切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (03) : 337 -341. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2017.03.017

所属专题: 文献

论著

宫腔镜及宫、腹腔镜联合治疗剖宫产术后子宫切口憩室的疗效分析
魏艳1, 罗剑儒1,(), 石钢2, 夏艳梅1   
  1. 1. 610091 成都市妇女儿童中心医院妇科
    2. 610041 成都,四川大学华西第二医院妇科
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-16 修回日期:2017-05-19 出版日期:2017-06-01
  • 通信作者: 罗剑儒

Clinical effects analysis of hysteroscopy and hysteroscopy combined with laparoscopy in repairing previous cesarean scar diverticulum

Yan Wei1, Jianru Luo1,(), Gang Shi2, Yanmei Xia1   

  1. 1. Department of Gynecology, Chengdu Women & Children′s Central Hospital, Chengdu 610091, Sichuan Province, China
    2. Department of Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2017-03-16 Revised:2017-05-19 Published:2017-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Jianru Luo
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Luo Jianru, Email:
引用本文:

魏艳, 罗剑儒, 石钢, 夏艳梅. 宫腔镜及宫、腹腔镜联合治疗剖宫产术后子宫切口憩室的疗效分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2017, 13(03): 337-341.

Yan Wei, Jianru Luo, Gang Shi, Yanmei Xia. Clinical effects analysis of hysteroscopy and hysteroscopy combined with laparoscopy in repairing previous cesarean scar diverticulum[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2017, 13(03): 337-341.

目的

探讨宫腔镜及宫、腹腔镜联合治疗剖宫产术后子宫切口憩室(PCSD)的临床疗效。

方法

选择2011年1月至2016年1月,于成都市妇女儿童中心医院通过超声和(或)宫腔镜检查确诊为PCSD,并于本院接受手术治疗的50例PCSD患者为研究对象。根据这50例PCSD患者接受修补手术的方式,将其分别纳入宫腔镜组(n=18,宫腔镜下PCSD修补术)与联合治疗组(n=32,宫、腹腔镜下联合PCSD修补术)。采用回顾性分析方法,对2组患者的术中出血量、手术时间、术后住院时间,以及术后并发症发生情况、PCSD修复情况和月经周期改善情况进行相关统计学分析。2组患者的年龄、剖宫产术分娩次数、月经期时间及术前PCSD深度等基本临床资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结果

①宫腔镜组患者术中出血量、手术时间及术后住院时间,显著少于或短于联合治疗组患者,并且差异均有统计学意义(t=-6.606、-10.525、-10.437,P<0.001)。②本研究50例PCSD患者术后均恢复良好,无修补术相关并发症发生。术后6个月时,宫腔镜组和联合治疗组患者月经期改善有效率分别为88.9%(16/18)与87.5%(28/32),二者比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.021,P=0.885)。宫腔镜组与联合治疗组患者PCSD修复有效率分别为94.4%(17/18)与93.8%(30/32),二者比较,差异亦无统计学意义(χ2=0.010,P=0.921)。

结论

宫腔镜下PCSD修补术及宫、腹腔镜下联合PCSD修补术,均可有效改善PCSD患者月经期延长症状,并有效修补PCSD。对于PCSD患者手术治疗方法的选择,应根据患者具体病情,选择最为合适的手术治疗方法。

Objective

To evaluate clinical effects of hysteroscopy and hysteroscopy combined with laparoscopy in repairing previous cesarean scar diverticulum (PCSD).

Methods

A total of 50 cases of patients who were diagnosed as PCSD through ultrasound or hysteroscopy and treated in Chengdu Women & Children′s Central Hospital from January 2011 to January 2016 were selected as research subjects. They were divided into hysteroscopy group (n=18, received hysteroscopic repair) and combined therapy group (n=32, received hysteroscopic repair combined with laparoscopic repair) according to the treatment methods. Intraoperative bleeding volume, operation duration, postoperative hospitalization time, complications, repair of PCSD and the improvement of menstrual period of two groups were retrospectively analyzed and compared by statistical methods. There were no statistical differences between two groups in the age, times of cesarean delivery, menstrual period and preoperative PCSD depth (P>0.05).

Results

①The intraoperative bleeding volume, operation duration and postoperative hospitalization time of hysteroscopy group all were better than those of combined therapy group, and all the differences were statistically significant (t=-6.606, -10.525, -10.437; P<0.001). ②All the 50 cases of PCSD patients were well recovered after surgery, and no complications related with repair surgery occurred. After 6 months of surgery, the menstruation period improvement rates were 88.9% (16/18) and 87.5% (28/32) in hysteroscopy group and combined therapy group, respectively, and the difference between the two groups had no statistical significance (χ2=0.021, P=0.885). The PCSD improvement rates were 94.4% (17/18) and 93.8% (30/32) in hysteroscopy group and combined therapy group, respectively, and the difference between the two groups had no statistical significance (χ2=0.010, P=0.921).

Conclusions

Both of hysteroscopy and hysteroscopy combined with laparoscopy have good effects in repairing PCSD and can markedly improve the clinical symptoms of patients. Different measures should be given to different PCSD patients according to the patients′ individual situations.

表1 2组剖宫产术后子宫切口憩室患者术中出血量、手术时间、术后住院时间比较(±s)
表2 2组剖宫产术后子宫切口憩室患者修补术后月经期改善情况及剖宫产术后子宫切口憩室修复情况比较
[1]
侯磊,李光辉,邹丽颖,等. 全国剖宫产率及剖宫产指征构成比调查的多中心研究[J]. 中华妇产科杂志,2014, 49(10): 728-735.
[2]
van der Voet LF, Bij de Vaate AM, Veersema S, et al. Long-term complications of caesarean section. The niche in the scar: a prospective cohort study on niche revalence and its relation to abnormal uterine bleeding[J]. BJOG, 2014, 121(2): 236-244.
[3]
Luo L, Niu G, Wang Q, et al. Vaginal repair of cesarean section scar diverticula[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2012, 19(4): 454-458.
[4]
Chen YQ, Chang YJ, Yao SZ. Transvaginal management of cesarean scar section diverticulum: a novel surgical treatment[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2014, 20(9): 1395-1399.
[5]
Li C, Tang S, Gao X, et al. Efficacy of combined laparoscopic and hysteroscopic repair of post-cesarean section uterine diverticulum: a retrospective analysis[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2016: 1765624.
[6]
沈瑶,林建华,林其德,等. 我国部分地区剖宫产率影响因素和指征分析[J]. 实用妇产科杂志,2011, 27(3): 183-187.
[7]
Istre O, Springborg H. Laparoscopic repair of uterine scar after C section[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2011, 18(6): S90.
[8]
Klemm P, Koehler C, Mangler M, et al. Laparoscopic and vaginal repair of uterine scar dehiscence following cesarean section as detected by ultrasound[J]. J Perinat Med, 2005, 33(4): 324-331.
[9]
Florio P, Filippeschi M, Moncini I, et al. Hysteroscopic treatment of the cesarean-induced isthmocele in restoring infertility[J]. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2012, 24(3): 180-186.
[10]
Marotta ML, Donnez J, Squifflet J, et al. Laparoscopic repair of post-cesarean section uterine scar defects diagnosed in nonpregnant women[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2013, 20(3): 386-391.
[11]
郭银树,段华,张颖,等. 宫腔镜联合B超及腹腔镜在剖宫产切口憩室诊治中的应用[J]. 中国微创外科杂志,2011, 11(11): 1019-1021.
[12]
Chang Y, Tsai EM, Long CY, et al. Resectoscopic treatment combined with sonohysterographic evaluation of women with postmenstrual bleeding as a result of previous cesarean delivery scar defects[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2009, 200(4): 370. e1-e4.
[13]
Mah MW, Pyper AM, Oni GA, et al. Impact of antibiotic prophylaxis on wound infection after cesarean section in a situation of expected higher risk[J]. Am J Infect Control, 2001, 29(2): 85-88.
[14]
Api M, Boza A, Gorgen H, et al. Should cesarean scar defect be treated laparoscopically? A case report and review of the literature[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2015, 22(7): 1145-1152.
[15]
Nirgianakis K, Oehler R, Mueller M. The Rendez-vous technique for treatment of caesarean scar defects: a novel combined endoscopic approach[J]. Surg Endosc, 2016, 30(2): 770-771.
[16]
Ding JX, Chen JL, Zhang HW, et al. Hysteroscopic examination and laparoscopic repair of uterine scar defect after cesarean section[J]. Fudan Univ J Med Sci, 2012, 39(5): 506-510.
[1] 孟飞龙, 华帅, 张莹, 路广海. 经脐单孔腹腔镜后鞘后入路在全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 658-660.
[2] 田文, 杨晓冬. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术式选择及注意事项[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 595-597.
[3] 李涛, 陈纲, 李世拥. 腹腔镜下右侧腹股沟斜疝修补术(TAPP)[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 598-598.
[4] 王可, 范彬, 李多富, 刘奎. 两种疝囊残端处理方法在经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 692-696.
[5] 袁伟, 张修稳, 潘宏波, 章军, 王虎, 黄敏. 平片式与填充式腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-701.
[6] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[7] 刘跃刚, 薛振峰. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝日间手术在老年患者中的安全性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-714.
[8] 徐金林, 陈征. 抗菌药物临床应用监测对腹股沟疝修补术预防用药及感染的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 720-723.
[9] 李炳根, 龚独辉, 赖泽如, 聂向阳. 产后腹直肌分离全腔镜下肌后/腹膜外补片修补术的临床研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 724-727.
[10] 于智慧, 赵建军. 后路腰方肌阻滞复合全身麻醉在腹股沟斜疝经腹腹膜前手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 734-739.
[11] 田静, 方秀春. 超声引导下横筋膜平面阻滞在儿童腹股沟疝手术的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 740-744.
[12] 王红艳, 马艳丽, 郑洁灿. 手术室综合护理在腹股沟疝手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 755-758.
[13] 王敏, 蒋家斌, 李茂新. 预警宣教联合个性化疼痛管理对腹股沟疝手术患者的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 764-767.
[14] 朱青青, 卫贞祺. 腹股沟疝患者围手术期自我能效管理探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 773-777.
[15] 高红琴, 陈晨, 陆瑞科, 王小雨, 张敏, 李少华, 郝梨岚, 黄新程, 关凌耀, 张韵红. 外阴阴道假丝酵母菌病对女性阴道-宫颈菌群的影响研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 720-725.
阅读次数
全文


摘要