切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2005, Vol. 01 ›› Issue (02) : 101 -104. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2005.02.110

论著

小儿急性淋巴细胞白血病长期存活61例分析
谷仁凯, 孙立荣, 卢洁, 庞秀英, 董增义, 李学荣, 卢愿, 宋爱芹, 刘毅   
  1. 青岛大学医学院附属医院小儿血液科(青岛,266003)
  • 出版日期:2005-08-25

Analysis of 61 cases of long-term survival children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Ren-kai GU, Li-rong SUN, Jie LU, Xiu-ying PANG, Zeng-yi DONG, Xue-rong LI, Yuan LU, Ai-qin SNONG, Yi LIU   

  1. Department of Pediatric Hematology, the Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, China.
  • Published:2005-08-25
引用本文:

谷仁凯, 孙立荣, 卢洁, 庞秀英, 董增义, 李学荣, 卢愿, 宋爱芹, 刘毅. 小儿急性淋巴细胞白血病长期存活61例分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2005, 01(02): 101-104.

Ren-kai GU, Li-rong SUN, Jie LU, Xiu-ying PANG, Zeng-yi DONG, Xue-rong LI, Yuan LU, Ai-qin SNONG, Yi LIU. Analysis of 61 cases of long-term survival children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2005, 01(02): 101-104.

目的

对61例存活5年以上的小儿急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)患儿进行分析,探讨影响其长期存活的因素。

方法

对这61例ALL患儿通过骨髓形态分型、免疫分型、染色体核型分析(MIC)、临床分型和微量残留病(MRD)检测,以及通过不同时期3组化疗方案及4种髓外白血病防治方法比较,了解其对疗效及预后的影响。

结果

61例5年以上存活ALL患儿与176例5年以下存活患儿比较,二者染色体差异有显著意义(P = 0. 007),临床分型、骨髓形态分型及免疫分型比较差异无显著意义(P>0.05)。61例5年以上存活的ALL患儿中,不同时期3组治疗方案无病存活率比较,VCP(长春新碱、环磷酰胺、强的松)组与VDLP(长春新碱、柔红霉素、L-门冬酰胺酶、强的松)组间差异有显著意义(P=0. 010)。采用60Co头颅照射为主的治疗方案,3例发生中枢神经系统白血病(CNSL),采用大剂量氨甲碟呤(HDMTX)防治组,无CNSL发生,5例发生睾丸白血病(TL)的患儿均系60Co头颅照射组,HDMTX组无TL发生(P=0. 000)。61例5年以上存活ALL患儿中,25例已存活10年以上,现仍然存活,另36例存活5至10年者中,有5例死于骨髓复发,这两者骨髓复发的差异无显著意义(χ2 = 3. 78,P=0. 072)。纳入本研究的所有ALL患儿中,26例MRD检测呈阳性,其中14例化疗停止时已转为阴性,13例仍长期存活;12例停止化疗后MRD呈弱阳性者,其中7例长期存活。

结论

系统规范化疗,是ALL患儿长期存活的关键,骨髓复发、髓外白血病是影响存活的重要因素。MRD转阴,可以作为患儿停止化疗的重要参考指标。

Objective

To explore factors effecting long-term survival of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

Methods

61 ALL patients with long-term survival and 176 ALL cases with under 5 years survival had been determined, before treatment, for bone marrow morphological, immunological, and chromosomal (MIC) types, and for clinical type and minimal resident disease (MRD)as well. 3 chemotherapy regimens and 4 preventive methods for extramedullary leukemia infiltration were adopted in different periods. Treatment effects and prognosis were compared according to their respective types.

Results

① MIC type and clinical type analysis : compared with the 176 cases survived less than 5years, the 61 cases with over 5 years survival had significant difference in chromosomal type (P<0.01), but no significant difference in clinical type, bone marrow morphological type, and immunological type (P>0. 05).② Treatment methods analysis : among the 61 over 5 years survival cases, patients with VDLP regimen from year 1992 to 1999 had higher disease-free survival rate than patients with VP regimen from year 1980 to 1984 (P<0. 05), and also higher than patients with VCP regimen from year 1985 to 1991 (P<0. 05). And VDLP group had lower death rate than VP group (P<0. 05).③Prevention and treatment of extramedullary leukemia infiltration : in the two groups mainly adopting head 60Co radiotherapy, 3cases occurred central nerve system leukemia (CNSL) , and no CNSL occurred in the group receiving high dose MTX (HDMTX)(P<0. 01). And 5 cases developed testical leukemia (TL) in group with head 60Co radiotherapy, and no TL cases in the group with HDMTX (P<0. 001).④The relationship between bone marrow relapse and survival time : 25 cases who have survived over 10 years are still alive, and there were5 cases died of bone marrow relapse after surviving for 5 to 10 years (P <0. 05).⑤ MRD dynamic quantitative determination: among the 26 cases with positive MRD, 13 cases turned negative upon treatment termination, and are still alive, 12 cases tested weakly positive upon treatment termination, among them, 7 cases survived over 5 years up to now.

Conclusions

Systemic and standard chemotherapy is essential to enable long-term survival of ALL patients. Bone marrow relapse and extramedullary leukemia infiltration are important factors adversely affecting long-term survival. MRD turning negative from positive may serve as a referential index for the termination of treatment.

1 顾龙君,孙桂香,卢新天等.小儿急性淋巴细胞白血病诊疗建议(第二次修订草案).中华儿科杂志,1999,37:305-307.
2 张之南主编.血液病诊断与疗效标准,第2版.北京:科学出版社,1999,187-188.
3 卢洁,谷仁凯,佟琳如等.儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病微量残留病细胞的DNA研究.中华儿科杂志,1999年,37:356-358.
[1] 江雅婷, 刘林峰, 沈辰曦, 陈奔, 刘婷, 龚裕强. 组织相关巨噬素3 保护肺血管内皮糖萼治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征的机制研究[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 353-362.
[2] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[3] 张洁, 罗小霞, 余鸿. 系统性免疫炎症指数对急性胰腺炎患者并发器官功能损伤的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 68-71.
[4] 康婵娟, 张海涛, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入术治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎的效果及对患者肝功能、炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 667-670.
[5] 党军强, 杨雁灵, 汪庆强, 尚琳, 朱磊, 项红军. 主动经皮穿刺引流治疗重症急性胰腺炎并发急性坏死物积聚的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 671-674.
[6] 刘卓, 张宗明, 张翀, 刘立民, 赵月, 齐晖. 腹腔镜手术治疗高龄急性梗阻性化脓性胆管炎患者的安全性与术式选择[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 795-800.
[7] 赵月, 田坤, 张宗明, 郭震天, 刘立民, 张翀, 刘卓. 降钙素原对老年急性重度胆囊炎发生的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 801-806.
[8] 梁轩豪, 李小荣, 李亮, 林昌伟. 肠梗阻支架置入术联合新辅助化疗治疗结直肠癌急性肠梗阻的疗效及其预后的Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 472-482.
[9] 史清泉, 苗彬, 王烁, 陶琳, 沈晨. miR-181a-5p 靶向ATG5 抑制雨蛙素诱导的大鼠胰腺腺泡细胞AR42J自噬的机制研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 524-530.
[10] 曾明芬, 王艳. 急性胰腺炎合并脂肪肝患者CT 与彩色多普勒超声诊断参数与其病情和预后的关联性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 531-535.
[11] 沈炎, 张俊峰, 唐春芳. 预后营养指数结合血清降钙素原、胱抑素C及视黄醇结合蛋白对急性胰腺炎并发急性肾损伤的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 536-540.
[12] 杨爽, 余宏亮, 谢敏. CT 与超声检查对急性胰腺炎合并脂肪肝的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 541-544.
[13] 董佳, 王坤, 张莉. 预后营养指数结合免疫球蛋白、血糖及甲胎蛋白对HBV 相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者治疗后预后不良的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 555-559.
[14] 颜世锐, 熊辉. 感染性心内膜炎合并急性肾损伤患者的危险因素探索及死亡风险预测[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 618-624.
[15] 董晟, 郎胜坤, 葛新, 孙少君, 薛明宇. 反向休克指数乘以格拉斯哥昏迷评分对老年严重创伤患者发生急性创伤性凝血功能障碍的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 541-547.
阅读次数
全文


摘要