新式阴道前、后壁联合修补术临床分析

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2022.01.011

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (01) : 80 -86. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2022.01.011

论著

新式阴道前、后壁联合修补术临床分析

杨一君¹^,¹, 漆苏婉²^,², 石灿¹^,¹, 姜旖³^,³, 王婷¹^,¹, 高迎春¹^,^†^,¹(

)

收稿日期:2021-10-08 修回日期:2021-11-20 出版日期:2022-02-01
通信作者: 高迎春

Clinical analysis of modified anterior and posterior vaginal wall joint repair

Yijun Yang¹^,¹, Suwan Qi²^,², Can Shi¹^,¹, Yi Jiang³^,³, Ting Wang¹^,¹, Yingchun Gao¹^,¹^,^†()

Received:2021-10-08 Revised:2021-11-20 Published:2022-02-01
Corresponding author: Yingchun Gao
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(81702566); Project of Jiangsu Maternal and Child Health Association(FYX202117); Huai′an Health Research Project(HAWJ201903); Huai′an Natural Sciences Research Projects(HAB202105); Science and Technology Development Fund of Nanjing Medical University(NMUB2019347); Development Funds of the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University(XYFM2021035); Education Research Projects of the Affiliated Huaian No.1 People′s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University(hyyjy2021011)

全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用

引用本文：

杨一君, 漆苏婉, 石灿, 姜旖, 王婷, 高迎春. 新式阴道前、后壁联合修补术临床分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(01): 80-86.

Yijun Yang, Suwan Qi, Can Shi, Yi Jiang, Ting Wang, Yingchun Gao. Clinical analysis of modified anterior and posterior vaginal wall joint repair[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2022, 18(01): 80-86.

目的

探讨新式阴道前、后壁联合修补术治疗盆腔脏器脱垂(POP)的临床效果。

方法

选择2017年1月至2021年1月，于南京医科大学附属淮安第一医院接受手术治疗的120例POP患者为研究对象。根据采用的手术方式，将其分为研究组(n＝60，采用新式阴道前、后壁联合修补术)及对照组(n＝60，采用腹腔镜下全子宫双侧附件切除术+传统阴道前、后壁修补术)。采用独立样本t检验及χ²检验，对2组患者一般临床资料，术中及术后情况进行统计学比较。本研究经南京医科大学附属淮安第一医院医学伦理委员会批准(审批文号：YX-P-2020-023-01)。所有患者知情同意并与之签署临床研究知情同意书。

结果

①2组POP患者年龄、人体质量指数(BMI)、产次、绝经者比例及POP脱垂程度比较，差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。②研究组POP患者手术时间、术中出血量、总住院时间、术后住院时间及住院费用分别为(88.0±30.6) min、(24.7±36.0) mL、(7.3±2.1) d、(4.6±1.4) d及(10 727±1 812)元，均短于或低于对照组的(118.0±33.4) min、(56.7±43.8) mL、(9.8±2.3) d、(6.4±1.6) d及(26 318±3 890)元，并且差异均有统计学意义(t＝5.130、4.372、6.218、6.558、28.138，均为P<0.001)。2组POP患者术后3、6、12个月复发率构成比比较，差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

新式阴道前、后壁联合修补术在不增加POP患者术后复发率的基础上，不仅能缩短手术时间、减少患者术中出血量，还可以缩短住院时间、减少住院费用，并且易于操作，适宜推广。

关键词: 盆腔脏器脱垂, 阴道前、后壁修补术，改良, 腹腔镜, 治疗应用, 保留子宫, 女(雌)性

Objective

To explore clinical effect of modified anterior and posterior vaginal wall joint repair in treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

Methods

From January 2017 to January 2021, a total of 120 POP patients who received surgical treatment in the Affiliated Huaian No.1 People′s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University were chosen as research subjects. According to surgical methods, they were divided into observation group (n=60, patients received modified vaginal anterior and posterior wall joint repair) and control group (n=60, patients received laparoscopic hysterectomy with bilateral adnexectomy plus traditional anterior and posterior vaginal wall repair). The general clinical data, intraoperative and postoperative conditions of patients were statistically compared between two groups by independent-samples t test and chi-square test. This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Huaian No.1 People′s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (Approval No. YX-P-2020-023-01), and all patients signed the informed consents.

Results

① There were no significant differences between two groups of POP patients in age, body mass index (BMI), parity, proportion of menopause and POP prolapse degree (P>0.05). ② The operating duration, volume of intraoperative bleeding, total average length of hospital stay, average postoperative length of hospital stay and cost of hospitalization in observation group were (88.0±30.6) min, (24.7±36.0) mL, (7.3±2.1) d, (4.6±1.4) d and (10 727±1 812) yuan, respectively, which were shorter or less than those of (118.0±33.4) min, (56.7±43.8) mL, (9.8±2.3) d, (6.4±1.6) d and (26 318±3 890) yuan, respectively in control group, and the differences were statistically significant (t=5.130, 4.372, 6.218, 6.558, 28.138; all P<0.001). There was no significant difference in constituent ratio of 3, 6, 12 months′ recurrence rate of POP after surgery between two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusions

On the basis of no increasing in postoperative recurrence rate of POP, the modified vaginal anterior and posterior wall joint repair could not only shorten operation duration and reduce volumes of intraoperative bleeding, but also shorten the length of hospital stay and reduce cost of hospitalization, which is easy to operate and suitable for popularization and application.

Key words: Pelvic organ prolapse, Colporrhaphia anterior-posterior, modified, Laparoscopes, Therapeutic uses, Reserve uterus, Female

图1 1例POP-Q Ⅲ度患者(58岁)新式阴道前、后壁联合修补术主要手术步骤的术中照片图与示意图[图1A、1I：纵行切开阴道前壁黏膜；图1B、1J：将阴道前壁从膀胱筋膜分离；图1C、1K：充分分离阴道膀胱间隙，上端位于阴道横沟水平、2侧达耻骨降支水平、下端位于膀胱底宫颈附着处稍下方；图1D、1L："烧杯形"切开阴道后壁黏膜，使下1/3黏膜呈正三角形，上2/3黏膜呈宽约1.0 cm的长方形，分离阴道后壁黏膜直至穹窿部位；图1E、1M：上推膀胱，采用7^#丝线于耻骨降支水平呈"U"型间断缝合双侧阴道壁筋膜组织，使膀胱完全位于阴道筋膜的上方；图1F、1N：采用2-0可吸收线连续兜底自阴道纵行切口顶端呈"U"型全层缝合阴道壁直至切口的下缘(示意图中红色实线及虚线表示缝线)；图1G、1O：修剪缝合缘处多余阴道壁组织后，采用2-0可吸收线连续锁边缝合阴道前壁黏膜；图1H、1P：采用2-0可吸收线连续锁边缝合阴道后壁黏膜]注：图1A~1H为照片图，图1I~1P为示意图。POP-Q为盆腔脏器脱垂定量

表1 2组POP患者一般临床资料比较

组别	例数	年龄(岁，±s)	BMI(kg/m²，±s)	产次[例数(%)]			绝经[例数(%)]	POP-Q分度[例数(%)]
组别	例数	年龄(岁，±s)	BMI(kg/m²，±s)	1次	2次	≥3次	绝经[例数(%)]	Ⅱ度	Ⅲ度	Ⅳ度
研究组	60	57.3±9.0	23.6±2.0	10(16.7)	30(50.0)	20(33.3)	43(71.6)	14(23.3)	32(53.3)	14(23.3)
对照组	60	60.0±9.9	23.0±2.3	8(13.3)	38(63.3)	14(23.3)	46(76.6)	16(26.6)	26(43.3)	18(30.0)
检验值		t＝1.548	t＝1.730	χ²＝2.220			χ²＝0.960	χ²＝1.254
P值		0.124	0.086	0.329			0.327	0.534

表1 2组POP患者一般临床资料比较

组别	例数	年龄(岁，±s)	BMI(kg/m²，±s)	产次[例数(%)]			绝经[例数(%)]	POP-Q分度[例数(%)]
组别	例数	年龄(岁，±s)	BMI(kg/m²，±s)	1次	2次	≥3次	绝经[例数(%)]	Ⅱ度	Ⅲ度	Ⅳ度
研究组	60	57.3±9.0	23.6±2.0	10(16.7)	30(50.0)	20(33.3)	43(71.6)	14(23.3)	32(53.3)	14(23.3)
对照组	60	60.0±9.9	23.0±2.3	8(13.3)	38(63.3)	14(23.3)	46(76.6)	16(26.6)	26(43.3)	18(30.0)
检验值		t＝1.548	t＝1.730	χ²＝2.220			χ²＝0.960	χ²＝1.254
P值		0.124	0.086	0.329			0.327	0.534

表2 2组POP患者术中及术后情况比较

组别	例数	手术时间(min，±s)	术中出血量(mL，±s)	总住院时间(d，±s)	术后住院时间(d，±s)	住院费用(元，±s)	术后复发[例数(%)]
组别	例数	手术时间(min，±s)	术中出血量(mL，±s)	总住院时间(d，±s)	术后住院时间(d，±s)	住院费用(元，±s)	3个月	6个月	12个月
研究组	60	88.0±30.6	24.7±36.0	7.3±2.1	4.6±1.4	10 727±1 812	0(0)	0(0)	1(1.7)
对照组	60	118.0±33.4	56.7±43.8	9.8±2.3	6.4±1.6	26 318±3 890	0(0)	2(3.3)	3(5.0)
检验值		t＝5.130	t＝4.372	t＝6.218	t＝6.558	t＝28.138	χ²＝0.259
P值		<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	0.611

表2 2组POP患者术中及术后情况比较

组别	例数	手术时间(min，±s)	术中出血量(mL，±s)	总住院时间(d，±s)	术后住院时间(d，±s)	住院费用(元，±s)	术后复发[例数(%)]
组别	例数	手术时间(min，±s)	术中出血量(mL，±s)	总住院时间(d，±s)	术后住院时间(d，±s)	住院费用(元，±s)	3个月	6个月	12个月
研究组	60	88.0±30.6	24.7±36.0	7.3±2.1	4.6±1.4	10 727±1 812	0(0)	0(0)	1(1.7)
对照组	60	118.0±33.4	56.7±43.8	9.8±2.3	6.4±1.6	26 318±3 890	0(0)	2(3.3)	3(5.0)
检验值		t＝5.130	t＝4.372	t＝6.218	t＝6.558	t＝28.138	χ²＝0.259
P值		<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	0.611

[1]	中华医学会妇产科学分会妇科盆底学组. 盆腔器官脱垂的中国诊治指南(2020年版)[J]. 中华妇产科杂志， 2020, 55(5): 300-306. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20200106-00016.
[2]	Brincat CA. Pelvic organ prolapse: reconsidering treatment, innovation, and failure[J]. JAMA, 2019, 322(11): 1047-1048. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.12245.
[3]	Nager CW, Visco AG, Richter HE, et al. Effect of vaginal mesh hysteropexy vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension on treatment failure in women with uterovaginal prolapse: a randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA, 2019, 322(11): 1054-1065. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.12812.
[4]	李棪，王楠，付晓宇，等. 改良阴道前后壁联合修补术治疗盆腔器官脱垂的疗效观察[J]. 解放军医学院学报， 2018, 39(6): 491-493, 497. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2018.06.009.
[5]	宋磊，付晓宇，李棪. 新式经阴道盆腔器官脱垂手术临床研究[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志， 2018, 34(11): 1267-1270. DOI: 10.19538/j.fk2018110119.
[6]	Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1996, 175(1): 10-17. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70243-0.
[7]	於莉英，张桂宝. 阴道前壁"斜拉桥"式修补术与传统阴道前壁修补术治疗阴道前壁膨出的临床效果比较[J]. 中国微创外科杂志， 2013, 13(3): 262-265. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2013.03.022.
[8]	Petros PE. Vault prolapseⅡ： restoration of dynamic vaginal supports by infracoccygeal sacropexy, an axial day-case vaginal procedure[J]. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct, 2001, 12(5): 296-303. DOI: 10.1007/pl00004039.
[9]	DeLancey JO. Anatomy and biomechanics of genital prolapse[J]. Clin Obstet Gynecol, 1993, 36(4): 897-909. DOI: 10.1097/00003081-199312000-00015.
[10]	朱兰，朗景和，宋岩峰. 第一届全国女性尿失禁与盆底功能障碍学术会纪要[J]. 中华妇产科杂志， 2004, 39(10): 652-654. DOI: 10.3760/j.issn:0529-567X.2004.10.002.
[11]	Pelvic organ prolapse: ACOG practice bulletin, Number 214[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2019, 134(5): e126-e142. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003519.
[12]	Serati M, Laganà AS, Casarin J, et al. Laparoscopic duplication of the uterosacral ligaments following hysterectomy for stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ apical pelvic organ prolapse[J]. Updates Surg, 2020, 72(1): 199-204. DOI: 10.1007/s13304-019-00690-9.
[13]	Ko KJ, Lee KS. Current surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse: strategies for the improvement of surgical outcomes[J]. Investig Clin Urol, 2019, 60(6): 413-424. DOI: 10.4111/icu.2019.60.6.413.
[14]	Kieserman-Shmokler C, Swenson CW, Chen L, et al. From molecular to macro: the key role of the apical ligaments in uterovaginal support[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2020, 222(5): 427-436. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.10.006.
[15]	宋岩峰. 如何理解经阴道植入网片手术的专家共识[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志， 2020, 36(10): 924-927. DOI: 10.19538/j.fk2020100104.
[16]	Korbly NB, Kassis NC, Good MM, et al. Patient preferences for uterine preservation and hysterectomy in women with pelvic organ prolapse[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 209(5): 470. e1-470. e4706. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.08.003.
[17]	Dietz HP. Prolapse worsens with age, doesn′t it？[J]. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 2008, 48(6): 587-591. DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2008.00904.x.

[1]	李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2]	李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3]	李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4]	陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5]	许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6]	李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7]	任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8]	赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9]	李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[10]	韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[11]	王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[12]	冯旺, 马振中, 汤林花. CT扫描三维重建在肝内胆管细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 104-107.
[13]	王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14]	杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15]	叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.

阅读次数

全文

摘要

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Clinical analysis of modified anterior and posterior vaginal wall joint repair

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Clinical analysis of modified anterior and posterior vaginal wall joint repair