切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2012, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (05) : 600 -602. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2012.05.012

所属专题: 文献

论著

人工支气管激发试验可靠性的研究
余静1, 李艳1,*,*(), 刘蓉1, 谢坚1   
  1. 1. 621000 四川绵阳,绵阳市中心医院儿科
  • 收稿日期:2012-05-15 修回日期:2012-08-11 出版日期:2012-10-01
  • 通信作者: 李艳

Study on Reliability of Artificial Bronchial Provocation Test

Jing YU1, Yan LI1(), Rong LIU1, Jian XIE1   

  1. 1. Central Hospital of Mianyang, Mianyang 621000, Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2012-05-15 Revised:2012-08-11 Published:2012-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Yan LI
  • About author:
    (Corresponding author: LI Yan, Email: )
引用本文:

余静, 李艳, 刘蓉, 谢坚. 人工支气管激发试验可靠性的研究[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2012, 08(05): 600-602.

Jing YU, Yan LI, Rong LIU, Jian XIE. Study on Reliability of Artificial Bronchial Provocation Test[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2012, 08(05): 600-602.

目的

评价人工乙酰甲胆碱(MCH)支气管激发试验[通过肺部听诊进行气道高反应性(AHR)结果判断]的可靠性。

方法

选取2009年10月1日至12月30日于本院诊断为慢性咳嗽的88例年长儿童(6~12岁)为研究对象,采用MCH从低浓度(0.25 mg/mL×2 min)开始逐渐递增(浓度依次为0.5 mg/mL,1 mg/mL,2 mg/mL,4 mg/mL,8 mg/mL和16 mg/mL)进行人工支气管激发试验。每次雾化吸入药物后首先进行肺部听诊,再进行肺通气功能检查,肺部任何区域出现哮鸣音、血氧饱和度下降>5%或MCH浓度已达16 mg/mL时终止激发试验。对肺通气功能测定和人工支气管激发试验2种方式判断结果进行比较(本研究遵循的程序符合本院人体试验委员会制定的伦理学标准,得到该委员会批准,并于患儿家属签署临床研究知情同意书)。

结果

本组88例患儿中,通过肺功能测定激发试验判断的阳性率为79.5%(70/88),通过肺部听诊的人工支气管激发试验判断阳性率为71.6%(63/88),肺功能测定判断为呈阴性患儿通过肺部听诊均判断为呈阴性。

结论

人工支气管激发试验方法可靠,灵敏度稍低于肺通气功能检查,具有一定假阴性,可作为不具备肺功能仪的医院完成支气管激发试验的一种替代手段。

Objective

To evaluate reliability of artificial methacholine bronchial provocation test (judging by auscultation of the lungs airway hyperresponsiveness).

Methods

88 patients in our hospital in accordance with the"guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic cough in children"for diagnosis of chronic cough in older children as a test object, with methacholine from low concentration gradually increasing concentrations of provocation test, every time the aerosolized medication after the first pulmonary auscultation and lung function, pulmonary any regional wheezing, oxygen saturation decreased more than 5% or MCH concentration has reached 16 mg/mL termination of the excitation test. On the 2 ways to judge the positive results were compared.

Results

According to pulmonary function to judge the positive rate was 79.5% by auscultation of the lungs, artificial test positive rate was 71.6%, and through the pulmonary function judgement for negtive cases were all judged negative to be negative for artificial method.

Conclusions

Artificial simple bronchial provocation test method is reliable, high specificity, sensitivity was slightly lower than the pulmonary function test results, there was some false negative results, but only for the 10%. It could be recommend as an alternative judgement methods of methacholine bronchial provocation test in hospital without the pulmonary function instrument.

表1 2种方法判断支气管激发试验气道高反应性结果比较[n(%)]
Table 1 Comparison of AHR of BMP by two methods[n(%)]
[1]
Gong CH, Fu Z, Yi QJ, et al. Etiological diagnosis value of bronchial provocation test in children with chronic cough[J]. Chin J Pract Pediatr, 2005, 20(8):112-113.
[2]
Li JH, Zhang LY, Wang H, et al. Etiological diagnosis of utilization value of bronchial provocation test in patients with chronic cough[J]. Int J Respr, 2009, 29(9):30-32.
[3]
Sun L, Yang Y. Implement bronchial provocative tests in children with asthma remission[J]. Int J Pediatr, 2010, 37(5):49-50.
[4]
Subspecialty Group of Respiratory Diseases, Chinese Medical Association, The Editorial Board, Chinese Journal of Pediatrics. Guideline for diagnosis and treatment of chronic cough in pediatrics[J]. Chin J Pediatr, 2008, 46(2):104-107.
[5]
Wang LB. Etiology and treatment of chronic cough in children[J]. J Appl Clin Pediatr, 2006, 21(4):194-196.
[6]
Zhong NS, Lai KF. Great importance to the cause of chronic cough diagnosis and treatment[J]. J Med Res, 2006, 35(5):12-15.
[7]
Huang DM, Xiao XX, Cui BY, et al. Application of the bronchial provocation test on diagnosis and treatment in the children with asthma[J]. Pediatr Emerg Med, 2005, 12(4):490-493.
[8]
Chen AH, Chen RC, Li JM, et al. Feasibility of expiratory flow limitation detected by negative expiratory pressure for airway hyperreactivity in children with asthma[J]. Int J Respir, 2008, 28(17):1-4.
[1] 张璇, 马宇童, 苗玉倩, 张云, 吴士文, 党晓楚, 陈颖颖, 钟兆明, 王雪娟, 胡淼, 孙岩峰, 马秀珠, 吕发勤, 寇海燕. 超声对Duchenne肌营养不良儿童膈肌功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1068-1073.
[2] 张宝富, 俞劲, 叶菁菁, 俞建根, 马晓辉, 刘喜旺. 先天性原发隔异位型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图诊断[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1074-1080.
[3] 韩丹, 王婷, 肖欢, 朱丽容, 陈镜宇, 唐毅. 超声造影与增强CT对儿童肝脏良恶性病变诊断价值的对比分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 939-944.
[4] 刘婷婷, 林妍冰, 汪珊, 陈幕荣, 唐子鉴, 代东伶, 夏焙. 超声衰减参数成像评价儿童代谢相关脂肪性肝病的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 787-794.
[5] 周钰菡, 肖欢, 唐毅, 杨春江, 周娟, 朱丽容, 徐娟, 牟芳婷. 超声对儿童髋关节暂时性滑膜炎的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 795-800.
[6] 米洁, 陈晨, 李佳玲, 裴海娜, 张恒博, 李飞, 李东杰. 儿童头面部外伤特点分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 511-515.
[7] 吴少峰, 张轶男, 孙杰. 机器人辅助手术在儿童微创泌尿手术中的应用和展望[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 440-444.
[8] 朱良振, 于永刚, 陈杲, 廖松柏. 儿童高级别闭合性肾损伤肾动脉栓塞与手术探查的疗效比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 461-465,475.
[9] 王蕾, 王少华, 牛海珍, 尹腾飞. 儿童腹股沟疝围手术期风险预警干预[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 768-772.
[10] 李芳, 许瑞, 李洋洋, 石秀全. 循证医学理念在儿童腹股沟疝患者中的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 782-786.
[11] 彭永辉, 张文杰, 李炳根, 聂向阳, 吴凯, 杨六成. 单孔双针疝囊高位结扎术在儿童巨大腹股沟疝的临床应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 566-569.
[12] 吕垒, 冯啸, 何凯明, 曾凯宁, 杨卿, 吕海金, 易慧敏, 易述红, 杨扬, 傅斌生. 改良金氏评分在儿童肝豆状核变性急性肝衰竭肝移植手术时机评估中价值并文献复习[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 661-668.
[13] 卓少宏, 林秀玲, 周翠梅, 熊卫莲, 马兴灶. CD64指数、SAA/CRP、PCT联合检测在小儿消化道感染性疾病鉴别诊断中的应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 505-509.
[14] 刘笑笑, 张小杉, 刘群, 马岚, 段莎莎, 施依璐, 张敏洁, 王雅晳. 中国学龄前儿童先天性心脏病流行病学研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1021-1024.
[15] 李静, 张玲玲, 邢伟. 兴趣诱导理念用于小儿手术麻醉诱导前的价值及其对家属满意度的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 812-817.
阅读次数
全文


摘要