切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2009, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (04) : 389 -392. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2009.04.114

论著

脑电双频指数用于门诊无痛人工流产术的临床研究
李海冰, 周守静, 刘志强, 余怡冰, 陈秀斌   
  1. 200032 上海,复旦大学附属华山医院麻醉科(现工作单位:上海市第一妇婴保健院麻醉科)
    200032 上海,复旦大学附属华山医院麻醉科
    上海市第一妇婴保健院麻醉科
  • 出版日期:2009-08-01

Clinical Study on Bispectral Index Monitoring Used in Out-Patients Undewent Artifical Abortion

Hai-bing LI, Shou-jing ZHOU, Zhi-qiang LIU, Yi-bing YU, Xiu-bin CHEN   

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
  • Published:2009-08-01
引用本文:

李海冰, 周守静, 刘志强, 余怡冰, 陈秀斌. 脑电双频指数用于门诊无痛人工流产术的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2009, 05(04): 389-392.

Hai-bing LI, Shou-jing ZHOU, Zhi-qiang LIU, Yi-bing YU, Xiu-bin CHEN. Clinical Study on Bispectral Index Monitoring Used in Out-Patients Undewent Artifical Abortion[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2009, 05(04): 389-392.

目的

观察脑电双频指数(bispectral index,BIS)监测对门诊无痛人工流产术患者麻醉过程及恢复的意义。

方法

将2008年6月至2008年10月上海市第一妇婴保健院门诊择期在丙泊酚–舒芬太尼静脉麻醉下行无痛人工流产术的门诊患者180例,随机分为BIS监测组(Ⅰ组,n=90)与常规监测组(Ⅱ组,n=90)(本研究遵循的程序符合上海市第一妇婴保健院人体试验委员会所制定的伦理学标准,得到该委员会批准,分组征得受试对象的知情同意,并与之签署临床研究知情同意书)。静脉给予枸橼酸舒芬太尼5 μg、丙泊酚1.0 mg/kg负荷量后,丙泊酚维持量Ⅰ组根据脑电双频指数(40~55)调节,Ⅱ组仅根据患者临床体征调节。分别测定T0(注药时),T1(睫毛反射消失时),T2(扩张宫颈时),T3(刮宫时),T4(退扩阴器完毕时)和T5(麻醉苏醒时)5个时点两组患者的平均气道压(mean arterial pressure,MAP)、心率(heart rate,HR)、动脉血氧饱和度(pulse oxygen saturation,SpO2)和脑电双频指数。记录丙泊酚用量、术中反应、手术时间及留院观察时间等。

结果

两组一般资料及麻醉前平均气道压、心率、动脉血氧饱和度、脑电双频指数比较,差异无显著意义(P>0.05)。人工流产术中两组丙泊酚用量及术后留院观察时间比较,Ⅰ组明显少于或短于Ⅱ组,且差异有显著意义(P<0.01)。在T1和T2时点,两组患者平均气道压均下降,但Ⅰ组降幅大于Ⅱ组,且差异有显著意义(P<0.01)。术后不良反应发生率比较,Ⅰ组明显少于Ⅱ组,且差异有显著意义(P<0.01)。

结论

脑电双频指数监测用于门诊人工流产术的麻醉,对预防麻醉药用量不足或逾量,减轻血流动力学改变,避免术中肢动与知晓,意义重大,有利于提高麻醉安全性,减少并发症。

Objective

To evaluate the process and significance of bispectral index(BIS) monitoring in out-patients who underwent artificial abortion under propofol-sufentanil anesthesia.

Methods

From June to October 2008, 180 patients who were underwent selective artificial abortion under propofol-sufentanil anesthesia were randomly divided into regular monitoring+ BIS monitoring group (group Ⅰ, n=90) and regular clinical monitoring group (group Ⅱ, n=90). Informed consent was obtained from all participates. In group Ⅰ, the maintenance dose of propofol infusion were adjusted to achieve a target bispectral index of 40~55. In group Ⅱ, propofol dose adjustments were made based only on standard clinical signs. The mean airway pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2) and bispectral index were detected at T0 (at giving drug), T1(loss of eyelash reflex), T2(cervical dilatation), T3(dilatation and curettage), T4(withdrawl vaginal speculum), T5(at analepsia) of two groups. The dosage of propofol, intraoperative response, duration of operation and recovery parameters were recorded.

Results

There were no significant differences between two groups of general clinical information, mean airway pressure before anaesthesia, heart rate, pulse oxygen saturation, and bispectral index monitoring (P>0.05). The dosage of propofol and duration of postoperative stay in hospital were significantly less and shorter in group Ⅰ than those of group Ⅱ(P<0.01), so did the decrease of mean airway pressure at T1 and T2 (P<0.01). And there also had significant difference of incidence of adverse reactions between two groups(P<0.01).

Conclusion

Titrating propofol with bispectral index monitoring during intravenous anesthesia for artifical abortion in chinic could prevent propofol under or over dose, decrease the change of haemodynamics, avoid limb movement, keep hemodynamics stable and make recovery quicker.

1 Pei LJ, Wang B, Huang YG. Bispectral index improves anesthetic management and facilitates recovery from general anesthesia of Meta–analysis study. Chin J Anesthesiol, 2006,20(10): 880–882.[裴丽坚,王波,黄宇光. 脑双频指数监测提高麻醉管理及全麻苏醒质量Meta分析研究. 中华麻醉学杂志,2006,20(10):880–882.]
2 Rudner R, Jalowiecki P, Kawecki P, et al. Conscious analgesia/sedation with remifentanil and propofol versus total intravenous anesthesia with fentanyl, midazolam, and propofol for outpatient colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc, 2003, 57(3): 657–663.
3 Glass P, Bloom M, Kearse L, et al. Bispectral analysis measures sedation and memory effects of propofol, midazolam, isoflurane, and alfentanil in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology, 1997, 86(11): 836–847.
4 Gajraj RJ, Doi M, Mantzaridis H, et al. Analysis of the EEG bispectrum, auditory evoked potentials and the EEG power spectrum during repeated transitions from consciousness to unconsciousness. Br J Anaesth, 1998, 80(9): 46–52.
5 Barr G, Anderson RE, Wall A, et al. Effects on the bispectral index during medium–high dose fentanyl induction with or without propofol supplement. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2000, 44(5): 807–811.
6 Iannuzzi M, Iannuzzi E, Rossi F, et al. Relationship between bispeet ral index,electroencephalographic state entropy and effect–site EC50 for propofol at different clinical endpoints.Br J Anaesth,2005,94(7):613–616.
7 Anothny R, Absalom N, Sutcliffe C, et al. Closed–loop control of anesthesia using bispectral index.Anesthesiology,2002,96(3):67–73.
8 Anez C, Papaceit J, Sala JM, et al. The effect of encephalogram bispectral index monitoring total intravenous anesthesia with propofol in out patient surgery.during Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim, 2001, 48(7): 264–269.
9 Nishiyama T, Matsukawa T, Hanaoka K. Is the ARX index a more sensitive indicator of anesthetic depth than the bispectral index during sevoflurane/nitrous oxide anesthesia? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2004, 48(11): 1028–1032.
10 Fechner J,Hering W,Ihmsen H,et al.Modelling the pharmacodynamic interaction between remifentanil and propofol by EEG controlled dosing. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2003, 20(12): 373–379.
[1] 王艺, 郝妍, 胡春雪, 鲁雪梅. 基于即刻口头反馈的客观结构化考核在国际伤口治疗师培训考核路径中的应用[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 422-428.
[2] 宋玟焱, 杜美君, 陈佳丽, 石冰, 黄汉尧. 唇腭裂手术围手术期疼痛管理的研究进展及基于生物材料治疗新方法的展望[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 397-405.
[3] 代莉, 郭华静, 邓恢伟. 镇痛-伤害性刺激指数指导下无阿片类药物麻醉对腔镜下甲状腺手术患者术后恢复质量的影响[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 282-286.
[4] 张丽娜, 邢建坤, 张梁, 李云生, 王兢, 孙丽莹, 朱志军. 婴幼儿活体肝移植受者术中麻醉护理单中心经验[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 235-238.
[5] 杜伟, 廖土明, 李雄才, 关刚强, 何燊, 吴佳桥, 朱和荣. 2%利多卡因凝胶和润滑剂凝胶在女性尿流动力学检查中应用的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 613-617.
[6] 杨勇军, 曾一鸣, 贺显雅, 卢强, 李远伟. ASA分级≥Ⅲ级患者局麻经会阴前列腺多模态影像融合穿刺的安全性和有效性[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 441-447.
[7] 何岩, 向文采. 七氟醚与异丙酚联合氯胺酮麻醉在疝修补术中的镇静镇痛效果及安全性[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 566-569.
[8] 丁荷蓓, 王珣, 陈为国. 七氟烷吸入麻醉与异丙酚静脉麻醉在儿童腹股沟斜疝手术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 570-574.
[9] 李先锋, 何懿, 程贞永, 邓国魁, 胡波, 谢红, 王莉, 王小燕, 李晓明. 右美托咪定对腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术患者血流动力学及麻醉复苏效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 437-441.
[10] 窦恩, 郑磊, 徐通海, 邓先锐. 局部神经阻滞麻醉在成人腹股沟疝无张力修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 442-445.
[11] 杨星, 刘梅, 刘思远, 张科. 胃肠癌患者术前焦虑情绪和术后苏醒期躁动情况及影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 159-163.
[12] 胡小靖, 张华. 妊娠期卵巢囊肿蒂扭转的诊断与治疗[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 197-201.
[13] 刘建, 王文珠, 王倩. 老年髋部骨折术后肺损伤现状调查分析及影响因素研究[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 260-264.
[14] 王文珠, 刘建, 袁常秀, 石亚飞, 尤培军. 竖脊肌平面阻滞对非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术中阿片类药物用量的影响[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 155-159.
[15] 王丽萍, 聂玉琴, 朱爱丽. 盆底肌电刺激联合生物反馈疗法在女性卒中后尿失禁患者中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 129-133.
阅读次数
全文


摘要