切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2010, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (01) : 18 -21. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2010.01.106

论著

CD105在宫颈癌发展过程中表达的研究
张江宇, 邓文喻, 陈文静, 陈伟芳, 李嘉蔚   
  1. 510010 广州,广东省妇幼保健院病理科
    510010 广州,广东省妇幼保健院检验科
    510010 广州,广东省妇幼保健院妇科
  • 出版日期:2010-02-01

Expression of CD105 in Evolution of Cervical Cancer

Jiang-yu ZHANG, Wen-yu DENG, Wen-jing CHENG, Wei-fang CHEN, Jia-wei LI   

  1. Department of Pathology, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital and Health Institute, Guangzhou 510010, China
  • Published:2010-02-01
  • Supported by:
    * Project No. B2007022, supported by the Guangdong Province Medicine Research Foundation
引用本文:

张江宇, 邓文喻, 陈文静, 陈伟芳, 李嘉蔚. CD105在宫颈癌发展过程中表达的研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2010, 06(01): 18-21.

Jiang-yu ZHANG, Wen-yu DENG, Wen-jing CHENG, Wei-fang CHEN, Jia-wei LI. Expression of CD105 in Evolution of Cervical Cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2010, 06(01): 18-21.

目的

探讨CD105单克隆抗体(monoclonal antibody, mAb)标记的微血管密度(microvascular density, MVD)在宫颈癌(cervical cancer)发生发展过程中的表达及其与临床病理指标的相关性研究。

方法

选择2005年9月至2009年1月在广东省妇幼保健院手术切除的宫颈癌标本80例,将其按临床分期分为宫颈原位癌组(n=30,0期),宫颈早浸润癌组(n=15,ⅠA期),宫颈浸润癌组(n=35,ⅠB~ⅢB);按恶性肿瘤的病理分级,将其分为Ⅰ级组(n=5),Ⅱ级组(n=35),Ⅲ级组(n=10);按浸润癌中淋巴结转移情况分为淋巴结呈阳性组(n=8),淋巴结呈阴性组(n=42)。采用免疫组织化学SP法检测宫颈原位癌组、宫颈早浸润癌组和宫颈浸润癌组患者肿瘤间质中新生血管内皮标志物CD105表达水平,同时观察用CD105单克隆抗体标记的微血管密度,在肿瘤发展不同阶段的表达及与临床病理指标相关性。

结果

用CD105单克隆抗体标记肿瘤间质的微血管密,在宫颈原位癌组、宫颈早浸润癌组和宫颈浸润癌组比较,差异有显著意义(P<0.05),在浸润癌中宫颈癌病理分级各组间微血管密度比较,差异无显著意义(P>0.05);淋巴结呈阴性和阳性组间比较,差异有显著意义(P<0.05);进一步行L-S-D检验显示,宫颈原位癌组与早浸润癌组比较,差异无显著意义(P=0.528)。微血管密度分别在患者年龄及肿瘤直径间无相关性(r=-0.200,P=0.863;r=0.353,P=0.12)。

结论

CD105单克隆抗体标记的微血管密度与宫颈癌的临床分期及预后相关,可为宫颈原位癌和宫颈早浸润癌治疗提供理论依据。

Objective

To explore the relationship between microvascular density(MVD) marked by CD105 monoclonal antibody (mAb) and stages of cervical cancer, clinical pathological factors.

Methods

From September 2005 to January 2009, cervical cancer specimens were stained by immunohistochemistry of CD105 monoclonal antibody marked by microvascular density in 30 cases of carcinoma in situ(stage 0), 15 cases of early invasive cervical cancer (stage ⅠA) and 35 cases of invasive cervical cancer (stage ⅠB-ⅡB). Furthermore, 50 cases with invasive cervical cancer were divided into group grade Ⅰ(n=5), group grade Ⅱ(n=35) and group grade Ⅲ (n=10) according to pathological grade of malignant tumor, and node-positive group (n=8) and node-negative group (n=42) according to lymph node metastasis. The expression of the vascular endothelial cell marked by CD105 monoclonal antibody in tumor interstitium of carcinoma in situ, early invasive cervical cancer, and invasive cervical cancer were detected by immunohistochemical SP method. Meanwhile, the correlation between the expression of microvascular density marked by CD105 monoclonal antibody in different stages of tumor development and clinicopathological factors was observed.

Results

The microvascular density marked by CD105 monoclonal antibody among carcinoma in situ(n=30, stage 0), early invasive cervical cancer (n=15, stage ⅠA) and invasive cervical cancer (n=30, stage ⅠB-ⅡB) were significant difference(P<0.05). But with the further test of L-S-D, microvascular density had no significant difference between carcinoma in situ and early invasive cervical cancer (P=0.528). Microvessel density in lymph node positive group was higher than that of lymph node negative group(P=0.035), and among group grade Ⅰ, group grade Ⅱ and group grade Ⅲ had no significant difference (P=0.059).

Conclusion

Microvascular density marked by CD105 is relative to clinical stages and prognosis of cervical cancer. It will give the therapy theory evidence of carcinoma in situ and early invasive cervical cancer.

图1 CD105 mAb标记的新生血管内皮在宫颈癌中的表达(IHC×200) (A:CD105在宫颈原位癌的表达,血管数量较少;B:CD105在宫颈早浸润癌的表达,周边见增生血管;C:CD105在宫颈浸润癌的表达,周边见淋巴细胞浸润及较多的新生血管;D:CD105在宫颈浸润癌的表达,周边见多量新生血管)
图2 宫颈癌临床各期CD105单克隆抗体标记MVD
图3 CD105单克隆抗体标记微血管密度与患者年龄的关系
图4 CD105单克隆抗体标记的微血管密度与肿瘤直径的关系
1 Herzog TJ, Wright JD. The impact of cervical cancer on quality of life-the components and means for management[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2007, 107(3): 572-577.
2 Vistad I, Fossa SD, Dahl AA. A critical review of patient-rated quality of life studies of long-term survivors of cervical cancer[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2006, 102(3): 563-572.
3 Zhang JY, Wang Q, Zhang YJ. Research progress in CD105 and its relation with tumors[J]. Chin J Cancer Prevent Treat, 2007, 14(18): 1433-1436.[张江宇,王颀,张雅洁.CD105与肿瘤关系的研究进展[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2007, 14(18): 1433-1436.]
4 Tavassoli FA, Devilee P. WHO classification of to tumours Pathology & genetics, tumours of the breast and female genital organs[J]. Lyon: IARC Press, 2003: 328.
5 Weidner N, Folkman J, Pozza F, et al. Tumor angiogenesis: A new significant and independent prognostic indicator in early-stage breast carcinoma[J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 1992, 84(24): 1875-1887.
6 Zhang JY, Wang Q, Zhu CX, et al. Expression of CD105, FⅧ,CD31 and CD34 in evolution of breast carcinoma[J/CD]. Chin J Breast Dis (Electron Ed), 2007, 1(2): 25-27. [张江宇,王颀,朱彩霞,等.血管内皮标记物在乳腺癌演变中的表达及意义[J/CD].中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2007, 1(2): 25-27.]
7 Zhang JY, Wang Q, Zhu CX, et al. Study of CD105 expression in evolution and development of breast carcinoma[J]. Chin J Cancer Prevent Treat, 2007, 14(19): 1472-1474. [张江宇,王颀,朱彩霞,等.CD105在乳腺癌发生发展过程中表达的研究[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2007, 14(19): 1472-1474.]
8 Thomas CW, Thomas JC, Stewart LM, et al. 2001 consensus guidelines for the management to women with cervical cytological abnormalities[J]. JAMA, 2002, 287: 2119-2120.
9 Cao ZY, ed. Chinese obstetrics and gynecology[M]. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House, 2003, 1744-1801. [曹泽毅,主编.中华妇产科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2003, 1744-1801.]
10 Tan XJ, Wu M, Geng AZ, et al. Diagnosis and management of 31 cases of micro-invasive carcinoma of cervix[J]. Chin J Pract Gynecol Obstet, 2009, 25(1): 43-45.[谭先杰,吴鸣,耿爱芝,等.子宫颈微小浸润癌31例诊治分析[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2009, 25(1): 43-45.]
[1] 林昌盛, 战军, 肖雪. 上皮性卵巢癌患者诊疗中基因检测及分子靶向药物治疗[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 505-510.
[2] 别瑶, 曹志斌, 辛静, 王健楠, 惠宗光. 应用基质血管成分细胞治疗糖尿病足溃疡的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 453-456.
[3] 全勇, 冉新泽, 胡梦佳, 陈芳, 陈乃成, 廖伟年, 陈默, 申明强, 陈石磊, 王崧, 王军平. 低氧习服在小鼠造血干细胞急性放射损伤修复中的作用观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(04): 293-298.
[4] 汤宏涛, 何坤. 中晚期肝细胞癌介入治疗的进展及前景[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 305-308.
[5] 张原, 李小龙, 王亚鹏. 胰腺癌中ANGPTL2蛋白与免疫抑制细胞浸润的关系及临床意义[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 145-148.
[6] 朱佳琳, 方向, 贵诗雨, 黄丹, 周小雨, 郭文恺. 大鼠切口疝腹膜前间隙补片修补术后血清中VEGF 和Ang-1 的表达情况[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 703-707.
[7] 刘福军, Asma Aladoofi, 付振华, 张琦玲, 杨蕾, 涂春华, 张智, 蔡丽萍. 机器人手术与传统开腹术治疗早期宫颈癌的效果分析[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(05): 293-298.
[8] 王楠, 孟元光, 马冰, 张鹏, 杨雯, 顾成磊, 闫志风, 翟青枝, 李明霞, 李震, 王铭洋, 李立安. 机器人手术在中央型复发宫颈癌的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(05): 278-282.
[9] 雷翠蓉, 马丽芳, 邹冬玲. 微创肿大淋巴结切除手术技巧[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(05): 299-303.
[10] 蒋嫒, 王红梅, 孔祥. miR-15a-5p靶向HPSE2促进宫颈癌细胞增殖、迁移和侵袭[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(01): 11-18.
[11] 刘佳, 付丽, 杨月美. miR-138-5p调节HIF-1α/Notch1轴对滋养层细胞侵袭和血管生成的影响[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 277-287.
[12] 李超迪, 刘娟芳, 闫肃, 秦胜东, 张镐哲, 常琼方, 韩新巍, 张建好. 血管性介入治疗在宫颈癌大出血患者中的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 217-220.
[13] 谢世锋, 林熙, 吴桂涛, 刘珍银. 散发性静脉畸形发病机制分子研究进展[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 250-255.
[14] 吕丽爱, 赖林强, 张登科. 载药微球子宫动脉化疗栓塞治疗局部晚期宫颈癌病理完全缓解患者一例[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 190-192.
[15] 殷雨来, 李雪, 何晓阳, 张晓宇. 体质量指数和4种女性特征性癌症的因果关系:一项两样本孟德尔随机化研究[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 253-260.
阅读次数
全文


摘要