切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (01) : 61 -68. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2026.01.009

论著

DGKE基因变异致婴儿期非典型溶血尿毒综合征1例并文献复习
骞佩, 包瑛(), 黄惠梅, 李志娟, 索磊   
  1. 西安市儿童医院肾脏科,西安 710003
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-18 修回日期:2025-12-13 出版日期:2026-02-01
  • 通信作者: 包瑛

Infantile-onset atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome caused by DGKE gene variant: a case report and literature review

Pei Qian, Ying Bao(), Huimei Huang, Zhijuan Li, Lei Suo   

  1. Department of Nephrology, Xi′an Children′s Hospital, Xi′an 710003, Shaanxi Province, China
  • Received:2025-08-18 Revised:2025-12-13 Published:2026-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Ying Bao
  • Supported by:
    Key Research and Development Project of Shaanxi Province(2022SF-263)
引用本文:

骞佩, 包瑛, 黄惠梅, 李志娟, 索磊. DGKE基因变异致婴儿期非典型溶血尿毒综合征1例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2026, 22(01): 61-68.

Pei Qian, Ying Bao, Huimei Huang, Zhijuan Li, Lei Suo. Infantile-onset atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome caused by DGKE gene variant: a case report and literature review[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2026, 22(01): 61-68.

目的

探讨DGKE基因变异致婴儿期非典型溶血尿毒综合征(aHUS)的临床表型及遗传学特征。

方法

选择2021年6月西安市儿童医院收治的1例aHUS婴儿(患儿1)为研究对象。采用全外显子组测序(WES)筛选候选变异基因后,进行Sanger测序验证。根据人类基因突变数据库(HGMD,https://www.hgmd.cf.ac.uk/)等生物信息学工具,了解DGKE基因变异是否为新发变异。根据美国医学遗传学与基因组学学会(ACMG)制定的《遗传变异分类标准与指南》(以下简称为"ACMG指南"),对检出的基因变异位点进行致病性评级。对变异位点进行氨基酸保守性分析和蛋白质建模功能分析,了解变异对临床表型的影响。以"DGKE""非典型溶血尿毒综合征""atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome"为中、英文关键词,在中国知网、万方数据知识服务平台、维普中文期刊服务平台及PubMed数据库中检索明确诊断为DGKE基因变异致aHUS患儿的相关文献。本次文献检索时限设定为2021年1月1日至2025年5月31日。本研究遵循的程序符合西安市儿童医院伦理委员会规定,并通过该伦理委员会审查及批准(伦理审批号:20250040),并且征得患儿1监护人对本研究知情同意。

结果

①患儿1为8个月龄女孩,以"腹泻伴肉眼血尿4 d"收入本院肾脏科治疗。患儿1的入院检查结果提示血尿、蛋白尿及血红蛋白(Hb)水平低,血小板计数(PLT)降低,乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)、尿素和肌酐水平升高,血清补体3、4水平正常。经血浆输注(PI)及血浆置换(PE)治疗后,对其随访4年,患儿1的aHUS复发2次,尿蛋白持续呈阳性,肾功能正常。②WES结果显示,患儿1 DGKE基因第5外显子检出c.839A>T(p.D280V)纯合变异,其父亲和母亲无临床症状,均为该基因的杂合变异携带者,符合常染色体隐性遗传特征。该变异(c.839 A>T)为HGMD等数据库既往未见报道的变异。根据ACMG指南评级标准,该变异的致病性等级为意义不明确。多种生物信息学预测结果显示,该变异具有致病、有害和破坏性。DGKE蛋白三维结构建模结果显示,该蛋白变异产生异常的晶体结构和构象,可能导致其下游信号通路失调。③文献复习结果:根据本研究设定的文献检索策略,检索到国内外关于DGKE基因变异aHUS患儿研究的相关文献为7篇,共19例aHUS患儿,加上患儿1,共计20例aHUS患儿被纳入以下DGKE基因变异aHUS患儿临床表型及遗传学特征分析的结果如下。20例aHUS患儿中,男性患儿为16例,女性为4例,19例起病年龄<2岁;14例病程中伴蛋白尿,16例有肾病高血压,8例有不同程度补体水平降低,11例于随访期间复发1~2次;5例患儿于首次或复发期间死亡。

结论

本研究发现DGKE基因c.839A>T(p.D280V)纯合变异为既往未见文献报道的新发变异,可导致婴儿期发生aHUS。DGKE基因变异相关aHUS婴儿常伴持续蛋白尿,具有较高复发风险。本研究结果拓展了DGKE基因变异谱,有助于提高临床医师对DGKE基因变异相关aHUS的认识与诊治水平。

Objective

To characterize the clinical phenotype and genetic features of infantile-onset atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) caused by DGKE gene variants.

Methods

One infant with aHUS (patient 1, the proband), admitted to Xi′an Children′s Hospital in June 2021, was investigated. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed to identify candidate pathogenic variants, followed by validation using Sanger sequencing. Bioinformatics tools, including the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD, https: //www.hgmd.cf.ac.uk/), were used to determine whether the DGKE variant had been previously reported. The pathogenicity of the detected variant was classified according to the standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants issued by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Amino acid conservation analysis and protein structural modeling were performed to evaluate the potential effect of the variant on protein structure and function, as well as its possible relevance to the clinical phenotype. A literature search was conducted using the keywords " DGKE" and " atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome" across CNKI, Wanfang Data, VIP, and PubMed databases, covering publications from January 1, 2021, to May 31, 2025. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Xi′an Children′s Hospital (Approval No. 20250040), and informed consent was obtained from the guardian of patient 1.

Results

①Patient 1, an 8-month-old female, presented with a 4-day history of diarrhea and gross hematuria. Initial laboratory evaluations revealed hematuria, nephrotic-range proteinuria, decreased hemoglobin (Hb), thrombocytopenia, and elevated levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), urea, and creatinine, with serum complement C3 and C4 levels within the normal range. The patient was treated with plasma infusion (PI) and plasma exchange (PE), and has been followed up for over 4 years. During this period, she experienced two relapses, with persistent proteinuria but preserved renal function. ② WES identified a homozygous variant in exon 5 of the DGKE gene [NM_003647.3: c.839A>T(p.D280V)], which has not been previously reported in HGMD. According to the rating criteria of the ACMG Guidelines, the variant was classified as a variant of uncertain significance. Both parents, who were asymptomatic, were confirmed to be heterozygous carriers, consistent with autosomal recessive inheritance. In silico analyses predicted this variant to be pathogenic. Three-dimensional modeling of the DGKE protein indicated that the mutation induces structural abnormalities, potentially disrupting downstream signaling pathways. ③ Literature review: According to the literature search strategy designed in this study, 7 relevant articles on DGKE gene variant-associated aHUS in children were retrieved from domestic and international sources, involving a total of 19 aHUS cases. Together with patient 1, a total of 20 aHUS children were included in the analysis of clinical phenotypes and genetic characteristics of aHUS children with DGKE gene variants. Among these, 16 were male and 4 female; 19 cases had disease onset before 2 years of age. Fourteen patients presented with nephrotic-range proteinuria, 16 developed hypertension, 8 exhibited varying degrees of complement depletion, and 11 experienced one or two relapses during follow-up. Five patients died during the initial episode or relapse.

Conclusions

This study identified that the homozygous variant c. 839A>T (p.D280V) in the DGKE gene is a previously unreported variant, which may cause infantile-onset aHUS, typically characterized by persistent proteinuria and a high risk of relapse. These findings expand the mutational spectrum of the DGKE gene and may enhance clinicians′ understanding, diagnosis, and management of DGKE-associated aHUS.

图3 DGKE蛋白p.D280V变异前、后空间结构预测图[图3A:变异前,第280位氨基酸为天冬氨酸(Asp,D280),其侧链羧酸基团可与D315和N372形成氢键,有助于局部结构稳定;图3B:变异后,第280位氨基酸变为缬氨酸(Val,V280),因侧链缩短,而且缺乏羧酸基团,导致与D315和N372的氢键连接丧失,可能破坏局部结构稳定性和蛋白功能]
[1]
Manrique-Caballero CL, Peerapornratana S, Formeck C, et al. Typical and atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome in the critically Ⅲ [J]. Crit Care Clin, 2020, 36(2): 333-356. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccc.2019.11.004.
[2]
Yan K, Desai K, Gullapalli L, et al. Epidemiology of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: a systematic literature review [J]. Clin Epidemiol, 2020, 12: 295-305. DOI: 10.2147/CLEP.S245642.
[3]
Lemaire M, Frémeaux-Bacchi V, Schaefer F, et al. Recessive mutations in DGKE cause atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome [J]. Nat Genet, 2013, 45(5): 531-536. DOI: 10.1038/ng.2590.
[4]
Michael M, Bagga A, Sartain SE, et al. Haemolytic uraemic syndrome [J]. Lancet, 2022, 400(10364): 1722-1740. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01202-8.
[5]
Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology [J]. Genet Med, 2015, 17(5): 405-424. DOI: 10.1038/gim.2015.30.
[6]
Alabdulqader M, Alfakeeh K. A patient with a homozygous diacylglycerol kinase epsilon (DGKE) gene mutation with atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome and low C3 responded well to eculizumab: a case report [J]. BMC Nephrol, 2021, 22(1): 140. DOI: 10.1186/s12882-021-02352-8.
[7]
Husain D, Barron B, Barron AG, et al. Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome due to DGKE mutation and response to eculizumab: lessons for the clinical nephrologist [J]. J Nephrol, 2021, 34(4): 1331-1335. DOI: 10.1007/s40620-020-00925-8.
[8]
Dai X, Ma Y, Lin Q, et al. Clinical features and management of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome patient with DGKE gene variants: a case report [J]. Front Pediatr, 2023, 11: 1162974. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2023.1162974.
[9]
Khandelwal P, Thangaraju S, Krishnamurthy S, et al. Clinical features and outcomes of patients with diacylglycerol kinase epsilon nephropathy: a nationwide experience [J]. Pediatr Nephrol, 2023, 38(9): 3009-3016. DOI: 10.1007/s00467-023-05939-5.
[10]
Sharma J, Lobo V, Singhal J, et al. Novel mutations in the DGKE gene in two Indian patients with early-onset atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome [J]. Indian J Nephrol, 2021, 31(2): 182-186. DOI:10.4103/ijn.IJN_336_19.
[11]
Fu W, Li M, Lin H, et al. Cyclosporine A relieved proteinuria and hypoproteinemia in DGKE nephropathy [J]. Clin Chim Acta, 2021518: 78-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2021.02.021.
[12]
王大海,单春荣,高婷婷,等. 非典型溶血尿毒综合征伴肾病水平蛋白尿患儿1例的遗传学分析 [J].中华医学遗传学杂志2023, 40(12): 1560-1565. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn511374-20220915-00625.
[13]
Yoshida Y, Kato H, Ikeda Y, et al. Pathogenesis of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome [J]. J Atheroscler Thromb, 2019, 26(2): 99-110. DOI: 10.5551/jat.RV17026.
[14]
Zhu J, Chaki M, Lu D, et al. Loss of diacylglycerol kinase epsilon in mice causes endothelial distress and impairs glomerular Cox-2 and PGE2 production [J]. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, 2016, 310(9): F895-F908. DOI:10.1152/ajprenal.00431.2015.
[15]
Bruneau S, Neel M, Roumenina LT, et al. Loss of DGKepsilon induces endothelial cell activation and death independently of complement activation [J]. Blood, 2015, 125(6): 1038-1046. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2014-06-579953.
[16]
Sheerin NS, Kavanagh D, Goodship TH, et al. A national specialized service in England for atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome-the first year′s experience [J]. QJM, 2016, 109(1): 27-33. DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcv082.
[17]
Schultz J, Milpetz F, Bork P, et al. SMART, a simple modular architecture research tool: identification of signaling domains [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1998, 95(11): 5857-5864. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.11.5857.
[18]
Franks CE, Campbell ST, Purow BW, et al. The ligand binding landscape of diacylglycerol kinases [J]. Cell Chem Biol, 2017, 24(7): 870-880. DOI:10.1016/j.chembiol.2017.06.007.
[19]
Brocklebank V, Kumar G, Howie AJ, et al. Long-term outcomes and response to treatment in diacylglycerol kinase epsilon nephropathy [J]. Kidney Int, 2020, 97(6): 1260-1274. DOI:10.1016/j.kint.2020.01.045.
[20]
Azukaitis K, Simkova E, Majid MA, et al. The phenotypic spectrum of nephropathies associated with mutations in diacylglycerol kinase epsilon [J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2017, 28(10): 3066-3075. DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2017010031.
[21]
Sánchez Chinchilla D, Pinto S, Hoppe B, et al. Complement mutations in diacylglycerol kinase-ε-associated atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome [J]. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2014, 9(9): 1611-1619. DOI: 10.2215/CJN.01640214.
[22]
Milne SB, Ivanova PT, Armstrong MD, et al. Dramatic differences in the roles in lipid metabolism of two isoforms of diacylglycerol kinase [J]. Biochemistry, 2008, 47(36): 9372-9379. DOI: 10.1021/bi800492c.
[23]
Westland R, Bodria M, Carrea A, et al. Phenotypic expansion of DGKE-associated diseases [J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2014, 25(7): 1408-1414. DOI:10.1681/ASN.2013080886.
[1] 张猛, 李军, 李娜, 孙豪, 韩军涛. 小儿烧伤后手指掌侧瘢痕的临床分型与治疗方式探讨[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2026, 21(03): 177-182.
[2] 李志超, 叶梓绎, 辛万鹏. TACE在肝细胞癌根治性切除术后MVI阳性患者的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 252-256.
[3] 赵军抗, 张前进, 庄惠杰. 腹腔镜直肠癌根治术保留左结肠动脉的疗效及对预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 257-260.
[4] 夏天, 肖恒军, 冯泽佳, 罗杰珩, 崔宇斌, 王华, 李腾成, 狄金明. 以持续性血精为首发症状的原发性精囊腺癌一例报告并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 346-351.
[5] 王妮, 赵哲, 王敏, 缪怡. 瑞马唑仑联合右美托咪定滴鼻在小儿腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 190-194.
[6] 高木超, 牛峻坚, 崔海龙, 盛国涛. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和平片式无张力疝修补术对腹股沟疝的疗效对比[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 201-205.
[7] 刘千什, 刘昶. 影响造口旁疝修补术后复发相关因素的系统评价及Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 221-225.
[8] 王书翰, 任振, 刘虎, 吴昊, 潘晨, 吴立胜. 腹腔镜Sugarbaker技术修补造口旁疝关键细节优化及近远期并发症处理分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 142-148.
[9] 汤亚南, 刘晓亮, 马秀英, 赵璐珊, 王丽颖, 周鹏翔, 盖晓燕, 邢燕. 577例儿童社区获得性肺炎临床特征及诊疗现状回顾性分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(02): 303-308.
[10] 叶金宝, 梁声强, 马建新, 林小强, 张海森. 小野寺预后营养指数对肝癌复发预测价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(03): 372-378.
[11] 张文华, 陈宇凡, 林松茸, 江艺, 江哲龙. 肝癌肿瘤出芽与患者临床病理特征关系及其对切除术后复发影响[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(03): 386-391.
[12] 麦吾兰江·麦麦提, 阿力娅·图拉丁, 吐尔洪江·吐逊. ABO血型不相容肝移植免疫抑制策略[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(02): 152-159.
[13] 杨宁, 张立翱, 李仁君, 金水. 非遗传性结直肠息肉病患者的临床特征及息肉复发的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2026, 15(02): 168-174.
[14] 张鹏, 杨极, 刘海, 刘涛. 重视翼状胬肉手术时机、术式及术后并发症处理方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(02): 65-69.
[15] 何淑敏, 盛倩倩, 丁桂霞. 儿童狼疮性肾炎合并高尿酸血症的特征分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 90-96.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?