切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2015, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (4) : 458 -461. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2015.04.005

所属专题: 文献

论著

人附睾蛋白4及CA125联合检测在卵巢肿瘤中的应用及人附睾蛋白4水平与卵巢肿瘤病理学分型的相关性研究
白杰*()   
  1. 476100 河南省商丘市第一人民医院妇产科
  • 收稿日期:2015-04-20 修回日期:2015-07-01 出版日期:2015-08-01
  • 通信作者: 白杰

Application of human epididymis protein 4 and CA125 joint detection in ovarian neoplasms and the correlation between human epididymis protein 4 and pathological type of ovarian neoplasms

Jie Bai*()   

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shangqiu First People's Hospital in Henan Province, Shangqiu 476100, Henan Province, China
  • Received:2015-04-20 Revised:2015-07-01 Published:2015-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Jie Bai
引用本文:

白杰. 人附睾蛋白4及CA125联合检测在卵巢肿瘤中的应用及人附睾蛋白4水平与卵巢肿瘤病理学分型的相关性研究[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2015, 11(4): 458-461.

Jie Bai. Application of human epididymis protein 4 and CA125 joint detection in ovarian neoplasms and the correlation between human epididymis protein 4 and pathological type of ovarian neoplasms[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2015, 11(4): 458-461.

目的

探讨人附睾蛋白(HE)4和CA125联合检测在卵巢癌诊断中的应用价值,以及HE4水平与卵巢癌病理学分型的相关性。

方法

选择2013年12月至2014年2月在河南省商丘市第一人民医院住院拟接受手术治疗的137例卵巢肿瘤患者为研究对象,根据术后病理检查结果将其分为卵巢癌组(n=54)和卵巢良性肿瘤组(n=83)。选择同期于本院体检中心体检且体检结果健康的76例女性纳入对照组,分别采用酶联免疫吸附法和电化学发光免疫分析法对3组受试者的血清HE4和CA125水平进行测定,并对检测结果进行统计学分析。本研究卵巢癌组及卵巢良性肿瘤组纳入标准:盆、腹腔影像学检查发现卵巢部位包块者;排除标准:排除相关检查发现子宫内膜异位症及盆腔炎症,合并原发性高血压、糖尿病等慢性疾病及肝、肾、心功能异常者,相关检查发现其他部位肿瘤及存在家族肿瘤病史的患者。3组受试者年龄构成比比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。本研究遵循的程序符合河南省商丘市第一人民医院人体试验委员会制定的伦理学标准,得到该委员会批准,分组征得受试对象及监护人知情同意,并与监护人签署临床研究知情同意书。

结果

卵巢癌组患者血清HE4及CA125水平分别为(335.25±314.02) pmol/L、(2215.25±1234.71)U/mL,显著高于卵巢良性肿瘤组的(45.36±8.14)pmol/L及(34.26±9.25)U/mL与对照组的(44.16±6.33) pmol/L及(27.85±8.25)U/mL,差异均有统计学意义(t=12.351,12.407,16.124,15.426;P<0.01)。CA125和HE4联合检测,对诊断卵巢癌的敏感度均显著高于二者单项检测,且差异均有统计学意义(t=4.788,3.927;P<0.05)。

结论

血清HE4和CA125联合检测极大地提高了对卵巢癌诊断的敏感度,对卵巢良、恶性肿瘤的鉴别诊断具有重要意义。

Objective

To explore the application value of human epididymis protein (HE)4 and carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) joint detection in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer and the correlation between HE4 level and pathological types of ovarian cancer.

Methods

From December 2013 to February 2014, a total of 137 cases of inpatients with ovarian tumor who would receive operation in Shangqiu First People's Hospital in Henan Province were selected into this study. According to the postoperative pathological examination results, they were divided into ovarian cancer group (n=54) and benign tumor group (n=83). During the same period 76 cases of health women who took health examination in the same hospital were selected as control group. The levels of serum HE4 and CA125 in three groups were respectively measured by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay and electro chemiluminescence immunoassay, and the testing results were statistically analyzed. The inclusion criteria of ovarian cancer group and benign tumor group in this study: confirmed by chest X-ray and ultrasonography, there was no tumor in other parts of the body; the exclusion criteria: patients with endometriosis and pelvic inflammatory disease detected by related examinations were excluded, and complicated with essential hypertension, diabetes and other chronic diseases, with liver, renal or cardiac dysfunction, and with tumors in other parts of the body and family history of cancer were excluded. The difference in age structure of the three groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The procedure that this study followed met the ethical standards made by Institutional Review Board of Shangqiu First People's Hospital in Henan Province and approved by the committee. Grouping had the consent of study subjects, and the clinical study letters of consent were signed.

Results

The serum HE4 and CA125 levels in the ovarian cancer group were (335.25±314.02)pmol/L and (2215.25±1234.71)U/mL, respectively, which were significantly higher than those(45.36±8.14)pmol/L and (34.26±9.25)U/mL in benign tumor group, and (44.16±6.33)pmol/L, (27.85±8.25)U/mL in control group, and the differences were statistically significant (t=12.351, 12.407, 16.124, 15.426; P<0.01). The sensitivity of HE4 and CA125 joint detection in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer was higher than that CA125 or HE4 detection alone, and the differences were statistically significant (t=4.788, 3.927; P<0.05).

Conclusions

The joint detection of serum HE4 and CA125 significantly improves the sensitivity in diagnosis of ovarian cancer, which is of great significance to the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian tumors.

表1 3组受试者血清HE4和CA125水平比较
表2 血清HE4与CA125联合检测和单项检测中各项指标比较[例数(%)]
表3 卵巢癌组和卵巢良性肿瘤组不同病理分型的血清HE4水平比较(±s)
[1]
余大海,徐鹏,刘晓斌. HE4检测在妇科卵巢癌诊治中的应用[J]. 中国医学创新2013, 10(32): 162–164.
[2]
叶敏. 血清CA125及HE4诊断卵巢癌的研究进展[J]. 现代妇产科进展2013, 22(6):496–498.
[3]
梁美蓉,曾四元,王素兰,等. 人附睾蛋白4联合CA125 检测在卵巢良恶性肿瘤诊断中的应用价值[J]. 中华临床医师杂志:电子版2013, 7(20): 9148–9152.
[4]
Sjövall K, Nilsson B, Einhorn N. The significance of serum CA125 elevation in malignant and nonmalignant diseases[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2002, 85(1): 175–178.
[5]
欧健,张晓霞,王翠翠,等.血清人附睾蛋白4的检测及其在卵巢癌诊断中的意义[J]. 吉林大学学报2010, 6(31): 543–545.
[6]
Moore RG, Brown AK, Miller MC, et al. The use of multiple novel tumor biomarkers for the detection of ovarian carcinoma in patients with a pelvic mass[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2008, 108(2): 402–408.
[7]
韩文明. HE4和CA125 联合检测在卵巢癌诊断中的应用价值[J].国际检验医学杂志2012, 33(14): 1757–1758.
[8]
姚艳霞,洪伟.血清HE4、CA125和CA724检测在卵巢恶性肿瘤诊断中的应用[J].标记免疫分析与临床2012, 19(3): 149–152.
[9]
陈丽梅,章琼,刘琦,等. HE4——一种新的卵巢上皮性癌肿瘤标记物的研究进展[J].现代妇产科进展2010, 19(1):66–68.
[10]
刘琛姝,王永莉,潘玉韵.联合检测CA125、HE4和RBP4对预测上皮性卵巢癌的临床价值评价[J].热带医学杂志2012, 12(10):1233–1236.
[11]
Kirchhoff C, Habben I, Ivell R, et al. A major human epididymis-specific cDNA encodes a protein with sequence homology to extracellular proteinase inhibitors[J]. Bio Reprod, 1991, 45(2): 350–357.
[12]
谢则金,王厚照,刘青,等.血清HE4与CA125联合检测在上皮性卵巢癌风险评估中的应用[J].临床军医杂志2012, 40(2): 392–394.
[13]
田峰,易梦璐,齐素文,等.联合检测HE4、CA125和CYFRA21-1在卵巢癌诊断中的应用[J].检验医学2014, 29(7): 697–700.
[14]
Kamei M, Yamashita SI, Tokuishi K, et al. HE4 expression can be associated with lymph node metastases and disease-free survival in breast cancer[J]. Anticancer Research, 2010, 30(11): 4779–4783.
[15]
毛佩敏,刘晓艳.血清CA125测定对卵巢高、低级别浆液性癌鉴别诊断价值的回顾性研究[J].检验医学201227(7):592–594.
[1] 李欢, 李晓琴, 吴秀花, 施燕芸. ADNEX模型联合哥本哈根指数对卵巢肿瘤良恶性的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(12): 1213-1219.
[2] 马士红, 李晓琴, 施燕芸. 四种恶性风险指数对卵巢肿瘤良恶性鉴别的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(11): 1108-1113.
[3] 林昌盛, 战军, 肖雪. 上皮性卵巢癌患者诊疗中基因检测及分子靶向药物治疗[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 505-510.
[4] 刘星辰, 刘娟, 魏宝宝, 刘洁, 刘辉. XIAP与XAF1异常表达与卵巢癌的相关性分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 419-427.
[5] 陈荟竹, 郭应坤, 汪昕蓉, 宁刚, 陈锡建. 上皮性卵巢癌"二元论模型"的分子生物学研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 394-402.
[6] 邓洁, 王一然, 王平. 卵巢透明细胞癌患者并发静脉血栓栓塞症的影响因素[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(02): 150-157.
[7] 初磊, 郭翼, 童晓文. Periostin在妇科恶性肿瘤中的研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(02): 145-149.
[8] 宫晗, 聂丹, 黄玥, 李征宇. 聚腺苷酸二磷酸核糖聚合酶抑制剂在复发性卵巢癌维持治疗中的作用[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(01): 1-6.
[9] 陈超, 王金娟, 李琳. 卵巢硬化性间质瘤的临床特点分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 16(04): 465-471.
[10] 马小睦, 肖剑春, 谢勇, 曲强. 腹膜后囊性病变65例临床特征及病理分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2021, 15(03): 203-206.
[11] 许琼, 马硝惟, 刘斌, 蒋捍东, 吴学玲. 血细胞因子在肺癌分型及预后中的临床意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(03): 283-287.
[12] 于峰. 狼疮肾炎新的诊疗指南解读——从《KDIGO 2021年肾小球疾病管理临床实践指南》谈起[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2022, 11(03): 178-178.
[13] 梁海昱, 李洪义, 高丹, 汤洋, 邢健. 3.0T磁共振扩散加权成像在乳腺癌诊断及病理分型中的应用价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2020, 10(05): 201-205.
[14] 刘育昕, 王子晗, 张艺馨, 栾永婕, 孟凯. 肾母细胞瘤基因1在卵巢疾病发病机制中的研究进展[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 178-183.
[15] 王可珺, 李吉镇, 马标, 续慧超, 谌红珊, 刘雷. 肌酐/胱抑素C对晚期上皮性卵巢癌术后并发症的预测价值[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 49-55.
阅读次数
全文


摘要