切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2012, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (02) : 183 -186. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2012.02.018

所属专题: 文献

论著

骶管阻滞对尿道下裂患儿术后早期镇痛的影响
尚玉超1, 陈本祯2, 姚玉笙3, 蒋璐4, 谭玲1,*,*()   
  1. 1. 610041 成都,四川大学华西医院麻醉科
    2. 四川省妇幼保健院麻醉科
    3. 福建省立医院麻醉科
    4. 四川省人民医院麻醉科
  • 收稿日期:2012-01-05 修回日期:2012-02-17 出版日期:2012-04-01
  • 通信作者: 谭玲

Early Postoperative Analgesia Effect of Caudal Block in Children With Hypospadias Repair Surgery

Yu-chao SHANG1, Ben-zhen CHEN2, Yu-sheng YAO3, Lu JIANG4, Ling TAN1()   

  1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, Sichuan province, China
  • Received:2012-01-05 Revised:2012-02-17 Published:2012-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Ling TAN
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: TAN Ling, Email:
引用本文:

尚玉超, 陈本祯, 姚玉笙, 蒋璐, 谭玲. 骶管阻滞对尿道下裂患儿术后早期镇痛的影响[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2012, 08(02): 183-186.

Yu-chao SHANG, Ben-zhen CHEN, Yu-sheng YAO, Lu JIANG, Ling TAN. Early Postoperative Analgesia Effect of Caudal Block in Children With Hypospadias Repair Surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2012, 08(02): 183-186.

目的

探讨骶管阻滞对尿道下裂修复术患儿术后早期的镇痛效果。

方法

选取2010年1至12月于四川大学华西医院接受尿道下裂修复术,并要求术后镇痛的38例患儿为研究对象。按照计算机录入顺序将其随机纳入研究组(采取全身麻醉联合骶管阻滞,n=20)及对照组(采取全身麻醉,n=18)。两组患儿于常规诱导下行气管插管术,采用2%~3%七氟醚(吸入)复合异丙酚[3 mg/(kg·h)静脉泵入维持麻醉。研究组采取单次骶管阻滞(局部麻醉药总剂量为0.8 mL/kg,包含1/3 1%利多卡因+2/3 0.2%罗哌卡因,分开配制,先后注入骶管);对照组加用瑞芬太尼[0.15 μg/(kg·min),持续静脉泵入]。所有患者采用曲马多自控性镇痛法(PCA)。记录两组患儿术中生命体征和术后48 h内不同观察时间点的FLACC镇痛评分、镇静效果及不良反应,并进行统计学分析(本研究遵循的程序符合本院人体试验委员会所制定的伦理学标准,得到该委员会批准,分组征得受试对象监护人的知情同意,并与之签署临床研究知情同意书)。

结果

两组患儿一般情况及术中生命体征比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。FLACC评分<4分患儿所占比例及术后Ramsay镇静评分结果比较,在麻醉复苏室(PACU)内,研究组高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),其他观察时间点比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。研究组术后躁动发生率明显低于对照组,差异也有统计学意义(P=0.013)。两组术后不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

骶管阻滞可为接受尿道下裂修复术患儿术中、术后早期提供满意镇痛效果,并可减少术后镇痛药物的需要量,降低疼痛造成的术后烦躁发生率。

Objective

To observe the early postoperative analgesia effect of caudal block in children with hypospadias repair surgery.

Methods

From January to December 2010, 38 children who accepted hypospadias repair surgery and required postoperative analgesia were included in this study. They were randomly divided into research group(general anesthesia combined with caudal block, n=20) and control group(general anesthesia, n=18). The volume of local anesthetics was 0.8 mL/kg, of which 1/3 was 1% lidocaine and 2/3 was 0.2% ropivacaine, separately prepared and injected. In addition, continuous intravenous infusion of remifentanil were added to control group. During the operation, 2-3% sevoflurane inhalation and continuous intravenous infusion of propofol [3 mg/(kg·h)] were given for maintaining sedation in both groups, and all patients received tramadol patient controlled analgesia(PCA). The vital signs during operation, the FLACC pain score, sedation scale, and adverse reactions in 48 h after operation were recorded and assessed.The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Investigation in Human Being of West China Hospital of Sichuan University.Informed consent was obtained from each parents.

Results

There had no significant difference in general condition and vital signs during the operation between two groups(P>0.05). The component ratio of the children whose FLACC scores were less than 4 points and Ramsay sedation score in research group was obviously higher than that in control group in post anesthesia care unit(PACU) (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in other observe time between two groups(P>0.05). The incidence of restlessness in research group was lower than that in control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of nausea after operation between two groups(P>0.05).

Conclusions

Caudal block not only can provide satisfying early postoperative analgesia effect for children with hypospadias repair surgery, but also reduce analgesic requirements after operation.

表1 两组患儿一般情况比较(±s)
Table 1 Comparison of general condition between two groups(±s)
图1 两组患儿术中心率变化情况
Figure 1 Variation of heart rate between two groups during the operation
图2 两组患儿术中平均动脉压变化
Figure 2 Variation of mean arterial pressure between two groups during the operation
表2 两组患儿术后镇痛效果(FLACC评分<4分患儿所占比例)比较 [n(%)]
Table 2 Comparison of analgesia effect (FLACC评分<4) between two groups [n(%)]
表3 两组患儿术后Ramsay镇静评分比较(±s)
Table 3 Comparison of Ramsay sedation score between two groups after the operation (±s)
1
Howard R, Carter B, Curry J, et al.Association of paediatric anaesthetists: Good practice in postoperative and procedural[J].Pain,2008,18:178.
2
Bosenberg A, Thomas J, Lopez T, et al. The efficacy of caudal ropivacaine 1, 2 and 3 mg/mL for postoperative analgesia in children[J].Pediatr Anaesth,2002,12:53-58.
3
Crawford MW, Hickey C, Zaarour C, et al.Development of acute opioid tolerance during infusion of remifentanil for pediatric scoliosis surgery[J]. Anesth Analg,2006,102:1662-1667.
4
Park WY, Thompson JS, Lee KK. Effect of epidural anesthesia and analgesia on perioperative outcome: A randomized, controlled veterans affairs cooperative study[J]. Anesthesiology, 2000,92:433-431.
5
Rigg JR, Jamrozik K, Myles PS, et al. Epidural anaesthesia and analgesia and outcome of major surgery: A randomized trial[J].Lancet, 2002,359:1276-1282.
6
Lonnqvist PA, Morton NS. Postoperative analgesia in infants and children[J]. Br J Anaesth,2005, 95:59-68.
7
Crews J.Multimodal pain management strategies for office-based and ambulatoryprocedures[J]. JAMA, 2002,288:629-632.
8
Brislin RP, Rose JB.Pediatric acute pain management[J]. Anesthesiol Clin N Am, 2005, 23:789-814.
9
Hung WT, Chen CC, Liou CM, et al. The effects of low-dose fentanyl on emergence agitation and quality of life in patients with moderate developmental disabilities [J]. J Clin Anesth, 2005, 17:474-478.
10
Weldon BC, Bell M, Craddock T. The effect of caudal analgesia on emergence agitation in children after sevoflurane versus halothane anesthesia[J].Anesth Analg, 2004, 98:321-326.
11
Shipton EA. Tramadol: Present and future[J]. Anesth Intensive Care,2000,28:363-374.
12
Pang WW, Mok MS, Huang S, et al.Intraoperative loading attenuates nausea and vomiting of tramadol patient-controlled analgesia[J]. Can J Anaesth,2000,47(10):968-973.
[1] 吴越廷, 周林雨涵, 胡钦, 许华燕, 黄敏, 陈晓勇, 张萌, 李中会, 茹凉, 王秋, 蔡晓唐. 皮质类固醇治疗非卧床杜氏肌营养不良症患儿肺功能与运动功能的纵向研究[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 292-301.
[2] 盛志强, 袁嫣然. ATP1A3基因突变相关疾病1个家系报道及文献复习[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 331-338.
[3] 王莉, 曹蕾, 王亚丹, 张伟. Krabbe病1例临床分析并文献复习[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 339-345.
[4] 李倩, 刘倩, 朱海玲, 倪娟, 任宝芹, 刘长云. 重组人生长激素治疗特发性矮小症患儿的疗效[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 346-352.
[5] 刘静, 王燕妮, 王继萍. 儿童毛发移植应用前景及病例讨论[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(04): 368-368.
[6] 张梦思, 麻艺群, 蒙礼娟, 朱辉, 付晋凤. 压力手套与指蹼加压带及泡沫型硅凝胶贴膜联合应用于儿童瘢痕性并指术后的效果观察[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(04): 329-334.
[7] 郑伟军, 方一凡, 吴典明, 王翔, 陈飞, 刘明坤. 先天性肠旋转不良诊治分析:单中心10年经验总结[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 338-341.
[8] 李盼, 韦登飞, 乔克坤, 李熊刚. 超声引导下骶管阻滞与髂腹股沟及髂腹下神经阻滞用于小儿腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术的比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 326-330.
[9] 成紫琳, 戴明, 李建华, 马靓. 加速康复外科理念在儿童腹股沟疝围手术期的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 331-335.
[10] 曾纪晓, 徐晓钢, 王欣星, 刘斐, 兰梦龙, 陶波圆, 梁子建, 叶志华, 罗媛圆. 达芬奇机器人辅助Swenson-like巨结肠根治术[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 239-243.
[11] 中华医学会器官移植学分会, 中华医学会外科学分会外科手术学学组, 中华医学会外科学分会移植学组, 华南劈离式肝移植联盟. 劈离式供肝儿童肝移植中国临床操作指南[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 593-601.
[12] 刘军, 丘文静, 孙方昊, 李松盈, 易述红, 傅斌生, 杨扬, 罗慧. 在体与离体劈离式肝移植在儿童肝移植中的应用比较[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 688-693.
[13] 汪久宏, 丁莉, 梁丽. 腹部彩超联合高频彩超用于小儿肠套叠诊断经验及价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(03): 226-228.
[14] 王晓瑜, 郭群英, 牛雅萌, 赵成松. 公立儿童医院促进儿科就医均等化实践探析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 383-387.
[15] 闫诺, 邓伟, 张英霞, 贺丹阳, 樊宁. 泌尿系超声检查联合降钙素原对儿童高级别膀胱输尿管反流的诊断价值[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 149-154.
阅读次数
全文


摘要