切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2011, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (05) : 458 -460. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2011.05.013

论著

晚期宫颈癌综合治疗的临床探讨
刘素云, 李高文, 陈志仁, 陈晓明   
  1. 512025 广东韶关,汕头大学附属粤北人民医院妇产科
    512025 广东韶关,汕头大学附属粤北人民医院介入科
    512025 广东韶关,汕头大学附属粤北人民医院放疗科
    广东省人民医院肿瘤介入中心
  • 出版日期:2011-10-01

Clinical Approach of Combined Treatment on Advanced Cervical Carcinoma

Su-yun LIU, Gao-wen LI, Zhi-ren CHEN, Xiao-ming CHEN   

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Affiliated Yue Bei People's Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou 512025, Guangdong Province, China
  • Published:2011-10-01
引用本文:

刘素云, 李高文, 陈志仁, 陈晓明. 晚期宫颈癌综合治疗的临床探讨[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2011, 07(05): 458-460.

Su-yun LIU, Gao-wen LI, Zhi-ren CHEN, Xiao-ming CHEN. Clinical Approach of Combined Treatment on Advanced Cervical Carcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2011, 07(05): 458-460.

目的

探讨晚期宫颈癌综合治疗的最佳有效方案。

方法

选择自1990年6月至2010年6月,在汕头大学附属粤北人民医院妇产科、介入科及放疗科接受综合治疗的晚期宫颈癌患者中,病历资料完整的126例患者为研究对象。按照不同综合治疗方案对其进行分组。采取单纯后装(腔内后装放射治疗)+ 60Co外照射治疗患者,纳入A组(n=46);行双侧子宫动脉化疗栓塞术患者,纳入B组(n=26);行子宫动脉化疗栓塞术+后装+60Co外照射治疗患者,纳入C组(n=19);行单纯中子刀直线加速器外照射治疗患者,纳入D组(n=35)(本研究遵循的程序符合汕头大学附属粤北人民医院人体试验委员会所制定的伦理学标准)。A,B,C及D组患者年龄、宫颈癌分期、分类等比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。采用回顾性分析法对4组患者的治疗效果进行比较。

结果

C组患者阴道流血停止率、肿块缩小率、3及5年生存率明显优于A,B,D组(P<0.05),临床死亡率(以局部大出血为主)也明显低于A,B,D组(P<0.05)。

结论

晚期宫颈癌综合治疗方案以子宫动脉化疗栓塞术或子宫动脉化疗栓塞术+后装+60Co外照射治疗最有效。因本研究样本量较小,是否值得临床推广应用,尚需大样本、多中心前瞻性随机对照研究进一步证实。

Objective

To observe the best approach of combined therapy of the advanced cervical cancer.

Methods

From June 1990 to June 2010, 126 women with advanced cervical carcinoma were divided into four groups according to combined therapy regimen. Group A (n= 46) underwent 60Co external beam radiotherapy + intracavitary radiotherapy. Group B (n=26) underwent interventional uterine arterial chemoembolization. Group C (n=19) underwent intracavitary radiotherapy + 60Co external beam radiotherapy with accelerator linear after interventional uterine arterial chemoembolization. Group D (n= 35) underwent radiotherapy by neutron knife and accelerator linear. The procedure of this study was consistent with ethical standard established by the committee of investigation in human beings of Affiliated Yue Bei People's Hospital of Shantou University Medical College. Informed consent was obtained from all participates. There had no significant differences of ages, degrees of cervical carcinoma, classifications, clinical stages between two groups. The therapeutic efficacy among four groups were conducted by retrospective analysis.

Results

Therapeutic efficacy (haltting colporrhagia, tumoral minification and three- and five- years survival rates) in group C were significance better than those in other three groups (P< 0.05). Clinical death rate in group C had statistically significant difference than those in other three groups (P<0.05).

Conclusion

It is optimization that intracavitary radiotherapy or neutron knife and electron beam radiotherapy with accelerator linear after interventional uterine arterial chemoembolization to treat advanced cervical carcinoma.

1 Yong BK, Jae HC, Ki CK, et al. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in uterine cervical cancer patients with high-rish factors[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2007, 104(1):58-63.
2 Li DQ, Chen JA, Cheng JE, et al. Comparison of effect in uterne artery intrevenional chemotherapy combined radiotherapy and simple radiotherapy in treatment of local advanced cervical carcinoma [J]. Chin J Cancer Prev Treat, 2007, 14(4): 304-306. [李大庆,陈建安.成金娥,等.子宫动脉灌注化疗联合放疗与单纯放射治疗局部晚期宫颈癌的疗效比较[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2007,14(4):304-306.]
3 Liu SY, Li GW, Zhu XL, et al. Observation curative effect of transcatheter uterine artery administration of two ways efficacy of the treatment of advanced cervical cancer [J]. Curr Adv Obstet Gynecol, 2004, 13(1): 56-57.[刘素云,李高文,朱雪连,等•经导管子宫动脉给药两种方法治疗晚期宫颈癌的疗效观察[J].现代妇产科进展,2004,13(1):56-57.]
4 Li GW? Liu SY, Chen ZH, et al. Curative effect analysis of intervention and radiotherapy onterminal cervical carcinoma [J]. Chin J Med Imag Technol, 2002, 18(10): 1043-1044.[李高文,刘素云,陈志红,等.晚期宫颈癌介人治疗与放射治疗的疗效对比分析[J]•中国医学影像技术,2002,18(10):1043-1044.]
5 Niu CG. Clinical observation of radiotherapy in advanced uterine cervical neoplasms combined with interventional chemotherapy [JJ. Chin J Misdiagn, 2007, 7(1): 72-73.[牛长庚.中晚期宫颈癌放疗联合介入化疗临床观察[J].中国误诊学杂志,2007,7(1):72-73.]
6 Cao ZY. Changes and thinking of the treatment of uterine cervical neoplasms [J]. Chin J Obstet Gynecol, 2004, 39(3): 212-215. [曹泽毅.子宫颈癌治疗的变迁和思考[J].中华妇产科杂志,2004,39(3):212-215.]
7 Cheng X, Cai SM, Li ZT. Chemotherapy research of uterine cervical neoplasms [J], Curr Adv Obstet Gynecol, 2004, 13(2):140-142.[程玺,蔡树模,李子庭.子宫颈癌化疗的研究[J].现代妇产科进展,2004,13(2):140-142.]
8 Green JA, Kirwan JM. Survival and recurrence after concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for cancer of the uterine cervix: A systematic review and meta analysis[J]. Lancet,20019 358(9284):781-786.
9 Eifel PJ. Chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer [J]. Semin Radiat Oncol, 2006, 3(16):177-185.
10 Mylin A, Torres MD, Anuja JM, et al. Comparison of treatment tolerance and outcomes in patients with cervical cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in a prospective randomized trial or with standard treatment [J]. Int J Radiol Oncol, 2008, 70(1): 118-125.
[1] 陈锴, 刘超乾, 盛湲. 残余肿瘤负荷评分在乳腺癌新辅助化疗效果评价中的应用[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(02): 113-115.
[2] 麦绍声, 陈小磊, 李洁云, 谭丹, 黎凌云, 吴春辉. 髌骨骨折钉线张力带固定与早期功能锻炼的评估[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(06): 776-780.
[3] 朱旭, 张林, 进晓辉, 曾纪洲, 张亚奎. 开放式楔形胫骨高位截骨术在膝骨关节炎中的应用[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(06): 769-772.
[4] 李沂阳, 孔宁, 刘冠志, 李哲, 王坤正, 杨佩. 新版膝关节评分系统在评价单髁关节置换术的应用分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(01): 47-51.
[5] 白伟民, 秦历杰. 不同心肺复苏培训模式在大学生中应用效果的研究[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2016, 09(04): 256-259.
[6] 郑晓霞, 李大鹏. 中性粒细胞计数与淋巴细胞计数比值对局部晚期宫颈癌患者新辅助化疗疗效的预测价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 16(05): 558-566.
[7] 韩历丽, 赵同香, 邓小红. 宫颈癌筛查工作评价指标的比较研究[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2014, 10(06): 757-761.
[8] 赵红利, 张仕田, 杨军, 龚钿. 屈螺酮炔雌醇与其他口服避孕药治疗多囊卵巢综合征的系统评价[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2014, 10(03): 333-342.
[9] 周小燕, 徐望明, 董兰, 王慧明, 罗增丽, 解美婷. 阿托西班与利托君治疗早产临床疗效的系统评价[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2014, 10(02): 170-176.
[10] 周路, 覃强, 刘星. 中、晚期宫颈癌三维适形放疗联合介入化疗的疗效分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2010, 06(01): 44-46.
[11] 刘斌, 乔亮. 标准化护理流程在灼伤手术室的应用和效果评价[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2018, 13(02): 151-154.
[12] 梁陶媛, 高小雁, 董秀丽, 沈杰, 王志稳. 骨科专科护士核心能力评价指标体系的构建[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2017, 12(02): 151-155.
[13] 刘云玥, 范文生, 顾成磊, 马鑫, 刘洪一, 孟元光. 达芬奇机器人MDT模式全盆腔廓清术治疗晚期宫颈癌一例[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(04): 249-251.
[14] 莫文权, 裴建, 杨晖. 采用CONSORT和STRICTA评价近5年针刺治疗偏头痛随机对照试验[J]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2018, 07(01): 26-31.
[15] 刘燕, 梁钻容. 基于熵权-模糊综合评价法的医学检验专业学生的人文素养评价指标体系研究[J]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2021, 09(03): 182-186.
阅读次数
全文


摘要