切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (03) : 313 -321. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2025.03.009

所属专题: 文献

论著

宫腔镜子宫内膜息肉切除术后放置左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统对子宫内膜息肉疗效及复发率的影响
张玲玲1,(), 邢莹2, 黄丽丽1, 邵小丽1   
  1. 1南通市第六人民医院妇产科,南通 226000
    2南通市妇幼保健院妇科,南通 226000
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-17 修回日期:2025-04-03 出版日期:2025-06-01
  • 通信作者: 张玲玲

Impact of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system placement following hysteroscopic transcervical resection of endometrial polyps on therapeutic effect and recurrence rate of polyps

Lingling Zhang1,(), Ying Xing2, Lili Huang1, Xiaoli Shao1   

  1. 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Sixth People′s Hospital of Nantong, Nantong 226000, Jiangsu Province, China
    2Department of Gynecology, Nantong Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Nantong 226000, Jiangsu Province, China
  • Received:2024-07-17 Revised:2025-04-03 Published:2025-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Lingling Zhang
  • Supported by:
    Jiangsu Province Maternal and Child Health Research Project(F202138)
引用本文:

张玲玲, 邢莹, 黄丽丽, 邵小丽. 宫腔镜子宫内膜息肉切除术后放置左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统对子宫内膜息肉疗效及复发率的影响[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 21(03): 313-321.

Lingling Zhang, Ying Xing, Lili Huang, Xiaoli Shao. Impact of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system placement following hysteroscopic transcervical resection of endometrial polyps on therapeutic effect and recurrence rate of polyps[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2025, 21(03): 313-321.

目的

探讨宫腔镜子宫内膜息肉切除术(TCRP)后放置左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统(LNG-IUS),对子宫内膜息肉(EP)患者的疗效及术后12个月内复发率的影响。

方法

选择2020年12月至2022年12月于南通市第六人民医院接受治疗的89例EP患者为研究对象。采用前瞻性研究方法,按照随机数字表法将其分为观察组(n=45,采取宫腔镜TCRP后放置LNG-IUS治疗)和对照组(n=44,采取宫腔镜TCRP治疗,未放置LNG-IUS)。对2组EP患者一般临床资料,治疗效果及宫腔镜TCRP术后12个月内复发率,以及宫腔镜TCRP术前及术后12个月的临床症状评估指标、子宫血流动力学指标及炎症因子水平、血清性激素水平,采用独立样本t检验及χ2检验进行统计学分析;对2组患者宫腔镜TCRP的4个时间点(术前与术后3、6、12个月)子宫内膜厚度及月经失血量图表(PBAC)评分比较,采用重复测量资料方差分析。本研究经病例收集医院伦理委员会批准(审批文号:NTLyLy2020042)。所有受试者签署临床研究知情同意书。

结果

①观察组EP患者治疗总有效率为97.8%,显著高于对照组为84.1%,宫腔镜TCRP术后12个月内复发率为4.4%,显著低于对照组的18.2%,并且差异均有统计学意义(χ2=5.09、4.21,P=0.024、0.040)。②对2组EP患者宫腔镜TCRP术前,以及术后3、6、12个月的子宫内膜厚度及PBAC评分进行重复测量资料方差分析结果显示,不同治疗措施与时间因素的交互效应,均有统计学意义(F治疗×时间=18.48、10.14,均为P治疗×时间<0.001)。对2组EP患者不同治疗措施的单独效应分析结果显示,观察组EP患者宫腔镜TCRP术后3、6、12个月的子宫内膜厚度及PBAC评分,均薄于、低于对照组,并且差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对观察组EP患者时间因素的单独效应分析结果显示,观察组EP患者宫腔镜TCRP术后3、6、12个月的子宫内膜厚度,均分别薄于术前,而术后12个月子宫内膜厚度,则厚于术后6个月,并且差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组EP患者宫腔镜TCRP术后3、6、12个月的PBAC评分呈降低趋势,并且差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对对照组EP患者时间因素的单独效应分析结果显示,对照组EP患者宫腔镜TCRP术后3、6、12个月的子宫内膜厚度呈增厚趋势,PBAC评分呈下降趋势,并且差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。③观察组EP患者宫腔镜TCRP术后12个月下腹部疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、经期不规律计分、白带异常评分、子宫动脉阻力指数(RI)和搏动指数(PI)值、血清白细胞介素(IL)-1及IL-6水平,均显著低于对照组;而血清卵泡刺激素(FSH)、促黄体激素(LH)、雌二醇及抗缪勒管激素(AMH)水平,则均显著高于对照组,并且差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

EP患者宫腔镜TCRP术后放置LNG-IUS,能有效降低EP复发率,改善患者临床症状,并且不增高不良反应发生率。

Objective

To investigate the efficacy of placing a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) after hysteroscopic transcervical resection of polyps (TCRP) and its impact on the recurrence rate of endometrial polyps (EP) within 12 months postoperatively.

Methods

A total of 89 EP patients treated in Nantong Sixth People′s Hospital from December 2020 to December 2022 were selected as the study subjects. Using a prospective study design, the patients were randomly divided into an observation group (n=45, treated with hysteroscopic TCRP followed by LNG-IUS placement) and a control group (n=44, treated with hysteroscopic TCRP without LNG-IUS placement) according to the random number table method. The general clinical data, treatment effects, recurrence rates within 12 months after hysteroscopic TCRP, as well as clinical symptom assessment indicators, uterine hemodynamic parameters, inflammatory cytokine levels, and serum sex hormone levels before hysteroscopic TCRP and 12 months after hysteroscopic TCRP were statistically compared between two groups of EP patients using independent-samples t test and chi-square test. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the endometrial thickness and pictorial blood loss assessment chart (PBAC) scores at four time points (before hysteroscopic TCRP and 3, 6, and 12 months after hysteroscopic TCRP) in two groups. This study was approved by the case collection hospital′s Ethics Committee (Approval No. NTLyLy2020042). All subjects signed informed consent forms for the clinical study.

Results

① The total treatment efficacy rate in observation group (97.8%) was higher than that in control group (84.1%), while the recurrence rate within 12 months after hysteroscopic TCRP in observation group (4.4%) was lower than that in control group (18.2%), and the differences were statistically significant (χ2=5.09, 4.21; P=0.024, 0.040). ② Repeated measures ANOVA of endometrial thickness and PBAC scores before hysteroscopic TCRP and at 3, 6, and 12 months after hysteroscopic TCRP in two groups showed interaction effects between different treatment measures and time factors were statistically significont (Ftreatment×time=18.48, 10.14; both with Ptreatment×time<0.001). Analysis of the individual effects of different treatment measures in two groups revealed that the endometrial thickness and PBAC scores at 3, 6, and 12 months after hysteroscopic TCRP in observation group were thinner and lower than those in control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Analysis of the individual effects of time factors in observation group showed that the endometrial thickness at 3, 6, and 12 months after hysteroscopic TCRP was thinner than that before hysteroscopic TCRP, respectively, and the endometrial thickness at 12 months after hysteroscopic TCRP was thicker than that at 6 months, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The PBAC scores in observation group showed a decreasing trend at 3, 6, and 12 months after hysteroscopic TCRP, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Analysis of the individual effects of time factors in control group showed that the endometrial thickness showed an increasing trend, while the PBAC scores showed a decreasing trend at 3, 6, and 12 months after hysteroscopic TCRP, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). ③ The visual analog scale (VAS) score for lower abdominal pain, irregular menstruation score, abnormal vaginal discharge score, uterine artery resistance index (RI) and pulsatility index (PI) values, and serum interleukin (IL)-1 and IL-6 levels at 12 months after hysteroscopic TCRP in observation group were all lower than those in control group, while the serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), estradiol, and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels in observation group were all higher than those in control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusions

Placing an LNG-IUS after hysteroscopic TCRP in EP patients can effectively reduce the recurrence rate of EP, improve clinical symptoms, and does not increase the incidence of adverse reactions.

表1 2组EP患者一般临床资料比较
表2 2组EP患者治疗效果及复发率比较[例数(%)]
表3 2组EP患者宫腔镜TCRP 4个不同时间点子宫内膜厚度及PBAC评分比较(±s)
表4 进一步分别对表3中2组EP患者宫腔镜TCRP 4个不同时间点2个指标的时间因素单独效应分析(组内总体及两两比较)结果
表5 2组EP患者宫腔镜TCRP术前及术后12个月临床症状评估指标比较(分,±s)
表6 2组EP患者宫腔镜TCRP术前及术后12个月子宫血流动力学指标及炎症因子水平比较(±s)
表7 2组EP患者宫腔镜TCRP术前及术后12个月血清性激素水平比较(±s)
[1]
Nassie D, Cohen G, Matot R, et al. The correlation between endometrial polyp size and the risk for uterine malignancy[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2023, 30(11): S11-S12. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2023.08.035.
[2]
Tcherniakovsky M, de Oliveira E, Martinelli Sonnenfeld M, et al. Evaluation of Comt2, Comt3, Cyp1b1, and Esr1 gene polymorphisms as risk factor for endometrial polyp[J]. Women Health, 2023, 63(10): 818-827. DOI: 10.1080/03630242.2023.2272206.
[3]
莫平,邹珺,蔡怡园,等. 宫腔镜手术联合不同药物治疗老年子宫内膜息肉患者的临床研究[J]. 中国临床药理学杂志2023, 39(22): 3228-3232. DOI:10.13699/j.cnki.1001-6821.2023.22.008.
[4]
孙宏. 《子宫息肉诊疗精要》出版:曼月乐环在预防子宫内膜息肉电切术后复发的临床应用[J]. 介入放射学杂志2021, 30(12): 1338. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-794X.2021.12.032.
[5]
Shi J, Gu Z, Wu Y,et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system in the treatment of adenomyosis: evidence mapping[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2024, 310(1):55-67. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-024-07546-7.
[6]
中国优生科学协会生殖道疾病诊治分会,中国医师协会微无创医学专业委员会妇科肿瘤学组. 子宫内膜息肉诊治中国专家共识(2022年版)[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志2022, 38(8): 809-813. DOI: 10.19538/j.fk2022080112.
[7]
王玲,马景,许嘉瑜,等. 何氏养巢颗粒联合针灸治疗卵巢储备功能减退伴不孕症肾虚证患者的随机双盲对照研究[J]. 北京中医药大学学报2023, 46(9): 1218-1226. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2157.2023.09.005.
[8]
Zhang DY, Peng C, Huang Y, et al. Rapidly growing extensive polypoid endometriosis after gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist discontinuation: a case report[J]. World J Clin Cases, 2023, 11(27): 6631-6639. DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i27.6631.
[9]
Vaduva CC, Constantinescu C, Serbanescu M, et al. The association between endometrial polyps, chronic endometritis, and IVF outcomes[J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2023, 27(18): 8895-8904. DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202309_33810.
[10]
黄杭珍,曹佳萍. 孕激素联合宫腔镜手术治疗多发性子宫内膜息肉及术后复发分析[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志2019, 27(6): 698-701. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-8189.2019.06.004.
[11]
李晓培,王伟伟,何青青. 血府逐瘀胶囊联合屈螺酮炔雌醇片预防宫腔镜术后子宫内膜息肉复发[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志2021, 29(7): 1348-1351. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-8189.2021.07.008.
[12]
杨梅,杨华,王彤. 宫腔镜电切术联合曼月乐治疗子宫内膜息肉疗效及对患者雌孕激素受体表达和炎性因子的影响[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志2023, 31(1): 60-63, 68. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-8189.2023.01.013.
[13]
伍雯,谭琴,李玲. 子宫内膜息肉宫腔镜手术后辅助放置左炔诺孕酮宫内缓释系统效果及复发率[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志2022, 30(12): 2802-2806. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-8189.2022.12.028.
[14]
韩晓洁,万颖. 宫腔镜下子宫内膜息肉切除术后两种不同方法预防息肉复发的效果比较[J]. 中国妇产科临床杂志2020, 21(4): 422-424. DOI: 10.13390/j.issn.1672-1861.2020.04.026.
[15]
许雁晗,刘海燕,刘红. 宫腔镜下子宫内膜息肉电切除术联合左炔诺孕酮宫内缓释系统治疗子宫内膜息肉的临床分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健2019, 34(12): 2889-2891. DOI: 10.7620/zgfybj.j.issn.1001-4411.2019.12.72.
[16]
Yong J, Wan Y, Ye M, et al. Comparative analysis of the clinical efficacy and reproductive outcomes of the hysteroscopic tissue removal system (MyoSure) and hysteroscopic electroresection in the treatment of benign intrauterine lesions[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2023, 163(1): 115-122. DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14863.
[17]
丁雪梅,郑莹. 左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统治疗要求保留生育功能的年轻子宫内膜癌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2016, 12(2): 241-244. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2016.02.021.
[18]
Kutlucan H, Işık G, Cevher Akdulum MF, et al. Comparison of two-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound, three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound and hysteroscopy to diagnose in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding: a retrospective observational study[J]. J Diagn Med Sonogr, 2023, 39(3): 238-248. DOI: 10.1177/87564793221140832.
[19]
梁梦珊,朱耀魁. 子宫内膜异位症发病机制的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(2): 138-141. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2021.02.003.
[1] 汪浪, 何怡华, 李征毅, 刘翠云, 颉剑锋, 陈健. 母胎超声参数对复发性流产孕妇不良妊娠结局的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2025, 22(06): 556-563.
[2] 明昊, 宋宏萍, 白誉誉, 党晓智, 赵阳, 程燕妮, 王琪, 肖迎聪. 自动乳腺超声联合临床病理特征预测Luminal B 型乳腺癌术后复发风险的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2025, 22(04): 337-347.
[3] 朱晓璐, 孙希希, 柴佳园, 董泽洋, 赵梦瑶, 黄斌. 超声引导下医用无水乙醇硬化治疗卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿疗效的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2025, 22(03): 215-223.
[4] 地力木热提·艾买提, 于鹏, 丁志翔, 段绍斌. 胆总管直径与肝内Ⅰ、Ⅱ级胆管直径的比值对胆总管结石复发的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 559-561.
[5] 王珂, 岳育民, 武珍珍, 许泽宇, 惠晓辉, 赵云, 窦维佳, 赵青川. 腹腔镜经自然腔道手术对结直肠癌患者肠道功能及远期效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 413-416.
[6] 袁强, 向文瑞, 吕远, 闫璋哲, 朱含放, 陈光, 孙亮, 陈纲, 赵锁. 基于随机生存森林的胃肠道间质瘤无复发生存期预测模型研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 438-441.
[7] 赵晨皓, 张序东, 杨浚沫, 周何. 血清肿瘤标志物对结直肠癌患者术后复发的预测效能研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 467-470.
[8] 王占奎, 陈治远, 孙闻晖, 杨庆玲, 杨小斌. 术前免疫炎症指数及AFU水平对肝癌患者介入术后早期复发的预测研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 247-250.
[9] 李华志, 孙海涛, 曹广, 张雅静. 基于膜解剖的完整系膜切除+D2根治术在进展期胃癌治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 262-265.
[10] 胡媛媛, 孙文萍, 杨丹, 方道成. 尿THP和24小时尿渗透压对草酸钙结石患者复发的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 460-464.
[11] 甘廷彬, 秦韬. SSIGN分级联合γ-谷氨酰转肽酶在高危非转移性肾癌术后复发的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 476-482.
[12] 徐燕楠, 胡成宇, 花荣. 围手术期放射治疗在可切除腹膜后肉瘤治疗中的价值[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 377-382.
[13] 乔鲜丽, 田向阳, 周文雅, 秦泽敏, 郭姗姗, 于俊岩. 循环肿瘤DNA 对非小细胞肺癌术后复发风险的预测意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(03): 395-400.
[14] 张鸣凤, 侯莉莉, 党萍, 马清艳, 康冠楠, 李志强, 陈倩倩, 张盼盼, 陈莹莹, 张楠楠. 复治耐多药/利福平耐药肺结核复发影响因素探讨[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(03): 406-410.
[15] 王永清, 马小花, 张晓玲, 张赛赛, 张娜丽. 老年脑卒中患者健康素养、社会支持与卒中复发风险感知的关系及其影响因素研究[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(03): 180-186.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?