切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2013, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (03) : 333 -336. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2013.03.012

所属专题: 文献

论著

影响新生儿通过瞬态声诱发耳声发射听力筛查的因素分析
葛伟琦1,*,*(), 恩晖2   
  1. 1. 100730 北京,首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院儿科
    2. 首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院耳鼻喉科研究所
  • 收稿日期:2013-01-07 修回日期:2013-04-09 出版日期:2013-06-01
  • 通信作者: 葛伟琦

Influence Factors of Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emission on Universal Newborn Hearing Screening

Wei-qi GE1(), Hui EN2   

  1. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Beijing Tongren Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China
  • Received:2013-01-07 Revised:2013-04-09 Published:2013-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Wei-qi GE
  • About author:
    (Corresponding author: GE Wei-qi, Email: )
引用本文:

葛伟琦, 恩晖. 影响新生儿通过瞬态声诱发耳声发射听力筛查的因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2013, 09(03): 333-336.

Wei-qi GE, Hui EN. Influence Factors of Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emission on Universal Newborn Hearing Screening[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2013, 09(03): 333-336.

目的

探讨影响新生儿通过瞬态声诱发耳声发射(TEOAE)听力筛查的相关因素。

方法

选择2005年10月至2006年9月在首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院出生并于本院儿科接受初次听力筛查的746例正常新生儿的临床病历资料为研究对象,采用TEOAE技术于新生儿出生后(2~3)d进行听力测试。探讨影响新生儿未通过TEOAE听力筛查的因素,如性别、耳别、娩出方式、脐带和胎盘因素、新生儿黄疸、母亲妊娠期疾病等(本研究遵循的程序符合本院人体试验委员会制定的伦理学标准,得到该委员会批准)。

结果

本组746例接受新生儿普遍听力筛查者中,未通过初筛者为115例(15.42%)。新生儿不同性别、不同娩出方式的TEOAE通过率间比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);而耳别、脐带和胎盘因素、新生儿黄疸、母亲妊娠期疾病(如先兆流产、细菌或病毒感染、妊娠期高血压、妊娠期糖尿病)的TEOAE通过率间比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

耳别、脐带和胎盘因素、新生儿黄疸、母亲妊娠期疾病是影响新生儿通过TEOAE听力筛查的因素。

Objective

To investigate the relative influence factors of transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) on newborn hearing screening.

Methods

From October 2005 to September 2006, a total of 746 newborns who received TEOAE hearing screening were included into this study. The relationship of passing rates of TEOAE and the following factors were discussed, gender, left and right ears, delivery ways, umbilical core and placenta, neonatal jaundice and diseases during pregnancy. The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Investigation in Human Being of Beijing Tongren Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University.

Results

The rate of failing to hearing screening was 15.42% (115/746). The left and right ears, umbilical core and placenta, neonatal jaundice and diseases during pregnancy had significant influence on the pass rate of TEOAE (P<0.05). But there were no influence of gender and delivery ways on pass rate of TEOAE, with no significant difference (P>0.05).

Conclusions

The left and right ears, umbilical core and placenta, neonatal jaundice and diseases during pregnancy are the influence factors of TEOAE on newborn hearing screening.

表1 影响新生儿听力初筛未通过的因素比较[n(%)]
Table 1 Comparison of influence factors on newborn hearing screening[n(%)]
[1]
Mauk GW, Behren TR. Historical and technological context associated with early identification of hearing loss[J]. Semin Hearing, 1993, 14:1-17.
[2]
Parving A. Congenital hearing disability: Epidemiology and identification: A comparison between two health authority districts[J]. Int J Pediatr Otolaryngol, 1993, 27:29-46.
[3]
Watkins P, Baldwin M, McEnery G. Neonatal at risk screening and the identification of deafness[J]. Arch Dis Child, 1991, 66:1130-1135.
[4]
Northern JL, Hayes DH. Universal screening for infant hearing impairment: Necessary, beneficial and justifiable[J]. Audio Today, 1994, 6:10-13.
[5]
Zhang XF, Ma Y, Shi L, et al. The analysis of 28 043 cases of neonatal hearing screening[J]. Beijing Med J, 2008, 30(3):159-162.
[6]
Hong JC, Cai LR, Cai Y, et al. Study on neonatal hearing screening[J]. J Clin Nurs, 2007, 6(3):38.
[7]
Gordts F, Naessens B, Mudde CA, et al. Reference data for DPOAE in healthy newborns[J]. Scand Audiol, 2000, 29(2):79-82.
[8]
Durante AS, Carvallo RM, da Costa FS, et al. Characteristics of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in newborn hearing screening program[J]. Pro Fono, 2005, 17(2):133-140.
[9]
Thornton AR, Marotta N, Kennedy CR. The order of testing effect in otoacoustic emissions and its consequences for sex and ear differences in neonates[J]. Hear Res, 2003, 184(1-2):123-130.
[10]
Vohr BR, Carty LM, Moore PE, et al. The Rhode Island hearing assessment program: Experience with statewide hearing screening (1993-1996)[J]. J Pediatr, 1998, 133(3):353-357.
[11]
Fowler KB, McCollister FP, Dahle AJ, et al. Progressive and fluctuating sensorineural hearing loss in children with asymptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection[J]. J Pediatr, 1997, 130(4):624-630.
[12]
Huang LH, Han DM, Chen Y, et al. The effects of gender, ear side and seasons on the pass rate of the universal newborn hearing screening program[J]. J Audiol Speech Pathol, 2009, 17(1):72-76.
[13]
Newmark M, Merlob P, Bresloff I, et al. Click evoked otoacoustic emissions: Inter-aural and gender differences in newborns[J]. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol, 1997, 8(3):133-139.
[14]
Cassidy JW, Ditty KM. Gender differences among newborns on a transient otoacoustic emissions test for hearing[J]. J Music Ther, 2001, 38(1):28-35.
[15]
Lamprecht-Dinnesen A, Pohl M, Hartmann S, et al. Effects of age, gender and ear side on SOAE parameters in infancy and childhood[J]. Audiol Neurootol, 1998, 3(6):386-401.
[16]
McFadden D. A speculation about the parallel ear asymmetries and sex differences in hearing sensitivity and otoacoustic emissions[J]. Hear Res, 1993, 68(2):143-151.
[17]
Sininger YS, Cone-Wesson B. Asymmetric cochlear processing mimics hemispheric specialization[J]. Science, 2004, 305(5690):1581.
[18]
Sininger YS, Cone-Wesson B. Lateral asymmetry in the ABR of neonates: Evidence and mechanisms[J]. Hear Res, 2006, 212(1-2):203-211.
[19]
Qi BR, Huang LH, Cai ZH, et al. Influence factors of TEOAE on universal newborn hearing screening[J]. Chin Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2006, 13(17):777.
[20]
Mei LY, Feng Y, Liu J. Application of distortion product otoacoustic emission in high-risk newborns[J]. China Med Engineering, 2005, 13(3):262.
[21]
Han DM. Newborn and infants hearing screening[M]. Beijing: Scientific and Technical Documentation Press, 2003, 41.
[22]
Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. Year 2000 position statement: Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs[J]. Am J Audiol, 2000, 9(1):9-29.
[23]
Bu XK, Huang LH, Nie WY, et al. Brief introduction of International Newborn Hearing Screening 2008[J]. J Audiol Speech Pathol, 2008, 16(4):334-335.
[24]
Zhou P, Wang YL, Chen YH, et al. Research on the effect of glucose tolerance screening on the prognosis of mothers and infants in different gestational ages[J]. Matern Child Health Care China, 2008, 23(35):4979-4981.
[1] 旺久, 陈军, 朱霞, 米玛央金, 赵胜, 陈欣林, 李建华, 王双. 山南市妇幼保健院开展胎儿系统超声筛查的效果分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 728-733.
[2] 危玲, 李会, 陈奕. 孕产妇产超广谱β-内酰胺酶的肠杆菌定植/感染与母婴传播研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 517-521.
[3] 张浩霖, 张旭, 梁昆, 金作林, 高洁. 儿童腺样体肥大的诊断与筛查技术进展现状[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 123-127.
[4] 高延庆, 韩菲, 朱怀军, 宋鹏, 陶亮, 管文贤, 卞晓洁. 胃癌手术患者营养风险筛查和评估适用性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 167-171.
[5] 李晓阳, 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 大数据及人工智能对女性盆底功能障碍性疾病的诊断及风险预测[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 549-552.
[6] 李小娟, 李炜佳, 彭凌燕, 周鹏莹, 李桂娥, 刘相辰. 体检人群中前列腺钙化灶的检出率及临床特征分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 336-338.
[7] 孙文琦, 吴欣荣, 王运荣, 赵贝, 窦晓坛, 李雯, 邹晓平, 王雷, 陈敏. 结直肠上皮细胞ROS及FH检测对结直肠癌筛查的应用价值[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 326-330.
[8] 鄂一民, 孙司正, 范小彧, 喻春钊. 结直肠癌粪便筛查的现状与展望[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 331-336.
[9] 刘骞, 崔巍, 高亦博, 张泽跃, 李典格, 王治杰, 王洁, 赫捷, 中国结直肠癌筛查与早诊早治指南制定专家组. 结直肠肿瘤早诊筛查新策略:基于液体活检技术的筛查方案[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(01): 17-20.
[10] 李京珂, 张妍春, 武佳懿, 任秀瑜. 深度学习在糖尿病视网膜病变筛查、评级及管理中的研究进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 241-246.
[11] 宗晨曦, 肖林, 宋红欣. 人工智能视力筛查在近视眼防控中的应用研究与展望[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(01): 60-64.
[12] 李文捷, 卢弘. 幼年特发性关节炎相关葡萄膜炎的研究进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(01): 40-44.
[13] 李雪珠, 谢剑锋, 李晓青, 夏泽燕, 鲁玲, 顾晓霞, 马绍磊, 黄英姿. 循环式筛查与五色区域分类模式在方舱医院管理中的应用[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 316-320.
[14] 蒋辛, 潘纯, 黄文辉, 甘桂芬. 西宁地区某三甲医院ICU 耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌主动筛查与感染的单中心研究[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 178-184.
[15] 刘平娟, 罗科城, 吴家茵, 廖康, 胡雯雯, 陈怡丽. 神经内科重症监护室患者肠道耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌目细菌主动筛查研究[J]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 235-240.
阅读次数
全文


摘要