切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (06) : 712 -721. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2022.06.013

论著

COVID-19疫情暴发前、后呼吸道感染住院患儿呼吸道病原体的变化
夏金蓉1,2, 王慧2, 刘玉珊2, 谢江1,2,()   
  1. 1西南医科大学临床医学院,泸州 646000
    2成都市第三人民医院儿科,成都 610031
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-10 修回日期:2022-11-20 出版日期:2022-12-01
  • 通信作者: 谢江

Changes of respiratory pathogens in hospitalized children with respiratory tract infection before and after outbreak of COVID-19 epidemic

Jinrong Xia1,2, Hui Wang2, Yushan Liu2, Jiang Xie1,2,()   

  1. 1School of Clinical Medicine, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, Sichuan Province, China
    2Department of Pediatrics, The Third People′s Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu 610031, Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2022-10-10 Revised:2022-11-20 Published:2022-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Jiang Xie
  • Supported by:
    Science and Technology Plan Project of Sichuan Province(2021YJ0170); Chengdu Science and Technology Project(2019-YF05-00498-SN)
引用本文:

夏金蓉, 王慧, 刘玉珊, 谢江. COVID-19疫情暴发前、后呼吸道感染住院患儿呼吸道病原体的变化[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(06): 712-721.

Jinrong Xia, Hui Wang, Yushan Liu, Jiang Xie. Changes of respiratory pathogens in hospitalized children with respiratory tract infection before and after outbreak of COVID-19 epidemic[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2022, 18(06): 712-721.

目的

探讨新型冠状病毒疾病(COVID-19)疫情暴发前、后,呼吸道感染住院患儿呼吸道病原体变化情况。

方法

选择2019年1月至2021年12月,成都市第三人民医院诊治的1 576例呼吸道感染住院患儿为研究对象。根据入院时间,将其分为研究组(n=771,入院时间为2020年1月1日至2021年12月31日,COVID-19疫情期内)与对照组(n=805,入院时间为2019年1月1日至2019年12月31日,COVID-19疫情暴发前)。采用间接免疫荧光法,检测2组患儿血清中嗜肺军团菌血清1型(LP1)、肺炎支原体(MP)等呼吸道9种病原体免疫球蛋白(Ig)M抗体。采用χ2检验,对2组患儿,不同性别、年龄段及季节患儿的血清呼吸道病原体IgM阳性率进行统计学比较。本研究遵循的程序经成都市第三人民医院医学伦理委员会批准(审批文号:成都三院伦〔2022〕S-110号)。监护人对患儿的诊治均知情同意。

结果

①本研究1 576例呼吸道感染患儿的血清呼吸道病原体IgM阳性率为53.2%(839/1 576)。2组患儿血清Q热立克次体(COX) IgM均呈阴性,研究组患儿血清LP1及肺炎衣原体(CP) IgM均呈阴性。2019—2021年,每年纳入本研究的呼吸道感染患儿均以单一感染为主,其病原体以MP为主。2019、2020、2021年纳入本研究患儿呼吸道感染病原体≥2种的混合感染率逐年下降(23.1%、13.1%、4.6%),并且两两比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001)。②2019、2020及2021年纳入本研究呼吸道感染患儿中,血清呼吸道病原体IgM阳性率位居前3位的病原体分别依次为MP、乙型流感病毒(INFB)及副流感病毒(PIV),MP、PIV及INFB,MP、PIV及INFB。研究组患儿血清MP、呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)、腺病毒、甲型流感病毒(INFA)、INFB及总体病原体IgM阳性率均较对照组低,而血清PIV IgM阳性率则较对照组高,并且差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。③研究组男性患儿血清MP及总体病原体IgM阳性率均低于女性患儿,对照组男性患儿血清MP、PIV及总体病原体IgM阳性率均低于女性患儿,并且上述差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组男性及女性患儿血清呼吸道总体病原体IgM阳性率,分别低于对照组同性别患儿(36.2% vs 55.6%,47.6% vs 76.1%),并且差异均有统计学意义(χ2=32.78、60.69,均为P<0.001)。④研究组4个年龄段(0~1岁,≥1~3岁,≥3~7岁,≥7~18岁)患儿血清MP、PIV及总体病原体IgM阳性率比较,以及对照组上述4个年龄段患儿血清LP1、MP、RSV、INFB、PIV及总体病原体IgM阳性率比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组≥1~3岁、≥3~7岁、≥7~18岁呼吸道感染患儿的血清呼吸道总体病原体IgM阳性率,均低于对照组同年龄段患儿,并且差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。⑤研究组患儿春、夏、秋、冬4个季节血清MP、INFB及总体病原体IgM阳性率比较,以及对照组患儿4个季节血清MP、RSV、INFB、PIV及总体病原体IgM阳性率比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组患儿春、夏、秋季血清呼吸道总体病原体IgM阳性率,均较对照组同季节低,并且差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001),其中春季的血清总体病原体IgM阳性率降低最显著。

结论

MP、INFB及PIV是本院住院患儿呼吸道感染的常见病原体;COVID-19疫情暴发前、后均以MP单一感染为主,疫情暴发后INFB感染有所减少,PIV感染有所增加。

Objective

To explore the changes of respiratory pathogens in hospitalized children with respiratory tract infection before and after outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic.

Methods

From January 2019 to December 2021, a total of 1 576 hospitalized children with respiratory infections treated in the Third People′s Hospital of Chengdu were selected as research subjects. According to admission time, they were divided into study group (n=771, admission time was from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2021, during COVID-19 epidemic period) and control group (n=805, admission time was from January 1 to December 31 in 2019, before outbreak of COVID-19 epidemic). Serum immunoglobulin (Ig)M antibodies of 9 respiratory pathogens such as Legionella pneumophila serotype 1 (LP1) and Mycoplasma pneumoniae (MP) in two groups of children were detected by indirect immunofluorescence method. Chi-square test was used to statistically compare the respiratory pathogen IgM positive rates in serum of children between 2 groups, between different genders, among different age groups and different seasons. This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Third People′s Hospital of Chengdu (Approval No. Lun [2022] S-110, Chengdu Third Hospital). The guardians signed informed consent to the diagnosis and treatment of the children.

Results

① In this study, the positive rate of IgM of respiratory pathogens in serum of 1 576 children with respiratory tract infections was 53.2% (839/1 576). There were negative of serum Coxiella burnetii (COX) IgM in two groups of children, and children in study group were negative of serum LP1 and Chlamydia pneumoniae (CP) IgM. From 2019 to 2021, the annual hospitalized children with respiratory infections included in this study were mainly single pathogen infections, and MP was the main pathogen. The mixed infection rates of ≥2 pathogens in respiratory tract annually decreased in 2019, 2020 and 2021 (23.1%, 13.1%, 4.6%), and the differences between pairwise comparisons were statistically significant (P<0.05). ②Among the children admitted for respiratory tract infections, the top three IgM positive rates in serum of respiratory pathogens were MP, influenza B virus (INFB) and parainfluenza virus (PIV) in 2019, MP, PIV and INFB in 2020, MP, PIV and INFB in 2021. The serum IgM positive rates of MP, syncytial respiratory virus (RSV), adenovirus, influenza A virus (INFA), INFB and total pathogens in study group were all lower, while the serum PIV IgM positivity rate was higher than those in control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). ③In study group, the IgM positive rates of serum MP and total pathogens of male children were lower than those of female children, and in control group, the IgM positive rates of serum MP, PIV and total pathogens of male children were lower than those of female children, and all of the above differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The serum IgM positive rate of respiratory total pathogens of male and female children in study group were lower than those of same gender in control group, respectively, and the differences were statistically significant (36.2% vs 55.6%, 47.6% vs 76.1%; χ2=32.78, 60.69; all were P<0.001). ④There were significant differences among 4 age groups (0-1 years old, ≥1-3 years old, ≥3-7 years old, ≥7-18 years old) of serum IgM positive rates of MP, PIV and total pathogens in study group, also LP1, MP, RSV, INFB, PIV and total pathogens among 4 age groups in control group (P<0.05). The serum IgM positive rate of respiratory total pathogens of ≥1-3 years old, ≥3-7 years old and ≥7-18 years old children in study group were lower than those of same age group in control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). ⑤There were significant differences among 4 seasons of spring, summer, autumn and winter of serum IgM positive rates of MP, INFB and total pathogens in study group, also MP, RSV, INFB, PIV and total pathogens among 4 seasons in control group (P<0.05). The serum IgM positive rate of respiratory total pathogens of children in spring, summer and autumn in study group were lower than those of same season in control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.001), among which the serum IgM positive rate of respiratory total pathogens was the most decreased in spring.

Conclusions

MP, INFB and PIV are common pathogens of respiratory infections in hospitalized children in our hospital; MP single infection was predominant both before and after outbreak of COVID-19 epidemic, INFB infection decreased and PIV infection increased after outbreak of epidemic.

表1 2组患儿不同年份血清呼吸道病原体IgM呈阳性者中,病原体单一或混合感染分布情况比较[例数(%)]
表2 2组患儿不同年份呼吸道感染患儿血清呼吸道病原体IgM阳性率比较[例数(%)]
表3 研究组不同性别呼吸道感染患儿血清呼吸道病原体IgM阳性率比较[例数(%)]
表4 对照组不同性别呼吸道感染患儿血清呼吸道病原体IgM阳性率比较[例数(%)]
表5 研究组不同年龄段呼吸道感染患儿血清呼吸道病原体IgM阳性率比较[例数(%)]
表6 对照组不同年龄段呼吸道感染患儿血清呼吸道病原体IgM阳性率比较[例数(%)]
表7 不同季节研究组呼吸道感染患儿血清呼吸道病原体IgM阳性率比较[例数(%)]
表8 不同季节对照组呼吸道感染患儿血清呼吸道病原体IgM阳性率比较[例数(%)]
[1]
陈红霞,马玲敏,黄艳,等. 台州地区儿童呼吸道感染非典型病原体检出情况分析[J]. 中国卫生检验杂志2014, 24(9): 1339-1340, 1343.
[2]
王加芬,王凤秀,郑媛媛,等. 呼吸道病毒特异性IgM检测对儿童呼吸道感染的指导意义[J]. 中国免疫学杂志201531(2): 257-260. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-484X.2015.02.023.
[3]
Fawkner-Corbett DW, Khoo SK, Duarte CM, et al. Rhinovirus-C detection in children presenting with acute respiratory infection to hospital in Brazil[J]. J Med Virol, 2016, 88(1): 58-63. DOI: 10.1002/jmv.24300.
[4]
新型冠状病毒肺炎诊疗方案(试行第九版)[J]. 心肺血管病杂志2022, 41(5): 449-457. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5062.2022.05.002.
[5]
周雨,张国平,薛逸飞,等. 新型冠状病毒肺炎发病日期估计及影响因子分析[J]. 现代预防医学2020, 47(24): 4422-4426.
[6]
江载芳,申昆玲,沈颖. 诸福棠实用儿科学[M]. 8版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2015: 1268-1278.
[7]
何成禄,徐从琼,王玉明,等. 呼吸道九联检IgM检测对儿童急性下呼吸道感染的早期诊断价值[J]. 昆明医科大学学报2014, 35(11): 129-132. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-4706.2014.11.034.
[8]
何媛,蒋红. 九江地区儿童呼吸道感染病原体流行特征分析[J]. 实用临床医学2020, 21(6): 87-89, 99. DOI: 10.13764/j.cnki.lcsy.2020.06.027.
[9]
李朝友,李秀义. 儿童下呼吸道感染病原体IgM九联检临床分析讨论[J]. 中国病原生物学杂志2021, 16(12): 1458-1461, 1464. DOI: 10.13350/j.cjpb.211220.
[10]
周绍真,苏胖胖,谢天祺. 儿童八项呼吸道感染病原体IgM抗体检测分析[J]. 中国卫生检验杂志2020, 30(5): 632-634.
[11]
罗小娟,蔡德丰,任振敏,等. 新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情前后急性呼吸道感染儿童支原体、衣原体和常见病毒谱分析[J]. 中国循证儿科杂志2021, 16(4): 296-300. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5501.2021.04.009.
[12]
Maykowski P, Smithgall M, Zachariah P, et al. Seasonality and clinical impact of human parainfluenza viruses[J]. Influenza Other Respir Viruses, 2018, 12(6): 706-716. DOI: 10.1111/irv.12597.
[13]
田树凤,邓继岿. 儿童副流感病毒感染的临床诊治进展[J]. 中国实用儿科杂志2020, 35(11): 905-908. DOI: 10.19538/j.ek2020110618.
[14]
严华杰,盛军,董蔚,等. 2007-2013年上海南翔医院急性呼吸道感染患儿咽拭病毒谱季节流行特征分析[J]. 中国实用儿科杂志2016, 31(3): 206-210. DOI: 10.7504/ek2016030612.
[15]
任吟莹,黄莉,王美娟,等. 儿童呼吸道人副流感病毒感染临床特征及流行病学特点[J]. 中华实用儿科临床杂志2017, 32(4): 270-274. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-428X.2017.04.008.
[16]
杜昆,刘学政,张家均. 学龄前儿童呼吸道感染常见病原体分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健2022, 37(15): 2808-2811. DOI: 10.19829/j.zgfybj.issn.1001-4411.2022.15.026.
[17]
廖嘉仪,张涛. 13 198例急性呼吸道感染住院患儿肺炎支原体、肺炎衣原体及嗜肺军团菌分布特点分析[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志2016, 18(7): 607-613. DOI: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2016.07.008.
[18]
张新星,季伟,顾文婧,等. 2005年至2014年苏州地区儿童呼吸道肺炎支原体感染流行病学分析[J]. 中华传染病杂志2015(10): 594-598. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6680.2015.10.002.
[19]
周燕,刘成桂,沈伟,等. 成都地区儿童呼吸道病原体IgM抗体检测结果分析[J]. 国际检验医学杂志2017, 38(18): 2517-2519, 2522. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4130.2017.18.007.
[20]
郑辉,彭亮,卓广超. 儿童呼吸道感染病原体IgM抗体检测结果分析[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志2015, 25(1): 236-238. DOI: 10.11816/cn.ni.2015-133820.
[1] 张璇, 马宇童, 苗玉倩, 张云, 吴士文, 党晓楚, 陈颖颖, 钟兆明, 王雪娟, 胡淼, 孙岩峰, 马秀珠, 吕发勤, 寇海燕. 超声对Duchenne肌营养不良儿童膈肌功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1068-1073.
[2] 张宝富, 俞劲, 叶菁菁, 俞建根, 马晓辉, 刘喜旺. 先天性原发隔异位型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图诊断[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1074-1080.
[3] 韩丹, 王婷, 肖欢, 朱丽容, 陈镜宇, 唐毅. 超声造影与增强CT对儿童肝脏良恶性病变诊断价值的对比分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 939-944.
[4] 刘婷婷, 林妍冰, 汪珊, 陈幕荣, 唐子鉴, 代东伶, 夏焙. 超声衰减参数成像评价儿童代谢相关脂肪性肝病的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 787-794.
[5] 周钰菡, 肖欢, 唐毅, 杨春江, 周娟, 朱丽容, 徐娟, 牟芳婷. 超声对儿童髋关节暂时性滑膜炎的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 795-800.
[6] 罗晨, 宗开灿, 李世颖, 傅应亚. 微小RNA-199a-3p调控CD4T细胞表达参与肺炎支原体肺炎患儿免疫反应研究[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 569-574.
[7] 董晓燕, 赵琪, 唐军, 张莉, 杨晓燕, 李姣. 奥密克戎变异株感染所致新型冠状病毒感染疾病新生儿的临床特征分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 595-603.
[8] 米洁, 陈晨, 李佳玲, 裴海娜, 张恒博, 李飞, 李东杰. 儿童头面部外伤特点分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 511-515.
[9] 李维, 莫俊俏. 儿童呼吸道耐药流感嗜血杆菌基因型鉴定及耐药分析对抗菌药物治疗选择的意义[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 315-323.
[10] 王蕾, 王少华, 牛海珍, 尹腾飞. 儿童腹股沟疝围手术期风险预警干预[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 768-772.
[11] 李芳, 许瑞, 李洋洋, 石秀全. 循证医学理念在儿童腹股沟疝患者中的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 782-786.
[12] 吕垒, 冯啸, 何凯明, 曾凯宁, 杨卿, 吕海金, 易慧敏, 易述红, 杨扬, 傅斌生. 改良金氏评分在儿童肝豆状核变性急性肝衰竭肝移植手术时机评估中价值并文献复习[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 661-668.
[13] 卓少宏, 林秀玲, 周翠梅, 熊卫莲, 马兴灶. CD64指数、SAA/CRP、PCT联合检测在小儿消化道感染性疾病鉴别诊断中的应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 505-509.
[14] 刘笑笑, 张小杉, 刘群, 马岚, 段莎莎, 施依璐, 张敏洁, 王雅晳. 中国学龄前儿童先天性心脏病流行病学研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1021-1024.
[15] 李静, 张玲玲, 邢伟. 兴趣诱导理念用于小儿手术麻醉诱导前的价值及其对家属满意度的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 812-817.
阅读次数
全文


摘要