儿童的心功能指标差异较大。成年人无创性心功能检查的Z0、大部分的心脏收缩及舒张功能参数正常参考值,基本适用于儿童;但其余指标,则需确立不同年龄段儿童的正常参考值范围。

Objective

To analyze the characteristics of normal reference values of noninvasive cardiac function test of children in different age groups, and explore the clinical value of adult normal reference values of digital impedance rheocardiogram (D-ICG) applied to children.

Methods

From October 2015 to March 2016, 53 children with stable condition and normal heart function after hospitalized in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) in West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, were selected as study subjects. 53 children were divided into three groups according to age, including infantile group (n=23, age≤1 year old), toddler and preschool group (n=15, age>1-6 years old), school age group (n=15, age>6-15 years old). D-ICG was used to detect heart function of all subjects under sleep, quiet and cooperate condition, about 30 parameters were obtained, and analyzed the differences of these parameters among three groups of children statistically, and compared with the adult normal reference values of these parameters. Summarized the characteristics of D-ICG results of children in different age groups, and the clinical value of apply adult D-ICG normal reference values to children.

Results

① There were significant differences among 3 groups of children in cardiac function parameters including stroke work (SW), stroke work index (SWI), cardiac work (CW), cardiac work index (CWI), stroke volume (SV), stroke index (SI), cardiac output (CO) and cardiac index (CI) (P<0.001), and these parameters increased with age. There were no significant differences among 3 groups in base impedance (Z0) and ejection fraction (EF) (P>0.05). ② There were significant differences among 3 groups of children in 4 preload and postload parameters including end-diastolic volume (EDV), aortic compliance (AC), total peripheral resistance (TPR) and total peripheral resistance index (TPRI) (P<0.001), and EDV and AC were increased with age, while TPR and TPRI were decreased with age. ③ Systolic function parameters including pre-ejection period (PEP), pre-ejection period index (PEPI), ventricular ejection time (VET), ventricular ejection time index (VETI), systolic function index (PEP/VET), total electromechanical systole (TEMS), Q-C interphase (Q-C), rapid ventricular ejection index (C/B-C), heather index (HI), ventricular amplitude of systolic wave (Cdz/dtmax), and diastolic function parameters including ventricular amplitude of diastolic wave (Odz/dtmax), atrial amplitude of systolic wave (WAdz/dtmax), left ventricular compliance index (WA/C), diastolic function index (O/C), isovolumetric relaxation phase (A2-O), the results of the comparison among 3 groups of children in all above 15 parameters showed that: there were significant differences among 3 groups of children in 7 cardiac function parameters of PEP, VET, PEP/VET, TEMS, Q-C, Cdz/dtmax and A2-O (P<0.05). There were no significant differences among 3 groups of children in other 8 systolic and diastolic function parameters (P>0.05). ④A total of 15 in 29 parameters mentioned above including SW, SWI, CW, CWI, SV, SI, CO, CI, EDV, AC, TPR, TPRI, PEP, VET and A2-O, only the children′s test results of school age group reached the range of adult normal reference values. And the test results of other 14 parameters of 3 groups of children were all in the adult normal reference values range. ⑤ Correlation analysis results showed that: the body surface area (BSA) was positively correlated with EDV (r=0.773, P<0.05), SV (r=0.843, P<0.05) and CO (r=0.839, P<0.05), respectively. Cdz/dtmax was positively correlated with HI (r=0.861, P<0.05) and SI (r=0.536, P<0.05), respectively. Heart rate was negatively correlated with PEP (r=-0.522, P<0.05), VET (r=-0.536, P<0.05), TEMS (r=-0.815, P<0.05), Q-C (r=-0.594, P<0.05) and A2-O (r=-0.451, P<0.05), respectively. There was no correlation between heart rate and PEP/VET (r=-0.189, P>0.05).

Conclusions

The differences of cardiac function parameters of children were great in different age grades. The basic impedance, most of cardiac systolic and diastolic function parameters of adults normal reference value of noninvasive cardiac function test are generally applicable to children. But normal reference values of other indicators need to be established for children with different ages.

表1 3组受试者一般临床资料比较
表2 3组受试者基础阻抗、心脏作功及心脏泵血功能参数比较(±s)
表3 3组受试者心脏前、后负荷参数比较(±s)
表4 3组受试者心脏收缩及舒张功能参数比较(±s)
[1]
梁华,鄢韵芝,范文琳,等. 数字心阻抗图仪的研制及其测量效果分析[J]. 南昌大学学报(医学版), 2010, 50(1): 105-108.
[2]
Siedlecka J, Siedlecki P, Bortkiewicz A. Impedance cardiography-old method, new opportunities. PartⅠ. Clinical applications[J]. Int J Occup Med Environ Health, 2015, 28(1): 27-33.
[3]
蒋黎鹏,杨力,季忠,等. 心阻抗法检测的研究进展[J]. 传感器与微系统,2014, 33(2): 1-3, 8.
[4]
Akhand M, Trakic A, Terril P, et al. Optimal tissue types in the thoracic electrical impedance model for thoracic electrical bioimpedance (TEB) studies[J]. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2009: 3913-3916.
[5]
胡爱荣,洪文钦,肖伟,等. 重建心阻抗图测定正常人总外周阻力的探讨[J]. 江西医学院学报,2009, 49(4): 4-6, 8.
[6]
官亚兰,钟玲. 心阻抗无创血流动力学监测临床应用的研究进展[J]. 现代医药卫生,2015, 31(12): 1813-1816.
[7]
郭钰,刘泽. 阻抗微分心动图在老年高血压中的应用研究进展[J]. 中华老年心脑血管病杂志,2013, 15(7): 773-775.
[8]
胡亚美,江载芳. 诸福棠实用儿科学. 7版[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2012: 1410.
[9]
朱大年. 生理学. 7版[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2008: 79-102.
[10]
沈晓明,王卫平.儿科学. 7版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2010: 48.
[11]
许娜,夏焙,周蔚,等. 儿童超声心动图测量指标正常参考值的建立及临床意义[J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2012, 9(1): 40-49.
[12]
黄国英. 小儿超声心动图学[M]. 上海:上海科学技术出版社,2015: 93-148.
[13]
秦三欢,邓梅,雷平生. 阻抗法O波和等容舒张期的意义及评价[J]. 水电医学杂志,1995, (1): 5-6.
[14]
沈建昕,张三明,温晓竞. 心阻抗血流图对儿童心功能的评价[J]. 中国应用生理学杂志,2008, 24(1): 17-18, 124.
[15]
韦玉文,王卫国,陈端睢,等. 无创血流动力学监测系统在ICU的综合应用分析[J]. 国际医药卫生导报,2004, 10(10): 57-59.
[1] 张璇, 马宇童, 苗玉倩, 张云, 吴士文, 党晓楚, 陈颖颖, 钟兆明, 王雪娟, 胡淼, 孙岩峰, 马秀珠, 吕发勤, 寇海燕. 超声对Duchenne肌营养不良儿童膈肌功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1068-1073.
[2] 张宝富, 俞劲, 叶菁菁, 俞建根, 马晓辉, 刘喜旺. 先天性原发隔异位型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图诊断[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1074-1080.
[3] 韩丹, 王婷, 肖欢, 朱丽容, 陈镜宇, 唐毅. 超声造影与增强CT对儿童肝脏良恶性病变诊断价值的对比分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 939-944.
[4] 刘婷婷, 林妍冰, 汪珊, 陈幕荣, 唐子鉴, 代东伶, 夏焙. 超声衰减参数成像评价儿童代谢相关脂肪性肝病的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 787-794.
[5] 周钰菡, 肖欢, 唐毅, 杨春江, 周娟, 朱丽容, 徐娟, 牟芳婷. 超声对儿童髋关节暂时性滑膜炎的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 795-800.
[6] 米洁, 陈晨, 李佳玲, 裴海娜, 张恒博, 李飞, 李东杰. 儿童头面部外伤特点分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 511-515.
[7] 李维, 莫俊俏. 儿童呼吸道耐药流感嗜血杆菌基因型鉴定及耐药分析对抗菌药物治疗选择的意义[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 315-323.
[8] 王蕾, 王少华, 牛海珍, 尹腾飞. 儿童腹股沟疝围手术期风险预警干预[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 768-772.
[9] 李芳, 许瑞, 李洋洋, 石秀全. 循证医学理念在儿童腹股沟疝患者中的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 782-786.
[10] 吕垒, 冯啸, 何凯明, 曾凯宁, 杨卿, 吕海金, 易慧敏, 易述红, 杨扬, 傅斌生. 改良金氏评分在儿童肝豆状核变性急性肝衰竭肝移植手术时机评估中价值并文献复习[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 661-668.
[11] 冷昭富, 汪永新. 儿童去骨瓣减压术后颅骨成形术的研究进展[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 313-317.
[12] 卓少宏, 林秀玲, 周翠梅, 熊卫莲, 马兴灶. CD64指数、SAA/CRP、PCT联合检测在小儿消化道感染性疾病鉴别诊断中的应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 505-509.
[13] 刘笑笑, 张小杉, 刘群, 马岚, 段莎莎, 施依璐, 张敏洁, 王雅晳. 中国学龄前儿童先天性心脏病流行病学研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1021-1024.
[14] 李静, 张玲玲, 邢伟. 兴趣诱导理念用于小儿手术麻醉诱导前的价值及其对家属满意度的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 812-817.
[15] 余林阳, 王美英, 李建斌, 楼骁斌, 谢思远, 马志忠, 齐海英, 李稼. 高原地区肺炎合并右心功能衰竭体征患儿的肺动脉压力和心脏形态与功能的特征[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 535-544.
阅读次数
全文


摘要