切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2009, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (06) : 566 -571. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2009.06.101

论著

1~3岁幼儿面孔表情认知发展特征研究
李咏梅, 静进, 邹小兵, 金宇, 五十岚一枝, 俞红   
  1. 510630 广州,中山大学附属第三医院儿童发育行为中心
    Shirayuri College, Tokyo, Japan
    广东省佛山市妇幼保健院
  • 出版日期:2009-12-01

Study on the Characteristics of Facial Expression Cognition of Children Aged 1~3

Yong-mei LI, Jin JING, Xiao-bing ZOU, Yu JIN, Igarashi Kazue, Hong YU   

  1. Child Developmental-Behavioral Center, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, China
  • Published:2009-12-01
  • Supported by:
    * Project No. 30872130, supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China
引用本文:

李咏梅, 静进, 邹小兵, 金宇, 五十岚一枝, 俞红. 1~3岁幼儿面孔表情认知发展特征研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2009, 05(06): 566-571.

Yong-mei LI, Jin JING, Xiao-bing ZOU, Yu JIN, Igarashi Kazue, Hong YU. Study on the Characteristics of Facial Expression Cognition of Children Aged 1~3[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2009, 05(06): 566-571.

目的

探讨1~3岁幼儿对5种面孔表情的认知反应发展特征。

方法

选择2006年11月至2008年11月,在中山大学附属第三医院和佛山市妇幼保健院常规保健的1~3岁幼儿180例作为观察对象,让幼儿观看电脑屏幕上呈现的5种标准面孔表情图,记录、编码和分析幼儿对面孔表情图的视觉注意、自身情绪和行为反应。

结果

1~2岁组幼儿对5种不同表情图的初次注视时间比较,差异无显著意义(P>0.05),2~3岁组幼儿对5种不同表情图的初次注视时间比较,差异无显著意义(P<0.01)。幼儿对5种表情图的回看次数和组别效应均不显著。1~1.5岁组幼儿对5种表情的初次注视时间和总注视时间短于其他两组(P<0.01)。各组幼儿对5种不同表情图的积极和消极情绪得分比较,差异有显著意义(P<0.05)。各组幼儿回看母亲、手指指向行为发生率比较,差异无显著意义(P>0.05),模仿表情行为发生率和语言表达能力比较,差异有显著意义(P<0.001)。

结论

1岁以后,幼儿基本能感知和识别不同情绪意义的面孔表情,并开始逐渐对表情进行分类和概念化,但很粗浅。

Objective

To study the developmental characteristics of five facial expressions cognition of children aged 1~3 years old.

Methods

From November 2006 to November 2008, a total of 180 children aged 1~3 years old were recruited from resident children routine health care department in the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University and Foshan Female and Child Health Hospital. They were requested to watch five kinds of normative facial emotional expression pictures which presented on computer screen. The visual attention, self emotional and behavioral responses of each child toward the facial expressions were recorded by a web camera and then were coded and analyzed from the videotaped observations.

Results

The difference of first-looking time to different expressions was not significant in 1~2 years old children while it was significant in 2~3 years old children. Neither expression nor group effects was obtained for the times of back-look. The first-looking time and the total looking time to expressions in 1~1.5 years old group were shorter than those of other groups( P<0.01). The score of both positive and negative responses to different expressions were significantly different in all groups. There was significant difference for the verbal ability(P<0.001) and behavior of expression imitating (P<0.01) but no obvious difference for behavior of looking back at mother and finger-pointing (P>0.05) among groups.

Conclusion

Children can apperceive and recognize facial expressions with different emotional significance over 1-year-old, and begin to categorize and conceptualize the expressions crudely.

1 Meng ZL, Yan J, Meng XD. A preliminary study on facial expressions of infants. Acta Psychol Sinica, 1985, 1(1): 55–65.[孟昭兰,阎军,孟宪东. 确定婴儿面部表情模式的初步尝试. 心理学报,1985,1(1):55–65.]
2 Zou XB, Jing J. Developmental and behavioral pediatrics. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House, 2005, 11, 21.[邹小兵,静进. 发育行为儿科学. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2005, 11, 21.]
3 Adolphs R. Recognizing emotion from facial expressions: Psychological and neurological mechanisms. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev, 2002, 1(1):21–26.
4 Batty M, Taylor MJ. The development of emotional face processing during childhood. Dev Sci, 2006, 9(2): 207–220.
5 Klinnert M. The regulation of infant behavior by maternal facial expression. Infant Behav Dev, 1984, 7(4): 447–465.
6 Dawson G, Toth K, Abbott R, et al. Early social attention impairments in autism: Social orienting, joint attention, and attention to distress. Dev Psychol, 2004, 40(2): 271–283.
7 Southam–Gerow MA, Kendall PC. Emotion regulation and understanding: Implications for child psychopathology and therapy Clin Psychol Rev, 2002, 22(2): 189–222.
8 Pons F, Lawson J, Harris PL, et al. Individual differences in children's emotion understanding effects of age and language. Scandinavian J Psychol, 2003, 44(4): 347–353.
9 Adolphs R, Damasio H, Tranel D, et al. Cortical systems for the recognition of emotion in facial expressions. J Neurosci, 1996, 16(23): 7678–7687.
10 MacDonald PM, Kirkpatrick SW, Sullivan LA. Schematic drawings of facial expressions for emotion recognition and interpretation by preschool–aged children. Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr, 1996,122(4): 373–388.
[1] 章宇潇, 杨凡, 毛萌. 《生长减缓婴幼儿的追赶性生长:指导普通临床医师的专家共识(2023版)》解读[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(04): 361-366.
[2] 张丽娜, 邢建坤, 张梁, 李云生, 王兢, 孙丽莹, 朱志军. 婴幼儿活体肝移植受者术中麻醉护理单中心经验[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 235-238.
[3] 孔令梅, 徐晓媛, 马丽颖. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病认知衰弱危险因素及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 407-410.
[4] 张骞, 唐伟, 刘丽丽. 右美托咪定复合羟考酮对老年经皮椎间孔镜腰椎间盘切除术患者术后认知功能、镇痛效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 209-214.
[5] 吉莉, 苏云楠, 王斌, 沈滔, 刘团结, 毛蕾, 徐玉萍, 张婷, 王博. 急性缺血性脑卒中患者脑白质微结构改变对长期认知功能损伤的预测价值研究[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 193-200.
[6] 高倩, 李晓芳, 杨亚昭, 张静, 崔蕾, 杨立青, 夏艳敏. 甲状腺激素及Apelin在CSVD致认知障碍的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 201-206.
[7] 朱镭, 朱庆义. 金氏菌属:引起婴幼儿侵袭性传染病的新发病原体[J/OL]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 229-237.
[8] 孙琴, 梁钿苑, 张源, 任亦星. 代谢异常型肥胖患者对肥胖和减重手术的认知调查研究[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 295-299.
[9] 高昊雯, 王桂琦, 庞利云, 张新昕, 谷敬锋. 减重手术治疗肥胖症相关认知障碍的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 206-212.
[10] 欧春影, 李晓宾, 郭靖, 朱亮, 许可, 王梦, 安晓雷. 丁苯酞对血管性认知障碍大鼠炎症因子的影响及对认知障碍的改善作用[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 483-487.
[11] 王丽娜, 吕书霞, 李亚男. 脑卒中偏瘫患者健康焦虑元认知与疾病接受度、恐惧疾病进展的相关性[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 434-440.
[12] 克地尔牙·马合木提, 胡波, 杨琼, 闫素, 胡岚卿, 高沛沛, 姚恩生. 依达拉奉右莰醇对急性脑梗死后认知功能障碍的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 459-466.
[13] 董立羚, 王添艺, 毛晨晖, 姜宇涵, 尚丽, 包嘉璐, 仇宇悦, 褚珊珊, 金蔚, 倪俊, 高晶. 非出血型脑淀粉样血管病的认知特征——来自北京协和医院痴呆队列的数据[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 295-300.
[14] 董坤, 陈海恋, 王景. 血清CircRNA_0003694与老年急性缺血性卒中患者卒中后认知损害的关系[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 230-235.
[15] 欧春影, 李晓宾, 郭靖, 许可, 王梦, 安晓雷. hs-CRP、Lp-PLA2和S100β与缺血性脑小血管病患者认知障碍的相关性[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 265-269.
阅读次数
全文


摘要