切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2012, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (05) : 573 -577. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2012.05.004

所属专题: 经典病例 文献

论著

宫腔镜诊治772例宫腔内疾病的临床分析
瞿大成1, 苏站勤2, 高雪梅2,*,*()   
  1. 1. 610041 成都,四川大学华西第二医院妇产科;川北医学院妇产科
    2. 610041 成都,四川大学华西第二医院妇产科
  • 收稿日期:2012-05-01 修回日期:2012-08-20 出版日期:2012-10-01
  • 通信作者: 高雪梅

Clinical Value of Hysteroscopy in Diagnosis and Management of Intrauterine Diseases: A Review of 772 Cases

Da-cheng QU1, Zhan-qin SU2, Xue-mei GAO2()   

  1. 1. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2012-05-01 Revised:2012-08-20 Published:2012-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Xue-mei GAO
  • About author:
    (Corresponding author: GAO Xue-mei, Email: )
引用本文:

瞿大成, 苏站勤, 高雪梅. 宫腔镜诊治772例宫腔内疾病的临床分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2012, 08(05): 573-577.

Da-cheng QU, Zhan-qin SU, Xue-mei GAO. Clinical Value of Hysteroscopy in Diagnosis and Management of Intrauterine Diseases: A Review of 772 Cases[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2012, 08(05): 573-577.

目的

探讨宫腔镜对宫腔内疾病的临床诊治价值。

方法

采用回顾性分析法选取2007年9月至2008年8月在四川大学华西第二医院门诊就诊并接受宫腔镜检查患者772例的临床病历资料为研究对象,并对相关检查结果进行统计学分析(本研究遵循的程序符合四川大学华西第二医院人体试验委员会所制定的伦理学标准,得到该委员会批准)。

结果

①772例接受宫腔镜检查患者中,10例(1.30%)未完成检查,均为绝经前患者。本组宫腔镜检查的成功率为98.70%(762/772)。772例患者的宫腔镜检查结果主要为:子宫内膜息肉222例(28.76%),为导致宫腔内疾病的最主要病因,宫腔粘连113例(14.64%)、节育环异常58例(7.51%)、子宫内膜增生50例(6.48%)等。②同时接受宫腔镜与组织病理学检查的423例患者的组织诊断结果吻合率为80.14%(339/423)。宫腔镜诊断对子宫内膜息肉、子宫内膜单纯增生、子宫黏膜下肌瘤的灵敏度分别为90.99%,53.06%及94.44%;特异度分别为86.07%,98.93%及98.02%;阳性预测值(PPV)分别为87.83%,86.67%及65.38%;对子宫内膜癌诊断的灵敏度为83.33%,PPV为100.00%。③615例(79.66%)宫腔内疾病患者中,经宫腔镜确诊为537例,符合率为87.32%;超声确诊为402例,符合率为65.37%。宫腔镜与超声对宫腔内疾病的检出率比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),且宫腔镜优于超声。401例(51.94%)宫腔占位病变中,经宫腔镜检出为339例,检出率为84.54%,经超声检出为303例,检出率为75.56%,二者检出率比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),且宫腔镜检查优于超声。④410例(65.92%)宫腔镜检查的同时行宫腔镜治疗患者中,子宫内膜息肉为86.49%(192/222),节育环异常为100.00%(58/58),粘连为90.14%(128/142)。

结论

宫腔镜诊治宫腔内疾病是一项安全、有效、可靠的微创方法,优于超声,可明显提高诊断准确率,并可在检查的同时对疾病进行治疗。采取宫腔镜检查结合组织病理学诊断,是确诊宫腔内病变的最佳选择。

Objective

To investigate the clinical value of hysteroscopy in diagnosis and management of intrauterine diseases.

Methods

A total of 772 out-patient cases who underwent hysteroscopical examinations from September 2007 to August 2008 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Clinical data were made statistical analysis. The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Investigation in Human Being of West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University. Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Results

① A total of 772 women were recruited in the study, and hysteroscopical examinations were successfully conducted in 98.70%(762/772) of them. Ten cases failed the hysteroscopy examination, all of them were premenopause cases. The detection rate of intrauterine diseases were 28.76% for endometrial polyps, 14.64% for intrauterine adhesion, 7.51% for intrauterine devices abnormalities and 6.48% for endometrial hyperplasia and so on. ②Biopsies were taken in 423 women, in which hysteroscopical diagnosis of 339 women were confirmed, the coincidence rate was 80.14%(339/423) between two methods. The sensitivity of hysteroscopy for endometrial polyps, simple endometrial hyperplasia and submucous fibroids were 90.99%, 53.06% and 94.44%, respectively, and the specificity were 86.07%, 98.03% and 98.02%, respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) were 87.83%, 86.67% and 65.38%, respectively. The sensitivity and PPV of hysteroscopy for endometrial carcinoma were 83.33% and 100.00%, respectively. ③Intrauterine diseases were identified in 615 patients (79.66%), among whom 537 by hysteroscopy with an accordance of 87.32% (537/615) and 402 by ultrasonography with an accordance of 65.37% (402/615). Hysteroscopy was better than ultrasonography in the diagnosis of intrauterine diseases (P<0.05). Occupation diseases in uterine cavity were reported in 401 cases. Of those 339 women were reported in hysteroscopy with the accordance of 84.54%, and 303 women were reported in ultrasonography with the accordance of 75.56% (P<0.05). ④Therapy had been conducted simultaneously in 65.49% of 772 women, with endometrial polpys of 86.49%(192/222), intrauterine devices abnormalities of 100.00%(58/58) and adhesions of 90.14%(128/142).

Conclusions

Hysteroscopy is a safe, effective and minimally invasive approach in diagnosis and management of intrauterine diseases. It could improve the diagnositic accurary than ultrasonography, also therapy can be conducted simultaneously as well. Hysteroscopy combined with endometrial biopsies might be an optimal choice in diagnosis of intrauterine diseases.

表1 772例接受宫腔镜检查患者的诊断结果及宫腔内疾病检出率比较[n(%)]
Table 1 Comparison of diagnostic results and rates by hysteroscopy among 772 cases [n(%)]
表2 423例同时行宫腔镜与组织病理学检查患者的诊断结果比较(n)
Table 2 Comparison of diagnostic results of hysteroscopy and pathology detection among 423 cases patients (n)
表3 615例宫腔内疾病患者的宫腔镜与超声对宫腔内病变诊断结果比较[n(%)]
Table 3 Comparison of diagnostic results of hysteroscopy and ultrasound among 615 cases with intrauterine diseases [n(%)]
表4 772例接受宫腔镜检查患者相关疾病的治疗率比较[n(%)]
Table 4 Comparison of diagnositic results and treatment rates with hysteroscopy among 772 cases [n(%)]
[1]
Li ZX, Xia EL. Gynecologic endoscopy[M]. Beijing:People's Medical Publishing House, 2001, 62-65.
[2]
Clark TJ. Outpatient hysteroscopy and ultrasonography in the management of endometrial disease[J]. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2004, 16(4):305-311.
[3]
Cicinelli E, Schonauer LM, Barba B, et al. Tolerability and cardiovascular complications of outpatient diagnostic minihysteroscopy compared with conventional hysteroscopy[J]. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc, 2003, 10:399-402.
[4]
Cicinelli E, Parisi C, Galantino P, et al. Reliability, feasibility, and safety of minihysteroscopy with a vaginoscopic approach: Experience with 6000 cases[J]. Fertil Steril, 2003, 80:199-202.
[5]
Ran MD, Smorgick A, Noam MD, et al. Can we rely on blind endometrial biopsy for detection of focal intrauterine pathology[J]? Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2008, 199(2):115e1-115e3.
[6]
Garuti G, Sambruni I, Colonnelli M, et al. Accuracy of hysteroscopy in predicting histopathology of endometrium in 1500 women[J]. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc, 2001, 8:207-213.
[7]
Xia EL. The value of hysteroscopy in endometrial carcinoma[J]. Chin J Pract Gynecol Obstet, 2002, 18(4):199-201.
[8]
Marello F, Bettocchi S, Greco P, et al. Hysteroscopic evaluation of menopausal patients with sonographically atrophic endometrium[J]. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc, 2000, 7(2):197-200.
[9]
Kudela M, Pilka R. Is there a real risk in patient with endometrial carcinoma undergoing diagnostic hysteroscopy(HSC)[J]. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol, 2001, 22(5):342-344.
[10]
Revel A, Tsafrir A, Anteby SO, et al. Dose hysteroscopy procedure intraperitoneal spread of endometrial cancer cells[J]. Obstet Gynecol Survey, 2004, 59(4):280-284.
[11]
Wen Y, Gao XM, Wang H, et al. Effect of 100% CO2 or 5% dextrose as distending uterine cavity medium on the proliferation and apoptosis of endometrial carcinoma cell in vitro[J]. J Sichuan Univ:Med Ed, 2007, 38(3):440-442.
[12]
Li L, Wang YJ, Gao XM. The progress of hysteroscopy used to endometrial cancer diagnosis[J]. Chin J Min Inv Surg, 2009, 10:896-898.
[13]
Jansen FW, Vredevoogd CB, Ulzen UK, et al. Complications of hysteroscopy: A prospective, multicenter study[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2000, 96:266-270.
[1] 张舒沁, 陈练. 产后宫腔内妊娠物残留的诊断和临床处理[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 493-497.
[2] 隋龙. 门诊和日间宫腔镜手术模式的建立与思考[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(06): 745-.
[3] 杨一君, 董雯, 刘晓平, 石灿, 张磊, 谷琎, 龚咪, 华馥. 腹腔镜折叠对接缝合联合宫腔镜憩室开渠法治疗剖宫产瘢痕憩室的疗效[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 330-337.
[4] 冯力民. ISGE指南——宫腔镜子宫肌瘤去除术[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(02): 250-250.
[5] 隋龙. 宫腔镜诊疗刘技术发展趋势[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(01): 125-125.
[6] 马黔红. 生殖医学中的宫腔镜应用[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(05): 620-620.
[7] 袁瑞. 宫腔镜对宫颈管病变的诊治 [J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(03): 373-373.
[8] 石钢. 宫腔镜下女性生殖道异物取出术[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(02): 249-249.
[9] 周明书, 郝一炜, 伊诺, 康晓迪, 丛集美, 宗艳丽. 非妊娠期肝硬化女性子宫异常出血临床特征及宫腔镜电切术疗效评价[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(06): 402-408.
[10] 魏莉, 张浩, 谭欣, 邓姗, 黄秀峰, 冯力民. 《宫腔镜下子宫肌瘤去除术管理规范》团体标准的解读[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 199-204.
[11] 赵雪燕, 李卫民, 徐云, 赵辉, 李春霞, 冯力民. 残留子宫纵隔的预测因素与妊娠结局的关系[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(05): 282-286.
[12] 黄春玉, 冯力民, 杨保军, 李春霞. 宫腔镜在妊娠期宫颈息肉治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(02): 81-84.
[13] 祁明花, 宋善兰, 俞丕超, 祁雁凌. 宫腔镜电切术联合生化汤加减治疗子宫内膜息肉的疗效及对短期复发的影响[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 171-175.
[14] 戴莉, 高红艳, 邢肖肖, 王清, 彭妍, 李沁, 王慧. 经阴道子宫憩室修补联合宫腔镜内膜电灼术治疗剖宫产瘢痕憩室的效果分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(12): 1243-1247.
[15] 李云飞, 夏恩兰, 黄晓武, 王翠芝. 绝经后无症状子宫内膜增厚的宫腔镜诊治分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(11): 1096-1102.
阅读次数
全文


摘要