切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2016, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (01) : 76 -82. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2016.01.014

所属专题: 文献

论著

改良荷包缝合法在宫颈冷刀锥切术中的应用价值
何文容1, 李莉1, 王晓雯1, 凌晟荣1, 陈克明1, 易村犍1,*,*()   
  1. 1. 434000 湖北荆州,长江大学附属第一人民医院妇产科
  • 收稿日期:2015-10-10 修回日期:2016-01-04 出版日期:2016-02-01
  • 通信作者: 易村犍

Application value of modified purse-string suture in cold knife conization

Wenrong He1, Li Li1, Xiaowen Wang1, Shengrong Ling1, Keming Chen1, Cunjian Yi1()   

  1. 1. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, First People's Hospital of Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434000, Hubei Province, China
  • Received:2015-10-10 Revised:2016-01-04 Published:2016-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Cunjian Yi
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yi Cunjian, Email:
引用本文:

何文容, 李莉, 王晓雯, 凌晟荣, 陈克明, 易村犍. 改良荷包缝合法在宫颈冷刀锥切术中的应用价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2016, 12(01): 76-82.

Wenrong He, Li Li, Xiaowen Wang, Shengrong Ling, Keming Chen, Cunjian Yi. Application value of modified purse-string suture in cold knife conization[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2016, 12(01): 76-82.

目的

探讨改良荷包缝合法在宫颈冷刀锥切术(CKC)中的应用价值。

方法

选择2009年1月至2013年12月于长江大学附属第一医院妇科行CKC的291例宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)Ⅱ~Ⅲ患者为研究对象。按照不同的缝合方式,将接受传统Sturmdorf缝合法缝合的130例患者纳入对照组,将接受改良荷包缝合法缝合的161例患者纳入改良组。对比分析两组患者的手术时间、住院时间、术中出血量、术后晚期出血量、术后活组织检查结果、术后宫颈塑性满意度、术后发热情况和术后3个月随访情况。两组患者的年龄、孕次、产次、绝经与否、CINⅡ和CINⅢ的构成比等一般临床资料比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。本研究遵循的程序符合长江大学附属第一医院人体试验委员会制定的伦理学标准,得到该委员会批准。

结果

①改良组患者的平均手术时间为(28.2±7.9) min,对照组为(40.5±9.4)min,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(t=12.127,P<0.05)。改良组患者术后平均住院时间为(3.7±1.3)d,对照组为(4.2±1.2)d,并且差异无统计学意义(t=3.375,P>0.05)。②改良组患者平均术中出血量为(38.6±24.3)mL;对照组为(67.0±18.6)mL,并且差异有统计学意义(t=10.978,P<0.05)。改良组患者的平均术后晚期出血量为(13.5±6.2)mL,对照组为(16.3±5.7)mL,并且差异无统计学意义(t=3.970,P>0.05)。③术后活组织检查结果(病理升级、浸润癌检出率及切缘阳性率)比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。④两组患者宫颈塑形满意度比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=14.883、8.432、7.587,P<0.05)。⑤两组患者术后发热情况比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.103,P>0.05)。⑥术后3个月随访结果显示,改良组患者术后宫颈管肉芽形成率及宫颈黏连发生率显著低于对照组,并且差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.638、3.754,P<0.05);但两组患者术后细胞学检出异常率比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.445,P>0.05)。

结论

改良荷包缝合法操作简单,手术时间短,止血及宫颈成形效果好,是CKC诊疗中值得推广的缝合方法。

Objective

To discuss the clinical application value of modified purse-string suture in cervical wound after cold knife conization (CKC).

Methods

Medical records of 291 patients who received CKC treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)Ⅱ-Ⅲ in Department of Gynecology and obstetrics, First People's Hospital of Yangtze University from January 2009 to December 2013 were included into this study. They were divided into modified group (n=161) and control group (n=130) according to two different suture methods. A total of 161 cases with modified purse-string suture from January 2012 to December 2013 were included into modified group, and another 130 cases with traditional Sturmdorf suture from January 2009 to December 2011 were included into control group. Operation time, hospitalization, intraoperative and postoperative blood loss, postoperative histopathological examination results, postoperative cervical plastic satisfaction, postoperative fever and postoperative follow-up of 3 months between two groups were compared. There were no statistically significant differences bwteen two groups in the aspects of age, gravidity, parity and the proportion of menopause (P>0.05). The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Investigation in Human Being of First People's Hospital of Yangtze University.

Results

①The operation time of modified group and control group were (28.2±7.9) min and (40.5±9.4) min, respectively, which had statistically significant difference (t=12.127, P<0.05). The hospitilization of modified group and control group were (3.7±1.3) d and (4.2±1.2) d, and there was no statistically significant difference (t=3.375, P>0.05). ② The average intraoperative blood loss of modified group was (38.6±24.3) mL and control group was (67.0±18.6) mL, and the difference was statistically significant (t=10.978, P<0.05). The postoperative blood loss of modified group was (13.5±6.2) mL and control group was (16.3±5.7) mL, and there was no statistically significant difference(t=3.970, P>0.05). ③There were no significant differences between two groups in the histopathological examination results (the incidence rates of pathological upgrade, invasive cervical cancer detection and positive surgical margin)(P>0.05). ④ There were significant differences between two groups in postoperative cervical shape satisfaction (χ2=14.883, 8.432, 7.587; P<0.05). ⑤There were no significant difference between two groups in fever (χ2=0.103, P>0.05). ⑥After 3 months follow-up, the incidence rates of cervical granulation and cervical adhesion of modified group were significant lower than those of control group, which had significant differences (χ2=4.638, 3.754; P<0.05). Meanwhile, there was no statistically significant difference between two groups in abnormity rate of cytology (χ2=0.445, P>0.05).

Conclusions

The modified purse-string suture presents effective hemostasis in CKC, leading to simple operation, short operation time, less blood loss and shorter postoperative hospitalization.

图1 改良组患者宫颈荷包缝合法示意图(图1A:宫颈缝合方法;图1B:宫颈缝合术后的宫颈)
图2 对照组患者宫颈传统Sturmdorf缝合法示意图(图2A:宫颈后唇的缝合;图2B:宫颈后唇成形后的宫颈外观)
表1 两组CINⅡ~Ⅲ患者的手术时间及住院时间比较(±s)
表2 两组CINⅡ~Ⅲ患者术中出血量和术后晚期出血情况比较
表3 两组CINⅡ~Ⅲ患者术后组织病理学结果比较[例数(%)]
表4 两组CINⅡ~Ⅲ患者术后宫颈塑形满意度比较[例数(%)]
表5 两组CINⅡ~Ⅲ患者术后3个月的随访情况比较[例数(%)]
1
Dalstein V, Riethmuller D, Prétet JL, et al. Persistence and load of high-risk HPV are predictors for development of high-grade cervical lesions: a longitudinal French cohort study[J]. Int J Cancer, 2003, 106(3):396-403.
2
荆淑云,贺瑞霞.三阶梯诊疗程序在子宫颈癌机会性筛查中的应用与探讨[J].肿瘤研究与临床,2011,23(5):346-348.
3
兰岚,黄冬梅.高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变的临床诊治分析[J].实用妇产科杂志,2013,29(2):140-143.
4
Reich O, Lahousen M, Pickel H, et al. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Ⅲ: long-term follow-up after cold-knife conization with involved margins[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2002, 99(2):193-196.
5
谢辛,尚文丽,主编.妇产科学.8版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2014:302.
6
Grio R, Rizzitiello A, Colla F, et al. Therapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and fertility[J]. Minerva Ginecol, 2002, 54(4):325-331.
7
Soutter WP, de Barros Lopes A, Fletcher A, et al. Invasive cervical cancer after conservative therapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia[J]. Lancet, 1997, 349(9057):978-980.
8
Milojkovic M. Residual and recurrent lesions after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2002, 76(1):49-53.
9
Melnikow J, McGahan C, Sawaya GF, et al. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia outcomes after treatment: long-term follow-up from the British Columbia Cohort Study[J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2009, 101(10):721-728.
10
Baser E, Ozgu E, Erkilinc S, et al. Risk factors for human papillomavirus persistence among women undergoing cold-knife conization for treatment of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2014, 125(3):275-278.
11
Serati M, Siesto G, Carollo S, et al. Risk factors for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia recurrence after conization: a 10-year study[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2012, 165(1):86-90.
12
Lu CH, Liu FS, Kuo CJ, et al. Prediction of persistence or recurrence after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Ⅲ[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 107(4):830-835.
13
Livasy CA, Maygarden SJ, Rajaratnam CT, et al. Predictors of recurrent dysplasia after a cervical loop electrocautery excision procedure for CIN-3: a study of margin, endocervical gland, and quadrant involvement[J]. Mod Pathol, 1999, 12(3):233-238.
14
Lima MI, Tafuri A, Araújo AC, et al. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia recurrence after conization in HIV-positive and HIV-negative women[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2009, 104(2):100-104.
15
Baloglu A, Uysal D, Bezircioglu I, et al. Residual and recurrent disease rates following LEEP treatment in high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2010, 282(1):69-73.
16
Shin JW, Rho HS, Park CY. Factors influencing the choice between cold knife conization and loop electrosurgical excisional procedure for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2009, 35(1):126-130.
17
Panna S, Luanratanakorn S. Positive margin prevalence and risk factors with cervical specimens obtained from loop electrosurgical excision procedures and cold knife conization[J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2009, 10(4):637-640.
18
Zeng SY, Liang MR, Li LY, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and complications of different surgical methods for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia[J]. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol, 2012, 33(3):257-260.
19
冯力民,史小雨,李晶华.宫颈锥切术及其相关问题[J/CD].中华妇幼临床医学杂志:电子版,2015,11(5):553-558.
20
Grimm C, Brammen L, Sliutz G, et al. Impact of conization type on the resected cone volume: results of a retrospective multi-center study[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2013, 288(5):1081-1086.
21
Dane C, Dane B, Cetin A, et al. Haemostasis after cold-knife conisation: a randomised prospective trial comparing cerclage suture versus electro-cauterization[J]. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 2008, 48(3):343-347.
22
Basic E, Kozaric H, Kozaric M, et al. Conization as treatment of choice for precancerous changes and university cervical cancer at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Clinical Center of Sarajevo University in 2009[J]. Med Arh, 2010, 64(3):171-174.
23
曹泽毅,主编.中华妇产科学.2版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2004:2027.
24
Mathevet P, Chemali E, Roy M, et al. Long-term outcome of a randomized study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2003, 106(2):214-218.
[1] 李程, 朱梁, 庞勇, 张星晨, 查国春, 郭开今. 改良加强减张无结缝线桥技术治疗肩袖撕裂合并冻结肩[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 424-429.
[2] 王旭, 李彦林, 王国梁, 赵正吕, 贾笛, 宁梓文, 施政良, 何璐, 王坤. 关节镜下带线锚钉缝合修复前交叉韧带部分损伤的疗效分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 326-333.
[3] 曾俊杰, 张绍龙, 马栋, 李玉民, 苑博. 单排缝合与Mason-Allen缝合治疗中小型肩袖损伤疗效对比[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 165-172.
[4] 罗丹, 孔为民, 陈姝宁, 赵小玲, 谢云凯. 子宫内膜异位症患者在位及异位内膜上皮细胞-间充质转化相关生物标志物的变化[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 530-539.
[5] 刘星辰, 刘娟, 魏宝宝, 刘洁, 刘辉. XIAP与XAF1异常表达与卵巢癌的相关性分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 419-427.
[6] 杨一君, 董雯, 刘晓平, 石灿, 张磊, 谷琎, 龚咪, 华馥. 腹腔镜折叠对接缝合联合宫腔镜憩室开渠法治疗剖宫产瘢痕憩室的疗效[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 330-337.
[7] 董双, 李晓莹, 孙立涛, 田家玮. 影像学技术在宫颈癌术前临床分期中的应用进展[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(01): 113-119.
[8] 邹佳桐, 王颂扬, 徐薇, 余婷婷, 叶红霞, 谯小勇. 自然流产女性精神健康问题的相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(01): 77-84.
[9] 戴佑任, 张悦, 李扬, 王聪, 陈婷, 程文俊, 罗成燕. 未分化/去分化子宫内膜癌的临床病理学特征及治疗研究[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(06): 660-668.
[10] 陈晶晶, 钱芳. 新疆地区不同民族育龄妇女胚胎停育与叶酸代谢酶基因多态性及染色体异常的相关性[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(05): 599-605.
[11] 马若骛, 郭雅彬, 张清学, 谢梅青. 46,XY女性性发育异常临床分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(01): 61-66.
[12] 米洁, 陈晨, 李佳玲, 裴海娜, 张恒博, 李飞, 李东杰. 儿童头面部外伤特点分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 511-515.
[13] 蓝青楠, 俞金龙, 余捷, 何首华, 翁起宁, 罗桂芝, 邹琦, 邹兆伟. 改良两针法连续缝合在回肠单腔造口术中的应用[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 278-281.
[14] 王举, 高小平, 张凤联, 姜世洲, 王永强, 姜洪伟. 免器械手工吻合技术在完全腹腔镜左半结肠切除术中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(06): 341-346.
[15] 阿孜古丽·阿力木江, 买买提·依斯热依力, 王婧, 阿巴伯克力·乌斯曼, 陈美华, 陆萍, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 探讨围绝经期妇女胃食管反流病症状和胃酸反流的特征[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2022, 09(03): 151-155.
阅读次数
全文


摘要