切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2010, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (01) : 29 -32. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2010.01.110

论著

腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉在经阴道子宫切除术中的应用
李海冰, 刘志强, 何瑶, 宦嫣, 孙跃, 胡鹏   
  1. 20040 上海,同济大学附属第一妇婴保健医院麻醉科
    四川省都江堰市妇幼保健医院
  • 出版日期:2010-02-01

Application of Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia in Trans-Vaginal Hysterectomy

Hai-bing LI, Zhi-qing LIU, Yao HE, Yan HUAN, Yao SUN, Peng HU   

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200040, China
  • Published:2010-02-01
引用本文:

李海冰, 刘志强, 何瑶, 宦嫣, 孙跃, 胡鹏. 腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉在经阴道子宫切除术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2010, 06(01): 29-32.

Hai-bing LI, Zhi-qing LIU, Yao HE, Yan HUAN, Yao SUN, Peng HU. Application of Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia in Trans-Vaginal Hysterectomy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2010, 06(01): 29-32.

目的

探讨经阴道子宫切除术时采用腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉(combined spinal epidural anesthesia,CSEA)与持续硬膜外麻醉(continuous epidural anesthesia,CEA)对血流动力学影响,局麻药用量、阻滞起效时间、临床效果评价等。

方法

将2009年1月至2009年9月上海市第一妇婴保健院手术室择期行阴道子宫切除术患者80例,随机分为两组:CEA组(n=40)和CSEA组(n=40)(本研究遵循的程序符合同济大学附属第一妇婴保健医院人体试验委员会所制定的伦理学标准,得到该委员会批准,分组征得受试对象本人的知情同意,并与之签署临床研究知情同意书)。两组患者一般情况比较,差异无显著意义(P>0.05)。分别观察、比较CEA,CSEA两组患者麻醉穿刺成功后椎管内注射局部麻醉药5 min,10 min,15 min,30 min及术毕时的血压、平均动脉压(mean arterial pressure,MAP)、心率、静脉血氧饱和度、局麻药用量、麻醉阻滞平面达T8的时间,术中肌组织松弛满意度、术后头痛发生率等。

结果

两组患者血流动力学比较,CSEA组平均动脉压显著低于CEA组(P<0.05),CSEA组阻滞平面达T8明显快于CEA组(P<0.01),CSEA组局部麻醉药用量明显少于CEA组(P<0.05),CSEA组肌组织松弛满意度优于CEA组(P<0.05)。

结论

就经阴道子宫切除术而言,腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉是经阴道子宫切除术的一种理想的麻醉方法。

Objective

To compare the anesthetic effects and hemodynamic changes between combined spinal-epidural anesthesia(CESA) and continuous epidural anesthesia (CEA) in trans-vaginal hysterectomy.

Methods

From January to September 2009, 80 patients who were underwent trans-vagina hysterectomy were randomly divided into two groups, CSEA group (n=40) and CEA group (n=40). Informed consent was obtained from all participates. There had no significant difference of the general situation between two groups(P>0.05). In CEA group, epidural anesthesia was established using (20-30) mL 2% lidocaine with epinephrine, whereas spinal anesthesia was performed using (2.0-3.0) mL hyperbaric 0.75% bupivacaine in CSEA group. The blood pressure, heart rate, SpO2 were monitored continuously during surgery. The changes of hemodynamic, anesthetic dosage, times of sensory block to T8, degrees of motor block and muscle relaxation, and postoperative headache were measured and analyzed.

Results

The mean arterial pressure(MAP) of CSEA group was significant lower than that of CEA group(P<0.05), times of sensory block to T8 was quicker in CSEA group than that of CEA group (P<0.01), anesthetic dosage of CSEA group was lower than that of CEA group (P<0.05), and muscle relaxation and motor block were much better in CSEA group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with continuous epidural anesthesia, combined spinal-epidural anesthesia is a perfect anesthetic option for trans-vaginal hysterectomy with smaller anesthetic dosages, quicker onset time and reliable muscle relaxation.

1 Zhang SH, Yin HQ, Cao H, et al. Clinical study epidural analgesia by two kinds of drugs in delivery[J/CD]. Chin J Obstet Gynecol Pediatr (Electron Ed), 2006, 2(4): 223-224. [张社会,殷红勤,曹红,等.两种药物硬膜外分娩镇痛效果的临床研究[J/CD].中华妇幼临床医学杂志:电子版,2006, 2(4): 223-224.]
2 Zhu L, Lang JH,Liu ZF. Clinical assessment in hysterectomy through three kinds of way[J]. Chin J Pract Gynecol Obstet, 2003, 10(4): 624. [朱兰,郎景和,刘珠风.三种途径子宫切除术的临床评估[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2003, 10(4): 624.]
3 Li HB, Sun XL, Ma XX, et al. Observation of general anaesthesia combined with epidural blocking in laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy[J]. China Anesth Analg, 2004, 6(3):182-183.[李海冰,孙晓林,马馨霞,等.全麻复合硬膜外麻醉用于腹腔镜经阴道式全子宫切除术[J].中国麻醉与镇痛,2004, 6(3):182-183.]
4 Zhang HG, Gong BH, Lu HX, et al. The safety and efficacy of spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric ropivacaine solutions in the elderly[J]. J Clin Anesthesiol, 2008, 24(9): 763-764. [张红光,宫本航,鹿洪秀,等.重比重罗哌卡因用于老年蛛网膜下腔麻醉[J].临床麻醉学杂,2008, 24(9): 763-764.]
5 Ma XX, Li HB. Application of spinal-epidural anesthesin in patients for cesarean section[J]. Shanghai Med J, 2004, 27(3): 200-201. [马馨霞,李海冰.脊麻-硬膜外联合麻醉在剖宫产术中的应用[J].上海医学,2004, 27(3): 200-201.]
6 Sell A, Olkkola KT, Jalonen J, et al. Minimum effective local anaesthetic dose of isobaric levobupivacaine and ropivacaine administered via a spinal catheter for hip replacement surgery[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2005, 94(12): 239-242.
7 Jin YM, Wang XM, Liu LI, et al. Application of spinal-epidural anesthesin for lower limbs operation in elderly[J]. J Clin Anesthesiol, 2007, 23(5): 504-505. [井郁陌,王香梅,刘莉,等.腰-硬联合麻醉用于高龄高危患者下肢手术的临床观察[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2007, 23(5): 504-505.]
[1] 杨蒙, 肖庆. 围绝经期焦虑患者骨科手术腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉前的心理干预[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2011, 07(06): 573-575.
[2] 施如霞, 刘素芬, 谢晔玲. 盆底悬吊术与传统经阴道子宫切除术在治疗盆底功能障碍性疾病中的临床疗效比较研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2011, 07(01): 34-38.
阅读次数
全文


摘要