切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (01) : 1 -8. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2024.01.001

先天性膈疝专辑

外科治疗先天性膈肌发育异常疾病患儿的随访研究
陈佳俊1, 徐慧姣1, 蒋琴1, 马俊梅1, 侯昉1, 徐冰,1, 刘文英,1   
  1. 1. 电子科技大学附属医院·四川省人民医院儿童医学中心小儿外科,成都 610072
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-30 修回日期:2024-01-03 出版日期:2024-02-01
  • 通信作者: 徐冰, 刘文英

Surgical treatment of children with congenital diaphragmatic dysplasia diseases: a follow-up study

Jiajun Chen1, Huijiao Xu1, Qin Jiang1, Junmei Ma1, Fang Hou1, Bing Xu,1, Wenying Liu,1   

  1. 1. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Children′s Medical Center, Sichuan Provincial People′s ospital, University of Electronic Science & Technology of China, Chengdu 610072, Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2023-10-30 Revised:2024-01-03 Published:2024-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Bing Xu, Wenying Liu
  • Supported by:
    Sichuan Province Tianfu Talent Plan, Tianfu Famous Physicians Project(TF005); Key Research and Development Project of Science & Technology Department of Sichuan Province(2021YFS0381); Specialized Project by Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences·Sichuan Provincial People′s Hospital(2021ZX03)
引用本文:

陈佳俊, 徐慧姣, 蒋琴, 马俊梅, 侯昉, 徐冰, 刘文英. 外科治疗先天性膈肌发育异常疾病患儿的随访研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(01): 1-8.

Jiajun Chen, Huijiao Xu, Qin Jiang, Junmei Ma, Fang Hou, Bing Xu, Wenying Liu. Surgical treatment of children with congenital diaphragmatic dysplasia diseases: a follow-up study[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2024, 20(01): 1-8.

目的

探讨先天性膈肌发育异常疾病患儿手术治疗效果。

方法

选择2011年1月1日至2023年9月30日于本中心小儿外科采取手术治疗的41例先天性膈肌发育异常疾病患儿为研究对象。将其中先天性膈疝(CDH)患儿,纳入CDH组(n=27);将先天性膈膨升(CDE)患儿,纳入CDE组(n=14)。①对2组患儿的出生体重、出生胎龄、手术时年龄、诊断时肺头比,手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间等临床资料进行统计学分析。②对2组患儿术后总体生存(OS)率、复发率,上呼吸道症状、消化道症状、肺功能低下发生率,患儿身高、体重、活动能力、学习能力等临床资料进行统计学分析。本研究符合2013年修订的《世界医学协会赫尔辛基宣言》相关要求。患儿监护人对诊疗均知情同意,并签署临床研究知情同意书。本研究对2组患儿的随访时间定义为,除外术后住院期间死亡的4例CDH患儿,将术后继续参加随访,并且随访时间<5年者,分别定义为CDH短期随访患儿(n=23)及CDE短期随访患儿(n=14),将随访时间≥5年者,分别定义为CDH中、长期随访患儿(n=16)及CDE中、长期随访患儿(n=8)。

结果

①2组患儿的出生体重、出生胎龄,手术时间、术中出血量及术后住院时间分别比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);而CDH组患儿的肺头比及手术时日龄均较CDE组小,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。②CDH组与CED组患儿术后OS率分别为77.8%(21/27)、92.9%(13/14),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。Kaplan-Meier生存曲线分析结果显示,术后2组出院患儿OS率比较,差异亦无统计学意义(P>0.05)。③术后CDH组完成短期随访患儿的消化道症状及肺功能低下发生率,分别为65.2%(15/23)与60.9%(14/23),均较CDE组的28.6%(4/14)与21.4%(3/14)高,并且差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),而术后2组完成中、长期随访患儿的消化道症状及肺功能低下发生率分别比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后2组患儿于短期及中、长期随访中,均未出现疾病复发及学习能力低于同龄儿表现。术后,2组短期及中、长期随访患儿的上呼吸道症状发生率与身高、体重低于同性别同龄儿及活动能力受限占比比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。④术后,CDH组完成中、长期随访患儿的上呼吸道症状、消化道症状、肺功能低下发生率,分别为25.0%(4/16)、18.8%(3/16)与12.5%(2/16),均较术后完成短期随访患儿的82.6%(19/23)、65.2%(15/23)与60.9%(14/23)低,并且差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),而其术后完成短期与中、长期随访患儿的身高、体重低于同性别同龄儿及活动能力受限占比比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。⑤CDE组完成中、长期随访患儿的上呼吸道症状发生率为12.5%(1/8),低于术后短期的68.8%(11/16),并且差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而其术后完成短期与中、长期随访患儿的消化道症状、肺功能低下发生率与身高、体重低于同性别同龄儿及活动能力受限占比比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。⑥41例患儿中,总体死亡率为17.1%(7/41),其中左侧CDH患儿死亡为4例,右侧CDH为1例,双侧CDH为1例,右侧CDE为1例。

结论

CDE患儿术后总体预后均较CDH患儿更好,CDE与CDH患儿术后中、长期预后均较短期预后好。但是,CDH患儿术后短期更容易出现消化道症状及肺功能低下症状,重症CDH患儿的预后仍然不是十分理想。

Objective

To investigate effectiveness of surgical treatment in children with congenital diaphragmatic dysplasia diseases.

Methods

A total of 41 cases of children with congenital diaphragmatic anomalies admitted to Department of Pediatric Surgery, Children′s Medical Center, Sichuan Provincial People′s Hospital, University of Electronic Science & Technology of China from January 1, 2011 to September 30, 2023 and treated surgically were selected for this study. Children with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) were included into CDH group (n=27), and children with congenital diaphragmatic eventration (CDE) were enrolled into CDE group (n=14). ①Clinical data such as birth weight, gestational age at birth, age at the time of surgery, lung-head ratio at the time of diagnosis, duration of surgery, intraoperative bleeding, and postoperative hospital stay were statistically analyzed in 2 groups. ②The postoperative overall survival(OS) rate and recurrence rate, incidences of upper respiratory tract symptoms, gastrointestinal tract symptoms, pulmonary hypofrontality, and children′s height, weight, mobility, learning ability and other clinical data of 2 groups were statistically analyzed. The study protocol was performed in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of the World Medical Association revised in 2013, and informed consents were obtained from guardians of all participants. Excluding the 4 children with CDH who died during postoperative hospitalization, those who continued to participate follow-up after surgery in the above 2 groups with a follow-up period of <5 years were defined as children with short-term follow-up in CDH (n=23) and children with short-term follow-up in CDE (n=14), respectively. Those with a follow-up period of ≥5 years were defined as children with medium- and long-term follow-up in CDH (n=16) and children with medium- and long-term follow-up in CDE (n=8), respectively.

Results

①There were no statistical differences between two groups in birth weight, gestational age at birth, duration of surgery, intraoperative bleeding and postoperative hospital stay (P>0.05); whereas the lung-head ratio and age at the time of surgery in CDH group were smaller than those in CDE group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). ②The postoperative OS rates of children in CDH group and CDE group were 77.8% (21/27) and 92.9% (13/14), respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P>0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival analyses indicated that there was no statistical difference in OS rate of children discharged from hospitals after surgery in both groups (P>0.05). ③The incidences of short-term postoperative gastrointestinal symptoms and pulmonary hypofrontality in CDH group was 65.2% (15/23) and 60.9% (14/23), respectively, which was higher than those of 28.6% (4/14) and 21.4% (3/14) in CDE group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05), while there were no statistical differences in the incidences of medium- and long-term postoperative gastrointestinal symptoms and pulmonary hypofrontality between 2 groups (P>0.05). In the short-term, medium- and long-term postoperative follow-up period, there was no recurrence of CDH or CDE and the learning ability was lower than that of children of the same age in both groups, and differences in the incidence of upper respiratory symptoms, proportions of height and weight lower than that of children with the same gender and age, and activity limitation in the short-term, and medium- and long-term postoperative period of two groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05). ④The incidences of medium- and long-term postoperative upper respiratory symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, and pulmonary hypofrontality in CDH group were 25.0% (4/16), 18.8% (3/16), and 12.5% (2/16), respectively, which were lower than those of 82.6% (19/23), 65.2% (15/23), and 60.9% (14/23) in the short-term follow-ups, and all the differences were statistically different (P<0.05). While there were no statistical differences in the proportions of height and weight lower than those of children with the same gender and age, and mobility limitation in the short-term follow-up and medium- and long-term follow-up (P>0.05). ⑤The incidence of medium- and long-term postoperative upper respiratory symptoms in CDE group was 12.5% (1/8), which was lower than that 68.8% (11/16) in short-term follow-up (P<0.05), while the incidences of short-term, and medium- and long-term postoperative gastrointestinal symptoms, pulmonary hypofrontality, proportions of height and weight lower than children of the same gender and age, and mobility limitation in CDE group were not statistically significant (P>0.05). ⑥Of the 41 children, the overall mortality rate was 17.1% (7/41), with four deaths in children with left-sided CDH, one in right-sided CDH, one in bilateral CDH, and one in right-sided CDE.

Conclusions

Overall postoperative prognosis of children with CDE is better than that of children with CDH, and children with CDE and CDH all have a better medium- and long-term prognosis than short-term prognosis. However, children with CDH are more likely to develop gastrointestinal symptoms and pulmonary hypoplasia in short term, and prognosis of children with severe CDH is still not very satisfactory.

表1 2组患儿一般临床资料比较
表2 2组患儿手术相关指标比较[M(Q1Q3)]
图1 CDH组与CDE组术后出院患儿的生存曲线分析注:CDH为先天性膈疝,CDE为先天性膈膨升,OS为总体生存
表3 术后2组完成随访患儿的短期生存质量比较[例数(%)]
表4 术后2组完成随访患儿的中、长期生存质量比较[例数(%)]
表5 7例CDH与CDE死亡患儿相关临床资料比较
[1]
De Bie FR, Avitabile CM, Joyeux L, et al. Neonatal and fetal therapy of congenital diaphragmatic hernia-related pulmonary hypertension[J]. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2021, 107(5): 458-466. DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2021-322617.
[2]
Chatterjee D, Ing RJ, Gien J. Update on congenital diaphragmatic hernia[J]. Anesth Analg, 2020, 131(3): 808-821. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004324.
[3]
Paoletti M, Raffler G, Gaffi MS, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a global view[J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2020, 55(11): 2297-2307. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.06.022.
[4]
宋燕,谢淋旭,宁刚,等. MRI对胎儿先天性膈疝的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 15(3): 275-282. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2019.03.007.
[5]
Kim DH, Sung SC, Kim H, et al. Is the pleating technique superior to the invaginating technique for plication of diaphragmatic eventration in infants?[J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2021, 56(5): 995-999. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.07.015.
[6]
Sallout B, Alshebli D, Sallout L, et al. Fetal diaphragmatic eventration: a case report[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2021, 43(8): 993-997. DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2020.12.014.
[7]
Aikaterini K, Paraskevi L, Paschalia TK, et al. Congenital diaphragmatic eventration in the neonatal period: systematic review of the literature and report of a rare case presenting with gastrointestinal disorders[J]. Pediatr Rep, 2023, 15(3): 442-451. DOI: 10.3390/pediatric15030041.
[8]
Luan CN, David T, Anna I, et al. Diaphragmatic eventration complicated by gastric volvulus[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2022, 93(4): 1064-1066. DOI: 10.1111/ans.18103.
[9]
梁润哲,张志涛,吕远,等. 脐带血自体回输在产时手术及新生儿外科手术中应用的可行性探讨[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志2019, 35(5): 589-592. DOI: 10.19538/j.fk2019050122.
[10]
赵生亮,潘征夏,李勇刚,等. 胸腔镜和传统开放性手术治疗婴幼儿先天性膈膨升的回顾性队列研究[J]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志2021, 28(6): 709-713. DOI: 10.7507/1007-4848.202005019.
[11]
Sundaram J, Ramasundaram M, Agarwal P, et al. Thoracoscopic repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in neonates: tips and tricks learned from an institutional experience[J]. Niger J Clin Pract, 2022, 25(10): 1635-1640. DOI: 10.1007/s00595-021-02278-6.
[12]
Quigley CP, Folaranmi SE. A systematic review comparing the surgical outcomes of open versus minimally invasive surgery for congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2023, 33(2): 211-219. DOI: 10.1089/lap.2022.0348.
[13]
Okawada M, Ohfuji S, Yamoto M, et al. Thoracoscopic repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in neonates: findings of a multicenter study in Japan[J]. Surg Today, 2021, 51(10): 1694-1702. DOI: 10.1007/s00595-021-02278-6.
[14]
李帅,曹国庆,许培培,等. 机器人辅助胸腔镜与传统胸腔镜膈肌折叠术治疗膈膨升的比较研究[J]. 机器人外科学杂志(中英文), 2023, 4(2): 121-125. DOI: 10.12180/j.issn.2096-7721.2023.02.006.
[15]
孙柏平,赵小琳,武鹏,等. 重症先天性膈疝患儿的临床治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(3): 327-332. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2021.03.014.
[16]
Gilbert RM, Schappell LE, Gleghorn JP. Defective mesothelium and limited physical space are drivers of dysregulated lung development in a genetic model of congenital diaphragmatic hernia[J]. Development, 2021, 148(10): dev199460. DOI: 10.1242/dev.199460.
[1] 陶宏宇, 叶菁菁, 俞劲, 杨秀珍, 钱晶晶, 徐彬, 徐玮泽, 舒强. 右心声学造影在儿童右向左分流相关疾病中的评估价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 959-965.
[2] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[3] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[4] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[5] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[6] 顾雯, 凌守鑫, 唐海利, 甘雪梅. 两种不同手术入路在甲状腺乳头状癌患者开放性根治性术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-690.
[7] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[8] 关小玲, 周文营, 陈洪平. PTAAR在乙肝相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者短期预后中的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 841-845.
[9] 张润锦, 阳盼, 林燕斯, 刘尊龙, 刘建平, 金小岩. EB病毒相关胆管癌伴多发转移一例及国内文献复习[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 865-869.
[10] 陈晓鹏, 王佳妮, 练庆海, 杨九妹. 肝细胞癌VOPP1表达及其与预后的关系[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 876-882.
[11] 刘郁, 段绍斌, 丁志翔, 史志涛. miR-34a-5p 在结肠癌患者的表达及其与临床特征及预后的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 485-490.
[12] 陈倩倩, 袁晨, 刘基, 尹婷婷. 多层螺旋CT 参数、癌胚抗原、错配修复基因及病理指标对结直肠癌预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 507-511.
[13] 曾明芬, 王艳. 急性胰腺炎合并脂肪肝患者CT 与彩色多普勒超声诊断参数与其病情和预后的关联性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 531-535.
[14] 沈炎, 张俊峰, 唐春芳. 预后营养指数结合血清降钙素原、胱抑素C及视黄醇结合蛋白对急性胰腺炎并发急性肾损伤的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 536-540.
[15] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
阅读次数
全文
1
HTML PDF
最新录用 在线预览 正式出版 最新录用 在线预览 正式出版
0 0 0 0 0 1

  来源 其他网站
  次数 1
  比例 100%

摘要
192
最新录用 在线预览 正式出版
0 0 192
  来源 本网站 其他网站
  次数 87 105
  比例 45% 55%