切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2012, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (06) : 716 -720. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2012.06.011

所属专题: 文献 妇产科超声

论著

乳腺黏液癌的临床、影像学及其组织病理学特征分析
陈琮瑛1, 傅建民2, 袁鹰1, 余容1, 赵弘3, 黄犁4, 李胜利1,*,*()   
  1. 1. 518028 深圳,南方医科大学附属深圳妇幼保健院超声科
    2. 518028 深圳,南方医科大学附属深圳妇幼保健院乳腺外科
    3. 518028 深圳,南方医科大学附属深圳妇幼保健院放射科
    4. 518028 深圳,南方医科大学附属深圳妇幼保健院病理科
  • 收稿日期:2012-06-01 修回日期:2012-10-15 出版日期:2012-12-01
  • 通信作者: 李胜利

Analysis of Clinical, Image Features and Histopathology in Breast Mucinous Carcinoma

Cong-ying CHEN1, Jian-min FU2, Ying YUAN1, Rong YU1, Hong ZHAO3, Li HUANG4, Sheng-li LI1()   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Shenzhen Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital Affiliated to Southern Medical University, Shenzhen 518028, Guangdong Province, China
  • Received:2012-06-01 Revised:2012-10-15 Published:2012-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Sheng-li LI
  • About author:
    (Corresponding author: LI Sheng-li, Email: )
引用本文:

陈琮瑛, 傅建民, 袁鹰, 余容, 赵弘, 黄犁, 李胜利. 乳腺黏液癌的临床、影像学及其组织病理学特征分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2012, 08(06): 716-720.

Cong-ying CHEN, Jian-min FU, Ying YUAN, Rong YU, Hong ZHAO, Li HUANG, Sheng-li LI. Analysis of Clinical, Image Features and Histopathology in Breast Mucinous Carcinoma[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2012, 08(06): 716-720.

目的

探讨乳腺黏液癌的临床、影像学特征及其组织病理学的相关性分析,旨在提高乳腺黏液癌的早期诊断率。

方法

选择2008年1月至2011年12月于南方医科大学附属深圳妇幼保健院接受右侧乳房全切除术+右腋窝淋巴结切除术,或右侧保留乳头乳晕全乳切除术+右腋窝淋巴结切除术,及经病理学检查证实为乳腺黏液癌的21例患者,共计22个乳腺癌病灶(1例为双侧乳腺黏液癌)为研究对象。回顾性分析术后22个乳腺黏液癌病灶的临床、超声、影像学特征及与组织病理类型间的关系(本研究遵循的程序符合本院人体试验委员会制定的伦理学标准,得到该委员会批准,并征得受试对象的知情同意)。

结果

22个乳腺黏液癌病灶中,单纯型为14个(富细胞型为6个,少细胞型为8个),混合型为8个。主要临床表现为,81.8%(18/22)病灶以发现乳腺肿块1~12个月就诊,仅14.2%(3/21)患者为体检时X射线摄片提示钙化而就诊。超声检查提示,所有患者均存在无假包膜的实性肿块,85.7% (12/14)的单纯型肿块为边界清楚,回声等于或略低于皮下脂肪回声,其中92.9%(13/14)的单纯型病灶后方回声增强。75.0%(6/8)的混合型和14.3%(2/14)的单纯型乳腺黏液癌显示为肿块边界较模糊并细小毛刺,内部回声较脂肪回声低,两者比较,差异有统计学意义(P=0.008)。超声和X射线摄片检查提示术前疑恶性比例均为63.6%(14/22)。X射线摄片表现为,肿块为10个,局限性不对称致密影为2个,结构扭曲并恶性钙化和单纯不定性钙化各为1个。肿块主要为高密度,单纯型者边界清楚或呈浅分叶,混合型者边界不规则和毛刺改变。81.8%(18/22)的病灶被超声或X射线其中之一疑似为恶性。45.5% (10/22)的病灶术前超声和X射线摄片均疑似为恶性。

结论

乳腺黏液癌以肿块为主要临床表现。乳腺黏液癌,尤其是单纯型不具备典型乳腺癌恶性肿块的影像特征,超声和X射线摄片可提示为良性病变,肿块边缘特征是重要的辨别良、恶性的影像特征,混合型肿块较单纯型更具浸润性特征,建议使用超声和X射线摄片联合诊断以避免误诊,当两者之一疑为恶性时,应行穿刺活检明确诊断。

Objective

To investigate dinical, image features and histopathology of breast mucinous carcinoma in order to improve the early diagnosis of breast mucinous carcinoma.

Methods

From January 2008 to December 2011, twenty-one patients with 22 focuses mucinous carcinomas of the breast who were confirmed by pathology were included in this study. Mammogram and sonographic features were retrospectively evaluated according to the American College of Radiology (ACR) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Lexicon, all cases were classified by BI-RADS. Histological types of breast mucinous carcinoma included two forms, mixed and pure type. The latter was classified into cellular variants and hypocellular variants. The correlation between the mammogram and ultrasonographic findings of mucinous carcinoma and histologic features in different types were analyzed.

Results

Histological types of breast mucinous carcinoma included 8 mixed type and 14 pure type (6 cellular variants and 8 hypocellular variants). The clinical manifestation were as follow, 81.8%(18/22) of cases presented mass as main complains, only 3 cases complained of calcification by mammogram during routine breast carcinoma screening. About ultrasonography examination, all 21 cases presented as solid mass. In pure form, they showed well-defined margins with no pseudocapsule and isoechogenic or hypoechoic internal echo pattern relative to that of subcutaneous fat in 85.7% (12/14) focuses which histological type were pure type. Ninety-two point nine percent of pure type focuses had posterior enhancement. Seventy-five percent (6/8)of mixed type focuses and 14.3%(2/14) of pure type focuses, however, demonstrated ill-defined and or spiculated margins with hypoechogenic structure. Sixty-three point six (14/22) percent of cases being classified as BI-RADS 4 or 5 were suspected as malignancy by ultrasonography and Mammograms respectively. These mammograms features contained 10 masses, 2 focal asymmetrys, one architectural distortions with malignant clacification and one isolated indifferent clacification. Mammographic main appearances of mass were well-defined margins with microlobulation for pure type, poorly differentiated or spiculated margins for mixed type. Eighty-one point eight (18/22) percent of focuses were suspected as malignancy by one kind of imaging, mammography or ultrasonography. Forty-five point five (10/22) percent of focuses were suspected as malignancy by both mammogram and ultrasonography, which suggested as BI-RADS 4 or 5.

Conclusions

Palpable mass was the main clinical manifestation of breast mucinous carcinoma. Breast mucinous carcinoma, especially pure type, did not have the typical image features for benign or malignant breast masses, which maybe be diagnosed benign focuses by mammography and or ultrasonography. Margins of the masses were the very important for differentiating begin or malignant. Mixed type of breast mucinous carcinomas tumors have more aggressive margin imaging characteristics, which demonstrated ill-defined and or spiculated margins. It is suggested that the combination of mammogram with ultrasonography to avoid the delay diagnosis of breast mucinous carcinoma. Biopsies should be performed when malignancy was suspected by any one of mammogram and ultrasonography.

[1]
Bode MK, Rissanen T. Imaging findings and accuracy of core needle biopsy in mucinous carcinoma of the breast[J]. Acta Radiol, 2011, 52(2):128-133.
[2]
Mendelson EB, Baum JK, Berg WA, et al. Ultrasonography//Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). 4th ed[M]. Reston, VA:American College of Radiology, 2003.
[3]
Americean College of Radiology (ACR). Breast imaging report and data system(BI-RADS). 3rd ed[M]. Reston:American College of Radiology, 1998.
[4]
Fu Li, Fu XL. Pathology of breast tumor[M]. People's Medical Publishing House, 2008, 56-60.
[5]
Capella C, Eusebi V, Mann B, et al. Endocrine differentiation in mucous carcinoma of the breast[J]. J Histopathol, 1980, 4(6):613-630.
[6]
Fan LJ, Jiang J, Zhao F, et al. Clinicopathological characteristics of mucinous carcinoma of the breast[J]. Academiae Medicinae Militaris Tertiae, 2003, 25(23):2077-2079.
[7]
Peng YL, Wei B, Lv Q, et al. The diagnosis and misdiagnosis with CDFI of mucinous carcinoma of breast[J]. West China Med J, 2007, 22(2):254-256.
[8]
Rahbar G, Sie AC, Hansen GC, et al. Benign versus malignant solid breast masses: US differentiation[J]. Radiology, 1999, 213:889-894.
[9]
Memis A, Ozdemir N, Parildar M, et al. Mucinous (colloid) breast cancer: Mammographic and US features with histological correlation[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2000, 35:39-43.
[10]
Dhillon R, Depree P, Metcalf C, et al. Screen-detected mucinous breast carcinoma: Potential for delayed diagnosis[J]. Clin Radiol, 2006, 61:423-430.
[11]
Wilson TE, Helvie MA, Oberman HA, et al. Pure and mixed mucinous carcinoma of the breast: Pathologic basis for differences in mammographic appearance[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1995, 165(2):285-289.
[12]
Lam WM, Chu WC, Tse GM, et al. Sonographic appearance of mucinous carcinoma of the breast[J]. Am J Roentgenol, 2004, 182:1069-1074.
[1] 王亚红, 蔡胜, 葛志通, 杨筱, 李建初. 颅骨骨膜窦的超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(11): 1089-1091.
[2] 李晓妮, 卫青, 孟庆龙, 牛丽莉, 田月, 吴伟春, 朱振辉, 王浩. 超声心动图在孤立性左心室心尖发育不良疾病中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 937-942.
[3] 陈慧, 姚静, 张宁, 刘磊, 马秀玲, 王小贤, 方爱娟, 管静静. 超声心动图在多发性骨髓瘤心脏淀粉样变中的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 943-949.
[4] 戴飞, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 田园诗, 狄敏. 胎儿心脏超声定量多参数对主动脉缩窄胎儿心脏结构及功能的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 950-958.
[5] 章建全, 程杰, 陈红琼, 闫磊. 采用ACR-TIRADS评估甲状腺消融区的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 966-971.
[6] 罗辉, 方晔. 品管圈在提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺检出率中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[7] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[8] 包艳娟, 杨小红, 张涛, 赵胜, 张莉. 阴道斜隔综合征的超声诊断与临床分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 859-864.
[9] 汪洪斌, 张红霞, 何文, 杜丽娟, 程令刚, 张雨康, 张萌. 低级别阑尾黏液性肿瘤与阑尾黏液腺癌超声及超声造影特征分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 865-871.
[10] 农云洁, 黄小桂, 黄裕兰, 农恒荣. 超声在多重肺部感染诊断中的临床应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 872-876.
[11] 刘思锐, 赵辰阳, 张睿, 张一休, 杨萌. 多普勒超声对孕鼠子宫动脉不同节段血流动力学参数的评估[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 877-883.
[12] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[13] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[14] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[15] 韩萌萌, 冯雪园, 马宁. 乳腺癌改良根治术后桡神经损伤1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 117-118.
阅读次数
全文


摘要