切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2015, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (01) : 37 -40. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2015.01.008

所属专题: 专题评论 文献

论著

低剂量米索前列醇用于Bishop宫颈成熟度评分值低待产孕妇引产的临床研究
何闰1,*,*(), 杨丽娜1, 张虹1, 徐寒梅1, 吕燕1, 尹学琼1   
  1. 1. 611230 四川省崇州市妇幼保健院分娩室
  • 收稿日期:2014-08-30 修回日期:2014-12-15 出版日期:2015-02-01
  • 通信作者: 何闰

Clinical study of low-dose misoprostol for labor induction with low-bishop-score pregnancy

Run He1(), Lina Yang1, Hong Zhang1, Hanmei Xu1, Yan Lyu1, Xueqiong Yin1   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics, Chongzhou Maternal & Child Health Hospital, Chongzhou 611230, Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2014-08-30 Revised:2014-12-15 Published:2015-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Run He
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: He Run, Email:
引用本文:

何闰, 杨丽娜, 张虹, 徐寒梅, 吕燕, 尹学琼. 低剂量米索前列醇用于Bishop宫颈成熟度评分值低待产孕妇引产的临床研究[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2015, 11(01): 37-40.

Run He, Lina Yang, Hong Zhang, Hanmei Xu, Yan Lyu, Xueqiong Yin. Clinical study of low-dose misoprostol for labor induction with low-bishop-score pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2015, 11(01): 37-40.

目的

探讨低剂量米索前列醇(misoprostol)经阴道给药方式,用于Bishop宫颈成熟度评分值低(low-Bishop-score)(<6分)孕妇引产的疗效及护理成效。

方法

选择2012年4~10月在崇州市妇幼保健院住院分娩的100例年龄为21~36岁的Bishop宫颈成熟度评分值低(<6分)待产孕妇为研究对象。按照抽签法将其随机分为米索前列醇组(n=60,采用低剂量米索前列醇经阴道给药引产)与缩宫素组(n=40,采用缩宫素引产),比较两组产妇的引产效果、安全性、新生儿情况、阴道分娩率及优质护理满意度。本研究遵循的程序符合崇州市妇幼保健院人体试验委员会所制定的伦理学标准,得到该委员会批准,分组征得受试对象本人的知情同意,并与之签署临床研究知情同意书。两组患者年龄、分娩孕龄、Bishop宫颈成熟度评分值及妊娠合并症等临床资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结果

米索前列醇组引产成功率显著高于缩宫素组,并且差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。米索前列醇组自用药到宫缩发动时间及第一产程时间均显著短于缩宫素组,产后2 h出血量显著少于缩宫素组,经阴道分娩率显著高于缩宫素组,并且差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。米索前列醇组患者的护理满意率显著高于缩宫素组,而且差异亦有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

对于Bishop宫颈成熟度评分值低孕妇采用低剂量米索前列醇经阴道给药引产的方法安全、有效,相对于缩宫素引产,可提高经阴道分娩率,而且护理成效显著。

Objective

To study the curative effects and nursing effects of low-dose vaginal misoprostol for labor induction with low-Bishop-score (<6 score)pregnancy.

Methods

From April to October 2012, a total of 100 cases pregnant women who delivered in Chongzhou Maternal & Child Health Hospital were selected into this study. Their ages were 21-36 years old, with low-Bishop-score (<6 score). According to strategies of labor induction by a lottery, they were divided into misoprostol group (n=60, labor induction with low-dose vaginal misoprostol) and oxytocin group (n=40, labor induction with intravenous oxytocin). Effects of labor induction, safety, outcomes of newborn, vaginal delivery rate and quality of nursing satisfaction were statistically analyzed between two groups. The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Investigation in Chongzhou Maternal & Child Health Hospital.Informed consent was obtained from each participate. There were no significant differences of age, gestational age, Bishop-score, and etc. between two groups (P>0.05).

Results

The successful rate of labor induction in misoprostol group was much higher than that in oxytocin group, and with significant differences (P<0.05). Duration from use of low-dose vaginal misoprostol/ intravenous of oxytocin, and the first stage of labor in misoprostol group were much shorter than those in oxytocin group, and with significant difference (P<0.05). Rate of satisfaction with nursing care in misoprostol group was much better than that in oxytocin group, and also with significant difference (P<0.05).

Conclusions

It is safe and effective for labor induction with low-dose vaginal misoprostol to low-Bishop-score pregnancy. Compared with intravenous oxytocin low-dose vaginal misprostol can increase the rate of vaginal delivery, and quality of satisfaction with nursing care is excellent.

表1 两组待产孕妇一般临床资料比较(±s)
Table 1 Comparison of general clinical data between two groups (±s)
表2 两组待产孕妇引产效果比较(±s)
Table 2 Comparison of effects of different labor induction strategies between two groups (±s)
表3 两组待产孕妇经阴道分娩率比较[例数(%)]
Table 3 Comparison of rate of vaginal delivery mode between two groups [case(%)]
表4 两组待产孕妇分娩新生儿情况比较(±s)
Table 4 Comparison of incidence of meconium stained amniotic fluid, fetal distress, and Apgar scores in newborns between two groups (±s)
表5 米索前列醇组与缩宫素组患者对护理的满意率比较[例数(%)]
Table 5 Comparison of rate of patients satisfaction with nursing care between two groups [case(%)]
[1]
Akhter P, Sultana M, Hoque M, et al. Maternal outcome of prolonged pregnancy[J]. J Bangladesh College Phys Surg,2014, 32(2): 66–70.
[2]
王义,甄学慧,杨东梅,等. 产时胎儿监测在过期妊娠中的临床价值[J]. 中国妇幼保健,2013, 28(10): 1591–1593.
[3]
尹学琼. 米索前列醇用于低宫颈评分引产疗效及安全性分析[J]. 中国医药导报,2013, 10(22): 85–87.
[4]
Allen R, O'Brien BM. Uses of misoprostol in obstetrics and gynecology[J]. Rev Obstet Gynecol, 2009, 2(3): 159–163.
[5]
徐亚平. 产期综合护理干预在产妇分娩中的应用效果[J]. 实用临床医药杂志,2014, 18(8): 113–115.
[6]
李桂青,陈兰,赖少芳,等. 优质护理用于顺产产妇第四产程产后出血的效果评价[J]. 临床护理杂志,2012, 11(5): 15–17.
[7]
鲁泽春,周玲,杜建新,等. 宫颈Bishop评分与地诺前列酮计划分娩效果的临床观察[J]. 中国妇幼保健,2012, 27(22): 3405–3408.
[8]
Swamy GK. Current methods of labor induction; proceedings of the seminars in perinatology[M]. Dutch:Dutch Publishing Company Elsevier, 2012, 1–5.
[9]
Diven LC, Rochon ML, Gogle J, et al. Oxytocin discontinuation during active labor in women who undergo labor induction[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2012, 207(6): 471. e1-e8.
[10]
Durocher J, Blum J, Walraven G, et al. Misoprostol in the management of postpartum haemorrhage in low-resource settings[J]. BJOG, 2011, 118(9): 1144–1145.
[11]
赵桂萍. 助产士心理疲劳原因分析及对策[J]. 护理实践与研究,2010, 7(7): 106–107.
[12]
Jindal P, Avasthi K, Kaur M. A comparison of vaginal oral misoprostol for induction of labor-double blind randomized trial[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol India, 2011, 61(5): 538–542.
[13]
王增芳,王增艳,王萍萍,等. 网状Meta分析评估七种常用引产方法的效果及安全性[J]. 中华围产医学杂志,2014, 17(4): 230–236.
[14]
张玉红,孙国珍. 助产士职业压力的研究现状[J]. 全科护理,2014, 12(17): 1553–1554.
[15]
张晶. 小剂量米索前列醇用于足月妊娠促宫颈成熟的疗效观察[J]. 中国妇幼保健,2012, 27(20): 3174–3175.
[1] 高艳多, 朱霞, 范建华, 戢秀勤, 赵胜, 谢磊. 产钳助产术后女性盆底机能的三维超声评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(12): 1361-1365.
[2] 王巍, 李顺双, 刘刚. 《2020 ACOG实践简报:孕龄≤70 d药物流产(No.225)》解读[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(03): 275-281.
[3] 周燕, 金靓, 王志群, 卢先艳, 戴毅敏. 对促宫颈成熟与引产孕产妇的全程分娩管理模式[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(03): 350-356.
[4] 吴嘉涵, 尤爱军, 宋燕. 旋后肩法处置肩难产对产妇分娩后盆底肌功能改善的临床研究[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(03): 355-359.
[5] 周子健, 吴忠. CT在泌尿系结石诊疗中的应用进展[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 299-302.
[6] 金淑溶, 李坤, 刘晨鹏, 潘振宇. 精细化检查流程在盆底疝动态磁共振成像中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 223-226.
[7] 刘晨鹏, 潘振宇, 龚翔, 金淑荣. 腹部CT扫描(低剂量)在腹壁疝中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(04): 400-402.
[8] 陈秀山, 张婷婷, 杨栓盈, 高娜. 低剂量CT扫描在肺部同轴穿刺活检中的临床应用[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 587-588.
[9] 常冬梅, 王鑫. 迭代重建技术对双低剂量肺动脉CT血管造影图像质量分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(04): 515-517.
[10] 于洪福, 尹超, 姜云飞. 低剂量CT空气潴留指标用于支气管哮喘患者病情分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(02): 231-233.
[11] 林丹丹, 吴晓青, 刘婷, 陈宗涛. 2 082例行肺部低剂量高分辨螺旋CT检查的健康体检者结果分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(05): 687-689.
[12] 王滨, 陈意志, 刘天曜, 何谐. 传统教学法和心理学思政辅助教学法对肾病科规培生学习效果和医患沟通能力影响的对比研究[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2021, 10(04): 220-223.
[13] 李慧, 征锦, 叶靖. 低剂量CT灌注成像对胃癌分化程度评估及Her2、EGFR水平相关性研究[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2020, 10(06): 252-255.
[14] 刘养奇, 林伟研, 欧伟麟, 林志丰, 柯莉, 林琳, 陈艳红. 依沙吖啶及其联合方案在中期妊娠引产中的应用[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2021, 10(04): 242-246.
[15] 李康荣, 杨鸣宇, 魏水生. DSA低剂量技术在肥胖冠心病患者行PCI手术的临床效果观察[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2021, 07(02): 93-98.
阅读次数
全文


摘要