切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2016, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (05) : 566 -570. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2016.05.014

所属专题: 文献

论著

谷胱甘肽S移换酶π与P170糖蛋白在上皮性卵巢癌联合化疗后的表达及其临床意义
董莺1, 马骏1, 金悦1, 张殊1, 王育1,()   
  1. 1. 200127 上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院妇产科、上海市妇科肿瘤重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2016-08-16 修回日期:2016-09-08 出版日期:2016-10-01
  • 通信作者: 王育

Expressions and clinical significances of glutathione S-transferase π and P170 glycoprotein in epithelial ovarian cancer chemotherapy

Ying Dong1, Jun Ma1, Yue Jin1, Shu Zhang1, Yu Wang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gynecologic Oncology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200127, China
  • Received:2016-08-16 Revised:2016-09-08 Published:2016-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Yu Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Yu, Email:
引用本文:

董莺, 马骏, 金悦, 张殊, 王育. 谷胱甘肽S移换酶π与P170糖蛋白在上皮性卵巢癌联合化疗后的表达及其临床意义[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2016, 12(05): 566-570.

Ying Dong, Jun Ma, Yue Jin, Shu Zhang, Yu Wang. Expressions and clinical significances of glutathione S-transferase π and P170 glycoprotein in epithelial ovarian cancer chemotherapy[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2016, 12(05): 566-570.

目的

探讨谷胱甘肽S移换酶π(GST-π)和P170糖蛋白,在紫杉醇联合顺铂治疗上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)后的表达及其临床意义。

方法

选取2012年6月至2016年6月上海市普陀区妇婴保健院收治的60例EOC患者为研究对象。按照计算机随机数字表法,将其随机分为研究组及对照组,各为30例。研究组采取紫杉醇联合顺铂治疗,对照组单纯采取紫杉醇治疗。化疗后,统计学分析两组患者GST-π和P170糖蛋白阳性表达率、化疗疗效、血清学指标及不良反应发生率。研究组及对照组患者的年龄、国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)分期及EOC复发率等临床资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。本研究遵循的程序符合上海市普陀区妇婴保健院人体试验委员会所制定的伦理学标准,得到该委员会批准,分组征得受试对象的知情同意,并与之签署临床研究知情同意书。

结果

化疗后,研究组EOC患者GST-π及P170糖蛋白阳性表达率,均显著低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=4.28、4.34,P<0.05);研究组EOC患者血清糖链抗原125(CA125)、转化生长因子(TNF)-α及可溶性白细胞介素-2受体(SIL-2R)水平的改善程度,均显著优于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(t=5.14、6.53、5.86,P<0.05)。研究组EOC患者的化疗总体不良反应发生率显著低于对照组,并且差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.44,P<0.05)。研究组EOC患者的化疗总有效率显著高于对照组,差异亦有统计学意义(χ2=5.52,P<0.05)。

结论

紫杉醇联合顺铂治疗EOC的化疗敏感性高,不良反应发生率低,临床疗效高。但是,临床对于EOC化疗,是否可选择GST-π和P170糖蛋白作为随访化疗疗效的指标,尚需多中心、大样本随机对照试验进一步研究、证实。

Objective

To study expressions and clinical significances of the glutathione S-transferase π (GST-π) and P170 glycoprotein in paclitaxel combined with cisplatin in treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

Methods

From June 2012 to June 2016, a total of 60 cases of EOC patients who hospitalized and treated in Putuo District Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Shanghai were recruited in this study. They were randomly divided into research group (n=30, treated by paclitaxel combined with cisplatin) and control group (n=30, treated by paclitaxel alone) by random number table method.Positive expressions of GST-π and P170 glycoprotein, curative effects, serological indicators, and incidence of adverse reactions after chemotherapy between two groups were analyzed by statistical methods. There were no significant differences between two groups among age, Federation International of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) clinical stage and relapse rate of EOC (P>0.05). The procedure of this study was consistent with ethical standard established by the committee of investigation in human beings of Putuo District Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Shanghai. Patients were informed of grouping and their written informed consents were obtained before clinical studies.

Results

After chemotherapy, positive expressions of GST-π and P170 glycoprotein in research group were remarkably lower than those in control group, and there were significant differences (χ2=4.28, 4.34; P<0.05). The levels improvement degrees of serological indicators such as carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125), transforming growth factor (TNF)-α, and soluble interleukin-2 receptor (SIL-2R) in research group were better than those in control group, and there were significant differences (t=5.14, 6.53, 5.86; P<0.05). Total incidence of adverse reactions of chemotherapy in research group was remarkably lower than that in control group, overall effective rate of chemotherapy in research group was much higher than that in control group, and all the differences were statistically significant (χ2=4.44, 5.52; P<0.05).

Conclusions

Chemotherapy sensitivity in treatment of EOC with paclitaxel combined with cisplatin is much higher than the treatment with paclitaxel alone, and total incidence of adverse reaction is remarkably lower, and overall effective rate of chemotherapy is much higher than the treatment with paclitaxel alone. Whether positive expressions of GST-π and P170 glycoprotein as a judging criteria of overall effective in treatment of EOC are worthy of clinical application or not, multi-center and large-sample randomized controlled trial will be needed to confirm.

表1 两组上皮性卵巢癌患者GST-π及P170糖蛋白阳性表达率比较[例数(%)]
表2 两组上皮性卵巢癌患者各项血清学指标比较(±s)
表3 两组上皮性卵巢癌患者不良反应发生率比较[例数(%)]
表4 两组上皮性卵巢癌患者治疗效果比较[例数(%)]
[1]
蒋劲松,黎皓,耿梅,等. 奈达铂或顺铂联合紫杉醇治疗晚期食管癌的临床观察[J]. 癌症进展,2014, 12(5): 483-487.
[2]
林春生,曾清芳. 异环磷酰胺联合卡铂方案治疗复发性卵巢癌的临床分析[J]. 临床军医杂志,2015, 43(10): 1074-1076.
[3]
KouXJ, ChenN, FengZY, et al. GSTP1 negatively regulates STAT3 activation in epidermal growth factor signaling[J]. Oncol Lett, 2013, 5(8): 1053-1057.
[4]
马俊,李博,王丽萍,等. 消化道肿瘤MDR1基因和P-糖蛋白的表达与化疗药物耐药的关系[J]. 广东医学,2013, 34(20): 3120-3123.
[5]
吴国芳,刘丽. 顺铂不同给药途径联合紫杉醇静脉滴注治疗晚期卵巢癌的疗效和不良反应[J]. 中国肿瘤临床与康复,2016, 23(3): 300-302.
[6]
梁梦,周英琼,郭芳,等. GST-π、ERCC1、MRP和LRP在卵巢癌组织中的表达及意义[J]. 中国现代医学杂志,2012, 22(1): 11-14.
[7]
林佳静,曾定元,贺红英,等. 卵巢恶性生殖细胞肿瘤患者治疗模式的探讨[J]. 肿瘤防治研究,2016, 18(3): 221-225.
[8]
李桂梅,刘冬梅,平伟,等. 紫杉醇脂质体联合卡铂与紫杉醇联合卡铂治疗卵巢癌的疗效比较[J]. 中国肿瘤临床与康复,2016, 30(5): 563-565.
[9]
朱小兰,陈小芳,许文林. YB1和CD44在上皮性卵巢癌中的表达及其与铂类耐药的关系[J]. 现代妇产科进展,2016, 25(2): 175-177.
[10]
关慧,王瑄,关瑞,等. 白蛋白结合型紫杉醇与紫杉醇治疗老年晚期卵巢癌疗效与安全性比较[J]. 实用老年医学,2016, 20(5): 415-417.
[11]
陈虎,农晓琳,陈宇麟,等. 顺铂短期诱导人腺样囊性癌细胞NACC产生耐药性的研究[J]. 现代生物医学进展,2016, 14(17): 2641-2645.
[12]
甄世萍,卢杉,王赞宏. 联合紫杉醇及卡铂治疗卵巢癌的临床疗效[J]. 中国医学工程,2016, 28(1): 52-54.
[13]
饶歆,杜朝晖,林从尧,等. P170蛋白的检测及其与结直肠癌术后化疗耐药的关系[J]. 公共卫生与预防医学,2015, 26(1): 24-26.
[14]
李宏,廉斌,王建,等. TopoⅡ、P170、GST-π、PCNA及E-Cadherin在乳腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义[J]. 宁夏医学杂志,2013, 35(1): 12-15.
[1] 温卿, 闫国珍, 何俊峰, 刘扬. 携紫杉醇和抗人表皮生长因子受体2抗体高分子造影剂的制备及体外寻靶实验研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2018, 15(06): 473-478.
[2] 郝帅, 田武国, 高博, 何渝军, 罗东林. ABCB1基因多态性对乳腺癌紫杉醇治疗反应的影响[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(01): 54-57.
[3] 陈荟竹, 郭应坤, 汪昕蓉, 宁刚, 陈锡建. 上皮性卵巢癌"二元论模型"的分子生物学研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 394-402.
[4] 宁涓, 王晓燕, 魏华萍. 白蛋白结合型紫杉醇治疗转移性胰腺癌的疗效观察[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 407-411.
[5] 张彬月, 贾红燕. 紫杉醇/白蛋白紫杉醇为基础的化疗联合PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂治疗三阴性乳腺癌的疗效和安全性:荟萃分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 52-58.
[6] 黄彩英, 陈萍, 潘杰, 莫彩云, 尚敏红, 周俊. 紫杉醇治疗胸腺鳞癌致大疱性表皮松解坏死性药疹救治成功一例[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(03): 442-444.
[7] 宋仲洁, 邢益阳. 卡瑞利珠单抗联合紫杉醇脂质体加卡铂一线治疗NSCLC的临床分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(06): 816-818.
[8] 潘腾莉, 刘彭坤, 李古郡, 程刚. 安罗替尼联合多西紫杉醇二线治疗进展期非小细胞肺癌临床分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(06): 767-769.
[9] 崔鹤清, 洪梅, 刘志远, 朱诺. SBRT同步贝伐珠单抗联合TP化疗对局部晚期NSCLC疗效分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(05): 596-598.
[10] 李静, 王志芬, 张晓慧, 杨庚武, 刘峥, 牛广旭. 阿帕替尼与白蛋白结合型紫杉醇在MDA- MB-231乳腺癌细胞系中的协同抗癌作用[J]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(02): 90-98.
[11] 曹文玺, 陈箫, 竺来法, 周永平. 尼妥珠单抗联合白蛋白结合型紫杉醇治疗胰腺癌的有效性及安全性分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 409-413.
[12] 丁洁, 刘兴祥, 申小章, 王彩霞, 郭卿. 纳米蛋白结合型紫杉醇联合顺铂治疗食管鳞状细胞癌的疗效分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(09): 892-896.
[13] 黄晴, 赵瑞珩, 钱惠英. PCI-24781诱导SKOV-3细胞凋亡及相关机制的研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(08): 775-781.
[14] 陈文静, 唐乙厶, 赵蓓, 徐敏燕, 李涛. 表皮生长因子受体在黑色素瘤紫杉醇耐药性中的机制研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(01): 94-99.
[15] 赖雪莹, 刘斌, 胡学琴, 陈浩军. 异甘草酸镁对紫杉醇致大鼠肝损伤的防治作用及其对血清IL-6、IL-10、TNF-α的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(11): 922-925.
阅读次数
全文


摘要