切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2013, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (02) : 193 -196. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2013.02.014

所属专题: 文献

论著

婴儿期特发性血小板减少性紫癜的临床特点分析
王功僚1,*,*(), 邓仕华1, 李慧娴1, 黄积德1   
  1. 1. 533000 广西百色,广西百色市妇幼保健院儿科
  • 收稿日期:2012-09-18 修回日期:2013-01-09 出版日期:2013-04-01
  • 通信作者: 王功僚

Clinical Analysis of Infantile Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura

Gong-liao WANG1(), Shi-hua DENG1, Hui-xian LI1, Ji-de HUANG1   

  1. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Guangxi Baise Maternal and Child Health-Care Hospital, Baise 533000, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China
  • Received:2012-09-18 Revised:2013-01-09 Published:2013-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Gong-liao WANG
  • About author:
    (Corresponding author: WANG Gong-liao, Email: )
引用本文:

王功僚, 邓仕华, 李慧娴, 黄积德. 婴儿期特发性血小板减少性紫癜的临床特点分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2013, 09(02): 193-196.

Gong-liao WANG, Shi-hua DENG, Hui-xian LI, Ji-de HUANG. Clinical Analysis of Infantile Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2013, 09(02): 193-196.

目的

探讨婴儿期特发性血小板减少性紫癜(ITP)的临床特点。

方法

收集2006年1月至2011年12月在本院儿科住院的婴幼儿ITP患儿130例为研究对象,均符合ITP的诊断标准。按照年龄段,将其分为婴儿组(n=67,≤12个月龄)和幼儿组(n=63,1~3岁)。两组患儿的性别、年龄等比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)(本研究遵循的程序符合本院人体试验委员会制定的伦理学标准,得到该委员会批准,分组征得受试对象监护人的知情同意,并与之签署临床研究知情同意书)。采用回顾性分析法对两组ITP患儿的性别构成、发病诱因、入院时血小板(PLT)计数、临床表现、疗效及转归等进行统计学分析。

结果

婴儿组和幼儿组的男、女患儿比例比较,差异无统计学意义(U=0.6499,P>0.05)。婴儿组于发病前4周内存在前驱感染者占40.29%(27/67),幼儿组占60.32%(38/63),两组比较,差异有统计学意义(U=2.2827,P<0.05);婴儿组于发病前4周内存在疫苗接种史者为23.88% (16/67),幼儿组为0(0/63),两组比较,差异有统计学意义(U=4.2909,P<0.01)。婴儿组患儿入院时中位PLT计数均低于幼儿组,两者比较(8×109/L vs. 13×109/L),差异有统计学意义(t=2.864,P<0.01)。婴儿组ITP多导致皮肤出血,出血程度较轻;而幼儿组则多导致皮肤黏膜出血,或皮肤与黏膜混合出血,出血程度较重,但其他出血部位婴儿组多于幼儿组(U=2.3238,P<0.05)。婴儿组疗效(完全缓解率+有效率)为100.00%,无一例进展至慢性ITP;幼儿组疗效(完全缓解率+有效率)为92.06%(58/63),11例(17.46%)进展至慢性ITP。

结论

婴儿期ITP的发病诱因为婴儿期疫苗接种史,临床常规ITP治疗对婴儿期ITP疗效较好,起效快,不易进展至慢性ITP。

Objective

To analysis clinical characteristics of infantile idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP).

Methods

From Jaunary 2006 to December 2011, a total of 130 ITP patients (including 67 infants and 63 children) were enrolled in this study. They were divided into two groups according to their age, infant group (n=67) and young children group (n=63). The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Investigation in Human Being of Guangxi Baise Maternal and Child Health-Care Hospital. Informed consent was obtained from all participates' parents. Clinical features of gender distribution, predisposing factors, clinical manifestations, blood test on admission, treatment effect and outcome were retrospectively reviewed.

Results

No significant difference of gender distribution in two groups were found (U=0.6499, P>0.05). Prodromal infections within 4 weeks before the onset were found in 40.29% (27/67) of infant group and 60.32% (38/63) of young children group (U=2.2827, P<0.05). The history of vaccination within 4 weeks were found in 23.88% (16/67) of infant group, and zero (0.00) of young children group (U=4.2909, P<0.01). The median of platelet counts on admission in infant group (8×109/L) were significant lower than that in young children group (13×109/L) (t=2.864, P<0.01). Clinical presentation of infant group were skin bleeding or mile hemorrhage, young children group showed mucosal bleeding or mixed bleeding of skin and mucous membrane and severe hemorrhage. Bleeding in other sites was observed predominantly in infant group compared with that in young children group (U= 2.3238, P<0.05). The rates of therapeutic effects (complete remission + valid) in infant group was 100.00% with no chronic cases, and 92.06% (58/63) in young children group, 11 cases (17.46%) were developed into chronic ITP in young children group.

Conclusions

The history of vaccination was the crux of infantile ITP. Infantile ITP has good efficacy, rapid response, lower susceptibility and so on.

表1 两组间不同性别ITP患儿发病率比较[n(%)]
Table 1 Comparison of ITP incidence rate between two groups[n(%)]
表2 两组患儿ITP发病诱因比较[n(%)]
Table 2 Comparison of ITP predisposing factors between the two groups [n(%)]
表3 两组ITP患儿出血部位比较[n(%)]
Table 3 Comparison of the bleeding sites between two groups [n(%)]
表4 两组患儿出血程度比较[n(%)]
Table 4 Comparison of the bleeding degrees between two groups[n(%)]
表5 两组ITP患儿疗效和慢性病发生率比较[n(%)]
Table 5 Comparison of curative effects and incidence of chronic cases between two groups[n(%)]
[1]
Jin CQ, Dong HX, Liu F, et al. Detection and clinical significance of interleukin-18 and platelet associated IgG in peripheral blood of acute idiopathic thrombotycopenic purpura children[J]. J Xinxiang Med Coll, 2010, 27(1):48-51.
[2]
He ZX, Shang F. The comparison of the diagnostic criteria for domestic and foreign idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura[J]. J Appl Clin Pediatr, 2006, 21(15):1035-1036.
[3]
Hu YM, Jiang ZF, ed. Practical pediatrics. 7th ed[M]. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House, 2002, 1800-1801.
[4]
Kalyoncu D, Yildirmak Y, Cetinkaya F. Comparison of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in children between 3 months and 2 years versus 2-5 years[J]. Pediatr Blood Cancer, 2009, 52:656-658.
[5]
Chen LL, Wen FQ. Study progress of diagnosis and treatment of immune thrombocytopenic purpura[J]. J Appl Clin Pediatr, 2010, 22(15):1201-1204.
[6]
Zhou DY. Clinical characteristics of 202 cases with children idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura[J]. Chin J Dis Control Prev, 2011, 15(9):757.
[7]
Monto AS. Epidemiology of viral respiratory infections[J]. Am J Med, 2002, 112(Suppl 6A):4S-12S.
[8]
Liu XD, Li XR, Sun LR. Analysis of clinical feature of infantile idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura[J]. J China Pediatr Blood Cance, 2011, 16(3):117-121.
[9]
Chandra J, Ravi R, Singh V, et al. Bleeding manifestations in severely thrombocytopenic children with immune thrombocytopenic purpura[J]. Hematology, 2006, 11(2):131-133.
[10]
Pan YS, Jia CS, Chen TT. Clinical characteristics of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in 401 infants[J]. J Appl Clin Pediatr, 2011, 26(15):1175-1177
[1] 史学兵, 谢迎东, 谢霓, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙帼. 声辐射力弹性成像对不可切除肝细胞癌门静脉癌栓患者放射治疗效果的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 778-784.
[2] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[3] 朱文婷, 顾鹏, 孙星. 非酒精性脂肪性肝病对乳腺癌发生发展及治疗的影响[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 371-375.
[4] 曹琮沅, 黄烁金, 何倩婷, 王安训. 平阳霉素复合剂治疗口腔颌面部脉管畸形的有效性和安全性[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 368-374.
[5] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[6] 陈浩, 王萌. 胃印戒细胞癌的临床病理特征及治疗选择的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 108-111.
[7] 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 压力性尿失禁阶梯治疗的项目介绍[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 125-125.
[8] 刘柏隆. 女性压力性尿失禁阶梯治疗之手术治疗方案选择[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 126-126.
[9] 袁园园, 岳乐淇, 张华兴, 武艳, 李全海. 间充质干细胞在呼吸系统疾病模型中肺组织分布及治疗机制的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 374-381.
[10] 王秋生. 胆道良性疾病诊疗策略[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 779-782.
[11] 国文凯, 纪鹏程, 毕靖茹, 谢院生. IgA 肾病的十种治疗措施[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 327-333.
[12] 帖璇, 苏晓乐, 王利华. 抗中性粒细胞胞质抗体相关性血管炎治疗研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 345-351.
[13] 李茂军, 唐彬秩, 吴青, 阳倩, 梁小明, 邹福兰, 黄蓉, 陈昌辉. 新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的管理:多国指南/共识及RDS-NExT workshop 共识陈述简介和评价[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 607-617.
[14] 崔军威, 蔡华丽, 胡艺冰, 胡慧. 亚甲蓝联合金属定位夹及定位钩针标记在乳腺癌辅助化疗后评估腋窝转移淋巴结的临床应用价值探究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 625-632.
[15] 王誉英, 刘世伟, 王睿, 曾娅玲, 涂禧慧, 张蒲蓉. 老年乳腺癌新辅助治疗病理完全缓解的预测因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 641-646.
阅读次数
全文


摘要