切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2005, Vol. 01 ›› Issue (02) : 101 -104. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2005.02.110

论著

小儿急性淋巴细胞白血病长期存活61例分析
谷仁凯, 孙立荣, 卢洁, 庞秀英, 董增义, 李学荣, 卢愿, 宋爱芹, 刘毅   
  1. 青岛大学医学院附属医院小儿血液科(青岛,266003)
  • 出版日期:2005-08-25

Analysis of 61 cases of long-term survival children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Ren-kai GU, Li-rong SUN, Jie LU, Xiu-ying PANG, Zeng-yi DONG, Xue-rong LI, Yuan LU, Ai-qin SNONG, Yi LIU   

  1. Department of Pediatric Hematology, the Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, China.
  • Published:2005-08-25
引用本文:

谷仁凯, 孙立荣, 卢洁, 庞秀英, 董增义, 李学荣, 卢愿, 宋爱芹, 刘毅. 小儿急性淋巴细胞白血病长期存活61例分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2005, 01(02): 101-104.

Ren-kai GU, Li-rong SUN, Jie LU, Xiu-ying PANG, Zeng-yi DONG, Xue-rong LI, Yuan LU, Ai-qin SNONG, Yi LIU. Analysis of 61 cases of long-term survival children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2005, 01(02): 101-104.

目的

对61例存活5年以上的小儿急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)患儿进行分析,探讨影响其长期存活的因素。

方法

对这61例ALL患儿通过骨髓形态分型、免疫分型、染色体核型分析(MIC)、临床分型和微量残留病(MRD)检测,以及通过不同时期3组化疗方案及4种髓外白血病防治方法比较,了解其对疗效及预后的影响。

结果

61例5年以上存活ALL患儿与176例5年以下存活患儿比较,二者染色体差异有显著意义(P = 0. 007),临床分型、骨髓形态分型及免疫分型比较差异无显著意义(P>0.05)。61例5年以上存活的ALL患儿中,不同时期3组治疗方案无病存活率比较,VCP(长春新碱、环磷酰胺、强的松)组与VDLP(长春新碱、柔红霉素、L-门冬酰胺酶、强的松)组间差异有显著意义(P=0. 010)。采用60Co头颅照射为主的治疗方案,3例发生中枢神经系统白血病(CNSL),采用大剂量氨甲碟呤(HDMTX)防治组,无CNSL发生,5例发生睾丸白血病(TL)的患儿均系60Co头颅照射组,HDMTX组无TL发生(P=0. 000)。61例5年以上存活ALL患儿中,25例已存活10年以上,现仍然存活,另36例存活5至10年者中,有5例死于骨髓复发,这两者骨髓复发的差异无显著意义(χ2 = 3. 78,P=0. 072)。纳入本研究的所有ALL患儿中,26例MRD检测呈阳性,其中14例化疗停止时已转为阴性,13例仍长期存活;12例停止化疗后MRD呈弱阳性者,其中7例长期存活。

结论

系统规范化疗,是ALL患儿长期存活的关键,骨髓复发、髓外白血病是影响存活的重要因素。MRD转阴,可以作为患儿停止化疗的重要参考指标。

Objective

To explore factors effecting long-term survival of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

Methods

61 ALL patients with long-term survival and 176 ALL cases with under 5 years survival had been determined, before treatment, for bone marrow morphological, immunological, and chromosomal (MIC) types, and for clinical type and minimal resident disease (MRD)as well. 3 chemotherapy regimens and 4 preventive methods for extramedullary leukemia infiltration were adopted in different periods. Treatment effects and prognosis were compared according to their respective types.

Results

① MIC type and clinical type analysis : compared with the 176 cases survived less than 5years, the 61 cases with over 5 years survival had significant difference in chromosomal type (P<0.01), but no significant difference in clinical type, bone marrow morphological type, and immunological type (P>0. 05).② Treatment methods analysis : among the 61 over 5 years survival cases, patients with VDLP regimen from year 1992 to 1999 had higher disease-free survival rate than patients with VP regimen from year 1980 to 1984 (P<0. 05), and also higher than patients with VCP regimen from year 1985 to 1991 (P<0. 05). And VDLP group had lower death rate than VP group (P<0. 05).③Prevention and treatment of extramedullary leukemia infiltration : in the two groups mainly adopting head 60Co radiotherapy, 3cases occurred central nerve system leukemia (CNSL) , and no CNSL occurred in the group receiving high dose MTX (HDMTX)(P<0. 01). And 5 cases developed testical leukemia (TL) in group with head 60Co radiotherapy, and no TL cases in the group with HDMTX (P<0. 001).④The relationship between bone marrow relapse and survival time : 25 cases who have survived over 10 years are still alive, and there were5 cases died of bone marrow relapse after surviving for 5 to 10 years (P <0. 05).⑤ MRD dynamic quantitative determination: among the 26 cases with positive MRD, 13 cases turned negative upon treatment termination, and are still alive, 12 cases tested weakly positive upon treatment termination, among them, 7 cases survived over 5 years up to now.

Conclusions

Systemic and standard chemotherapy is essential to enable long-term survival of ALL patients. Bone marrow relapse and extramedullary leukemia infiltration are important factors adversely affecting long-term survival. MRD turning negative from positive may serve as a referential index for the termination of treatment.

1 顾龙君,孙桂香,卢新天等.小儿急性淋巴细胞白血病诊疗建议(第二次修订草案).中华儿科杂志,1999,37:305-307.
2 张之南主编.血液病诊断与疗效标准,第2版.北京:科学出版社,1999,187-188.
3 卢洁,谷仁凯,佟琳如等.儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病微量残留病细胞的DNA研究.中华儿科杂志,1999年,37:356-358.
[1] 张婉微, 秦芸芸, 蔡绮哲, 林明明, 田润雨, 金姗, 吕秀章. 心肌收缩早期延长对非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者冠状动脉严重狭窄的预测价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1016-1022.
[2] 薛艳玲, 马小静, 谢姝瑞, 何俊, 夏娟, 何亚峰. 左心声学造影在急性心肌梗死合并室间隔穿孔中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1036-1039.
[3] 伊喆, 王志新, 陈伟, 齐伟亚, 方杰, 石海飞, 赵夏, 赵喆, 竺枫, 盛伟, 陈焱, 张宇昊, 朱瑾, 殷耀斌, 杨勇, 陈山林, 刘波. 机器人辅助无移位急性舟骨骨折经皮内固定的诊疗与手术操作规范[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 464-468.
[4] 何毅, 余东升. 年轻恒牙脱位性损伤的诊疗进展[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 400-406.
[5] 吴方园, 孙霞, 林昌锋, 张震生. HBV相关肝硬化合并急性上消化道出血的危险因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 45-47.
[6] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[7] 鲁鑫, 许佳怡, 刘洋, 杨琴, 鞠雯雯, 徐缨龙. 早期LC术与PTCD续贯LC术治疗急性胆囊炎对患者肝功能及预后的影响比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 648-650.
[8] 张海涛, 康婵娟, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎效果观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 654-657.
[9] 姜里蛟, 张峰, 周玉萍. 多学科诊疗模式救治老年急性非静脉曲张性上消化道大出血患者的临床观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 520-524.
[10] 王小红, 钱晶, 翁文俊, 周国雄, 朱顺星, 祁小鸣, 刘春, 王萍, 沈伟, 程睿智, 秦璟灏. 巯基丙酮酸硫基转移酶调控核因子κB信号介导自噬对重症急性胰腺炎大鼠的影响及机制[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 422-426.
[11] 陆萍, 邹健. 凝血和纤维蛋白溶解标志物的动态变化对急性胰腺炎患者预后的评估价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 427-432.
[12] 吉茜茜, 田尧, 马林, 钱进. 红细胞分布宽度-白蛋白比值联合BISAP评分对急性胰腺炎严重程度及死亡率的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 433-438.
[13] 吴蓉菊, 向平超. COPD频繁急性加重表型与炎性因子相关性研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 939-947.
[14] 王磊, 李梦, 孙文利, 刘瑞, 王红春, 卢光泽, 赵颖, 郭进艳, 刘红星. 液相色谱质谱法对急性白血病患者血浆代谢组学的特征分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 850-857.
[15] 易成, 韦伟, 赵宇亮. 急性肾脏病的概念沿革[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 906-910.
阅读次数
全文


摘要