切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2009, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (04) : 389 -392. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2009.04.114

论著

脑电双频指数用于门诊无痛人工流产术的临床研究
李海冰, 周守静, 刘志强, 余怡冰, 陈秀斌   
  1. 200032 上海,复旦大学附属华山医院麻醉科(现工作单位:上海市第一妇婴保健院麻醉科)
    200032 上海,复旦大学附属华山医院麻醉科
    上海市第一妇婴保健院麻醉科
  • 出版日期:2009-08-01

Clinical Study on Bispectral Index Monitoring Used in Out-Patients Undewent Artifical Abortion

Hai-bing LI, Shou-jing ZHOU, Zhi-qiang LIU, Yi-bing YU, Xiu-bin CHEN   

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
  • Published:2009-08-01
引用本文:

李海冰, 周守静, 刘志强, 余怡冰, 陈秀斌. 脑电双频指数用于门诊无痛人工流产术的临床研究[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2009, 05(04): 389-392.

Hai-bing LI, Shou-jing ZHOU, Zhi-qiang LIU, Yi-bing YU, Xiu-bin CHEN. Clinical Study on Bispectral Index Monitoring Used in Out-Patients Undewent Artifical Abortion[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2009, 05(04): 389-392.

目的

观察脑电双频指数(bispectral index,BIS)监测对门诊无痛人工流产术患者麻醉过程及恢复的意义。

方法

将2008年6月至2008年10月上海市第一妇婴保健院门诊择期在丙泊酚–舒芬太尼静脉麻醉下行无痛人工流产术的门诊患者180例,随机分为BIS监测组(Ⅰ组,n=90)与常规监测组(Ⅱ组,n=90)(本研究遵循的程序符合上海市第一妇婴保健院人体试验委员会所制定的伦理学标准,得到该委员会批准,分组征得受试对象的知情同意,并与之签署临床研究知情同意书)。静脉给予枸橼酸舒芬太尼5 μg、丙泊酚1.0 mg/kg负荷量后,丙泊酚维持量Ⅰ组根据脑电双频指数(40~55)调节,Ⅱ组仅根据患者临床体征调节。分别测定T0(注药时),T1(睫毛反射消失时),T2(扩张宫颈时),T3(刮宫时),T4(退扩阴器完毕时)和T5(麻醉苏醒时)5个时点两组患者的平均气道压(mean arterial pressure,MAP)、心率(heart rate,HR)、动脉血氧饱和度(pulse oxygen saturation,SpO2)和脑电双频指数。记录丙泊酚用量、术中反应、手术时间及留院观察时间等。

结果

两组一般资料及麻醉前平均气道压、心率、动脉血氧饱和度、脑电双频指数比较,差异无显著意义(P>0.05)。人工流产术中两组丙泊酚用量及术后留院观察时间比较,Ⅰ组明显少于或短于Ⅱ组,且差异有显著意义(P<0.01)。在T1和T2时点,两组患者平均气道压均下降,但Ⅰ组降幅大于Ⅱ组,且差异有显著意义(P<0.01)。术后不良反应发生率比较,Ⅰ组明显少于Ⅱ组,且差异有显著意义(P<0.01)。

结论

脑电双频指数监测用于门诊人工流产术的麻醉,对预防麻醉药用量不足或逾量,减轻血流动力学改变,避免术中肢动与知晓,意义重大,有利于提高麻醉安全性,减少并发症。

Objective

To evaluate the process and significance of bispectral index(BIS) monitoring in out-patients who underwent artificial abortion under propofol-sufentanil anesthesia.

Methods

From June to October 2008, 180 patients who were underwent selective artificial abortion under propofol-sufentanil anesthesia were randomly divided into regular monitoring+ BIS monitoring group (group Ⅰ, n=90) and regular clinical monitoring group (group Ⅱ, n=90). Informed consent was obtained from all participates. In group Ⅰ, the maintenance dose of propofol infusion were adjusted to achieve a target bispectral index of 40~55. In group Ⅱ, propofol dose adjustments were made based only on standard clinical signs. The mean airway pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2) and bispectral index were detected at T0 (at giving drug), T1(loss of eyelash reflex), T2(cervical dilatation), T3(dilatation and curettage), T4(withdrawl vaginal speculum), T5(at analepsia) of two groups. The dosage of propofol, intraoperative response, duration of operation and recovery parameters were recorded.

Results

There were no significant differences between two groups of general clinical information, mean airway pressure before anaesthesia, heart rate, pulse oxygen saturation, and bispectral index monitoring (P>0.05). The dosage of propofol and duration of postoperative stay in hospital were significantly less and shorter in group Ⅰ than those of group Ⅱ(P<0.01), so did the decrease of mean airway pressure at T1 and T2 (P<0.01). And there also had significant difference of incidence of adverse reactions between two groups(P<0.01).

Conclusion

Titrating propofol with bispectral index monitoring during intravenous anesthesia for artifical abortion in chinic could prevent propofol under or over dose, decrease the change of haemodynamics, avoid limb movement, keep hemodynamics stable and make recovery quicker.

1 Pei LJ, Wang B, Huang YG. Bispectral index improves anesthetic management and facilitates recovery from general anesthesia of Meta–analysis study. Chin J Anesthesiol, 2006,20(10): 880–882.[裴丽坚,王波,黄宇光. 脑双频指数监测提高麻醉管理及全麻苏醒质量Meta分析研究. 中华麻醉学杂志,2006,20(10):880–882.]
2 Rudner R, Jalowiecki P, Kawecki P, et al. Conscious analgesia/sedation with remifentanil and propofol versus total intravenous anesthesia with fentanyl, midazolam, and propofol for outpatient colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc, 2003, 57(3): 657–663.
3 Glass P, Bloom M, Kearse L, et al. Bispectral analysis measures sedation and memory effects of propofol, midazolam, isoflurane, and alfentanil in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology, 1997, 86(11): 836–847.
4 Gajraj RJ, Doi M, Mantzaridis H, et al. Analysis of the EEG bispectrum, auditory evoked potentials and the EEG power spectrum during repeated transitions from consciousness to unconsciousness. Br J Anaesth, 1998, 80(9): 46–52.
5 Barr G, Anderson RE, Wall A, et al. Effects on the bispectral index during medium–high dose fentanyl induction with or without propofol supplement. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2000, 44(5): 807–811.
6 Iannuzzi M, Iannuzzi E, Rossi F, et al. Relationship between bispeet ral index,electroencephalographic state entropy and effect–site EC50 for propofol at different clinical endpoints.Br J Anaesth,2005,94(7):613–616.
7 Anothny R, Absalom N, Sutcliffe C, et al. Closed–loop control of anesthesia using bispectral index.Anesthesiology,2002,96(3):67–73.
8 Anez C, Papaceit J, Sala JM, et al. The effect of encephalogram bispectral index monitoring total intravenous anesthesia with propofol in out patient surgery.during Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim, 2001, 48(7): 264–269.
9 Nishiyama T, Matsukawa T, Hanaoka K. Is the ARX index a more sensitive indicator of anesthetic depth than the bispectral index during sevoflurane/nitrous oxide anesthesia? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2004, 48(11): 1028–1032.
10 Fechner J,Hering W,Ihmsen H,et al.Modelling the pharmacodynamic interaction between remifentanil and propofol by EEG controlled dosing. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2003, 20(12): 373–379.
[1] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[2] 朱明, 童国煜, 赵海腾, 钟量, 邹翔宇, 吴少峰, 张轶男. 腹腔镜在减少儿童隐匿性腹股沟斜疝与鞘膜积液二次手术的意义[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 457-460.
[3] 田静, 方秀春. 超声引导下横筋膜平面阻滞在儿童腹股沟疝手术的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 740-744.
[4] 刘骏, 朱霁, 殷骏. 右美托咪定对腹股沟疝手术麻醉效果及安全性的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 570-573.
[5] 孙伟, 林丽, 师高洋. 超声引导下连续髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞在老年腹股沟疝手术中应用效果比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 593-597.
[6] 党情超, 魏星, 詹必伟, 何振. 超声引导下髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞联合局部麻醉在老年腹股沟疝修补术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 598-602.
[7] 周顺, 赵素侠, 时静静, 吴双双, 吴圆圆, 李金山. 丙泊酚-舒芬太尼复合七氟烷吸入对小儿腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术的麻醉效果及安全性[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 603-607.
[8] 彭涛, 吴志福, 张俊生. 骶管阻滞复合全身麻醉在腹股沟斜疝患儿腹腔镜手术中的效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 449-453.
[9] 林华婵, 林赛娟, 陈民学. 腹横筋膜阻滞对老年斜疝患者麻醉效果及肠黏膜屏障功能的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 454-457.
[10] 段文忠, 白延霞, 徐文亭, 祁虹霞, 吕志坚. 七氟烷和丙泊酚在肝切除术中麻醉效果比较Meta分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 640-645.
[11] 廖家权, 吴波, 唐昌敏. 体外冲击波联合肌电生物反馈对脑卒中后足下垂的影响[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 286-292.
[12] 王军, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 索利斌, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 腹膜后肿瘤切除术中大量输血患者的麻醉管理特点与分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 844-849.
[13] 索利斌, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 王军, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 原发性腹膜后副神经节瘤切除术麻醉管理的特点和分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 771-776.
[14] 李静, 张玲玲, 邢伟. 兴趣诱导理念用于小儿手术麻醉诱导前的价值及其对家属满意度的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 812-817.
[15] 边震, 宋绍永, 杨国旺, 范凤尾, 黄庆红, 李健, 金鑫. 江苏省基层医院围麻醉期危机状况的调查分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 499-506.
阅读次数
全文


摘要