切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2014, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (02) : 210 -212. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2014.02.018

所属专题: 文献

论著

锐扶刀治疗前庭大腺囊肿和前庭大腺脓肿的临床价值
伍世端1,*,*(), 梁莉1, 邹晓红1, 苏庆霞1, 梁燕梅1   
  1. 1. 526040 高要,广东省高要市人民医院妇产科
  • 收稿日期:2013-12-04 修回日期:2014-02-06 出版日期:2014-04-01
  • 通信作者: 伍世端

Clinical Effects of Radio-Frequency Treatment on Bartholin Cyst and Abscess of Bartholin Glands

Shiduan Wu1(), Li Liang1, Xiaohong Zou1, Qingxia Su1, Yanmei Liang1   

  1. 1. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Gaoyao People's Hospital, Gaoyao 526040, Guangdong Province, China
  • Received:2013-12-04 Revised:2014-02-06 Published:2014-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Shiduan Wu
  • About author:
    (Correspondingauthor: Wu Shiduan, Email: )
引用本文:

伍世端, 梁莉, 邹晓红, 苏庆霞, 梁燕梅. 锐扶刀治疗前庭大腺囊肿和前庭大腺脓肿的临床价值[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2014, 10(02): 210-212.

Shiduan Wu, Li Liang, Xiaohong Zou, Qingxia Su, Yanmei Liang. Clinical Effects of Radio-Frequency Treatment on Bartholin Cyst and Abscess of Bartholin Glands[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2014, 10(02): 210-212.

目的

探讨锐扶刀治疗前庭大腺囊肿和前庭大腺脓肿的临床价值。

方法

选取2010年6月至2013年2月于广东省高要市人民医院妇科门诊就诊的169例前庭大腺囊肿及前庭大腺脓肿患者为研究对象,其年龄为20~ 45岁.按照入院顺序单双号的原则,将其分为研究组和对照组。单号纳入研究组(n=85),采用锐扶刀行前庭大腺囊肿造口或脓肿切开引流术,双号纳入对照组(n=84),行传统前庭大腺造口术或脓肿切开引流术。两组患者的年龄等一般临床病历资料比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)(本研究遵循的程序符合广东省高要市人民医院伦理委员会制定的伦理学标准,得到该委员会批准,分组征得受试对象的知情同意,并与之签署临床研究知情同意书)。对两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术后恢复时间及复发率等情况进行统计学分析。

结果

研究组患者的平均手术时间显著较对照组短[(5.60 ± 0.55)min vs.(17.50 ± 0.56)min],且差异有统计学意义(t=1.99,P<0.05);研究组患者的平均术中出血量显著少于对照组[(5.64 ± 0.30)mL vs.(23.11 ± 0.26)mL],且差异有统计学意义(t=1.97,P< 0.05);研究组患者的平均术后恢复时间显著短于对照组[(24.72 ± 0.85)h vs.(75.59 ± 0.67)h],且差异有统计学意义(t=1.99,P<0.05)。术后随访6个月结果显示,研究组中无一例患者复发,对照组中8例(9.52%)患者复发,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=5, 21,P<0.05)。

结论

锐扶刀治疗前庭大腺囊肿和前庭大腺脓肿较传统手术方法更具可行性。

Objective

To investigate clinical effects of radio-frequency treatment on Bartholin cyst and abscess of Bartholin glands.

Methods

A total of 169 cases with Bartholin cyst or abscess of Bartholin glands were obtained from Gaoyao People's Hospital between June 2010 and February 2013. They were randomly divided into two groups according to the order of hospitalization, study group (n =85, odd number) patients underwent radio-frequency for Bartholin gland cyst or abscess incision drainage stoma; control group (n=84, even number) underwent traditional incision and drainage for the Bartholin gland abscess or colostomy. There were no significant differences between two groups on age and other clinical information (P>0.05) . The duration of operation, intraoperative bleeding amount, postoperative recovery time and postoperative recurrence were analyzed. The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Investigation of Gaoyao People's Hospital. Informed consent was obtained from all participates.

Results

The average duration of operation in study group and control group were (5.60 ± 0.55) min and (17.50 ± 0.56) min, respectively, with significant difference (t=1.97, P<0.05) .The bleeding amount during operation in study group and control group were (5.64 ± 0.30) mL and (23.11 ± 0.26) mL, respectively, with significant difference (t=1.97, P<0.05) .The average recovery time in study group and control group were (24.72 ± 0.85) h and (75.59 ± 0.67) h, respectively, with significant difference (t= 1.99, P<0.05) .The six-month follow-up showed that no patient had relapse in study group and 8 cases (9.52%) relapsed in control group.There were significant difference between two group on the incidence rate of relapse during the six-month follow-up (χ2 =5, 21, P<0.05) .

Conclusions

Radio-frequency in the treatment of Bartholin cyst and abscess of Bartholin glands is of more advantages than traditional operation methods.

表1 研究组与对照组患者的手术时间比较(min,±s
Table 1 Comparison of operation duration between two groups (min,±s
表2 研究组与对照组的术中出血量比较(mL,±s
Table 2 Comparison of bleeding during operation between two groups (mL,±s
表3 两组患者的术后恢复时间比较(h,±s
Table 3 Comparison of postoperative recovery time between two groups (h,±s
[1]
谢幸,苟文丽,林仲秋.妇产科学.8版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:75.
[2]
王静艳.棱形切口联合半导体激光治疗前庭大腺囊肿及脓肿的疗效观察[J].河北医药,2012,34(9):1353.
[3]
Lashgari M,Keene M.Excision of Bartholin duct cysts using the CO2 laser [J].Obstet Gynecol,2011,67(5):735.
[4]
吴晓玉.改良式前庭大腺造口术32例分析[J].中外医学研究,2012,10(36):126.
[5]
常珩,余良宽,邱学华.自凝刀造口治疗前庭大腺囊脓肿32例临床分析[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2007,23(6):491.
[6]
李碧惠.微波治疗38例前庭大腺囊肿疗效观察[J].按摩与康复医学,2012,3(4):100.
[7]
秦海霞,黄学敏.自凝刀治疗前庭大腺囊脓肿23例临床分析[J].安徽医学,2009,30(6):235.
[1] 吴少敏, 张世豪, 刘炳光, 李婵, 尹嘉敏, 郑昌业, 黄素然. 胎儿巨大蛛网膜囊肿并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(04): 390-397.
[2] 朱然, 于清霞, 林鹏, 叶莉萍. 产气荚膜梭菌感染致血管内溶血并肝脓肿一例[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 187-190.
[3] 张锐, 赵舸. T1和T2期胆囊癌外科治疗研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 225-228.
[4] 黄建, 胡安丽, 王建平. 不同手术入路的骶前囊肿切除术单中心回顾性队列研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 683-686.
[5] 曹彬, 王强, 卢扬柏, 黄红星, 黄亚强, 龙永富, 钟睿, 李灿永, 罗刚. 单孔经皮肾镜和腹腔镜处理肾囊肿的术式对比研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 566-571.
[6] 王晓玲, 林天海, 陈林, 杨进, 韦堂墙. 后腹腔镜处理一例腹膜后良性上皮性囊肿的报道[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 406-409.
[7] 林英, 何洪, 杨琦, 姚兴伟, 马婧涵, 杨玉婷, 刘月红, 贾悦, 李长安. 联合宏基因组二代测序诊断普雷沃氏菌致肺脓肿1例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 625-629.
[8] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[9] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[10] 王秋生. 胆道良性疾病诊疗策略[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 779-782.
[11] 张燕, 许丁伟, 胡满琴, 李新成, 李翱, 黄洁. 胆囊癌免疫治疗的知识图谱可视化分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 319-327.
[12] 王春霞, 赵丽霞, 张迪, 张洪来, 张维胜, 王涛, 杨熊飞. 肛周坏死性筋膜炎伴腹膜后延伸一例病例报道[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 256-259.
[13] 陈景星, 吴建雄, 谭焯荣, 杜宁超. 肛周脓肿感染臀深筋膜致臀大肌深部脓肿一例报道[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 158-161.
[14] 张昊悦, 汤正好. 腰大肌脓肿的诊断与治疗研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 299-302.
[15] 胡小靖, 张华. 妊娠期卵巢囊肿蒂扭转的诊断与治疗[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 197-201.
阅读次数
全文


摘要