切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (02) : 149 -155. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2017.02.006

所属专题: 经典病例 文献

论著

1 146例极低/超低出生体重儿临床资料分析
胡勇1, 唐军1,(), 夏斌1, 母得志1   
  1. 1. 610041 成都,四川大学华西第二医院儿科、出生缺陷与相关妇儿疾病教育部重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2017-01-11 修回日期:2017-03-07 出版日期:2017-04-01
  • 通信作者: 唐军

Clinical analysis of 1 146 cases of very/extremely low birth weight infants

Yong Hu1, Jun Tang1,(), Bin Xia1, Dezhi Mu1   

  1. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, West China Second University Hospital, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2017-01-11 Revised:2017-03-07 Published:2017-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Jun Tang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Tang Jun, Email:
引用本文:

胡勇, 唐军, 夏斌, 母得志. 1 146例极低/超低出生体重儿临床资料分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2017, 13(02): 149-155.

Yong Hu, Jun Tang, Bin Xia, Dezhi Mu. Clinical analysis of 1 146 cases of very/extremely low birth weight infants[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2017, 13(02): 149-155.

目的

探讨极低出生体重儿(VLBWI)/超低出生体重儿(ELBWI)的临床特点、救治策略及转归,为VLBWI/ELBWI的临床救治提供参考。

方法

选取2009年1月1日至2015年12月31日于四川大学华西第二医院新生儿科接受住院治疗的1 146例VLBWI/ELBWI为研究对象。将其按照胎龄分为:<28周组(n=84)、≥28~32周组(n=679)、≥32~37周组(n=378)及≥37周组(n=5)。分析各组VLBWI/ELBWI的临床特点,统计学比较各组受试者住院时间、存活率、呼吸机使用情况、主要并发症发生情况、放弃治疗情况等。

结果

本研究纳入的1 146例VLBWI/ELBWI中,早产儿为1 141例,足月儿为5例,由于足月儿中VLBWI/ELBWI病例数太少,故未对其进行相关统计学分析。对于<28周组、≥28~32周组、≥32~37周组VLBWI/ELBWI进行统计学比较的结果显示:①3组受试者住院时间、存活率比较,差异有统计学意义(Z=34.667,P<0.001;χ2=71.012,P<0.001),并且VLBWI/ELBWI胎龄越小,住院时间越长,存活率越低。②<28周组VLBWI/ELBWI的有创机械通气治疗率,显著高于≥28~32周组及≥32~37周组,并且差异均有统计学意义(χ2=53.001、162.157,P<0.001)。<28周组及≥28~32周组无创辅助通气治疗率,均显著高于≥32~37周组,并且差异均有统计学意义(χ2=21.872、74.418,P<0.001),但是,<28周组与≥28~32周组呼吸暂停和宫内感染发生率分别比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。3组无创辅助通气治疗时间两两比较,差异均有统计学意义(Z=-4.077,P<0.001;Z=-4.655,P<0.001;Z=-2.879,P=0.002),并且胎龄越小,无创辅助通气治疗时间越高。③3组VLBWI/ELBWI常见并发症,如新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征(NRDS)、严重颅内出血(Ⅲ~Ⅳ级)、支气管肺发育不良(BPD)及早产儿视网膜病变(ROP)发生率分别比较,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=111.662、74.639、58.076、70.049,P<0.001),并且胎龄越小,上述并发症发生率越高。3组呼吸暂停与宫内感染发生率分别比较,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=59.683、25.937,P<0.001);而<28周组及≥28~32周组呼吸暂停及宫内感染发生率,均显著高于≥32~37周组,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=19.586、57.893,P<0.001;χ2=10.146、25.019,P<0.001),但是<28周组分别与≥28~32周组呼吸暂停和宫内感染发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。④3组VLBWI/ELBWI放弃治疗率比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=18.636,P<0.001),并且胎龄越小,放弃治疗率越高;死亡VLBWI/ELBWI中,放弃治疗后死亡者占73.8%(141/191)。

结论

VLBWI/ELBWI中,胎龄越小,并发症发生率越高,呼吸机治疗率及治疗时间明显增加,VLBWI/ELBWI存活率下降。降低VLBWI/ELBWI放弃治疗率,可提高其存活率。

Objective

To study the clinical characteristics, treatment strategies and outcomes of very low birth weight infants (VLBWI) and extremely low birth weight infants (ELBWI), and to provide references for the treatment of them.

Methods

From of 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2015, a total of 1 146 cases of VLBWI/ELBWI who were hospitalized in Department of Neonatology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University were recruited as research subjects. According to the gestational ages, the VLBWI/ELBWI were divided into 4 groups: <28 weeks group (n=84), and ≥28-32 weeks group (n=679), ≥32-37 weeks group (n=378), ≥37 weeks group (n=5). The clinical characteristics of each group were analyzed, and hospitalization time, survival rate, rate of using ventilator, rate of the main complications, and the situation of giving up treatment were statistically compared among groups.

Results

Among 1 146 cases of VLBWI/ELBWI, there were 1 141 premature infants and 5 full-term infants. Because the number of full-term infants was too small, they were not analyzed by statistical methods, <28 weeks, ≥28-32 weeks, ≥32-37 weeks group were compared by related statistical methods. The results showed as follows. ①There were significant differences among 3 groups in hospitalization time and survival rate (Z=34.667, P<0.001; χ2=71.012, P<0.001). And the smaller of gestational age, the longer of hospitalization time, the lower of survival rate among those 3 groups. ②Rates of using invasive ventilation in <28 weeks group were higher than those in ≥28-32 weeks group and ≥32-37 weeks group, and both the differences were statistically significant (χ2=53.001, 162.157; P<0.001). Rate of using noninvasive assisted ventilation in <28 weeks group and ≥28-32 weeks group were higher than those in ≥32-37 weeks group, and both the differences were statistically significant (χ2=21.872, 74.418; P<0.001), but there was no significant difference between <28 weeks group and ≥28-32 weeks group in the rates of using noninvasive assisted ventilation (P>0.05). There were significant differences in durations of noninvasive assisted ventilation treatment among 3 groups by pairwise comparison (Z=-4.077, P<0.001; Z=-4.655, P<0.001; Z=-2.879, P=0.002), and the smaller of gestational age, the longer duration of noninvasive assisted ventilation treatment. ③There were significant differences among common complications, such as neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS), severe intracranial hemorrhage (Ⅲ-Ⅳ), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in 3 groups (χ2=111.662, 74.639, 58.076, 70.049; P<0.001), and the smaller gestational age, the higher incidences of aboved complications among 3 groups. There were significant differences in the incidences of apnea and intrauterine infection in 3 groups (χ2=59.683, P<0.001; χ2=25.937, P<0.001), and the incidences of apnea and intrauterine infection in <28 weeks group and ≥28-32 weeks group were higher than those in ≥32-37 weeks group, and all the differences were statistically significant (χ2=19.586, 57.893, P<0.001; χ2=10.146, 25.019, P<0.001), but there were no significant differences between <28 weeks group and ≥28-32 weeks group in the incidences of apnea or intrauterine infection (P>0.05). ④There were significant difference in 3 groups of rates of abandoned treatment (χ2=18.636, P<0.01). The smaller gestational age, the higher rate of abandoned treatment among 3 groups. Among the dead of VLBWI/ELBWI, the percentage of death after abandoned treatment was 73.8% (141/191).

Conclusions

In the VLBWI/ELBWI, the smaller gestational age, the higher rate of complications, higher use rates and longer use time of ventilations, and the lower survival rate. Reducing the proportion of abandoned treatment can improve the survival rate of VLBWI/ELBWI.

表1 2009-2015年,1 146例VLBWI/ELBWI在病例收集医院接受相关治疗后的存活率比较[%(n/n′)]
表2 <28周组、≥28~32周组及≥32~37周组VLBWI/ELBWI基本临床资料比较
表3 <28周组、≥28~32周组及≥32~37周组VLBWI/ELBWI呼吸机治疗情况比较
表4 <28周组、≥28~32周组及≥32~37周组VLBWI/ELBWI主要并发症发生率比较[例数(%)]
表5 2009-2015年,<28周组、≥28~32周组及≥32~37周组VLBWI/ELBWI存活率比较 [%(n/n′)]
表6 <28周组、≥28~32周组及≥32~37周组VLBWI/ELBWI放弃治疗基本情况比较 [%(n/n′)]
表7 <28周组、≥28~32周组及≥32~37周组放弃治疗与未放弃治疗VLBWI/ELBWI前5位疾病患病率比较[例数(%)]
[1]
Owens JD, Soltau T, Mccaughn D, et al. Multi-hospital community NICU quality improvement improves survival of ELBW infants[J]. J Miss State Med Assoc, 2015, 56(8): 237-242.
[2]
Su BH, Hsieh WS, Hsu CH, et al. Neonatal outcomes of extremely preterm infants from Taiwan: comparison with Canada, Japan, and the USA[J]. Pediatr Neonatol, 2015, 56(1): 46-52.
[3]
陈春, 张谦慎. 超低出生体重儿救治的国内外近况[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2013, 15(8): 703-707.
[4]
Lin HJ, Du LZ, Ma XL, et al. Mortality and morbidity of extremely low birth weight infants in the mainland of China: a multi-center study[J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2015, 128(20): 2743-2750.
[5]
Shim JW, Jin HS, Bae CW. Changes in survival rate for very-low-birth-weight infants in Korea: comparison with other countries[J]. J Korean Med Sci, 2015, 30(Suppl 1): S25-S34.
[6]
李爱月, 杨宇萍. 极低和超低出生体重儿临床分析[J/CD]. 中国新生儿科杂志, 2016, 31(1): 24-27.
[7]
阚清, 杨洋, 邱洁, 等. 超低/极低出生体质量儿223例临床回顾分析[J]. 东南大学学报(医学版), 2016, 35(5): 713-718.
[8]
Zhang R, Zhang K, Yuan L, et al. Clinical analysis of 105 extremely low birth weight infants[J]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi, 2014, 94(6): 446-448.
[9]
李明玉, 唐军, 伍金林, 等. 极低与超低出生体质量儿的临床分析[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2014, 10(3): 44-49.
[10]
Njom Nlend AE, Zeudja C, Ndiang S, et al. Trends in neonatal mortality of very-low-birth-weight infants between 1998 and 2013 in Essos Hospital, Yaoundé, Cameroon[J]. Arch Pediatr, 2016, 23(9): 895-898.
[11]
王恋, 李娟, 毛健, 等. 极低及超低出生体重儿的预后因素分析[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2014, 16(6): 601-605.
[12]
Demauro SB, Millar D, Kirpalani H. Noninvasive respiratory support for neonates[J]. Curr Opin Pediatr, 2014, 26(2): 157-162.
[13]
Isayama T, Lee SK, Mori R, et al. Comparison of mortality and morbidity of very low birth weight infants between Canada and Japan[J]. Pediatrics, 2012, 130(4): e957-e965.
[14]
Morris M, Cleary JP, Soliman A. Small Baby unit improves quality and outcomes in extremely low birth weight infants[J]. Pediatrics, 2015, 136(4): 1007-1015.
[15]
夏斌, 胡勇, 李晋辉, 等. 足月儿和晚期早产儿出生早期呼吸困难的不同抗菌药物使用策略研究[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2014, 10(6): 737-741.
[16]
Horbar JD, Carpenter JH, Badger GJ, et al. Mortality and neonatal morbidity among infants 501 to 1 500 grams from 2000 to 2009[J]. Pediatrics, 2012, 129(6): 1019-1026.
[17]
Ballot DE, Davies VA, Cooper PA, et al. Retrospective cross-sectional review of survival rates in critically ill children admitted to a combined pediatric/neonatal intensive care unit in Johannesburg, South Africa, 2013-2015[J]. BMJ Open, 2016, 6(6): e010850.
[1] 金鑫, 谢卯, 刘芸, 杨操, 杨述华, 许伟华. 个性化股骨导向器辅助初次全髋关节置换的随机对照研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 780-787.
[2] 杜滨和, 徐楠, 杨云川, 崔培元. 5项改良衰弱指数预测胰十二指肠切除术近期预后的价值探讨[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 444-448.
[3] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[4] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[5] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[6] 陈垚, 徐伯群, 高志慧. 改良式中间上入路根治术治疗甲状腺癌的有效性安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 619-622.
[7] 陈大敏, 曹晓刚, 曹能琦. 肥胖对胃癌患者手术治疗效果的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 651-653.
[8] 曹智, 朱希望, 王尉, 张辉, 杨成林, 张小明. 经皮肾镜碎石取石术中不同肾盂内压力与围术期并发症相关性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 616-620.
[9] 叶晋生, 路夷平, 梁燕凯, 于淼, 冀祯, 贺志坚, 张洪海, 王洁. 腹腔镜下应用生物补片修补直肠术后盆底缺损的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-691.
[10] 袁伟, 张修稳, 潘宏波, 章军, 王虎, 黄敏. 平片式与填充式腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-701.
[11] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[12] 代格格, 杨丽, 胡媛媛, 周文婷. 手术室综合干预在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[13] 潘冰, 吕少诚, 赵昕, 李立新, 郎韧, 贺强. 淋巴结清扫数目对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除手术疗效的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 608-612.
[14] 崔佳琪, 吴迪, 陈海艳, 周惠敏, 顾元龙, 周光文, 杨军. TACE术后并发肝脓肿的临床诊治分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 688-693.
[15] 王小娜, 谭微, 李悦, 姜文艳. 预测性护理对结直肠癌根治术患者围手术期生活质量、情绪及并发症的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 525-529.
阅读次数
全文


摘要