切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (03) : 323 -329. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2023.03.012

论著

652例死胎相关因素分析及防控措施评价
毛赤慧, 张佳妮, 王晓东()   
  1. 四川大学华西第二医院妇产科、出生缺陷与相关妇儿疾病教育部重点实验室,成都 610041
  • 收稿日期:2023-01-08 修回日期:2023-05-01 出版日期:2023-06-01
  • 通信作者: 王晓东

Analysis of risk factors related to 652 stillbirths and evaluation of prevention and control measures

Chihui Mao, Jiani Zhang, Xiaodong Wang()   

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2023-01-08 Revised:2023-05-01 Published:2023-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Xiaodong Wang
  • Supported by:
    Key Research and Development Project by Department of Science and Technology in Sichuan Province(2022YFS0042)
引用本文:

毛赤慧, 张佳妮, 王晓东. 652例死胎相关因素分析及防控措施评价[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 323-329.

Chihui Mao, Jiani Zhang, Xiaodong Wang. Analysis of risk factors related to 652 stillbirths and evaluation of prevention and control measures[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(03): 323-329.

目的

探讨死胎发生的相关因素变迁,为评价及优化死胎防控措施提供依据。

方法

选择2008—2021年于四川大学华西第二医院(中国区域围产医学中心之一)住院终止妊娠的胎儿总计为152 490中的652例死胎(均为单胎妊娠)为研究对象,并纳入全阶段组。采取回顾性分析法,将652例死胎按照发生年份,分别纳入前阶段组(n=447,2008—2014年在本院住院终止妊娠的胎儿总数为55 508例)与后阶段组(n=205,2015—2021年在本院住院终止妊娠的胎儿总数为96 982例)。本研究遵循的程序符合2013年修订的《世界医学协会赫尔辛基宣言》。

结果

2008—2021年,本研究死胎平均发生率为0.428%,其中前阶段组为0.805%,后阶段组为0.211%。后阶段组导致死胎相关因素占比由高到低依次为母体因素(61.46%)、脐带因素(20.98%)、胎盘因素(20.49%)、胎儿因素(15.60%)、不明原因(8.29%)。①母体因素:死胎相关母体因素主要为妊娠合并心血管疾病、糖尿病、妊娠期肝内胆汁淤积症、甲状腺功能异常;其导致的死胎胎龄为31~34+6周;后阶段组母体妊娠合并甲状腺功能异常相关的死胎比例,较前阶段组显著升高,差异有统计学意义(χ2=28.83,P<0.001)。②脐带因素:后阶段死胎相关脐带因素从高到低依次为脐带扭转(17.56%)、缠绕(1.95%)、脱垂(0.49%);其发生的死胎胎龄为32~33+6周;后阶段组脐带扭转占比,较前阶段组显著升高,差异有统计学意义(χ2=8.62,P=0.003),而脐带脱垂占比,则较前阶段组显著下降,差异亦有统计学意义(χ2=8.46,P=0.004))。③胎盘因素:后阶段死胎相关胎盘因素由高到低依次为前置胎盘(7.80%)、胎盘早剥(4.39%);其导致的死胎胎龄为31~33+6周;后阶段组死胎前置胎盘占比,较前阶段组显著上升,差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.20,P=0.041)。④胎儿因素:以胎儿发育异常(11.20%)多见,其导致的死胎胎龄为31~33+6周。⑤不明原因:其导致的死胎胎龄为29~33+6周;后阶段组死胎不明因素占比,较前阶段组显著下降,差异有统计学意义(χ2=5.94,P=0.015)。

结论

加强对死胎病因疾病谱、尤其是重点疾病的管理和母胎保健,防控其导致死胎相关因素引起的病理进展,监测胎儿宫内生长、发育状态,尤其在胎儿发育的关键风险时段,及时发现胎儿宫内不良状态,健全高危妊娠转诊及宫内转运绿色通道,适时积极终止妊娠,这些措施对降低我国死胎发生率,均具有至关重要作用。

Objective

To explore the changes in risk factors related to stillbirth, and provide basis for evaluating and optimizing the prevention and control measures of stillbirth.

Methods

A total of 652 stillborn fetuses (all from singleton pregnancies) were selected in this study from 2008 to 2021 at West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University, one of the regional centers for perinatal medicine in China. A retrospective analysis was conducted, and the 652 cases of stillbirth were divided into two groups based on the year of occurrence: the early-stage group (n=447, total number of in-patient deliveries of fetuses in our hospitals from 2008-2014 was 55 508) and the late-stage group (n=205, total number of inpatient deliveries of fetuses in our hospitals from 2015-2021 is 96 982). The procedures followed in this study were in accordance with the revised 2013 Declaration of Helsinki by the World Medical Association.

Results

From 2008 to 2021, the average incidence rate of stillbirths in this study was 0.428%, with 0.805% in the early-stage group and 0.211% in the late-stage group. The late-stage group′s proportion of factors contributing to stillbirths, from highest to lowest, was maternal factors (61.46%), umbilical cord factors (20.98%), placental factors (20.49%), fetal factors (15.61%), and unknown causes (8.29%). ① Maternal factors: The main maternal factors associated with stillbirths were maternal cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, and thyroid diseases. The gestational week of stillbirths was mainly between 31 and 34+ 6 weeks. The proportion of stillbirths associated with thyroid disease in the late-stage pregnancies significantly increased compared to the early-stage group (χ2=28.83, P<0.001). ② Umbilical cord factors: The late-stage group′s umbilical cord factors contributing to stillbirths, from highest to lowest, were cord torsion (17.56%), cord entanglement (1.95%), and cord prolapse (0.49%). The gestational week of stillbirths was mainly between 32 and 33+ 6 weeks. The proportion of cord torsion significantly increased in the late-stage group compared to the early-stage group (χ2=8.62, P=0.003), while the proportion of cord prolapse significantly decreased (χ2=8.46, P=0.004). ③ Placental factors: The late-stage group′s placental factors associated with stillbirths, from highest to lowest, were placenta previa (7.80%) and placental abruption (4.39%). The gestational week of stillbirths was mainly between 31 and 33+ 6 weeks. The proportion of stillbirths associated with placenta previa significantly increased in the late-stage group compared to the early-stage group (χ2=4.20, P=0.041). ④ Fetal factors: Abnormal fetal development (11.20%) was the most common fetal factor. The gestational age of stillbirths was mainly between 31 and 33+ 6 weeks. ⑤ Unknown causes: The proportion of stillbirths with unknown causes significantly decreased in the late-stage group compared to the early-stage group (χ2=5.94, P=0.015), and the occurrence of stillbirths was mainly between 29 and 33+ 6 weeks of gestation.

Conclusions

Strengthening the management of etiological spectrum diseases associated with stillbirths, especially focusing on key diseases, and enhancing maternal and fetal healthcare interventions are crucial in preventing and controlling pathological progression caused by relevant factors leading to fetal demise. Monitoring fetal intrauterine growth and intrauterine conditions, particularly during critical risk periods, enables timely detection of adverse intrauterine conditions in the fetus. Establishing efficient referral systems and green channels for intrauterine transportation of high-risk pregnancies, along with timely and proactive termination of pregnancies, play a vital role in reducing the stillbirth rate in China. These measures are of paramount importance.

表1 全阶段组死胎的前5位相关因素,以及前、后阶段组死胎的前5位相关因素比较
死胎相关因素 全阶段组(n=652) 前阶段组(n=447) 后阶段组(n=205) 前阶段组占比vs后阶段组占比
胎龄(周) 例数(%) 胎龄(周) 例数(%) 胎龄(周) 例数(%) χ2 P
母体因素 32.7±3.7 375(57.52) 33.0±3.7 249(55.70) 32.1±3.4 126(61.46) 1.91 0.167
心血管系统疾病 33.6±3.5 176(26.99) 33.4±3.6 128(28.63) 33.3±3.7 48(23.41) 2.66 0.454
妊娠期高血压疾病 32.0±3.4 154(23.62) 32.3±3.5 111(24.83) 31.5±3.5 43(20.98) 3.78 0.652
其他 34.3±3.9 22(3.37) 34.6±3.6 17(3.80) 33.8±3.7 5(2.43) 1.24 0.266
内分泌系统疾病 32.9±3.7 128(19.63) 34.4±3.4 67(14.99) 32.1±3.7 61(29.76) 10.08 0.001
糖尿病 33.6±3.6 95(14.57) 33.9±3.6 59(13.20) 33.3±4.0 36(17.56 ) 1.05 0.305
甲状腺功能异常 32.0±4.1 33(5.06) 34.8±2.4 8(1.79) 31.1±4.3 25(12.20) 28.83 <0.001
消化系统疾病 32.7±3.3 76(11.66) 33.9±3.4 56(12.31) 32.4±3.4 21(10.24)) 2.67 0.339
ICP 31.6±3.4 38(5.83) 33.7±3.4 31(6.94) 32.4±2.9 7(3.41) 4.37 0.037
其他 33.1±3.3 38(5.83) 34.0±3.3 24(5.37) 32.0±3.0 14(6.83) 0.20 0.655
血液系统疾病 32.9±3.6 48(7.36) 32.7±3.1 29(6.49) 33.1±4.6 19(9.27) 0.88 0.347
生殖系统疾病 32.9±3.6 50(7.67) 33.8±2.9 35(7.83) 31.0±3.4 15(7.32) 0.33 0.563
肾脏系统疾病 31.7±2.9 20(3.07) 32.1±2.9 12(2.68) 31.4±2.8 8(3.90) 0.39 0.533
其他 32.4±3.4 56(8.59) 32.6±2.9 37(8.28) 32.2±3.4 19(9.27) <0.001 0.955
胎盘因素 32.4±3.5 177(26.53 ) 32.6±3.5 135(30.20) 32.1±3.5 42(20.49) 6.71 0.010
前置胎盘 32.6±3.6 46(7.05) 32.8±3.4 30(6.71) 31.8±3.8 16(7.80 ) 4.20 0.041
胎盘早剥 31.7±2.9 37(5.67 ) 31.6±2.4 28(6.26) 32.1±3.6 9(4.39) 0.01 0.924
胎盘形态异常 34.7±3.0 17(2.61) 34.6±2.6 11(2.46) 34.5±3.9 6(2.92) 1.391 0.238
其他 32.4±3.4 77(15.03) 32.6±3.5 66(18.34) 31.9±3.7 11(7.80) 6.65 0.010
胎儿因素 32.9±3.6 100(15.34 ) 32.8±3.3 68(15.21) 32.9±3.6 32(15.61) 0.16 0.448
胎儿发育异常 32.5±3.6 73(11.20) 32.9±3.4 50(11.19) 31.9±3.5 23(11.21) 0.68 0.537
胎儿生长受限 32.0±2.9 16(2.45) 30.6±2.3 10(2.24) 32.4±3.2 6(2.92) 0.41 0.413
其他 31.9±3.3 11(1.23) 31.9±3.2 8(1.79) 31.7±3.3 3(1.46) <0.001 1.000
脐带因素 32.3±4.0 66(10.12) 32.3±3.9 23(5.15) 32.1±4.1 43(20.98) 36.99 <0.001
脐带扭转 32.0±3.9 48(7.36 ) 33.1±3.1 12(2.68) 31.6±3.9 36(17.56) 8.62 0.003
脐带脱垂 30.7±3.3 7(1.07) 30.8±3.3 6(1.34) 30.0±3.4 1(0.49) 6.21 0.013
脐带缠绕 33.8±3.1 7(1.07) 31.0±3.4 3(0.67) 36.0±3.8 4(1.95) <0.001 1.000
脐带打结 37.7±3.6 4(0.61) 37.8±3.4 2(0.45) 37.6±3.3 2(0.98) 0.01 0.942
不明因素 32.4±5.6 85(13.04) 33.2±5.2 68(15.21) 29.9±6.0 17(8.29) 5.94 0.015
[1]
Management of Stillbirth: Obstetric Care Consensus No, 10[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2020135(3):e110-e132. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003719.
[2]
Chen D, Cui S, Liu C, et al. Stillbirth in China [J]. Lancet, 2016, 387(10032): 1995-1996. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30461-5.
[3]
Hug L, You D, Blencowe H, et al. Global, regional, and national estimates and trends in stillbirths from 2000 to 2019: a systematic assessment [J]. Lancet, 2021, 398(10302): 772-785. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01112-0.
[4]
万斯. 中国开放二胎政策后湖北武汉地区产妇年龄变化及其对怀孕结局的影响[D].武汉大学,2021,85-86. DOI:10.27379/d.cnki.gwhdu.2021.000134.
[5]
Flenady V, Koopmans L, Middleton P, et al. Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: a systematic review and Meta-analysis [J]. Lancet, 2011, 377(9774): 1331-1340. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(10)62233-7.
[6]
周凡,李雅倩,邓茜茜,等.产科患者血液管理 [J/OL].中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 16(05): 497-503. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2020.05.001.
[7]
黄桂琼,王晓东,余海燕,等.宫颈内口成形术在完全性前置胎盘伴胎盘植入患者剖宫产术分娩中的应用 [J/OL].中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 15(1):19-24. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2019.01.004.
[8]
邓春艳,黄桂琼,王晓东,等.胎盘早剥诊断与处理规范探讨——附244例病案资料临床分析[J].四川大学学报(医学版)2014, 45(05): 866-868. DOI: 10.13464/j.scuxbyxb.2014.05.033.
[9]
Jenabi E, Salimi Z, Bashirian S, et al. The risk factors associated with placenta previa: an umbrella review [J]. Placenta, 2022, 117(1): 21-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.placenta.2021.10.009.
[10]
Pilliod RA, Cheng YW, Snowden JM, et al. The risk of intrauterine fetal death in the small-for-gestational-age fetus[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2012, 207(4): 318,e1-e6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.06.039.
[11]
Naftali S, Ashkenazi YN, Ratnovsky A. A novel approach based on machine learning analysis of flow velocity waveforms to identify unseen abnormalities of the umbilical cord[J]. Placenta, 2022, 127(1): 20-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.placenta.2022.07.008.
[12]
Pinar H, Koch MA, Hawkins H, et al. The stillbirth collaborative research network postmortem examination protocol [J]. Am J Perinatol, 2012, 29(3): 187-202. DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1284228.
[13]
余海燕,姚强,周容,等.妊娠晚期死胎相关危险因素分析 [J/OL].中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版)20106(1):39-43. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5250.2010.01.012.
[14]
冯莉,邢爱耘,战军,等. 609例死胎相关因素分析 [J]. 华西医学2013, 28(1): 59-62. DOI: 10.7507/1002-0179.20130017.
[15]
Zhu J, Zhang J, Xia H, et al. Stillbirths in China: a nationwide survey [J]. Bjog, 2021, 128(1): 67-76. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16458.
[16]
Henderson CE, Shah RR, Gottimukkala S, et al. Primum non nocere: how active management became modus operandi for intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 211(3):189-196. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.03.058.
[17]
Alves Junior JM, Bernardo WM, Ward LS, et al. Effect of hyperthyroidism control during pregnancy on maternal and fetal outcome: a systematic review and Meta-analysis [J]. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2022, 13: 800257. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.800257.
[1] 李钱梅, 何冠南, 赵婧, 陈曦, 唐玉英, 马丽琼, 梁蓉, 袁桃, 李明星. 早孕期低危妊娠和高危妊娠胎盘微血流成像特征及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 726-732.
[2] 明昊, 肖迎聪, 巨艳, 宋宏萍. 乳腺癌风险预测模型的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 287-291.
[3] 庄燕, 戴林峰, 张海东, 陈秋华, 聂清芳. 脓毒症患者早期生存影响因素及Cox 风险预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 372-378.
[4] 黄鸿初, 黄美容, 温丽红. 血液系统恶性肿瘤患者化疗后粒细胞缺乏感染的危险因素和风险预测模型[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 285-292.
[5] 罗文斌, 韩玮. 胰腺癌患者首次化疗后中重度骨髓抑制的相关危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 357-362.
[6] 贺斌, 马晋峰. 胃癌脾门淋巴结转移危险因素[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 694-699.
[7] 林凯, 潘勇, 赵高平, 杨春. 造口还纳术后切口疝的危险因素分析与预防策略[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-638.
[8] 杨闯, 马雪. 腹壁疝术后感染的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 693-696.
[9] 周艳, 李盈, 周小兵, 程发辉, 何恒正. 不同类型补片联合Nissen 胃底折叠术修补食管裂孔疝的疗效及复发潜在危险因素[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 528-533.
[10] 张伟伟, 陈启, 翁和语, 黄亮. 随机森林模型预测T1 期结直肠癌淋巴结转移的初步研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 389-393.
[11] 司楠, 孙洪涛. 创伤性脑损伤后肾功能障碍危险因素的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 300-305.
[12] 颜世锐, 熊辉. 感染性心内膜炎合并急性肾损伤患者的危险因素探索及死亡风险预测[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 618-624.
[13] 李文哲, 王毅, 崔建, 郑启航, 王靖彦, 于湘友. 新疆维吾尔自治区重症患者急性肾功能异常的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 269-276.
[14] 刘志超, 胡风云, 温春丽. 山西省脑卒中危险因素与地域的相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 424-433.
[15] 曹亚丽, 高雨萌, 张英谦, 李博, 杜军保, 金红芳. 儿童坐位不耐受的临床进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 510-515.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?