切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版)

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (02) : 218 -221. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2017.02.018

所属专题： 文献；

论著

电刺激治疗产后腹直肌分离的效果观察
王影1, 张洁1, 冯艳霞1,†(), 马乐2   
  1. 1. 066000　河北，秦皇岛市妇幼保健院妇科
    2. 100006　首都医科大学附属北京妇产医院男科
  • 收稿日期:2016-11-03 修回日期:2017-02-17 出版日期:2017-04-01
  • 通信作者: 冯艳霞

Curative effects on electrical stimulation treatment for postpartum diastasis recti abdominis

Ying Wang1, Jie Zhang1, Yanxia Feng1,†(), Le Ma2   

  1. 1. Department of Gynecology, Maternity & Child Care Center of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao 066000, Hebei Province, China
    2. Department of Andrology, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100006, China
  • Received:2016-11-03 Revised:2017-02-17 Published:2017-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Yanxia Feng
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Feng Yanxia, Email:
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

王影, 张洁, 冯艳霞, 马乐. 电刺激治疗产后腹直肌分离的效果观察[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2017, 13(02): 218-221.

Ying Wang, Jie Zhang, Yanxia Feng, Le Ma. Curative effects on electrical stimulation treatment for postpartum diastasis recti abdominis[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2017, 13(02): 218-221.

目的

探讨电刺激治疗产后腹直肌分离的临床效果。

方法

选择2013年1月至2015年1月，于秦皇岛市妇幼保健院产后门诊复查的23例腹直肌分离距离大于2.0 cm的产后42 d妇女为研究对象。采用PHENIX USB 8神经肌肉电刺激治疗仪对23例患者进行电刺激治疗，20 min/次，2次/周，共计治疗6次。采用腹部触诊法，检查患者治疗前、后腹直肌分离距离，并进行统计学分析。

结果

①本研究23例患者经电刺激治疗后，腰部、背部疼痛症状均得到缓解。电刺激治疗过程中及治疗后，患者均无不适，均未发生相应并发症。②本研究23例患者经电刺激治疗后，22例患者腹直肌分离距离<2.0 cm，1例腹直肌分离距离为3.0 cm，但该患者治疗后腹直肌分离距离较治疗前缩小2.5 cm。这23例患者治疗后腹直肌分离距离为(1.6±0.5)cm，较治疗前的(3.9±0.7)cm显著缩小，二者比较，差异有统计学意义(t＝12.80，P<0.001)。

结论

电刺激治疗产后腹直肌分离效果良好、安全，无不良反应。

关键词: 电刺激, 产伤, 腹直肌分离, 治疗结果, 产妇
Objective

To study the clinical effect of electrical stimulation treatment of postpartum diastasis recti abdominis.

Methods

A total of 23 cases of 42 d postpartum women from January 2013 to January 2015 in Maternity & Child Care Center of Qinhuangdao, whose separations of diastasis recti abdominis were greater than 2.0 cm were selected as research subjects. All the 23 cases patients were given 6 times of electrical stimulation treatment by PHENIX USB 8 neuromuscular electrical stimulation therapy device, each treatment time need 20 min and 2 times a week. The separation of diastasis recti abdominis were measured by abdominal palpation method before and after treatment. And the separation of diastasis recti abdominis before and after treatment were analyzed statistically.

Results

①After the electrical stimulation treatment, lumbar and back pain of all the 23 cases of patients were released. During the course of treatment and after treatment, none of them felt uncomfortable, and no corresponding complications occurred among them. ②After the electrical stimulation treatment, the separations of diastasis recti abdominis of 22 cases of patients were less than 2.0 cm, and the separation of 1 case was more than 3.0 cm whose separation was 2.5 cm shorter than before treatment. After treatment, the separation of diastasis recti abdominis was (3.9±0.7) cm, which was significantly shorter than (1.6±0.5) cm before treatment, and the difference was statistically significant (t=12.80, P<0.001).

Conclusions

Electrical stimulation is effective, safe and has no side effects in the treatment of diastasis recti abdominis.

Key words: Electrical stimulation, Birth injuries, Diastasis recti abdominis, Treatment outcome, Parturient
[1]
Ha W, Song SY, Yoon CS, et al. Severe irreversible diastasis recti abdominis and abdominal hernia in postpartum women: rare case report[J/OL]. Int Surg, (2016-04-22)[2016-06-17].

URL    
[2]
Kimmich N, Haslinger C, Kreft M, et al. Diastasis recti abdominis and pregnancy[J]. Praxis (Bern 1994), 2015, 104(15): 803-806.
[3]
BøK, Hilde G, Tennfjord MK, et al. Pelvic floor muscle function, pelvic floor dysfunction and diastasis recti abdominis: prospective cohort study[J/OL]. Neurourol Urodyn, (2016-03-31)[2017-01-17].

URL    
[4]
Bursch SG. Interrater reliability of diastasis recti abdominis measurement[J]. Phys Ther, 1987, 67(7): 1077-1079.
[5]
Sperstad JB, Tennfjord MK, Hilde G, et al. Diastasis recti abdominis during pregnancy and 12 months after childbirth: prevalence, risk factors and report of lumbopelvic pain[J]. Br J Sports Med, 2016, 50(17): 1092-1096.
[6]
Keshwani N, McLean L. Ultrasound imaging in postpartum women with diastasis recti: intrarater between-session reliability[J]. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 2015, 45(9): 713-718.
[7]
Keshwani N, Mathur S, McLean L. Validity of inter-rectus distance measurement in postpartum women using extended field-of-view ultrasound imaging techniques[J]. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 2015, 45(10): 808-813.
[8]
Fernandes da Mota PG, Pascoal AG, Carita AI, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of diastasis recti abdominis from late pregnancy to 6 months postpartum, and relationship with lumbo-pelvic pain[J]. Man Ther, 2015, 20(1): 200-205.
[9]
Benjamin DR, van de Water AT, Peiris CL. Effects of exercise on diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscle in the antenatal and postnatal periods: a systematic review[J]. Physiotherapy, 2014, 100 (1): 1-8.
[10]
Bellido Luque J, Bellido Luque A, Valdivia J, et al. Totally endoscopic surgery on diastasis recti associated with midline hernias. The advantages of a minimally invasive approach. Prospective cohort study[J]. Hernia, 2015, 19 (3): 493-501.
[11]
Akram J, Matzen SH. Rectus abdominis diastasis[J]. J Plast Surg Hand Surg, 2014, 48(3): 163-169.
[12]
Spector P, Laufer Y, Elboim Gabyzon M, et al. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation therapy to restore quadriceps muscle function in patients after orthopaedic surgery: a novel structured approach[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2016, 98(23): 2017-2024.
[13]
Dall′ Acqua AM, Sachetti A, Santos LJ, et al. Use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation to preserve the thickness of abdominal and chest muscles of critically ill patients: a randomized clinical trial[J]. J Rehabil Med, 2017, 49(1): 40-48.
[14]
Talbot LA, Brede E, Metter EJ. Effects of adding neuromuscular electrical stimulation to traditional military amputee rehabilitation[J]. Mil Med, 2017, 182(1): e1528-e1535.
[15]
孙智晶， 朱兰， 郎景和， 等. 产后盆底康复锻炼对女性盆底功能障碍性疾病的预防作用[J]. 中华妇产科杂志， 2015, 50(6): 420-427.
[1] 王宏宇. 固定与活动平台假体在全膝关节置换术中的应用价值[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 871-876.
[2] 许正文, 李振, 侯振扬, 苏长征, 朱彪. 富血小板血浆联合植骨治疗早期非创伤性股骨头坏死[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 773-779.
[3] 高玲, 于哲, 范然, 臧银善. 外周血细胞计数比值评估类风湿关节炎疗效的价值[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 642-647.
[4] 王泽勇, 覃健. 白细胞含量对富血小板血浆治疗运动系统损伤的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 684-688.
[5] 闫兆龙, 张镇斌, 李广兴, 赵璋, 张业勇, 殷鲁旭, 李树锋. 胫骨高位截骨术治疗膝骨关节炎的早期效果及影响因素[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 492-499.
[6] 危玲, 李会, 陈奕. 孕产妇产超广谱β-内酰胺酶的肠杆菌定植/感染与母婴传播研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 517-521.
[7] 张海涛, 康婵娟, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎效果观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 654-657.
[8] 陈垚, 徐伯群, 高志慧. 改良式中间上入路根治术治疗甲状腺癌的有效性安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 619-622.
[9] 黎熊, 曹永宽. 不同远切缘距离的ISR在局部进展期直肠癌新辅助治疗后的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 443-446.
[10] 冯树森, 张东成, 郭奇, 张皓露, 陈阔. 两种手术方法对急性阑尾炎患者的临床疗效及对炎性因子的影响比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 447-450.
[11] 卜晓沛, 刘冰, 张江华, 赵臣, 张金江, 尚培中. 子宫直肠瘘1例报告[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 469-470.
[12] 李炳根, 龚独辉, 赖泽如, 聂向阳. 产后腹直肌分离全腔镜下肌后/腹膜外补片修补术的临床研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 724-727.
[13] 王峰杰, 王礼光, 廖珊, 刘颖, 符荣党, 陈焕伟. 腹腔镜右半肝切除术治疗肝癌的安全性与疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 517-522.
[14] 刘卓, 段虎斌. 生物电相关疗法在神经损伤修复中的应用进展[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 257-260.
[15] 党圆圆, 赵虎林. 机器人辅助小脑齿状核脑深部电刺激植入术[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 320-320.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号