切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2011, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (02) : 121 -124. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2011.02.009

论著

阴道镜宫颈Ⅲ型转化区诊断为宫颈上皮内瘤变Ⅰ的漏诊预测分析
邰海燕, 尤志学, 季静, 王淑玉   
  1. 214000 江苏无锡,南京医科大学附属无锡市人民医院妇产科
    江苏省人民医院
    无锡市妇幼保健院
  • 出版日期:2011-04-01

Analysis of Cervical Intraepithelial NeoplasiaⅠWith Type Ⅲ Transformation Zone

Hai-yan TAI, Zhi-xue YOU, Jing JI, Shu-yu WANG   

  1. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, People's Hospital of Wuxi, Wuxi 214016, Jiangsu Province, China
  • Published:2011-04-01
引用本文:

邰海燕, 尤志学, 季静, 王淑玉. 阴道镜宫颈Ⅲ型转化区诊断为宫颈上皮内瘤变Ⅰ的漏诊预测分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2011, 07(02): 121-124.

Hai-yan TAI, Zhi-xue YOU, Jing JI, Shu-yu WANG. Analysis of Cervical Intraepithelial NeoplasiaⅠWith Type Ⅲ Transformation Zone[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2011, 07(02): 121-124.

目的

探讨采用经宫颈环形电切术(loop electrosurgical excision procedure,LEEP),对阴道镜检查为宫颈Ⅲ型转化区异常部位多点活检宫颈组织病理学诊断为宫颈上皮内瘤变(cervical intraepithelial neoplasias,CIN)Ⅰ,对漏诊宫颈高级别病变(宫颈上皮内瘤变Ⅱ,Ⅲ)的预测价值。

方法

选取2007年1月至2009年10月于江苏省人民医院宫颈病中心就诊,宫颈脱落细胞学结果示≥不明意义非典型鳞状细胞(atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance,ASCUS),高危型人乳头瘤病毒(high-risk human papillomavirus,HR-HPV)呈阳性,阴道镜检查为宫颈Ⅲ型转化区活检组织病理学诊断为宫颈上皮内瘤变Ⅰ患者79例为研究对象。对其采取经宫颈环形电切术后行组织病理学检查,比较阴道镜多点活检与经宫颈环形电切术后组织病理学检查结果变化,分析术前宫颈脱落细胞学及高危型人乳头瘤病毒载量与经宫颈环形电切术后组织病理学结果相关性(本研究遵循的程序符合江苏省人民医院人体试验委员会所制定的伦理学标准,得到该委员会批准和受试对象本人的知情同意,并与之签署临床研究知情同意书)。

结果

①79例阴道镜下多点活检组织病理学结果为宫颈上皮内瘤变Ⅰ,经宫颈环形电切术后组织病理学诊断结果升级率为53.16%(42/79),其中宫颈上皮内瘤变Ⅱ为22例,宫颈上皮内瘤变Ⅲ为18例,宫颈癌ⅠA1期为2例。②术前宫颈脱落细胞学级别与宫颈病变程度呈正相关(P<0.05),但一致性较差(Kappa=0.1247)。③高危型人乳头瘤病毒载量与宫颈病变程度无相关性(P>0.05)。

结论

阴道镜检查为宫颈Ⅲ型转化区多点活检组织病理学诊断宫颈上皮内瘤变Ⅰ级存在高级别病变漏诊风险,术前宫颈脱落细胞学对诊断有一定参考价值,但对高危型人乳头瘤病毒载量预测价值不大。

Objective

To discuss the predicting value of cervical intraepithelial neoplasias (CIN) Ⅰ with type Ⅲ transformation zone (TZ) had high grade cervical lesion.

Methods

From January 2007 and October 2009, 79 cases who were diagnosed as cervical intraepithelial neoplasias Ⅰ by histopathology in the People's Hospital of Jiangsu Province were recruited into this study. The cervical cytological examination showed ≥atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance (ASCUS), and high-risk human papilloma virus(HR-HPV) is positive. The histopathology was conducted after the loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP), and histopathology changes were compared between colposcopic site-specific biopsies and loop electrosurgical excision procedure. Histopathological correlation were compared among preoperational cervical cytology, high-risk human papilloma virus load and loop electrosurgical excision procedure. The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Investigation in Human Being of People's Hospital of Jiangsu Province. Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Results

①For 79 cases, 53.16%(42/79, 53.16%) cervical intraepithelial neoplasias Ⅰ was graded up after loop electrosurgical excision procedure with 22 cervical intraepithelial neoplasias Ⅱ, 18 cervical intraepithelial neoplasias Ⅲ and 2 cervical cancer ⅠA1. ②The cytology positively correlated with the grade of cervical lesion (P<0.05), but not accordant (Kappa=0.1247). ③The viral load of high-risk human papilloma virus was not correlated with the grade of cervical lesion (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasias Ⅰ with type Ⅲtransformation zone is prone to omission of high-grade intraepithelial lesion. The cytology may help to predict the grade of cervical lesion. But the predicting value of high-risk human papilloma virus on the grade of cervical lesion may be inadequate.

1 Huang J, Yang LJ, Su YY, et al. The relationship between various types of cervical transformation zone and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia[J]. Chin J Pract Gynecol Obstet, 2009, 25(5): 371. [黄瑾,阳丽君,苏圆圆,等.不同类型宫颈转化区与宫颈上皮内瘤变的关系[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2009, 25(5): 371.]
2 Zhao XD, Zhang Y. The management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [J]. Foreign Med Sci (Obstet Gynecol Fascicle), 2007, 34(1): 47-50. [赵晓东,张毅.子宫颈上皮内瘤变的处理[J].国外医学妇产科学分册,2007, 34(1): 47-50.]
3 Sui L, Wang Q, Zheng RL, et al. Reappraisal on mild cervical intraepithelial neoplasia based on punch biopsy and colposcopical diagnosis through cervical conization by LEEP[J]. J Fudan Uni (Med Sci), 2006, 33(6): 745-748. [隋龙,汪清,郑瑞莲,等.宫颈LEEP活检对阴道镜检诊断为CINⅠ的再评估[J].复旦学报:医学版,2006, 33(6): 745-748.]
4 Solomon D, Nayar R. The bethesda system for reporting cervical cytology. 2 nd ed[M]. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2004, 67-87.
5 Carcopino X, Akkawi R, Conroy R, et al. Specific timing for colposcopy: Is it worthwhile [J]? Obstet Gynecol, 2008, 111(2Pt1): 373-377.
6 Li Q, Liang MY, Li XL, et al. The clinical analysis of types of cervical transformation zone under colposcope[J]. Chin Clin J Gynecol Obstet, 2008, 9(5): 374-375. [李晴,梁美艳,李小玲,等.阴道镜下子宫颈转化区类型的临床分析[J].中国妇产科临床杂志,2008, 9(5): 374-375.]
7 Xie F, Sui L, Wang Q, et al. Retrospective analysis on advantages and disadvantages of colposcopically directed biopsy on diagnosing cervical lesion[J]. Prog Obstet Gynecol, 2009, 18(4): 241-244. [谢锋,隋龙,汪清,等.阴道镜引导活检诊断宫颈病变的优势与不足[J].现代妇产科进展,2009, 18(4): 241-244.]
8 Lin ZQ. Interpretation of 2009 NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: Cervical cancer [J]. J Int Obstet Gynecol, 2009, 36(2): 167-168. [林仲秋. 2009 NCCN宫颈癌临床实践指南解读[J]. 国际妇产科学杂志,2009, 36(2): 167-168.]
9 Singer A, Monaghan JM. Lower genital tract precancer.2 nd ed [M]. UK: Blackwell Science Ltd, 2000, 161-213.
10 Kyrgiou M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, et al. Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: Systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Lancet, 2006, 367(9509): 489-498.
11 Wright TC, Massad LS, Dunton CJ, et al. 2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or adenocarcinoma in site[J]. J Low Genit Tract Dis, 2007, 11: 223-239.
12 Stoler MH, Schiffman M. Interobserver reproducibility of cervical cytologic and histologic interpretations[J]. JAMA, 2001, 285: 1500-1505.
13 Jin L, Lang JH, Wang YF,et al. Relationship of HR-HPV DNA loads with the stages of CIN[J]. Reprod Contracept, 2006, 26(7): 422-425. [金力,郎景和,王友芳,等.高危人类乳头状病毒负荷与宫颈上皮内瘤变的分级关系[J].生殖与避孕,2006, 26(7): 422-425.]
14 Zhang WY, Xue YZ, Han L, et al. Correlation between high risk human papillomavirus viral load and severity of cervical lesion [J]. J Shanghai Jiaotong Uni (Med Sci), 2007, 27(11): 1354-1357. [张文璎,薛月珍,韩玲,等. 高危型人乳头瘤状病毒负荷量与宫颈病变严重程度的关系[J].上海交通大学学报:医学版,2007, 27(11): 1354-1357.]
[1] 程颢, 杨高怡, 张超. 超声引导下甲状腺结节细针穿刺术的个人学习曲线初步研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(02): 153-158.
[2] 刘俊平, 毛伟敏, 徐栋, 徐海苗, 程晔, 楼寒梅, 陈丽羽, 吕敏, 程芳. 超声引导细针穿刺细胞病理学对卵巢肿瘤及腹膜后转移性淋巴结的临床诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2017, 14(10): 794-798.
[3] 赵继伟, 曾志芬, 曾红华, 张萌, 李玲玲, 何志捷, 植耀炜. 成人脓毒症患者骨髓细胞学特征的研究[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(01): 14-21.
[4] 李霞, 何跃东. 宫颈DNA倍体分析联合宫颈细胞学检查在宫颈癌筛查中的应用价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2018, 14(05): 602-607.
[5] 董婕, 陈瑛瑛, 王凯怡. 高危型人乳头瘤病毒癌基因-E6/E7 mRNA检测的临床价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2018, 14(05): 527-534.
[6] 丁平安, 郭洪海, 张志栋, 杨沛刚, 田园, 刘洋, 林叶成, 檀碧波, 王冬, 李勇, 赵群. 腹腔镜探查联合腹腔脱落细胞学检测在Ⅳb期胃癌诊治中的临床应用[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 86-90.
[7] 柴吉鑫, 张雪, 何时知, 齐艳涛, 王婧婧, 敖亚洲, 陈泳. 不同穿刺方法对甲状腺结节细胞学检查的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 315-318.
[8] 张璐, 刘修恒, 王敏, 汪志顺, 王磊, 陈晖, 郭佳, 翁小东. LSD1抑制剂对前列腺癌细胞体外生物学行为的调控[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(02): 129-135.
[9] 陈心怡, 张扬, 金宁, 冯旰珠, 沈红. 支气管镜检查联合快速现场细胞学诊断的应用[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(04): 498-501.
[10] 赵磊, 刘建, 黄涛, 张伟, 刘春庆, 邵建平. NOSES与非NOSES腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后腹盆腔冲洗液肿瘤细胞检测及细菌培养结果的对比分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2020, 09(01): 36-40.
[11] 彭健, 丁成明, 贾泽民, 陈杰, 赵丹, 张洋, 杨智, 邱俊, 骆冬仁, 何胖祥, 钟树武. NOSES结直肠癌根治术后腹腔冲洗液肿瘤细胞学检测及细菌培养结果分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2018, 07(04): 342-346.
[12] 李晨帆, 吴立桦, 郑泽宇, 郑月萍, 谢韵, 刘婕, 吴碧芳, 苏瑞章, 万曼, 田钊旭, 胡益群. 超声内镜引导下穿刺诊断胰腺癌的方法研究进展[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(02): 102-107.
[13] 李秘, 邱华娟, 纪燕琴, 周明辉. P16、Ki67表达及病毒载量对宫颈上皮内瘤变Ⅱ合并高危型人乳头瘤病毒感染患者病变转归的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 272-278.
[14] 陈学敬, 周立娟, 杜伟丽, 李琨, 车南颖. 细胞DNA定量分析技术在肺癌诊断中的应用价值[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 331-334.
[15] 谢风祥, 张丽冉, 王新国, 赵东曼, 彭德志, 毕春蕊, 姜玲波, 赵俊艳, 祁德波. 山东东明县23 088名已婚女性宫颈癌筛查结果分析[J]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2018, 06(03): 157-161.
阅读次数
全文


摘要