切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2013, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (02) : 193 -196. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2013.02.014

所属专题: 文献

论著

婴儿期特发性血小板减少性紫癜的临床特点分析
王功僚1,*,*(), 邓仕华1, 李慧娴1, 黄积德1   
  1. 1. 533000 广西百色,广西百色市妇幼保健院儿科
  • 收稿日期:2012-09-18 修回日期:2013-01-09 出版日期:2013-04-01
  • 通信作者: 王功僚

Clinical Analysis of Infantile Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura

Gong-liao WANG1(), Shi-hua DENG1, Hui-xian LI1, Ji-de HUANG1   

  1. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Guangxi Baise Maternal and Child Health-Care Hospital, Baise 533000, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China
  • Received:2012-09-18 Revised:2013-01-09 Published:2013-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Gong-liao WANG
  • About author:
    (Corresponding author: WANG Gong-liao, Email: )
引用本文:

王功僚, 邓仕华, 李慧娴, 黄积德. 婴儿期特发性血小板减少性紫癜的临床特点分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2013, 09(02): 193-196.

Gong-liao WANG, Shi-hua DENG, Hui-xian LI, Ji-de HUANG. Clinical Analysis of Infantile Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2013, 09(02): 193-196.

目的

探讨婴儿期特发性血小板减少性紫癜(ITP)的临床特点。

方法

收集2006年1月至2011年12月在本院儿科住院的婴幼儿ITP患儿130例为研究对象,均符合ITP的诊断标准。按照年龄段,将其分为婴儿组(n=67,≤12个月龄)和幼儿组(n=63,1~3岁)。两组患儿的性别、年龄等比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)(本研究遵循的程序符合本院人体试验委员会制定的伦理学标准,得到该委员会批准,分组征得受试对象监护人的知情同意,并与之签署临床研究知情同意书)。采用回顾性分析法对两组ITP患儿的性别构成、发病诱因、入院时血小板(PLT)计数、临床表现、疗效及转归等进行统计学分析。

结果

婴儿组和幼儿组的男、女患儿比例比较,差异无统计学意义(U=0.6499,P>0.05)。婴儿组于发病前4周内存在前驱感染者占40.29%(27/67),幼儿组占60.32%(38/63),两组比较,差异有统计学意义(U=2.2827,P<0.05);婴儿组于发病前4周内存在疫苗接种史者为23.88% (16/67),幼儿组为0(0/63),两组比较,差异有统计学意义(U=4.2909,P<0.01)。婴儿组患儿入院时中位PLT计数均低于幼儿组,两者比较(8×109/L vs. 13×109/L),差异有统计学意义(t=2.864,P<0.01)。婴儿组ITP多导致皮肤出血,出血程度较轻;而幼儿组则多导致皮肤黏膜出血,或皮肤与黏膜混合出血,出血程度较重,但其他出血部位婴儿组多于幼儿组(U=2.3238,P<0.05)。婴儿组疗效(完全缓解率+有效率)为100.00%,无一例进展至慢性ITP;幼儿组疗效(完全缓解率+有效率)为92.06%(58/63),11例(17.46%)进展至慢性ITP。

结论

婴儿期ITP的发病诱因为婴儿期疫苗接种史,临床常规ITP治疗对婴儿期ITP疗效较好,起效快,不易进展至慢性ITP。

Objective

To analysis clinical characteristics of infantile idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP).

Methods

From Jaunary 2006 to December 2011, a total of 130 ITP patients (including 67 infants and 63 children) were enrolled in this study. They were divided into two groups according to their age, infant group (n=67) and young children group (n=63). The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Investigation in Human Being of Guangxi Baise Maternal and Child Health-Care Hospital. Informed consent was obtained from all participates' parents. Clinical features of gender distribution, predisposing factors, clinical manifestations, blood test on admission, treatment effect and outcome were retrospectively reviewed.

Results

No significant difference of gender distribution in two groups were found (U=0.6499, P>0.05). Prodromal infections within 4 weeks before the onset were found in 40.29% (27/67) of infant group and 60.32% (38/63) of young children group (U=2.2827, P<0.05). The history of vaccination within 4 weeks were found in 23.88% (16/67) of infant group, and zero (0.00) of young children group (U=4.2909, P<0.01). The median of platelet counts on admission in infant group (8×109/L) were significant lower than that in young children group (13×109/L) (t=2.864, P<0.01). Clinical presentation of infant group were skin bleeding or mile hemorrhage, young children group showed mucosal bleeding or mixed bleeding of skin and mucous membrane and severe hemorrhage. Bleeding in other sites was observed predominantly in infant group compared with that in young children group (U= 2.3238, P<0.05). The rates of therapeutic effects (complete remission + valid) in infant group was 100.00% with no chronic cases, and 92.06% (58/63) in young children group, 11 cases (17.46%) were developed into chronic ITP in young children group.

Conclusions

The history of vaccination was the crux of infantile ITP. Infantile ITP has good efficacy, rapid response, lower susceptibility and so on.

表1 两组间不同性别ITP患儿发病率比较[n(%)]
Table 1 Comparison of ITP incidence rate between two groups[n(%)]
表2 两组患儿ITP发病诱因比较[n(%)]
Table 2 Comparison of ITP predisposing factors between the two groups [n(%)]
表3 两组ITP患儿出血部位比较[n(%)]
Table 3 Comparison of the bleeding sites between two groups [n(%)]
表4 两组患儿出血程度比较[n(%)]
Table 4 Comparison of the bleeding degrees between two groups[n(%)]
表5 两组ITP患儿疗效和慢性病发生率比较[n(%)]
Table 5 Comparison of curative effects and incidence of chronic cases between two groups[n(%)]
[1]
Jin CQ, Dong HX, Liu F, et al. Detection and clinical significance of interleukin-18 and platelet associated IgG in peripheral blood of acute idiopathic thrombotycopenic purpura children[J]. J Xinxiang Med Coll, 2010, 27(1):48-51.
[2]
He ZX, Shang F. The comparison of the diagnostic criteria for domestic and foreign idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura[J]. J Appl Clin Pediatr, 2006, 21(15):1035-1036.
[3]
Hu YM, Jiang ZF, ed. Practical pediatrics. 7th ed[M]. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House, 2002, 1800-1801.
[4]
Kalyoncu D, Yildirmak Y, Cetinkaya F. Comparison of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in children between 3 months and 2 years versus 2-5 years[J]. Pediatr Blood Cancer, 2009, 52:656-658.
[5]
Chen LL, Wen FQ. Study progress of diagnosis and treatment of immune thrombocytopenic purpura[J]. J Appl Clin Pediatr, 2010, 22(15):1201-1204.
[6]
Zhou DY. Clinical characteristics of 202 cases with children idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura[J]. Chin J Dis Control Prev, 2011, 15(9):757.
[7]
Monto AS. Epidemiology of viral respiratory infections[J]. Am J Med, 2002, 112(Suppl 6A):4S-12S.
[8]
Liu XD, Li XR, Sun LR. Analysis of clinical feature of infantile idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura[J]. J China Pediatr Blood Cance, 2011, 16(3):117-121.
[9]
Chandra J, Ravi R, Singh V, et al. Bleeding manifestations in severely thrombocytopenic children with immune thrombocytopenic purpura[J]. Hematology, 2006, 11(2):131-133.
[10]
Pan YS, Jia CS, Chen TT. Clinical characteristics of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in 401 infants[J]. J Appl Clin Pediatr, 2011, 26(15):1175-1177
[1] 江泽莹, 王安婷, 王姣丽, 陈慈, 周秋玲, 黄燕娟, 周芳, 薛琰, 周剑烽, 谭文勇, 杜美芳. 多种植物油组分预防肿瘤放化疗相关毒性反应的效果分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 523-527.
[2] 朴广昊, 李屹洲, 刘瑞, 赵建民, 王凌峰. 皮肤撕脱伤撕脱皮瓣活力早期评估与修复的研究进展[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 528-532.
[3] 王得晨, 杨康, 杨自杰, 归明彬, 屈莲平, 张小凤, 高峰. 结直肠癌微卫星稳定状态和程序性死亡、吲哚胺2,3-双加氧酶关系的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 462-465.
[4] 彭旭, 邵永孚, 李铎, 邹瑞, 邢贞明. 结肠肝曲癌的诊断和外科治疗[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 108-110.
[5] 马伟强, 马斌林, 吴中语, 张莹. microRNA在三阴性乳腺癌进展中发挥的作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 111-114.
[6] 张海涛, 康婵娟, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎效果观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 654-657.
[7] 杨雪, 张伟, 尚培中, 宋创业, 尚丹丹, 张蔚. 胆囊十二指肠瘘结石经瘘口排出后自愈一例报道[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 707-708.
[8] 杨瑞洲, 李国栋, 吴向阳. 腹股沟疝术后感染的治疗方法探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 715-719.
[9] 魏小勇. 原发性肝癌转化治疗焦点问题探讨[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 602-607.
[10] 张其坤, 商福超, 李琪, 栗光明, 王孟龙. 联合脾切除对肝癌合并门静脉高压症患者根治性切除术后的生存获益分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 613-618.
[11] 蓝冰, 王怀明, 王辉, 马波. 局部晚期结肠癌膀胱浸润的研究进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 505-511.
[12] 陆志峰, 周佳佳, 梁舒. 虚拟现实技术在治疗弱视中的临床应用研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 891-895.
[13] 李田, 徐洪, 刘和亮. 尘肺病的相关研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 900-905.
[14] 岳瑞雪, 孔令欣, 郝鑫, 杨进强, 韩猛, 崔国忠, 王建军, 张志生, 孔凡庭, 张维, 何文博, 李现桥, 周新平, 徐东宏, 胡崇珠. 乳腺癌HER2蛋白表达水平预测新辅助治疗疗效的真实世界研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 765-770.
[15] 符梅沙, 周玉华, 李慧, 薛春颜. 淋巴细胞免疫治疗对复发性流产患者外周血T淋巴细胞亚群分布与PD1/PD-L1表达的影响及意义[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 726-730.
阅读次数
全文


摘要